Re: Sharia Law in NWFP
Well Mercenary2k you have a point here, but only due to the reason that you have seen "Kingdom of Heavens" with the good projection of a muslim leader and that in a hollywood production for the first time. And yet you kept It in your mind as best memories of a muslim leader as ever.
Not really buddy
I have been saying that ever since I joined Gupshup
I have a read a lot of books on the Crusades and I know in great detail about Saladin before Kingdom of Heaven came out
Quite fascinating for you (which I can understand) but the laws you are refering to of have been used in past by a lot other muslim leaders as well, but non are ever to be mentioned in hollywood movies neither in western story books.
And did I use them examples to show how true Sharia law is suppose to be practiced?
Nevertheless, It is true that KSA has changed the shariah laws on their behalf, but so have other leaders too.
thank you for agreeing with me
The great difference was that the Sauds with Abdul Wahhabs major influence gave Shariah a very "conservative touch".
A conservative touch is misleading. When Abdul Wahhab started preaching, Saudi Arabia was under Ottoman rule. Wahhab beleived that Ottomans were not representing the true form of Islam and thus Arabs must practice Islam as it was done during the 7th Century
And as we speak of It. Why was there never enough pressure by the US of A + Canada on KSA to adopt democracy instead of ruling the country under monarchic system and that with a Shariah Law? Just to make you understand my worries.
And when have I said that USA or the West don't have double standards when it comes to these things
Shariah laws and monarch don't fit together and a monarchic system is an insult on Islam and can never work as combination ever!
Totally agree
Even the Caliph was a democratically elected leader chosen by scholars
Democracy is true political representation of Sharia Law but that goes against the very essence of the Taliban and other extremists who have said that Democracy is un-Islamic
So it proves my point yet again