Sharif deported to saudi arabia

LAHORE, Pakistan - A plane carrying exiled opposition leader Shahbaz Sharif landed in the eastern Pakistani city of Lahore on Tuesday, but the government immediately deported him amid an intense crackdown that has seen hundreds of his supporters arrested.

AP Photo

Information Minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed told The Associated Press that a Pakistan International Airlines plane carrying Sharif had taken off from the Lahore airport en route to Jiddah, Saudi Arabia.

“His plane has left,” Ahmed said. The plane took off just 90 minutes after Sharif arrived after more than three years in exile.

Sharif’s brother, former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, was toppled by President Gen. Pervez Musharraf in a bloodless coup in 1999. Musharraf has consolidated control since then, winning election as president in a referendum in which he was the only candidate.

The government has said the Sharif family was exiled to Saudi Arabia in 2000 for 10 years in a deal struck after Nawaz Sharif was convicted of trying to assassinate Musharraf as the coup unfloded. But the Supreme Court has said Shahbaz Sharif, who has been in London since a medical checkup there last year, has the right to return.

Authorities barricaded roads and detained more than 1,100 members of Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League-N party across Punjab province in the weeks ahead of his arrival “to prevent them from going to the Lahore airport to welcome Shahbaz Sharif,” party spokesman Binyamin Rizvi said.

PML-N chairman Raja Zafarul Haq said Sharif’s deportation was “highly condemnable” and “an insult to democracy.”

There were reports of several clashes between police and demonstrators as Sharif’s plane touched down in Lahore, with at least six activists and one policeman lightly injured. Activists pelted police with stones and shouted anti-government slogans, and police responded with tear gas and baton charges.

Reporters and other spectators were kept far from the airport, and Pakistani television said cell phone coverage around the facility was blocked. Hundreds of policemen were on hand to keep order. The Saudi Embassy said it had no information.

Shahbaz Sharif faces murder charges in connection with the 1998 killings of five men in Lahore. Their families claim he ordered police to fire on them when he was Punjab’s chief minister. It wasn’t clear if the charges would allow police to jail him when he stepped off the plane.

Sharif denies the charges, and said he was returning to defend himself.

“Now that they wish to incarcerate me, it’s up to them. If they want to try me, it’s up to them. If they want to deport me, it’s up to them,” he told reporters before leaving London. “But this would be a most deplorable, unconstitutional, unlawful measure, adding to the not very rosy history of Pakistan in terms of governance, both by the military and political leadership.”

In Lahore, Rizvi accused the police of raiding and closing three party offices and launching raids to arrest local party leaders.

Party officials accused police of arresting dozens of activists on Tuesday in cities across Punjab, including Multan, Gujranwala, Gujar Khan and Bahawalpur.

Police insisted the steps they had taken were for security. They said they’ve detained fewer than 100 people — who can be held for 90 days without charge to maintain public order.

“We are increasing security just to maintain law and order, and it is not fair to say that we are victimizing the opposition,” said police officer Aftab Cheema in Lahore.

Among the detainees was Mamoona Hashmi, daughter of Pakistan Muslim League-N acting president Javed Hashmi — who last month was jailed for 23 years on sedition charges.

Mamoona was detained Tuesday as she arrived at Lahore airport to greet Sharif.


Associated Press writer Paul Haven in Islamabad, Pakistan, contributed to this report.

The government has lost all credibility. Stooge No. 1 Sheikh Rashid clearly said that Shabby would not be deported.

Another victory for our justice system.

Lo dasso... ay ki victory hoyee...? phaRR ke jail ich sutt tay fer victory ho na...

Ay te kuch maza nayee aaya.

Ainee mehnat karr ke banda wapis ayay, te jet-lag vi nayee utriya tau auno tussi fer jahaaz ich bitha dita. durr fittay mooN.

jiho jay auray kartoot saan na auray naal ainj hi hona chaee da see warna khup pay janee see

:bukbuk:

Pathetic. If the army qubza group used even 1/3 of the resources for keeping Shahbaz out of Pakistan, to battle anti-shia terrorism we would would be all better off.

Entire Punjab police is busy acting as thugs for the army. When there is a terrorist attack, the best the rangers and police can do is come 2 hrs late and do lathi charge and then half expect people to put garlands on them for showing up their faces. do jotti marru

imdad, love to bring word punjab in any shape :)

well its not decision of Punjab Police to deport him but mushy and co.

firstly they should have been deported at the first place. for musharraf it was easy to get rid of him this way rather keep him in pak and open a new pandora box.

I personally think all the looters should be brought back and should be punished in Pakistan.

Looking at the judicial system , this will not going to happen looking at the records, no powerful has been convicted normally. its better if they are away from pak by any means!

Mushrraf just allowed all this shahbaz hoopla this far to make sure that PML(Q) ,under threat of disintegrating, shapes up. Now just see, today they announced the merger :~)

Regarding shahbaz shareef, well he knew he wont be able to live in pakistan. His sole attempt was to hold his head high and score some points in front of his workers and subordinates who hold grudges when he left them by making a deal instead of fighting it out in jails.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by saby: *
Mushrraf just allowed all this shahbaz hoopla this far to make sure that PML(Q) ,under threat of disintegrating, shapes up. Now just see, today they announced the merger :~)

Regarding shahbaz shareef, well he knew he wont be able to live in pakistan. His sole attempt was to hold his head high and score some points in front of his workers and subordinates who hold grudges when he left them by making a deal instead of fighting it out in jails.
[/QUOTE]

From the pictures available from BBC, it showed that Shahbaz was happy to be deported.

^
Shahbaz is quite a character! Choti Tind lol

There are a few things that need to be clarfied,

1- Is Mr Sharif a Pakistani Citizen, and if yes why was he denied entry into his country of Domicile or Nationality?? Irrespective of his (So Called) Crimes, He Could have been brought to Justice in Pakistan.

2- Is Mr Sharif a Non Pakistani Citizen, and if Yes was he issued a visa for pakistan (or did he require a visa) if yes was it not stupid (I mean Issuance of visa or a Waiver) ?? if no was it not even more stupid allowing him to board the flight in the first place??

And please dont say it was not PIA coz Visa rules are Visa Rules irrespective of the Carrier.

Last but not the least, did the aircraft need refueling in Pakistan after Landing, if yes I can understand the situation, but if NO couldnt the PAF have ordered the plane to turn around, and denied it landing??

Any Takers??

regards

Aejaz

1) Yes; he and his family signed a 10 year exile deal with the govt.
2) No
3) It was a Passanger aircraft that was carrying other civilians which had nothing to do with the whole incident. They could not have been denied entry. Also Sharif was returned on a seperate plane.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by lunaticCalm: *
1) Yes; he and his family signed a 10 year exile deal with the govt.
[/QUOTE]
This is the whole question. He claims he did not sign anything and no one else has a right to sign on his behalf. For example, will you accept if Allah Rakha of Gujranwala signs a piece of paper saying lunaticCalm will not return to Pakistan for 10 years? I don't think so. His brother or his family had no right to sign on his behalf. And if he didn't sign it, how could he be denied entry into Pakistan. If he has committed any crime, register a case, throw him in jail and try him. What the heck is an exile??? Is it part of Pakistan's new constitution or penal code?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Faisal: *
This is the whole question. He claims he did not sign anything and no one else has a right to sign on his behalf. For example, will you accept if Allah Rakha of Gujranwala signs a piece of paper saying lunaticCalm will not return to Pakistan for 10 years? I don't think so. His brother or his family had no right to sign on his behalf. And if he didn't sign it, how could he be denied entry into Pakistan. If he has committed any crime, register a case, throw him in jail and try him. What the heck is an exile??? Is it part of Pakistan's new constitution or penal code?
[/QUOTE]

Faisal Bhai,

I agree with everything you said except the Exile part.

Exile = Self Imposed.

Deportation = Government Imposed.

and as per the news Mr Sharif was Deported!!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by lunaticCalm: *
1) Yes; he and his family signed a 10 year exile deal with the govt.
2) No
3) It was a Passanger aircraft that was carrying other civilians which had nothing to do with the whole incident. They could not have been denied entry. Also Sharif was returned on a seperate plane.
[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the reply, one question still remains, Why was he allowed to board the Plane??

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Aejaz: *
and as per the news Mr Sharif was Deported!!
[/QUOTE]
That may be so. I was responding to lunaticCalm's post where he said the family signed a deal for 10 years of 'exile'. Since when did 'exile' become a part of Pakistan's penal code? If the family has committed crimes, they should be fully tried and punished. Going to exile in the palaces of Saudi Arabia, that are paid for by the immense corruption perpetrated against the people of Pakistan by these very people is a black spot for our nation.

And "deportation"? If I am not wrong, 'deportation' is a process in which a government kicks out a foreigner from their land. Since when did a government started deporting their own citizens? Do you ever hear that US government is considering "deporting" Kobe Bryant for raping a woman in Colorado or that Michael Jackson is going to be 'deported'? Its all BS.

:k: :k:

I take back the Deportation Issue

Yes I fully agree that Shahbaz has the right to try to enter pakistan. But the way he approached the issue was quite baffling and lead to beleive that all he wanted to do was to score some points.

IMO, he could have asked saudi Govt. that he wishes to remain in pakistan, Then he could have legally approached Pakistani govt that the deal does not apply on him as he never signed it.

Though personally i feel for him.

Frankly, personally, I don't feel for him at all.

But the way Pak government dealt with the whole thing was absurd, over-reaction and totally making a mockery of law and justice.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Faisal: *
And "deportation"? If I am not wrong, 'deportation' is a process in which a government kicks out a foreigner from their land. Since when did a government started deporting their own citizens? Do you ever hear that US government is considering "deporting" Kobe Bryant for raping a woman in Colorado or that Michael Jackson is going to be 'deported'? Its all BS.
[/QUOTE]

Exactly right .