SHIA BELIEFS

Society Religion & Philosophy
1

OKAY SO ALIJAN whatever username has banned me from his post on shia Islam. Maybe because I was helping the correct shia views seen??? Well anyways, here are some speeches by Shia scholars or maualanas.. The first few are of Syed Mustafa Qazwini, a famous shia maulvi originally from Iraq,Karbala. His father and two brothers are also famous maulvis:

Let me know of you still think Shias are kafirs! Think before you speak because a TRUE Muslim cannot judge another person and say whether they follow Islam correctly or not. Shias pray, fast, give zakat, go on Hajj, etc etc… And they do not pray to Imam Ali or think him as high as God..my poor shia friend went to a sunni owned video store and the owner knew she was shia and told her she must not have fasted becuase she was shia. She was offended by this and said ofcourse she did. He joked with her she must be secretly sunni. How can one say this to another fellow Muslim??

2

Re: SHIA BELIEFS

phooljari dnt open pointless threads

3

if you dont like then close it instead of giving him /her orders

4

ummm SUE ME!!!! if u dnt like my reply..........
its not like i said i was against Shia's did i

Tumhari Yeh Shrarat Aj Tak Naqsh Hai
5

is not my problem wether you are in favour or not
but he/ or she has same right of posting as you have

6

Re: SHIA BELIEFS

No one says that Shias are Kaafir.

Even within same school of thought, Ulema say that almost all the Muslims in their life unintentionally say/do something that could nullify their faith so its better for muslims to recite Shahaada, once a year at least .. and if possible, re-do the nikah (with the same spouse) cause if the faith was nullified, they are technically no longer married..

When I heard that above mentioned suggestion, I recited shahaada again and asked my wife to do that. That does not mean that I was telling my wife that she was Kaafir (naoozo billah).

I know that to some, it sounds like extreme but better safe than sorry ..

based on that, if/when Ulema of different school of thought point out the kufr, they are not saying that the other person is kaafir, they are basically saying that the act is kufr. To me, there is a difference.

(I did not watch the videos, I am just saying things in general)

7

Re: SHIA BELIEFS

wow very interesting reply TLK unkil, Jazak Allah

8

in reply of such posts i have right to post that when our ulma of ahlul sunna says of shai religion.

Imam Ahmed
And al-Khallaal said: ‘Abdul-Malik Ibn ‘Abdul-Hameed informed me saying: I heard Aba ‘Abdullaah say: “Whosoever reviles the (Companions (radiyallaahu ‘anhum), then I fear disbelief for him like the Rawaafid.” Then he said,* “Whosoever reviles the (Companions of the Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallarn), then we do not believe he is safe from having rejected the Religion.”* [Refer to as-Sunnah (2/557-558) of al-Khaliaal.]
780 -وأخبرني عبدالملك بن عبدالحميد قال سمعت أبا عبدالله قال من شتم أخاف عليه الكفر مثل الروافض** ثم قال من شتم أصحاب النبي لا نأمن أن يكون قد مرق عن الدين**

And Imaam Ahmad also said, “They are those who free themselves from the (Companions of Muhammad (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) and they curse them and belittle them. They declare the Imaams disbelievers, except four: ‘Alee, ‘Ammaar, al-Miqdaad and Salmaan. And the Raafidah do not have anything to do with Islaam.” [Refer to Usoolus-Sunnah (p. 82) of Ahmad Ibn Hanbal.]

Can’t find it in usul as-Sunnah

And he said: ‘Abdullaah Ibn Ahmad Ibn Hanbal informed me saying: I asked my father about a man who reviled a man from amongst the Companions of the Prophet (salallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam). So he said, “I do not hold him to be upon Islaam.” [Refer to as-Sunnah (2/558) of al-Khallaal.]
782 -أخبرنا عبدالله بن أحمد بن حنبل قال سألت أبي عن رجل شتم رجلا من أصحاب النبي فقال ما أراه على الإسلام

Ahmad Ibn Yoonus (d.134H):
Ahmad Ibn Yoonus said, “If a Jew were to sacrifice a lamb and a Raafidee were to sacrifice, I would surely eat the sacrifice of the Jew. And I would not eat the sacrifice of the Raafidee because he is an apostate from Islaam.” [Refer to as-Saarimul-Maslool (p. 570)]

**و قال ****أحمد بن يونس****:  ****لو أن يهوديا ذبح شاة و ذبح رافضي لأكلت ذبيحة اليهودي و لم آكل ذبيحة الرافضي لأنه مرتد عن الإسلام ****]**

Ibn Qutaybah ad-Deenawree (d.276H):
Ibn Qutaybah said, “Because the extremism of the Raafidah in love for ‘Alee (radiyallaaliu ‘anhu) resembles the precedence that he and the (Companions would give to the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa saliam) and their claims of him sharing in Prophethood along with the Prophet and their ascribing knowledge of the Unseen to their imams and these statements and secret affairs are combined with lying and disbelief through excessive ignorance and stupidity.” [Refer to al-Ikhtilaaf fil-Lafdh war-Radd 'alal-Jahmiyyah wal-Mushabbihah (p. 47) of Ibn Qutaybah]

Don’t have the book

Abul-Mudhaffar as-Sam’aanee (d.489H):
Imaam Abul-Mudhaffar as-Sam’aanee - rahimullaah - said, “The Ummah has a consensus (ijmaa’) on the takfeer of the Imaamiyyah, because they believe the Companions are misguided, they reject their consensus and they attribute to them that which does not befit them.” [Refer to al-Ansaab (6/341) of as-Sam'aanee]

Aboo Haamid Muhammad al-Maqdisee (d.744H):
He said after speaking about the sects and the belief’s of the Raafidah, “It is not hidden from anyone who possesses insight and understanding from amongst the Muslims that most of what we have discussed previously from the topic of the beliefs of this group, the Raafidah, along with their various groupings, is clear disbelief and stubborn rejection along with disgraceful ignorance. The careful one will not hesitate in takfeer of them and judging them to have become apostates from the Religion of Islaam.” [Refer to ar-Risaalah fir-Radd 'alar-Raafidah (p. 200) of al-Maqdisee]

Don’t have the book

Imam Shafi on Shias

  1. Al-Harawee relates from Yoosuf Ibn Yahyaa al-Buwaytee who said, ‘I asked ash-Shaafi’ee, ‘Can I pray behind a Raafidee?’ He said, ‘Do not pray behind the Raafidee, nor the Qadaree, nor the Murjiyee’. I said, Describe them to me.’ He said, The one who says that eemaan is statement (only), then he is Murjiyee. And whosoever says that Aboo Bakr and ‘Umar are not the two imaams, then he is a Raafidee. And whosoever places the Will for himself, then he is Qadaree.”

Dhammul-Kalaam (qaaf/215) and it was mentioned by adh-Dhahabee in as-Siyar (10/31).
سمعت البويطي يقول: سألت الشافعي: أصلي خلف الرافضي ؟ قال: لا تصل خلف الرافضي، ولا القدري، ولا المرجئ.
قلت: صفهم لنا.
قال: من قال: الايمان قول، فهو مرجئ، ومن قال: إن أبا بكر وعمر ليسا بإمامين، فهو رافضي، ومن جعل المشيئة إلى نفسه، فهو قدري
Here are the quote from as-Sarim al-Maslul:

و كذلك قال عبد الله بن إدريس من أعيان أئمة الكوفة : ليس لرافضي شفعة إلا لمسلم
قال أحمد في رواية أبي طالب في الرجل يشتم عثمان **: *هذا زندقة و قال في رواية المروزي *: *من شتم أبا بكر و عمر و عائشة ما أراه على الإسلام *]**

Here is the one from mirqat of mulla ali qari:
الصحيح المختار الذي قاله الأكثرون أن الخوارج كسائر أهل البدع لا تكفر قلت وهذا في غير حق الرافضة الخارجة في **
*زماننا فإنهم يعتقدون كفر أكثر الصحابة فضلا عن سائر *أهل السنة**** والجماعة فهم كفرة بالإجماع بلا نزاع**

الصواعق المحرقة
ومن هذه الآية أخذ الإمام مالك في رواية عنه بكفر الروافض الذين يبغضون الصحابة قال لأن الصحابة يغيظونهم ومن غاظه الصحابة فهو كافر
وهو مأخذ حسن يشهد له ظاهر الآية ومن ثم وافقه الشافعي رضي الله تعالى عنهما في قوله بكفرهم ووافقه أيضا جماعه من الأئمة
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Assawaaiqul Muhriqa

And from this verse , Imaam Maalik rahimahullah,as reported from him, Had deducted the verdict of KUFr against those whoshow hatred to the Sahaabah radhiyaallahu anhum. He further states because the Sahaabah causes them anger and every individual who is angered by the Sahaabah is a KAAFir. This extraction is excellent as the verse in itself bears testimony to it. Therefore Imaam shafiee rahimahullaah has Agreed with Him (imam maalik) on the verdict of declaring them Kaafir and a large group of the scholars too.
الصارم المسلول
و قال أحمد بن يونس [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]: لو أن يهوديا ذبح شاة و ذبح رافضي لأكلت ذبيحة اليهودي و لم آكل ذبيحة الرافضي لأنه مرتد عن الإسلام [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]]
و كذلك قال أبو بكر بن هاني [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]: لا تؤكل ذبيحة الروافض و القدرية كما لا تؤكل ذبيحة المرتد مع أنه تؤكل ذبيحة الكتابي لأن هؤلاء يقامون مقام المرتد و أهل الذمة يقرون على دينهم و تؤخذ منهم الجزية
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]As sarmul Maslool

Ahmad bin younas rahimahullah mentions “ If a jews slaughters and a Raafidhi slaughters a sheep, I will eat the slaughtered animal of the Jew and not that of the raafidhi – Because He is an Apostate from Islam (I.e. The raafidhi) Similarily, Abu Bakr bin Hani rahimahullaah has mentioned, “ the Slaughtered animal of the qadiriyyah and the rawaafidh are not eaten as the slaughtered animal of any Murtad (apostate) with the fact that the slaughtered animal of the people of the book because they take the position of an apostate whereas the People of the book who live in islamic lands remain practising on their religions and they pay jizya .

السنة للخلال [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]- (ج [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]3 / ص [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]493)
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]779 - أخبرنا أبو بكر المروذي قال سألت أبا عبدالله عن من يشتم أبا بكر وعمر وعائشة قال ما رآه على الإسلام قال وسمعت أبا عبدالله يقول قال مالك الذي يشتم أصحاب النبي ليس لهم سهم أو قال نصيب في الإسلام
** [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]As sunna lil khilaal**

Abu Bakr alwarwazi rahimahullaah mentions “ I asked abu abdullaah concerning the individual that verbally abuses Abu Bakr, Umar andf A’isha Radhiyallahu anhum.” He replied “ I do not regard them to be muslim.” He further says “ I have heard Maalik rahimahullah say, “ whoever Verbally abuses the Sahaabah of Rasulullaah saaws he has no share in islam.” P493 volume 3
السنة للخلال [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]- (ج [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]3 / ص [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]493)
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]781 - أخبرنا زكريا بن يحيى قال ثنا أبو طالب أنه قال لأبي عبدالله الرجل يشتم عثمان فأخبروني أن رجلا تكلم فيه فقال هذه زندقة
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]As sunna lil Khilaal

Zakariyyah bin yahya mentions he has heard Abu taalib mention that He mentioned to abu abdullah concerning an individual who verbally abuses Uthman radhiyalaahu anhu and people have mentioned this fact to me tha he speaks ill of uthman r.a. He replied they (the ones who speak ill) are zindeeqs.” p493 v3

السنة للخلال [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]- (ج [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]3 / ص [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]493)
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]783 - أخبرني يوسف بن موسى موسى أن أبا عبدالله سئل وأخبرني علي بن عبدالصمد قال سألت أحمد بن حنبل عن جار لنا رافضي يسلم
علي أرد عليه قال لا
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]As sunna lil Khilaal

yousuf bin musa mentions that abu abdullah as asked -this was mentioned to me by ali bin abdus samad- He replied I asked Imam ahmad bin Hanbal concrning a rafidhi neighbour who greets me , should I answer his salaam?” He replied “No” p493 v3
السنة للخلال [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]- (ج [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]3 / ص [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]494)
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]784 - أخبرنا إسماعيل بن إسحاق الثقفي النيسابوري أن أبا عبدالله سئل عن رجل له جار رافضي يسلم عليه قال لا وإذا سلم عليه لا يرد عليه
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]As sunna lil Khilaal

isma’il bin ishaaq as saqfi an nisaapuri mentions that abu abdullaah ws asked concerning greeting ones neighbour who is a raafidhi? He replied “dont greet him and if he greets you dont answer him.” p 494 v3
السنة للخلال [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]- (ج [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]3 / ص [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]494)
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]785 - كتب إلي يوسف بن عبدالله قال ثنا الحسن بن علي بن الحسن أنه سأل أبا عبدالله عن صاحب بدعة يسلم عليه قال إذا كان جهميا أو قدريا أو رافضيا داعية فلا يصلي عليه ولا يسلم عليه
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]As sunna lil Khilaal

yousuf bin abdullah narrates from hassen bin ali bin hassan that he asked abu abdullah about greeting the ahlul bid3ah, He replied “ If they are Jahmi, Qaadiri or raafidhi then neither greet them nor bless them٫” p494 v3
السنة للخلال [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]- (ج [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]3 / ص [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]494)
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]786 - أخبرني محمد بن الحسين أن الفضل بن زياد حدثهم أن أبا عبدالله قال الرافضة لا تكلمهم
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]As sunna lil Khilaal

muhammed bin alhussain mentions fadhal bin ziyad narrates that abu abdullah said dont speak to a raafidhi” p494 v3
السنة للخلال [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]- (ج [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]3 / ص [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]495)
[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]788 - أخبرني حرب قال حدثني محمد بن عبدالرحمن الجعفي قال ثنا حسين بن علي عن هاني بن أيوب قال سألت محارب بن دثار عن غيبته الرافضة قال إنهم إذا لقوم صدق قال حسين لم ير بغيبتهم بأسا

[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]As sunna lil Khilaal

Harb mentions that muhammed bin abdur rahman alju3fi narrates that husain bin ali narrates from hani bin ayyoub that he asked muharib bin disthar concerning backbiting the raafidha . He mentioned (sarcasically) “they are a very truthful nation.” Husain mentions that it seems that he saw no problem with backbiting the rawaafidh

9

To much excited over the opinion of Imam Ahmed about Shias? Then by the same token I would expect you to accept Ahmed's opinion on other people too, for example:

*Ahmad bin al-Hassan al-Tirmidhi said: ‘I heard Ahmad bin Hanbal saying: ‘Abu Hanifa used to tell lies’. *
Tarikh Baghdad, Volume 15 page 579

In Tarikh Baghdad, Volume 15 page 569 we read another Sahih narration:

Ahmad ibn Hanbal said: ‘According to me the opinion of Abu Hanifa is equal to the faeces of goats’

Modern day Sunni scholar Hassan al-Saqqaf records in his book Al-Salafya al-Wahabia, page 73:

[RIGHT]فالحنابلة يرون أن الإمام أبو حنيفة من أئمة الضلال!.[/RIGHT]

“The Hanbalis believe that Abu Hanifa was an Imam of error”

Imam Dhahabi in his book Tazkirat al-Hufaz, Volume 3 page1187 and Siyar alam un-Nubla, Volume 18 page 508 records under the biography of Shaykh ul Islam Abu Ismaeel Abdullah Ansari that once he was travelling from Hirat to Basra meanwhile some people accosted him and asked as to which sect he belonged to, he replied that he was a Hanbali but a man caught him and brought to Shaykh Abu Hatim al-Hanbali who was having a huge gathering at that time. When that man informed Shaykh Abu Hatim Hanbali about the claim of Shaykh Abu Ismaeel, Abu Hatim asked the man to realease him and then the unequivocal statement given by Shaykh Abu Hatim Hanbali was as follows:

"Whoever is not a Hanbali, verily he is not a Muslim"

[quote]
Imam Shafi on Shias1. Al-Harawee relates from Yoosuf Ibn Yahyaa al-Buwaytee who said, ‘I asked ash-Shaafi’ee, ‘Can I pray behind a Raafidee?’ He said, ‘Do not pray behind the Raafidee, nor the Qadaree, nor the Murjiyee’. I said, Describe them to me.’ He said, The one who says that eemaan is statement (only), then he is Murjiyee. And whosoever says that Aboo Bakr and ‘Umar are not the two imaams, then he is a Raafidee. And whosoever places the Will for himself, then he is Qadaree.”
[/quote]

Lets also ruin your excitement over Imam Shafi's views on Shias by presenting his views on Hanafis and Hanablis too:

Shafiyee said: ‘I don’t know anyone who wrote a book proving his errors except Abu Hanifa’
Tarikh Baghdad, Volume 15 page 567

In another Sahih tradition that we read in Tarikh Baghdad, Volume 15 page 549:

[RIGHT]وقال الشافعي شر عليهم من أبي حنيفة[/RIGHT]

Shafiyee said: ‘No one was born in Islam more evil than Abu Hanifa’

Now let us read the belief of Shafiyee scholar Muhammad bin Muhammad Abu Mansur al-Faqih al-Barawi al-Tusi (d. 576 H) in Shazarat al-Dahab, Volume 4 page 271:

It has been reported that al-Barawi said: 'If I was the authority I would take Jaziya from the Hanbalis'

Jaziya is a tax that is imposed on non-Muslims.

[quote]
Here is the one from mirqat of mulla ali qari:
[/quote]

[quote]

الصحيح المختار الذي قاله الأكثرون أن الخوارج كسائر أهل البدع لا تكفر قلت وهذا في غير حق الرافضة الخارجة في **
*زماننا فإنهم يعتقدون كفر أكثر الصحابة فضلا عن سائر *أهل السنة**** والجماعة فهم كفرة بالإجماع بلا نزاع**

[/quote]

A Hanafi fatwa on Shias? Okay, then lets see Hanafi fatwas on their fellow Sunni brothers too:

"It is not allowed for a Hanafi man to marry his daughter to a Shafiyee man but it is allowed [for a Hanafi man] to marry a Shafiyee woman"
Baraziyah Bar Hashiyah al-Fatawa al-Hindyah, Volume 4 page 112, printed in Quetta Pakistan

It means that the way Muslims are barred from marrying a male amongst the AhlulKitab Christans and Jews but can marry with their women, similarly the Sunnis belonging to Shafiyee sect falls in the same category in the eyes of Hanafis. This is what Imam Nasiruddin Albaani al-Salafi commented as recorded by Ahmad al-Zahrani in his book Al-Talyqat al-Athira fi Sharh al-Tahawia, page 35:

"They declared that it is not allowed for a Hanafi to marry with Shafiyee woman! While some of them showed leniency and claimed that it is lawful but not the other way around. (i.e. not allowed for Shaffiyee man to marry a Hanafi woman). And they justify that by giving her (Shaffiyee woman) the status of Ahlul kitab! I personally know a Shaffiyee Sheikh who asked a Hanafi Sheikh's daughter for marriage but he (the Hanafi Sheikh) refused and said: 'If you are not a Shafiyee…!'"

We read in Shazarat al-Dahab, Volume 6 page 309:

"Muhibuddeen Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Muhammad bin Abi Bakr al-Dumraqi al-Hindi al-Hanafi [d.789 H], he migrated to Makka and heard (hadith) from al-Ez bin Jama'a, he is was a skillful scholar and used to perform umra and recite the whole Quran every day and used to record the knowledge, Ibn Hajar said: 'But he was so intolerant and used to abuse al-Shafiyee'."

Qadhi Muhammad bin Musa al-Hanafi (d. 506 H) who while writing on the Shafiyee school of thought said:

"If I was in power I would order the Shafiyees to pay Jaziya".
1. Meezan al Etidal, Volume 4 page 52
2. Jawahir al-Muziyah, Volume 2 page 136 *
*3. Siyar Alam an-Nubla, Volume 19 page 249
*4. Al-Bidayah wa al-Nahayah, Volume 12 page 216 *

Jaziya is a tax that is imposed on non-Muslims, so this great Hanafi jurist believed that Imam Shafiyee and his followers were kaffir.

10

offtopic this thrad is belows to shia beliefs not differences between sunni imams.

do not post any thing offtopic.

producing below more ulmas fatwas against shia religion.

What Do Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah in the Past and Present say about Shia (Rafidah)? : **

1) **Imam Ash-Shafi'i: On one occasion Imam Shafi'i said concerning the Shia,
"I have not seen among the heretics a people more famous for falsehood than the Raafidi* Shia." and on another occasion he said; "Narrate knowledge from everyone you meet except for the raafidi* Shia, because they invent ahadith and adopt them as part of their religion." (Minhaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah) *
(Some shia at the time of the Alid Imam Zayd ibn 'Ali demanded that he make a declaration of innocence (tabarra) from whoever disagreed with 'Ali's right to be Imam. When Zayd refused, they rejected him, and became known as the "raafida" or rejectors. Those who followed Imam Zayd became known as Zaydis, and have very little difference from mainstream Islam. The Raafidi evolved into the the various Imami shia sects, the largest of which is the Ithna 'Ashari.)

2) Imam Abu Hanifah: It is reported that often Imam Abu Hanifah used to repeat the following statement about the raafidi Shia; "Whoever doubts whether they are disbelievers has himself committed disbelief."
3) Imam Malik: Once when asked about the raafidi Shia, Imam Malik said; "Do not speak to them or narrate from them, for surely they are liars." During one of Imam Malik's classes, it was mentioned that the raafidi Shia curse the sahaba. Imam Malik recited the verse, "Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah and those with him are harsh with the disbelievers and gentle among themselves. So that the disbelievers may become enraged with them." (48:29) He then said, "Whoever becomes enraged when the sahaba are mentioned is the one about whom the verse speaks." (Tafseer al-Qurtubi)
4) Abu Zur'ah ar-Razi: He said of the raafidi Shia doctrine of cursing the sahaba, "If you see someone degrade any of the companions of the ProphetSAWS know that he is a disbeliever. Because the ProphetSAWS was real, what he brought was the truth and all of it was conveyed to us by way of the sahaba. What those disbelievers wish to do is cast doubt on the reliability of our narrators in order to invalidate the Qur'an and Sunnah. Thus the disbelievers are the ones most deserving of defamation."
5) Ibn Hazm al-Andalusi: During the period of Muslim rule in Spain, Imam Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm would often debate with the Catholic priests about their religious texts. He brought before them evidence of textual distortions in the Bible and the loss of the original manuscripts. When they replied by pointing out the Shia claims that the Qur'an has been distorted and altered, Ibn Hazm informed them that Shia claims were not valid evidence because the shia were not themselves muslims.

6) Imam Al-Alusi: He declared the raafidi Shia disbelievers because of their defamation of the sahaba. His position was based on the rulings of Imam Malik and other scholars. In response to their claim to be followers of the Ahl al-Bayt (the Prophet'sSAWS family) Al-Alusi said, "No, they are really followers of the devils and the Ahl al-Bayt are innocent of them."
7) Muhammad Rasheed Rida: This scholar was among those who worked sincerely for rapproachment between the shia and the sunni, and they in turn pretended moderation for his benefit. However, in the midst of his efforts, they caught him by surprise by presenting him with a number of their books which slander Islam. He then replied in a paper called As-Sunnah wa Ash-Shia in which he exposed their false doctrines and idolatrous practices.
8) Dr. Hilali: After living close to the shia for some years, the famous Moroccan scholar, Dr. Hilali wrote a paper on them in which he declared them to be disbelievers.

9) Abul-A'la Maududi: This great Pakistani scholar wrote an introduction to the book, "Ar-Riddah bain al-Ams wa al-Yaum" In it was written, regarding the Imami Ja'fari Shia, "despite their moderate views (relative to other shia sects), they are swimming in disbelief like white bloodcells in blood or like fish in water."

10) among the other contemporary scholars who have expressed similar views are: Sheikh Abdul 'Aziz ibn Baz, Sheikh Nassiraddin Al-Albani, Allama Ash-Shanqiti, Sheikh An-Nashashibi, Imam Ahmad Ameen, and Dr. Rashaad Salim.

11

What Do Scholars of Ahl us-Sunnah in the Past and Present say about Shia (Rafidah)? : **

1) **Imam Ash-Shafi'i: On one occasion Imam Shafi'i said concerning the Shia,
"I have not seen among the heretics a people more famous for falsehood than the Raafidi* Shia." and on another occasion he said; "Narrate knowledge from everyone you meet except for the raafidi* Shia, because they invent ahadith and adopt them as part of their religion." (Minhaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah) *
(Some shia at the time of the Alid Imam Zayd ibn 'Ali demanded that he make a declaration of innocence (tabarra) from whoever disagreed with 'Ali's right to be Imam. When Zayd refused, they rejected him, and became known as the "raafida" or rejectors. Those who followed Imam Zayd became known as Zaydis, and have very little difference from mainstream Islam. The Raafidi evolved into the the various Imami shia sects, the largest of which is the Ithna 'Ashari.)

2) Imam Abu Hanifah: It is reported that often Imam Abu Hanifah used to repeat the following statement about the raafidi Shia; "Whoever doubts whether they are disbelievers has himself committed disbelief."
3) Imam Malik: Once when asked about the raafidi Shia, Imam Malik said; "Do not speak to them or narrate from them, for surely they are liars." During one of Imam Malik's classes, it was mentioned that the raafidi Shia curse the sahaba. Imam Malik recited the verse, "Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah and those with him are harsh with the disbelievers and gentle among themselves. So that the disbelievers may become enraged with them." (48:29) He then said, "Whoever becomes enraged when the sahaba are mentioned is the one about whom the verse speaks." (Tafseer al-Qurtubi)
4) Abu Zur'ah ar-Razi: He said of the raafidi Shia doctrine of cursing the sahaba, "If you see someone degrade any of the companions of the ProphetSAWS know that he is a disbeliever. Because the ProphetSAWS was real, what he brought was the truth and all of it was conveyed to us by way of the sahaba. What those disbelievers wish to do is cast doubt on the reliability of our narrators in order to invalidate the Qur'an and Sunnah. Thus the disbelievers are the ones most deserving of defamation."
5) Ibn Hazm al-Andalusi: During the period of Muslim rule in Spain, Imam Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm would often debate with the Catholic priests about their religious texts. He brought before them evidence of textual distortions in the Bible and the loss of the original manuscripts. When they replied by pointing out the Shia claims that the Qur'an has been distorted and altered, Ibn Hazm informed them that Shia claims were not valid evidence because the shia were not themselves muslims.

6) Imam Al-Alusi: He declared the raafidi Shia disbelievers because of their defamation of the sahaba. His position was based on the rulings of Imam Malik and other scholars. In response to their claim to be followers of the Ahl al-Bayt (the Prophet'sSAWS family) Al-Alusi said, "No, they are really followers of the devils and the Ahl al-Bayt are innocent of them."
7) Muhammad Rasheed Rida: This scholar was among those who worked sincerely for rapproachment between the shia and the sunni, and they in turn pretended moderation for his benefit. However, in the midst of his efforts, they caught him by surprise by presenting him with a number of their books which slander Islam. He then replied in a paper called As-Sunnah wa Ash-Shia in which he exposed their false doctrines and idolatrous practices.
8) Dr. Hilali: After living close to the shia for some years, the famous Moroccan scholar, Dr. Hilali wrote a paper on them in which he declared them to be disbelievers.

9) Abul-A'la Maududi: This great Pakistani scholar wrote an introduction to the book, "Ar-Riddah bain al-Ams wa al-Yaum" In it was written, regarding the Imami Ja'fari Shia, "despite their moderate views (relative to other shia sects), they are swimming in disbelief like white bloodcells in blood or like fish in water."

10) among the other contemporary scholars who have expressed similar views are: Sheikh Abdul 'Aziz ibn Baz, Sheikh Nassiraddin Al-Albani, Allama Ash-Shanqiti, Sheikh An-Nashashibi, Imam Ahmad Ameen, and Dr. Rashaad Salim.

12

That is not off topic at all and what I have posted was not just ‘differences between Sunni Imams’ but was their total onslaught on their fellow Sunis just like they have done for Shias, so if you are not a hypocrtie and do not indulge in double standards, you have to accept what they have said about other people too.

Since you are adamant to continue copy pasting the Fatwas of Sunni Imams against Shias, I would also like to keep reminding you their Takfeer made against eachother.

Shafiyee said: ‘I don’t know anyone who wrote a book proving his errors except Abu Hanifa’
Tarikh Baghdad, Volume 15 page 567

In another Sahih tradition that we read in Tarikh Baghdad, Volume 15 page 549:

[RIGHT]وقال الشافعي شر عليهم من أبي حنيفة[/RIGHT]

Shafiyee said: ‘No one was born in Islam more evil than Abu Hanifa’

Now let us read the belief of Shafiyee scholar Muhammad bin Muhammad Abu Mansur al-Faqih al-Barawi al-Tusi (d. 576 H) in Shazarat al-Dahab, Volume 4 page 271:

It has been reported that al-Barawi said: ‘If I was the authority I would take Jaziya from the Hanbalis’

Jaziya is a tax that is imposed on non-Muslims.

The followers of Hanafi sect i.e. Brelvis and Deobandies have been issuing Takfeer against eachother as well:

Ex Leader of the Nasibi terorrist orgnization of the Subcontinent Sipah Sahaba [kr-hcy.com], Zia ur Rahman Faruqi in his support of the banning of Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi’s Tafseer of the Quran in Saudi Arabia, stated:

“We have come to know that some people of this evil [Dhaala] sect via a letter to you have sought to revoke the ban on the said Tafseer and translation [of Quran], and have very cunningly made an venomous attempt to cover up the wrong beliefs of their founder…The said Tafseer and translation [of Quran] is the result of the pen by the founder Ahmed Raza Khan Brelvi and his caliph Mufti Naeemuddin Muradabadi of this evil [Dhaala] sect. It is our demand that not only Kanz ul Iman be banned in Saudi Arabia but in other Arabic world, moreover the followers of ‘Raza Khani’ sect should be strictly prohibited from performing the rites of Hajj”.
Kanz al Iman par pabandee kyo? [Why a ban on Kanz ul Iman?] pages 3-4 printed Ish’aat ul Maarif, Faislabad

Imam Ahmad Raza Khan stated:

“The worse Murtad [apostate] amongst all is a Munafiq [hypocrite]. He is the one whose company is more harmful than the company of thousdand Kafirs because such a person teachs Kufr while being a Muslim, specially Wahabia Deobandia, as they call themsevles as pure Ahlul Sunnah, try to be Hanafi, Chishti Naqshbandi, offer prayers and keep fasts similar to our’s, learn and teach our books and call names upon Allah and Prophet [s], they are the most lethal ones”
Ahkaam e Shariat, part 1 page 77, Abulaala Press, Agra, India

Similarly we read:

“Deobandis and others, their prayer [Salat] is no prayer [Salat] and to pray behind them is also no prayer [Salat]. If for example the Imam of Friday prayer [Juma] or of the two Eid is amongst them [Deobandis etc] and you are unable to find a Muslim Imam, then it is obligatory [Fardh] to abandon the Friday and Eid prayers, one should just perform Zuhar instead of Friday prayer”.
1. Ahkaam e Shariat, part 1 page 77
*2. Fatawa Rizvia, Volume 1 page 191 and page 736 (published in Breli) *

He was himself a Nasibi scholar, then you can hardly expect him to say something good about the followers of Ali bin Abi Talib [as]. Like his Banu Ummayya’s Nasibi Khalifas, Ibn Hazm toed the same anti Ali line and to prove this we quote Dhahabi who stated in Siyar alam al-Nubala, Volume 18 page 201:

“What increased his status was his inclination towards the rulers of Bani Ummaya, the past and the present of them and his belief of the correctness of their Imamate, till he was attributed to Nasb”

The common link between the above cited names of scholars is the fact that they are adherents of the Salafi / Wahabi / AhleHadeeth cult who unlike ‘true’ Sunnis reject Tawassul, performing ziarat to Rasulullah’s grave etc. The key link to these Nawasib is the fact that they deem their Imam to be Ibn Tamiyah, they deem him to be “Shaykh ul Islam” and their Nasibi thought is in line with his views. Now let us analyse what the Ahl’ul Sunnah have said about their Imam.

We read in Daf Shubah min Shabah by Abu Bakr bin Muhammad al-Hesni al-Dimashqi al-Shafiyee (d. 829 H), page 123:

“Sheikh Zainuddin ibn Rajab al-Hanbali was amongst those who believed that Ibn Taimiyah is a kafir”

Abu al-Mahasin al-Dimashqi in his book Zayl Tazkirah tul Hufaz, page 316 and Shaykh Ahmed Raza Bijnawri in Anwar al-Bari, Volume 11 page 192 have recorded another statement of Shaykh Alauddin Bukhari al-Hanafi (d. 841 H) regarding Ibn Tamiyah that:

**“He (Alauddin Bukhari) declared in his assembly that whoever deems Ibn Taymia to be ‘Sheikh ul Islam’ is kafir”. **

We read in Takmilat al-Sayf al-Saqil by Imam Muhammad Zahid bin Hassan al-Kawthari al-Hanafi (d. 1371 H), page 177:

**“The Syrian (scholars) issued a statement about ibn Taimiyah, and al-Burhan ibn al-Ferkah wrote on it forty lines wherein he declared that he (ibn Taimiyah) is a kafir, and al-Shehab bin Jabhal agreed with him” **

13

The bottom line is that particulary the early scholars of Ahle Sunnah, plus of the modern day have always been busy in issuing Takfeer against this and that, so if you are to accept their Takfeer against group A, you have to by the same taken accept their Takfeer against group B as well, which subsiquently render whole Ummah into infidel unfortunately.

14

you are misguiding ummah again, for your information in era of abdullah bin sabah (jew) there were 500 sect in shia religion, and till today there are thousands sect in shai religion, mostly not exist today.

even dozens sect of shia exist in iran and iraq.

the worse sect of shia in pakistan is zikri (mehadvi) they beleived that Syed Mehdi Jonpura was 12th imam and they have place in koh-e-murad baluchistan, every year they gethered their and perform their haj.

15

What does this post of yours have to do with the topic :S ? Anyhow, I am not concerned with the sub sects of Shias, I am only representing Shia Imami or Shia Atha Ashari school.

16

there are many sect in shia imami like akhbari, tauhidi etc.

which sect you belongs.

17

you mean scholars of ahlul sunna was not right even shia have these kind of beliefs.

**TERRIFYING BELIEFS OF SHI'ITES

Allaah often lies and does mistakes. (usool-e-kaafi, page #328, yaqoob kulaini, vol1).

The Munafiqeen (i.e. Sahaba) took very much out of Quran (took out the verses). (Ihtijaj-e-tibri, page #382).

When Imaam Mehdi comes he will bring with him the real and original Quran. (Ahsan-ul-maqaal, page #336, safdar Husain najfi).

The person who says that the present Quran is complete is a liar because the “complete Quran” was compiled by Hazrat Ali. (Fasl-ul-khitaab fee tahreef kitaab rab-ul- arbab, page #4, Noori Tibri).

Abu Bakr is kafir and the one who loves Abu Bakr is also kafir. (Faq-ul-yaqeen, page #690, Baqar majlisi).

Abu Bakr was kafir and Zandeeq. naouzobillah.

There is no difference in Abu Bakr and mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiyani.naouzobillah.

Shia deny existance of Allah and Nabih
Neither we believe the Allah nor the Prophet of the God whose khalifah is Abu Bakr . (Anwar-ul-nomania, page #278).
I don’t believe in that Allah who gives government to Usman and Ma’avia. (Kashf-ul-asrar, page #107, Khamini).

Umar was a real kafir and Zandeeq. (Kashf-ul-asrar, Khaminee, page #119).

When imam Mehdi comes he will make alive Hazrat Aa'ishah from death and whip her. (Tafseer saafi, line 16, page #108).

Abu Bakr and Umar were agents of Iblees. (Hulyat-ul-mateen, mulla baqar majlisi).

Hazrat Khalid bin Walid was not saif-ullah but saif-us-shaitaan. (Manazir-o-baghdad, page #100).

All the Prophets will become alive from dead and start the jihad under the leadership of Hazrat Ali. (Tafseer ayyashee, page #181).

Real Quran that is compiled by Hazrat Ali will come with imam Mehdi. (Anwar-ul-nomania, page #360).

All Prophets are beggar at the doorstep of Ali. (khalqat-e-norania, page #201, Talib Husain karpalwi).

All the prophets and Angels are the slaves of the 12 imams except Mohammad . (kaleed manaazra, page #35, barkat ali).

12 imams are the teachers of all Prophets except Mohammad . (Majmoa-e-majalis, page #29).

When imam Mehdi comes he will hang Hazrat Abu Bakr and Umar at the holy grave of . (Majma-ul-ma’arif, page #49).

If Gabriel and Mekael had loved Abu Bakr then they would have been in hell too. (Ameer mukhtar, page #8, mirza basharat Husain).

After the death of all the Sahaba become MURTAD except three. (Roza-e-kafee, page #245)

Hazrat Anas Bin Malik, Abu huraira, Amr bin Aas, Ameer Ma’avia and Aa'ishah were worst people of all times. (Makalmaat-e-husainia, page #59).

Man can have Nikah (marriage) with man and his mother, sister and daughter too. (Firqa-ul-shiat, Abi Mohammad-ul-Hasan Bin Moosa).

Hazrat Abu Bakr was Mushrik, Umar was Munafiq and Usman was Kafir. (Shia’an-e-ali aur inn kee shaan, page #54, ghulam husain najfi).

When imam Mehdi come he will be nude and the first person who Bay’ah him is Mohammad . (Haq-ul-yaqeen, page #347, Baqar majlisi).

Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) was the leader of the Munafiqeen (hypocrites).

Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had prayed for the murder of Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu).

The day on which Hadhrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu), was murdered by the Persian kafir, Lu'lu', is the most auspicious day of the year.

Aa'ishah and Hafsah martyred Rasulullah by giving him poison. (Hayat-ul-quloob, page #870, Baqar Majlisi).

Thus these two male munafiqs (referring to Abu Bakr and Umar) and those two female munafiqs (referring to Aa'ishah and Hafsah) agreed to martyr Rasulullah by administering poison to him. (Hayat-ul-quloob, page #745, Baqar Majlisi)**

18

Shia Beliefs :With Citations?
001. Neither we accept such Lord nor do we accept the Prophet of such Lord whose Caliph is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na'uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#278 - Published Iran]
002. None of the Prophets (a.s) had been bestowed with the Prophet Hood until He declared His belief in the fallacy character of ALLAH (Na'uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#265 - Published Iran]
003. Disclaimer to the doctrines that fate, benediction and vice belong to ALLAH (Na'uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#293 - Published Iran]
004. The fourteen innocents (Ma'sumeen) are incomparable and unprecedented like ALLAH. (Na'uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#2 - Published Lahore]
005. There is no difference between ALLAH and Ali (r.a) such as in the virtues for; The master of Khatim-e-Suleman, The Master of Doomsday, The master of Siraat (The Bridge over Hell) and Renaissance Field, The Creator of leaves on the trees, The one who ripens the fruits, The one who continued fountains, The one who made drift in the canals (Na'uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A'yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
006. To call ALLAH Omnipresent and Omniscient is against faith (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
007. Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his descendants are omnipresent and omniscient, and it is only theirs quality, not of ALLAH’s (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
008. ALLAH when talks about blessings, does so in Persian and when talks about persecution does so in Arabic (Na’uzubillah). [Tareekh-e-Islam, Pg#163 – Published Lahore]
009. Shiite confession of faith “LA ILAHA IL-ALLAH-U MUHAMMAD-UR RASOOL-ULLAH ALI-UN WALI-ULLAH WASI-U RASOOL-ULLAH WA KHALIFA-TU BILA FASL” (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#10 – Published Lahore]
010. Wherever Quran referred the word “RABB”, it meant as Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#66 – Published Lahore]
011. Original Quran will not come into view till the manifestation of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#360 - Published Iran]
012. Collectors of Quran eliminated virtues of Prophet’s progeny from Surah Al-Ahzab which was about to the length of Surah Al-Bakrah (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#66 - Published Iran]
013. Usman (r.a) made alteration in Surah Al-Rehman by eliminating words “MINKUM” (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#525 - Published Iran]
014. Quran has been purposely altered by the drunkard Caliphs {Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a)}; The present Quran is false; It’s the duty of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) to bring it in its original form; When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will come, then the Quran will be recited in its original form (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#12, Pg#384 – Published India]
015. “ILAA AJALIN-MUSAMMA” has been removed from the Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Muta’h Aur Salahuddin A’ybi, Pg#60 – Published Karachi]
016. Quranic verses were not arranged by Abu-Bakr (r.a) in the same order as that in which it was revealed {hence Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran and present day Quran is incorrect} (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#134 – Published Karachi]
017. After the death of Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) original Quran was in the possession of Ali (r.a) which he brought before Abu-Bakr (r.a) but He refused to prevail such version that is why Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#138 – Published Karachi]
018. To provide reasoning to “WATI-FIL-DUBR” changes were made in the Quranic comprehension (Na’uzubillah). [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#415 – Published Iran]
019. The present (false) Quran doesn’t mentions the name of “Pakistan” however* ours (SHIAs) true Quran even have the name of “Pakistan” (Na’uzubillah). [Hazar Tumhari Das Hamari, Pg#554 – Published Karachi]
020. Shiites scholars believe that Ali (r.a) and all his innocent patriarchs are superior to all Prophets (a.s) except Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#70 - Published Iran]
021. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will come out of his cave he will be naked like a newborn and the first person who shall take the oath of allegiance on his hands will be the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 - Published Iran]
022. The greatest slander upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) of sexual intercourse… (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#119 – Published Iran]
023. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) used to perform Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#118 – Published Iran]
024. On the night of consummation of marriage of Ali (r.a) and Fatima (r.a), Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) instructed them not to start their work (sexual intercourse) until He arrives their (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#251 – Published Multan]
025. Ali (r.a) and other Ahlul Bayt (r.a) are equal in the rank with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and are superior to all other Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]
026. After ALLAH and Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) only Holy Descendants (r.a) reached the height of saintliness, rest all other Prophets (a.s) and Angels (a.s) lie below their ranks (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#29 – Published Lahore]
027. Jibrael (Gabriel) used to talk with Fatima (r.a) {after the death of Muhammad (s.a.w.w)} (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#198 – Published Multan]
028. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his Holy Descendants (r.a) are not the offspring of Adam (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]
029. Adam (a.s)’s prayers were accepted on the mediation of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), Ali (r.a), Fatima (r.a), Hasan (r.a) and Hussain (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#92 – Published Lahore]
030. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) had some purpose to acquiesce Usman (r.a) with Himself otherwise that man was of no use to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#129 – Published Karachi]
031. Adam (a.s) became Infidel due to His jealousy (Na'uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#428 - Published Iran]
032. Ali (r.a) possesses same rights as were kept by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#380 - Published Iran]
033. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) taught Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) to Abu-Zar Ghaffari (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#92 – Published Karachi]
034. The rank of Imams (12 Imams) is higher than every Prophet (a.s) and every Angel (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Hakumat-e-Islamiah, Pg#52 – Published Iran]
035. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s house was like that of dirge player’s house (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]
036. What was the compulsion on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) that He used to do intercourse with Ayesha (r.a) during her menses? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]
037. What the lady “Zulekhah”, Ayesha (r.a) had got that Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) despite having coeval wives or other young ladies, married with a nine years old little mother at His age of fifty (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#64 – Published Lahore]
038. Slander to Ali (r.a) to declare rape as a dogmatic matrimonial (Na’uzubillah). [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#5, Pg#467 – Published Iran]
039. One who does not consider Ali (r.a) as the first Caliph (successor) is an apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#3, Pg#264 - Published Iran]
040. To marry Umm-e-Kulsoom (r.a) with Umar (r.a) was a subterfuge on the part of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#1, Pg#81-82 - Published Iran]
041. Penis proclaimed the Imamate (patriarchate) of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Aasar-e-Haidery, Pg#557 – Published Lahore]
042. When the last era will come, Ali (r.a) will appear (Na'uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#603 - Published Lahore]
043. Ali (r.a) is Dabat-ul-Arz (a cattle who will arise from earth before the Doomsday) (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#602 - Published Lahore]
044. Ayesha (r.a) was an American Lady or any European Madam? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#64 – Published Lahore]
045. Hafsa (r.a), a bad natured woman, was accepted by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)… She was a pig-faced woman (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#124 – Published Lahore]
046. Ali (r.a) is Dabat-ul-Arz (a four-legged animal) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#336 - Published Iran]
047. When Imam Mehdi will appear, he will first dig out Ayesha (r.a) from Her grave and will reprehend her (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 - Published Iran]
048. Curse upon Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) who gave poison to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#700 – Published Iran]
049. Ayesha (r.a) and Shiites Imam performed Muta’h (a form of temporary marriage regarded as illegitimate in Islam) (Na’uzubillah). [Jawaz-e-Muta’h, Pg#78 – Published Bhakkar]
050. Jealousy, hatred and resentment were the attributes of Ayesha (r.a)’s nature (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#40]

  1. Ayesha (r.a) use to misbehave, oppose, talk louder, babble and slander on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#70]
  2. The youth of this misfortune {Ayesha (r.a)} would have spoil the old age of Mua’zzamah (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#88]
  3. Ayesha (r.a) used to babble and fight with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#53]
  4. On not arriving of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), Ayesha (r.a) suffered with the fits of madness and passion (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#54]
  5. After the death when Angels of grave start questioning then Maula’s {Ali (r.a)} chair is being brought and sins are pardoned only after recognizing him (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
  6. Sheikheen (r.a) {Abu-Bakr (r.a) & Umar (r.a)}, Hafsa (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a) gave poison to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#28, Pg#894 – Published India]
  7. Ayesha (r.a) for the first time initiated the war customs (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#275 – Published Karachi]
  8. Ayesha (r.a) was a malicious and short-tempered woman (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#289 – Published Karachi]
  9. Abu-Moosa Asha’ri (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a) had become apostate by narrating forged Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#475 – Published Karachi]
  10. Ayesha (r.a) used to say that kill the Na’sal {Usman (r.a)} because he has become a Infidel (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#Preface – Published Karachi]
  11. Ayesha (r.a)’s heart was blacked-out (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#30 – Published Karachi]
  12. Ayesha (r.a) had such an opposition with Usman (r.a) that she ordered for his murder (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#31 – Published Karachi]
  13. Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) played a cunning game like fox upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#69 – Published Lahore]
  14. O Sunnis! Is Ayesha (r.a) a woman or a female monkey? (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#67 – Published Lahore]
  15. Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will resurrect Sheikheen (r.a) {Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a)} and punish them by hanging on the tree (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#361 - Published Iran]
  16. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will appear, before other nonbelievers, he will kill Ahl-e-Sunnah and Ahl-e-Sunnah scholars (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#527 - Published Iran]
  17. Imams used to say Salam to each other while taking bath (Na’uzubillah). [Hulya-tul-Muttaqeen, Pg#118 - Published Iran]
  18. Imams are not born through the womb of their mothers but they are born from the sides of their mothers (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#474 – Published Lahore]
  19. Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) recited Holy Quran and called Salam in the womb of his mother (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#475 – Published Lahore]
  20. Imams are also innocent like the Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#28 – Published Lahore]
  21. Abdullah Ibn-e-Saba was the first who declared the faith in Imamat and that Ali (r.a) is the true God (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#234 - Published Iran]
  22. We (Imams) among ALLAH’s creatures are His eyes and among His servants (human being) the people of command (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#260 - Published Iran]
  23. In the early Islamic period due to Taqiyyah (subterfuge), Shiites scholars used to hide the Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#92 - Published Iran]
  24. To weep on the vulnerability of Imams and to hide the secrets is like Holy crusade (Jihad) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#283 - Published Iran]
  25. World cannot exist without Imam (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#233 - Published Iran]
  26. Imams know all what happened earlier and what is about to happen and nothing remains hidden to them (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#10 - Published Iran]
  27. Without knowing the Imam, God cannot be proved (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#331 - Published Iran]
  28. Imam knows the time of his death and dies by his own will (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#23 - Published Iran]
  29. Imam has greater qualities than the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#299-300 - Published Iran]
  30. Imams are equal in the status with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#287 - Published Iran]
  31. Imam get revelations (WAHI by ALLAH) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#329-330 - Published Iran]
  32. In the state of Taqiyyah (subterfuge) whatever Imam says just obey him and act accordingly (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#72 - Published Iran]
  33. The Angels reveal upon Imams in the Shab-e-Qadr (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#569 - Published Lahore]
  34. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will appear there will be only forty perfect believers (Mo’min) in the world (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#571 - Published Lahore]
  35. All Angels, Jibrail (a.s) {Gabriel (a.s)} and Mikail (a.s) will take the oath of allegiance upon Imam Mehdi’s (SHIAs 12th Imam) hand (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#594 - Published Lahore]
  36. After Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s death all his disciples except four became apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#1, Pg#81 - Published Iran]
  37. Umar (r.a) told to Satan that he had invaded the Caliphate of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#1, Pg#82 - Published Iran]
  38. Ali (r.a) imprecated Talha (r.a) and Zubair (r.a) to ruin in life and thereafter (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#189 - Published Iran]
  39. The first three Caliphs (r.a) and other Sahabah (r.a) became apostate due to the denial of Ali (r.a)’s prophecy (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#184 - Published Iran]
  40. Mua’wiyah (r.a) can be associated with whole vice (Na’uzubillah). [Ay As As, Pg#35 – Published Karachi]
  41. Sahabah (r.a) brought disgrace upon Islam in Uhad War (Na’uzubillah). [Ay As As, Pg#21 – Published Karachi]
  42. Ja’far Sadiq (r.t.a) never stood up from the prayer mat unless he had not sent curse upon Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a), Mua’wiyah (r.a), Ayesha (r.a), Hafsa (r.a), Hind (r.a) and Umm-ul-Hakm (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [A’yn-ul-Hayat, Pg#599 – Published Iran]
  43. After the death of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), except three all the Sahabah (r.a) have become apostate (Na’uzubillah). [A’yn-ul-Hayat, Pg#3 – Published Iran]
  44. The first after Satan who had accepted his religion is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#18 – Published Lahore]
  45. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was of the same belief which was founded by Satan (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#22 – Published Lahore]
  46. We have only La’nat (curse) and Tabbarah (imprecation) for Abu-Hurairah (r.a) like narrators (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]
  47. Mua’wiyah (r.a) was a disgraced character (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#65 – Published Lahore]
  48. Mua’wiyah (r.a) and Abu-Hurairah (r.a) were infidels and apostates (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#79 – Published Lahore]
  49. Sahabah (r.a)’s testimonial cannot save them from imprecation (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#32 – Published Lahore]
  50. Sahabah (r.a) were not blessed according to the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#68 – Published Karachi]
  51. Some Sahabah (r.a) performed evil deeds; they did the acts of stealing, rape and telling a lie (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#64 – Published Karachi]
  52. Ayesha (r.a) use to compare Usman (r.a) with a Jew named Na’sal and say that he should be killed (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#584 - Published Lahore]
  53. The caliphate of first three caliphs is like the penis of donkey (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#72 – Published Lahore]
  54. Sahabah (r.a) made innovations in the religion after Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), cut Islam into pieces and minced the Shari’ah (Islamic Jurisprudence) (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]
  55. Sodomy was very common among various Sahabah (r.a); for e.g. Waleed bin Mugha’irah, Umar (r.a)… (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]
  56. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a) will enter into hell through a special door (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#500 - Published Iran]
  57. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a) and Mua’wiyah will be persecuted severely than other hellish people (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#503 - Published Iran]
  58. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a), Mua’wiyah (r.a), Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) are the worst creatures (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#519 - Published Iran]
  59. Abbas (r.a) and Aqeel (r.a) were weak believers and men of mean spirit (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#618 – Published Iran]
  60. There is no difference in the faith of Abu-Bakar and in the faith of Satan (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#93 – Published Lahore]
  61. Abu-Hurairah (r.a) was the greatest liar who associated false Hadiths to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#442 – Published Lahore]
  62. Mua’wiyah (r.a) was apostate, the greatest non believer and a corrupt man (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#306 – Published Lahore]
  63. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was a puppet in the hands of Umar (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#92 – Published Lahore]
  64. Mua’wiyah (r.a) is being burnt inside a coffin beneath the interior most part of the hell and if Pharaoh (Firo’un) would have not said “INNA RABBI-KUM-UL-A’LA” there would be no one below Mua’wiyah (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#316 – Published Lahore]
  65. Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s mother and granny were prostitutes (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#301 – Published Lahore]
  66. Usman (r.a) protested against Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and disobeyed him (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#30, Pg#934 – Published India]
  67. Quran does not show the superiority of Abu-Bakr (r.a) but the infidelity of Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Manazarah Hussainiyah, Pg#47 – Published Lahore]
  68. Zubair bin Al-Awam (r.a) is the breed of Muta’h (temporary marriage illegitimate according to Islam) (Na’uzubillah). [Muta’h Aur Salahuddin A’ybi, Pg#24 – Published Karachi]
  69. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a cunning person (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#339 – Published Karachi]
  70. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) made naked himself… (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#148 – Published Karachi]
  71. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a liar and a miser (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#147 – Published Karachi]
  72. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a)’s mother was a big liar. [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#146 – Published Karachi]
  73. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a cheater. [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#245 – Published Karachi]
  74. Abu-Moosa Asha’ri and Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) were hypocrites and traitors (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#474 – Published Karachi]
  75. The history of the first three Caliphs was full of ignorance, stupidity, brutality, bribery and sinfulness (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#252 – Published Karachi]
  76. How unfortunate are these Talha (r.a), Zubair (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a)! (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#63 – Published Karachi]
  77. Mua’wiyah used to feign and wile (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#421 – Published Karachi]
  78. The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) himself passed the orders of Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s murder (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#108 – Published Karachi]
  79. Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s all army men were foul-natured, *******s, wile and non-believers (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#473 – Published Karachi]
  80. Mugha’irah bin Shaiba (r.a) himself and his father were hypocrites and imps (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#775 – Published Karachi]
  81. Mugha’irah bin Shaiba (r.a) was very unfortunate in faith and Islam and he left this world in the same state (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#258 – Published Karachi]
  82. Rural-ship of a villager is better than the piety of Sahabah (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#432 – Published Karachi]
  83. Talha (r.a) and Zubair (r.a) were seditious, vicious and dissentious persons who could commit any crime for wealth and power (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#443 – Published Karachi]
  84. Among a few extremely remorseful and shameful characters of the world, one is of Zubair (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#48 – Published Karachi]
  85. Usman (r.a) reaped whatever he sew (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#108 – Published Karachi]
  86. Usman (r.a)’s mother was a prostitute (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#18 – Published Karachi]
  87. I dare say that today’s Iranic Nation is far better than the people of Hijaz (Sahabah) in Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s era (Na’uzubillah). [Sahifah-e-Inqalab {Khomeini’s last will and testament}, Pg#46]
  88. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was habitual of using foul-mouth and giving abuses (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#148 – Published Karachi]
  89. Abu-Bakr (r.a) used to abuse very often (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#21 – Published Karachi]
  90. Abu-Bakr (r.a) had no religious status (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#8 – Published Karachi]
  91. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was like Halaku and Changez (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#10 – Published Karachi]
  92. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was only curious about the money in his Caliphate (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#142 – Published Karachi]
  93. Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a) were culpable and unforgiving (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#159 – Published Karachi]
  94. Mua’wiyah (r.a) killed Ayesha (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#32 – Published Karachi]
  95. Umar (r.a) not even liked Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and His daughter (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#94 – Published Karachi]
  96. Starting from the day first, Umar (r.a) is responsible for the hostilities and blood-shedding among the Muslims (Na’uzubillah). [Waqi’a Qirtas Aur Kirdar-e-Umar, Pg#63 – Published Karachi]
  97. Umar (r.a) passed humiliating sentences upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s sayings (Na’uzubillah). [Waqi’a Qirtas Aur Kirdar-e-Umar, Pg#67 – Published Karachi]
  98. Abbas (r.a)’s false allegations upon Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Wohi Mujrim Wohi Munsif, Pg#75]
  99. Umar (r.a) was sent to Hell on 9th Rab’i-ul-Awwal (Na’uzubillah). [Zaad-ul-Mua’d, Pg#404 – Published Iran]
  100. Curse upon Ayesha (r.a) and Umar (r.a); Mua’wiyah (r.a) was sent to Hell on 22nd Rajab so this day must be celebrated (with Koondas) (Na’uzubillah). [Zaad-ul-Mua’d, Pg#34 – Published Iran]
  101. Last diet of Umar (r.a)’s was Vine (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#241 – Published Lahore]
  102. Umar (r.a) belonged to such family in which mothers and sisters are made as wives (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#306 – Published Lahore]
  103. Umar (r.a) is the lock of Hell, it was better if he would be the gate (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#430 – Published Lahore]
  104. Umar (r.a) and Waleed Bin Mugha’irah (r.a) were she-gay (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#246 – Published Lahore]
  105. Nikkah is valid without the witnesses. [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#5, Pg#387 – Published Iran]
  106. Quran can be recited in toilet (Na’uzubillah). [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#6, Pg#502 – Published Iran]
  107. By hiding the private parts with only hand, Sattr can be achieved. [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#6, Pg#501 – Published Iran]
  108. What so ever the Ahl-e-Sunnah scholar tells about some query, to do its opposite is SHIA religion. [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#3, Pg#55 - Published Iran]
  109. According to SHIA scholars, Ahl-e-Sunnah are worse and dirtiest infidels than the Jews or Christians or Majoos (Na'uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#306 - Published Iran]
  110. Taqiyyah (concealing the facts) is the true religion. [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#332 - Published Iran]
  111. Taqiyyah (concealing the facts) is the part of belief. [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#328 - Published Iran]
  112. By not reciting “ALI-UN-WALI-ULLAH”, Ahl-e-Sunnah are not Mo’min (Na'uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#13 – Published Lahore]
  113. ALLAH produces 70 Angels from the couple who perform Muta’h which keep on praying for them (Na'uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
  114. Ahl-e-Sunnah (Nasibi) are worse than dog in front of ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#516 - Published Iran]
  115. Black dress is the dress of people of Hell (Na’uzubillah). [Hulya-tul-Muttaqeen, Pg#8 - Published Iran]
  116. Leavings of Ahl-e-Sunnah’s are as Haram then any other Non-Muslim. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#8* - Published Iran]
  117. Niece and Aunts can remain in Nikkah at a time. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#260* - Published Iran]
  118. Donkey’s flesh is Halal. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#213* - Published Iran]
  119. Black dress is the dress of Firo’un. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#163* - Published Iran]
  120. No witness is required in the Nikkah as GOD Himself is. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#251* - Published Iran]
  121. Present Azaan is correct, curse be upon Mafoodha who innovated “ALI-UN-WALI-ULLAH” in Azaan. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#188* - Published Iran]
  122. There is no right for Ahl-e-Sunnah in Islam so Nikkah with them is also Haram. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#3 ,Pg#258* - Published Iran]
  123. Istinja (washing of private parts) with Saliva is legitimate. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#41* - Published Iran]
  124. Announcement of SHIA Kalimah; reciting “LA-ILAHA-ILL-ALLAHU-MUHAMMAD-UR-RASOOL-... is not the sign of Iman. [Shia Mazhab Haq Hai, Pg#3 – Published Lahore]
  125. Neither Fasting is spoiled nor Bath (Ghusl) is subjected by doing un-natural things with a women. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#460 – Published Iran]
  126. Own female servant can be given to someone temporarily for Muta’h practices. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#244 – Published Iran]
  127. Muta’h can also be done with Non-Muslims. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#256 – Published Iran]
  128. A man can even take benefit (by doing Muta’h) from a woman for about an hour or so. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#266 – Published Iran]
  129. Muta’h (illegitimate temporary marriage) has no accountability; it can be done with 1000 even. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#258-259 – Published Iran]
  130. Imams use to order openly for Muta’h. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#253 – Published Iran]
  131. Ahl-e-Sunnah are infidels (Kafir) so Nikkah with them is illegitimate. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#302 – Published Iran]
  132. Ahl-e-Sunnah are infidels (Kafir) so Nikkah with them is illegitimate and their slaughtered animals are also Haram. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#303 – Published Iran]
  133. Muta’h (illegitimate temporary marriage) is legitimate even for the sake of a piece of wood. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#267 – Published Iran]
  134. MEHRAM male and female can see each other’s body. [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#292 – Published Lahore]
19

Believe me you are proving yourself as one thick Nasibi who is just desperate to copy paste stuff from Naisib websites no matter what is the topic of the thread. Anyhow, you are just another person who copy paste the list provided by Nasibi websites without even making an attempt to check the authenticity of the stuff, thats why you are going to face some embarrassment next:

[quote]

TERRIFYING BELIEFS OF SHI'ITES

*Allaah often lies and does mistakes. (usool-e-kaafi, page #328, yaqoob kulaini, vol1). *

[/quote]

Lets forget about rest of your lies, take the following challenge if you have some shame:

If you can show me scan or online link from the book which says exactly same as you have asserted, the next moment I will change my madhab but if in case you do not prove it, you will have to accept that you are just another Nasibi wanting to spread menace around like your predecessors.

20

by the grace of Allah shia beliefs already been exposed, i challenge you prove me even one of such beliefs are wrong it is challenge for you.

if you want to see all beliefs from your books just google it you will find all of them from your own web site like hub-e-ali and many more.

also it looks out of topic could you have answer of following question.

PRODUCING BELOW THAT NAME OF HAZRAT ALI’S RA 18 SONS, IF SHIA BELEIVE IS TRUE WHY ALI RA SONS NAME UMER AKBAR, UMER ASGHAR, USMAN AKBAR, AS WE ALL AWARE THAT 2ND MERRAGE OF ALI RA WAS PERFORMED AFTER WISAL OF RASOOL PBUH AND WISAL OF HAZRAT FATIMA RA, THESE 15 SONS WAS BORN IN THE KHILAFAT PERIOD OF HAZRAT ABU BAKAR RA, UMER RA, USMAN RA AND ALI RA HIMSELF, IF WE BELEIVE ALI RA WAS ANGREE ON KHULFA ON THE ACCEPTANCE OF IMMAMAT ISSUE WHY ALI RA NAMED THEIR SONS ON THE NAME OF KHULFA.

Hadrat Hassan:razi:
Hadrat Hussain:razi:
Hadrat Abdullah Akbar
Hadrat Abdullah Ausat
Hadrat Abdullah Asghar
Muhammad Akbar( known as Ibn Hanfia- famous for requesting Hadrat Hussain :razi: not to go to Kaufa)
Muhammad Ausat
Muhammad Asghar(also known as abu bakr)
Jaffer Akbar
Jaffer Asghar
Umer Akbar
Umer Asghar
Usman Akbar
Usman Asghar
Abbas Akbar( Hadrat Abbas Ulamdar)
Abbas Asghar
Yahya
Aun

Timepass - February