Some more Truth: Imran Khan

Anjum Niaz talks to IK, a man who is anti-American, Taliban-tolerant and an NRO-basher

http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/6605/57933986.png

Slouching towards oblivion is a phrase I’ve borrowed. Never mind. It sits well on Imran Khan, my interviewee for the next 2 hours. I must know if he’s fast becoming history? While IK, as all call him, gains the stature of a rock star when cranking up issues that hit you in the heart, his buzz doesn’t last long. The chief justice’s restoration has left him by the roadside. Why? We’ll get to it in a moment.
Today, he sits in splendid isolation serenaded by the magnificent Margallas facing him directly. ‘I don’t live in a palace; I live in paradise,’ is his oft-repeated epigram. Indeed, the home that wife Jemima built atop the highest hill around Islamabad is a standalone, just like its occupant. It’s rugged, muscular and handsome, just like its dweller. The bedroom is Spartan – floor to ceiling grey enameled painted windows opening up to the elements. The furniture looks tired. Hard to miss are a pile of aged prayer rugs sitting on the back of a sofa. He’s a five-time namazi - puritanical, sober and sagacious.
The interview is hardly a scoop. Imran is an open book. His pronouncements are like threadbare clichés. He’s anti-American; Taliban-tolerant and an NRO-basher. Drone attacks are his catchphrase. So what else is new? To fire up things, I sprinkle some more truth that bedevils IK’s ascent to the very top.

You’re a friend of the fundos (read Qazi Hussain Ahmad) and a lover of the Taliban. You’re confused …one day you praise the Sharia law in Swat and the next day you accuse Sufi Mohammad of violating the Quran. What’s with you?

IK merely smiles. 'Zardari, Maulana Fazlul Rehman and their ilk (notice he leaves out Nawaz Sharif & Asfandyar Wali) are confused. They showcase themselves as westernised liberals because they want American aid. Their somersaults on Swat deal are shameful. They frog marched before Gordon Brown and ordered our troops to kill fellow Pakistanis in Malakand. There are 1.5 million armed men on both sides of the tribal belt. Are you going to kill them all? **Qazi sahib is a man of honour. He’s untainted with corruption. I therefore respect him. **

You were a hot ticket in 1996 elections. On the eve of the polls, PTV carried a damning story about your love affair and a love child. Sita White was on every lip.

‘More than the Sita White affair, I was completely demolished by the Jewish lobby claiming that my former father-in-law Jimmy Goldsmith (British billionaire) pumped $40 million for my election campaign. As for Sita, I never claimed to be an angel. I’ve never glossed over my personal life. I admit my faults but have since undergone an inner transformation. Spirituality has made me a better person.’

But the MQM was unforgiving. In its media trial you were charged with adultery. Cricketer Sarfraz Nawaz also jumped into the fray. He flew to London to meet Altaf Hussain. You never followed through with your counter charges (terrorism) against the MQM leadership. Why?

‘I’ve proof but my witnesses are terrified to come forward. I asked that the Scotland Yard come and record their statements in Pakistan but because MQM has been in the government, the Yard was denied visas.

You’re still sexy and fit at 57. Is there a woman in your life?

IK laughs. ‘Politics is my life. I don’t have time for anything else. **My greatest happiness comes from being a father. It’s given me fulfillment. But I’m sad my sons don’t live with me. For their sake I’ll never remarry.’ **

You play solo? Sources close to you say that this is a big turn off. An air force couple based in Peshawar collected money for your cancer hospital. You arrived, sat on their sofa with feet up including the chappals, got the money and left without a word of thanks?

‘I wasn’t a public person then. I couldn’t make speeches. Many mistook my shyness and the desire to be alone as arrogance.’

Once in a lifetime a person gets the chance that you got to show leadership qualities before a world audience – the World Cup in 1992. But you blew it? You only talked about yourself and your cancer hospital, nothing about the team?

‘I had retired from cricket. I returned for Shaukat Khanum. I had to raise money for my hospital. Remember out of nine teams, we were placed 2nd from bottom, the odds being one to 50. My sister who was fundraising called from Lahore with a frantic message that people were pulling out of their pledges because Pakistan was going to lose. We won! But I was not prepared for a speech before a marathon crowd. Even now when I watch that speech of mine, I hang my head in shame.’

Don’t you owe your whole persona to cricket? Why snub it now? You’re silent on our being out of the loop for the next World Cup?

IK’s eyes narrow with anger ‘It’s criminal. Imagine how much money we could have earned? Even now if we swap with Australia, there’s a chance we host it next time. But like Pakistan, cricket is run on ad hoc basis where the president handpicks the cricket head. Besides, I’ve a higher call (Tehreek-i-Insaaf) to attend to.

Was there match fixing during your 10 years of captaincy?

‘No. But in the Sharjah Cup final (1989) where we played Australia, I was told that four of my players had sold out. I called my team and told them I’ll watch your game like a hawk and if you don’t perform according to your potential, I’ll have you put in jail! The threat worked and my boys played a winning game.’

You come so strong against the American administration. You’re the last person they’d want to see in power? Why hate them?

‘Never would I consent to becoming a puppet PM! Pakistan’s sovereignty is not for sale to the Americans. To legitimatise Musharraf, the US forced the NRO (National Reconciliation Ordinance) on us and talked about it openly because they have so much contempt for the people of Pakistan.
We need an Ataturk? Can you be one?

‘No. He’s not my model. You can’t force your people to become westernised at the point of a gun. My models are Jinnah and Mahathir of Malaysia.’

The Chief Justice’s restoration seems to disappoint you and Qazi Hussain. You two are the only losers? Were you not hoping for mid-term polls? Aitzaz Ahsan didn’t even bother acknowledging your critical role in the long march. He only mentioned the Sharifs whom he kept informed when the march was being put off. Isn’t that insulting?

‘Tehreek-i-Insaaf is movement for justice. I didn’t participate for power but to change the system. I am positive that in the next 6 months you will see justice restored because we now have an independent judiciary. The Chief Justice is phenomenal. Wait and see what he does. I didn’t participate for political gain.’

You’re not an idealist; you’re not a romantic; you’re not shallow (even though when you entered politics people thought you lacked substance); so why then are men like you not in the forefront of our destiny?
‘I’m in no hurry. My time will come. We have a groundswell of people joining us. The man on the street and I want to live in dignity, not US enslavement. Our culture, values, belief is sacrosanct and is not for sale to foreigners. Our sovereignty is non-negotiable.

What do you think of Daphne Barak? She seemed very chummy with you when she came to interview you?

‘Well she was a friend of Benazir and Asif too. But now Asif Zardari and Sanam Bhutto have disowned their interviews with her. The trouble with us Pakistanis is our gora complex. The more we kowtow before them the more they show us contempt. When Tony Blair came here he said he was at Oxford the same time as me and keenly followed my cricket career. In jumped Aitzaz Ahsan and Amin Fahim standing near us. ‘Please prevail on BB to return to Pakistan,’ they groveled before Blair. Immediately his tone changed towards us – he was the master and we the servants!’

This interview was taken before Imran Khan hit the headlines again when denied entry into Karachi recently.

This is really funny and as usual hypocritical of IK. Mahatir is the person who took out judiciary like Musharaf did but when another court tried to overrule muhatir, muhatir took care of them too. Funny IK likes muhatair but dislikes Musharaf.

^ I think we are all confused to a degree. And just because we admire or look up to someone does not have to mean that we agree with their every word or deed.

Re: Some more Truth: Imran Khan

Imarn Khan is a graduate of Qazi Hussein Ahmad Institute of Politics...not much that he says makes sense. He used to say no one will attack a cricket team in Pakistan. If we listened to him we should have not provide ANY protection to Sir Lankan team. Then when attack happened he was complaining why enough protection was not provided. IK is a fool, a fool who’ll get us killed. Best for him and us he sticks to philanthropy.

^ reluctantly have to admit that you make a very fair point with regards to the Sri Lankan security fiasco

Re: Some more Truth: Imran Khan

‘No. He’s not my model. You can’t force your people to become westernised at the point of a gun. My models are Jinnah and Mahathir of Malaysia.’

Absolutely... Sadly, the secular degenerates who claim the Taliban are forcing religion down people's throats are the ones who believe in using guns to force westernization down people's throats too. Let people choose what they want, on their own!

Jalib once said:

jin ko zaat ka ghum hai kab woh maney hain
bey bas logoon par bandookain taaney hain

You missed the point. Mahathir took the kinds of liberties with the constitution that Musharraf did. Why is he any kind of hero to a democrat?

[quote]

Sadly, the secular degenerates who claim the Taliban are forcing religion down people's throats

[/quote]

Do you dispute this claim?

[quote]

Let people choose what they want, on their own!

[/quote]

Sure, which is why it is imperative to eliminate those forcing any sort of lifestyle on people.

[quote]

Jalib once said:

jin ko zaat ka ghum hai kab woh maney hain
bey bas logoon par bandookain taaney hain

[/quote]

Habib Jalib, the left-wing communist secular-progressive?

Re: Some more Truth: Imran Khan

History will remember Jammat Islami & Imran Khan as the loser of the century. When their country & armed forces were fighting and laying down lifes they were supporting the terrorists.

I think he didn't read the history of Mohatir Muhammad before declaring him his role model :)

dont bring Jalib into this, We al know which side he would be on, and it wouldnt be on the side trying to Islamize the country with a gun. Maybe some hadith or ayat will be better for Taliban apologies.

when in the history of pakistan have a group of seculars tried to:

-create their own parallel court system
-Forced the population to marry their daughters to them
-Dug up graves
-kidnapped/murdered/beheaded the army

The worst they did was to write some poems.

Re: Some more Truth: Imran Khan

Here is a classic example of star power.
IK is not being judged by his ideals, but ideology itself is being judged based on IK's support.
Pretty soon IK supporter will start showering praise on Qazi Hussain Ahmed as well,
just because IK likes him.
same goes for talibans. if they are good enough for IK, they must be good for us.
On a side note, Ata-turk was heck of a leader.

I think IK has short term memory. Look what JI jayaalas did to him but he still praise Qazi Hussain Ahmad. Why? Will some IK lovers enlighten with the answer.

Re: Some more Truth: Imran Khan

King Khan arrived in Karachi today despite fierce opposition from MQM in the past few years. No one killed yet! Hope it stays like that. Inshallah

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cK8sK36K16Y[�tween%](“http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cK8sK36K16Y&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Finsaf.pk%2FMedia%2FVideos%2Ftabid%2F62%2FarticleType%2FArticleView%2FarticleId%2F2262%2FImran-Khans-Karachi-visit-Islamabad-and-Karachi-a&feature=player_embedded”)

niden:

Like I said in post 3 it is possible to not agree with someone's every word or action but still support them. I don't view everything as a black and white issue. While I admire IK - I think he has many positives just like he has some negatives - I have a different view on IK's stance on Taliban and his alliance with Qazi and co.

Re: Some more Truth: Imran Khan

^ to me its a defining moment. Supporting taligoons, is the biggest sin of all.

Convey my message to him, if he can't leave his one-man brain farts.. then don't talk about people of Pakistan as a whole. Soldiers are dying, we are in war, and he is busy writing letters to Gordon Brown. Tell him to write something to US President too, what a looser he is !

Re: Some more Truth: Imran Khan

^^ Lol we all expect this from MQM folks! Mirchi lagi hui hai tum logo ko lol I love it! Just dont start killing those PTI workers please! :-(

Bhai mere, some time do give sane reply, instead of same bashing. As far as Mirchi lagna concerned, if you don't know about one person affiliation then don't speculate.
**
Just a pointer for you:**
Watch any tv channel and see how much Jammat Islami & Imran Khan views are getting attention. A mindset changed happened in people of Pakistan, we are war right now. If people like Imran Khan can't support in this hour of need, then they better dig up a hole and bury themselves.

I admire IK as you do. But his political party did not click as main stream party. As a politician he is a failed politician. Sooner the better he should understand this.

Best option for him is to abandon his failed political career and focus on his social work and coaching for cricket where his expertise is. Or join main line parties either PPP or PML (N) and liquidate his Tehrik-e-Insaf party if he so ambitious in Paki politics.

Re: Some more Truth: Imran Khan

There are 1.5 million armed men on both sides of the tribal belt. Are you going to kill them all?


Uh, yes.

So, if these 1.5 million armed men are putting my relatives in danger, I should just stand by and let them do it?

WTF people?

extreme left is as bad as the extreme right.

killing discriminately does not solve anything, never has, never will. the leadership of TTP needs to be targetted, their finances looked at and supplies cut. then the Army can go after whoever financed this proxy to wreak havoc in Pakistan, be it within Pakistan or outside its boundaries, and GoP should be expected to do the diplomatic bidding to secure Pakistan's perspective. If USA can come this far to secure its interests and guard against its citizens, then Pakistan by the same token can cross borders and lay waste to those who back and finance terrorists within Pakistan (if they're located outside Pakistani borders) neighbors included.

killing 1.5 is equivalent to sheer slaughter, and needs to be condemned and anyone who suggests it should be treated the same way as an extremist.