ajazali
November 28, 2017, 8:10am
107
Re: Sins
Expecting an arrogant and ignorant reply is what I expect from you. You are the one who has nothing but nonsense typed up and wants to call it a response
Here is the beautiful thing about science. If something that deviates from the norm is created or discovered, science can make exceptions and work around it to add it in to the body of knowledge so it will overall make sense. Science, ideally, allows for improvement on the knowledge that is already known. Do you know that viruses are not considered to be living things because they do not meet the requirements to be a living thing? Those hypothetical “artificial objects” that are immortal (lol) do not violate any of the requirements of being a living being, then they will be considered a living being because they are currently alive and meet the requirements. It is not a hard concept to fathom. You really look pathetic trying to put me in some sort of trap when the reality is, unlike you, I do not treat science like how people treat their religion. If something gets discovered/created that contradicts earlier knowledge then there should be an effort made to understand where it is coming from and how it works instead of discrediting it, calling it sin, banning it..etc.
Idiot, you said death is a characteristic of living being then you say, an artificial object that will have no point of death will also be a living being. In no way, life can be created because it has a point of death, you need digest it first. or get your bakwas back that you said only two categories are enough jahil to cope up with your ignorance.
