Re: Should Punjab carry Pakistan's burden?
Punjab bashing is fashion , it evolved after 71 's debacle .
Perhaps if people had tried to take to task the elite and establishment before, that "71 's debacle" could have been averted. To avoid further such debacles, however, Pakistanis could do much worse than to have sincere discussion about the legitimate rights of smaller provinces and any impediment there might be to achieving those rights.
[quote]
.the fault lies with the Punjabis themselves, there devil may care attitude and not putting the records straight allows other to spin doctor and spew hatred for them .
now let me see..
1947-1958 Civilian Rule .... around 8-9 Priminister , .... 5-6 of them Bengalis .
1958-1969-71 Ayub Khan and then Yahaa Khan .
1972-1977 Z A Bhutto
1977-1988 Zia ul Haq
1988-1999 2 Times Nawaz Shareef a Kashmiri Mohajir living in Punjab ...and 2 Time Benazir Bhutto
1999-2008 General Musharraf
2008- 2013 .... first Zardari ..... and now Nawaz Shareef...
..where is the Punjabi in it ... ??
[/quote]
If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck then it probably* is a duck. The ethnic makeup of military dictators hardly makes much difference first because they are *dictators and not elected representatives of people and second because they are a product of and crème de la crème of what's largely a Punjabi-dominant Pakistani army. The Sharifs are born and bred Punjabis with some distant kashmiri background; not many people really regard Nawaz as a "Kashmiri Mohajir" (whatever that means).
Since Zar-dari had essentially zero support in much of the country, that leaves us with the Bhuttos in a post-broken up Pakistan. Can we use the Bhuttos as poster-childs of Sindhi and/or non-Punjabi leadership of Pak? I don't think so. Benazir's first two governments were quickly dismissed and then she was assassinated when she returned from exile so it did not really end up well for her, did it? Her father met an equally sad and gruesome fate when he was hanged by a dictator. When Musharaff spared Nawaz and let him go to exile, there was more than a little murmur about whether the decision was made with the latter's ethnicity in mind. Perhaps if Nawaz drew bulk of his support from Sindh or Balochistan, Musharaff could have afforded to be a little more vengeful?
[quote]
... now the Argument of Army domination ..
of the 14-15 COAS's .... only two are/were Punjabi ... Asif Nawaz and now Kiyani ...
[/quote]
Sorry but that's just an attempt to sugar coat the dominance of Punjabis in army. The army comprises overwhelmingly of Punjabis. As does the establishment, the real movers and shakers of the country, and I don't mean that as compliment.
[quote]
about sacrifices...
there was no division of India... rather it was the division of Punjab and Bengal only .......so with present pakistan ..... ONLY Punjab was divided.
[/quote]
Punjab was in India so division of Punjab = division of India. Besides, you can't have your cake and eat it too. Hardly a "sacrifice."
[quote]
and i have been quoting these figures endlessly ... let me repeat again..
13-14 lac were killed during 1947 .... 10 lac of them were Punjabis .
14.2 Millions were forced to migrate .... 9.2 Million of them were Punjabis ... 3.2 Million of them were Bengalis .....then after Aug 47 ....... 1.2 Million Sinds educated middle class was forced to migrate..... now sum them up and figure out the rest ..
[/quote]
That's very sad. That said, most of the movement of people from Sindh, UP, Bihar, Bengals, etc was largely without bloodshed and was generally peaceful. If sadly Punjabis killed each other then the fault lies with them, on both sides, Sikh Punjabis and Muslim Punjabis alike. Outsiders cannot be blamed for what Punjabis did to each other.
[quote]
.... the reason is Punjabi 's intellectual own callousness , regarding it ... Punjabi does not speaks Punjabi ..rather he speaks urdu ...
[/quote]
No one is stopping Punjabi from speaking Punjabi and I am pretty sure it doesn't make an ounce of a difference to someone in Multan or Karachi or Gilgit or Gwadar or anywhere else what language Punjabis speak with each other. And for good reason too; it's none of someone else's business!
[quote]
from Iqbal to Faiz .... all great URDU names are Punjabi ..
[/quote]
Iqbal wrote long before Pak came to being and in Persian too. Faiz should have probably written in Punjabi but might have chosen Urdu for the same reason you are posting in English here instead of Punjabi or some other language: it has a larger audience so your words and thoughts can be understood and appreciated by a much wider audience. And they are. Faiz is still regarded as one of the most eminent poets of the country.
[quote]
... to me there are two three reasons for this ... Punjabis callousness... will discuss them if the debate turns into appropriate direction ...
... Bottom Line .... Punjab's shoulder was USED by other .... and the fault lies with the Punjabi
himself. ..... and Punjab and Punjabi has suffered the most ..... yet spin doctoring of history , hiding of facts , distortion of truths ,,....in short Murder of history ....did not allowed it to be highlighted .
[/quote]
That's a lot of dramatic rhetoric there. But more style than substance.
You know what the bottom line is? That there has been no shoulder to speak of, and people in other provinces or in Gilgit-Baltistan or in Azad Kashmir or even in South Punjab don't really care about the linguistic preferences of Punjabis. That's not what can fill their stomach, after all. What those people care about are things like equitable distribution of water, and a fair share of royalties of things like power generation or coal or natural gas production that belong to their provinces. What they care about is a sense of security and safety so they can run their businesses or realize their tourism potential or perhaps even protect their shrines or just go about their everyday lives without any risk of extremists disrupting their lives. What they want is the establishment to respect their leaders and not to plant parties or rig elections or to foster extremism in other parts of the country. That's the bottom line.
PS: No offence is intended to any Punjabi, who, like others, are mostly very nice people.