Sex with slaves

Re: Sex with slaves

*No, I'm not supporting that at all and I don't think it was right, however that was the norm of the time. We are talking centuries ago and history is not always picture perfect or the way we would like. I also believe that the reason it is easier to see women as property in this day and time because of thinking like this through the centuries. *

** As far as religion supporting it, it was legal at the time. All nations had slaves, everywhere, it was a fact. Religions dealt with this issue the best they could in the mindset of that day. Do you doubt that slaves were a part of everyday life? Then why wouldn't there be guidelines on owning, caring, and using slaves? As a civilization we evolved beyond the thinking that slaves were short of being human and realized that the institutuion of slavery is outdated and a violation of a person's basic rights. But if you read any historical account of those times right on up to early America, slaves were second class.**

I don't understand your viewpoint. History treated women as property...history also shows that baby girls were buried alive. Should Islam have made concessions for burying girls alive as well? Is there any point in history where burying alive ur child becomes morally acceptable and scriptorally approved? Slaves being viewed as less than human or as objects is a human construct; and God should not give into human illusions of their own grandeur. If slavery as an institution is objectively immoral; then God should have stated this in what is meant to be the final and last religion of mankind (or any previous religions as well..but especially the last). The Prophet was continously asked to make concessions with the faith by the pagans; like allowing a few 'side' Gods. Why would God want to appease to cultural demands that are inconsistent with the "truth"; when the Muslim faith was under attack from the same culture. Alcoholism was a cultural aspect of those people as well; this got slammed down in 3 or so steps. Slavery has no such equivalent. It has not been made "haraam". So if one is to believe in the Qu'ran; then you cannot believe in our current cultural mindset that "slavery is wrong; slaves should be treated as equals IF anyone kept slaves..which one shouldn't".

Religion does not support anything because the current people have a law that allows it......religion asserts whats legal and illegal over any of the original cultural practices because it is revealed to THOSE people for the specific reason that their practices and laws are skewed.

Alcohol isn't bad for you but good: it is bad in excess. It was forbidden because of its potential for damage in society, even though it had some benefits. Slavery also has great potential for damage in society (as has been shown continously in history), yet for some reason..alcohol is deemed more haraam than slavery!!

**
I know everyone likes to think that their book is perfect, etc, but the men who wrote these books existed in another time. As holy as they were, they were also human and no human was perfect or God himself. The same for the Bible. They dealt with what they knew in the mindset of that day. Even the Christian Saints, as holy as they are to me, were imperfect human beings just closer to God's ideal than I am.**

Ok, but your position is not what I'm arguing. It is the orthodox interpetation that the book IS perfect and human culture has no influence on it that i am talking about.

Why is it that you should assume that it would be valid now simply because it was valid then? It is like saying that you should be without running water and electricity because the Qu'ran (insert your book here) doesn't mention them. Civilizations change and evolved beyond what man can concieve because man is limited.

My question about slavery being valid now because it was valid then is to those on this board who say that cultural interpetation is not acceptable. It is also a question as to whether it WAS valid 1400 years ago to keep slaves ...or were they wrong in allowing this..giving into their cultural norm. Now if we think about it: lawfully allowing slaves has a GREAT potential for misuse (social degredation). Women leading prayers has very SMALL potential for social degredation. Forbidden slavery would have caused people back 1400 years ago some minor incoveniences..and they could just as well just hire people as employees (the religion could have recommended this as an alternative to 'slavery'). So what is the reason that such a crucial issue was not made unlawful. And if we are to beleive the Qu'ran message is applicable to all times; then our position on slavery should not change. It shuold not be viewed as primitive; but a natural way of life.

I agree, but again, the reason slavery existed was that it wasn't considered immoral to own slaves, it was acceptable and gave status to a person who owned them. I agree with the statment that a slave 1400 years ago should be as human and worthy of a better life then a slave today, however do you really believe that was a fact? Remember that religion was a baby, if you will. It wasn't fully formed. I am sure there were a lot of moral people, but the cultural and societal norms were different. Again, you are making a mistake in assuming that respect was automatically given to slaves because they were human, it wasn't, they were property. Most were won in battle, some were bought at a price. In either of those situations, in the first there is a contempt for a people that would allow themselves to defeated (OR in later times God allowed it because they were destined to be that way) so they deserved the treatment they got or in the case of a bought slave contempt for a person who would allow that.

Religion was apparently not a baby 1400 years ago but in its final form. It could not be asserting the arabic cultural norm of slavery and female objectification to all of mankind for the future!! based on what? that the arabs back then thought it was good to have as many slaves and women as u could? religion does not cater to such ridiculous aspritations of greedy men! No matter how babyish a religion may be. There are some truths that you do not need to give concessions to from culture to culture. For example compare: institution of slavery and eating pigs. If humans are to reach a stage in evolution where they are too good to eat pigs; then they certainly should not be keeping slaves or thinking of them as property. I dont see any consistency! Why not, as the last religion, strike down on slavery as an example for the future! The reason why slavery flourished so much in America was because Islamic teachings did not prevent Arabs from selling off slaves to white colonialists. This LAWFUL attitude towards slavery BACKFIRED!

**828 - What are you going to do to change history? You can't, you accept that things happened - bad and good - and make a better world from that point on. You may see it as a cop-out but what kind of dealing with it do you mean considering how many centuries ago this happened?

I cannot comment on what the Qu'ran position is, my knowledge is limited to what my husband interprets for me. I am not saying don't talk about old history, what I am saying is to look into the reasons for it and move on. Some things will not be applicable today simply because civilization has moved to a point were it is a non-issue or because a moral shift in the people. Morally, we as a civilization do not condone slavery, it is not mainstream as it was centuries before.

Again, it is what God has dictated to man, an imperfect vessel. Some were closer to God than others, but no one can claim perfection. That alone is God. As much as people are going to hate this, man makes mistakes.
**

But how are we supposed to evaluate our morality? If people here are asserting that we should only look to the Qu'ran for moral guidance...then we would never come to the conclusion that slavery should be abolished. We have used humanistic thinking to come to that conclusion..and when it is in conflict with Islamic teachings: we excuse ourselves by saying that the issue was "in the past" so its irrelevant.

WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON!

brain explodes

Re: Sex with slaves

[QUOTE]
brain explodes
[/QUOTE]

lol, Thank God, that circle we had going there was doing the same to me :)

Re: Sex with slaves

Very true …it is childish and extremely stupid to assume that wars will ever end an illusion like that was shattered by WW1 at the start of 20th centuary
so take heed “let him who desires peace, prepare for war”-Flavius vegetius

Re: Sex with slaves

Again I agree we are not here to pass judgement on what Allah and his prophet(PBUH) has made lawful.

Re: Sex with slaves

I do not know any Bible Verse regarding permission about having sex with your slave, but I do know that two hundred years ago, when slavery was permissible in USA, this was not a taboo. You cannot find as many pure black African Americans as you can the mixed breeds.
If sex with slaves was permissible when slavery was rife in USA, why do you find it disturbing if it occured more than a thousand years ago?
Someone mentioned that slavery was still practised in Pakistan. That is a lie. I have lived in Pakistan for fifty years, travelled far and wide, but have not found any part of the society practising it.

Re: Sex with slaves

You wouldn't. The sex slaves are tied down in basements in the homes of men who have them.

Re: Sex with slaves

which would imply that its socially unacceptable in a Muslim society to have sex slaves.

Re: Sex with slaves

Surah al-ahzab is chapter 33 doesnt have those verses..i think u were refering to surah al-mumenoon

Re: Sex with slaves

I suggest a reading of others books and what it says about men having relations with women other than their wives. It's quite enlightening. People should really educate themselves first, especially muslims with the amount of disdain that people have for Islam these days.

After studying several different religions, I dont know of any other religion that speaks of women as well as Islam does. Go ahead and laugh, but I stick by my statement.

Regarding slavery in Islam, there are plenty of books on it that explain it very well. If you need a title, just PM me. smile

Re: Sex with slaves

This is a figment of imagination. Women exploitation is not uncommon in Pakistan; it is not more common than in other countries of Asia. But the kind described by you does not exist.

Re: Sex with slaves

Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem

In order to understand the allowance to have sex with slave girls (not slave boys) it should be known that slavery is not the invention of Islam but it had been the practice of people from ancient times.
Islam is the religion that took the initiative so that the slavery can be stopped in the world and for that Islam encouraged manumitting (freeing) slaves and so great companions like Saiyidina Zayd bin Haritha and Saiyidina Bilal Habshi ridhwanullahe 'alayhim ajma'een were manumitted slaves by the Prophet Muhammad sallAllahu 'alayhe wasallam and Saiyidina Abu Bakr As-Siddeeq radhiyAllahu 'anhu.

With this introduction I want to clarify that there are social practices which can't be abandoned all at once and they take time to go, the example of drinking wine is there. This in fact is the part of human creation and nature that habits and practices take time to go, e.g giving up smoking or taking drugs or anxiolytics.
So today we can see that there is almost no slavery existing in this world except some remote cases with a possibility (though I am not aware of them).

Now if we go back at the time of the Prophet Muhammad sallAllahu 'alayhe wasallam, where people kept slave girls, Islam could never forget their rights which were never protected before Islam. As off course they would be the property of their masters who might use them as they wished. There wouldn't be any security for their honour, they might be the victims of so many men, in other words they might be sex objects as used by many people through their masters.

What Islam gave these slave girls was restricting them to their masters only. And if we compare this slave girl - master relationship with marriage (nikah), we don't find any difference except that the Wife enjoys more rights than a slave girl does.
In nikah (marriage) witnesses are called and the purpose of calling for witness is to announce the nikah and make it known that the couple would stay together in order to fulfil their human desires.
The slave girl's being the slave of her master is already known to everyone, everyone knows that the so and so slave girl is owned by the so and so master, so if they have a sexual relationship they don't need to proclaim anything as calling for witness.
In nikah and slave girl - master relationship both, the girl can sleep with only one same man.

Such a relationship can never be compared to Adultery or Mut'ah, both of what are haraam in our religion.

Some people showed their dislike towards this slaver girl - master relationship, though there is nothing to dislike except the slavery itself.
No master would want to marry his slave girl with someone else on whom he paid money.

More than everything, we as Muslims should be careful, we can't criticise the commands of our Creator. We dont know everything, only Allah knows the best:

وَالَّذِينَ هُمْ لِفُرُوجِهِمْ حَافِظُونَ

And those who guard their chastity, (70:29)

إِلَّا عَلَى أَزْوَاجِهِمْ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُمْ فَإِنَّهُمْ غَيْرُ مَلُومِينَ

Except with their wives and the (captives) whom their right hands possess,- for (then) they are not to be blamed, (70:30)

فَمَنِ ابْتَغَى وَرَاء ذَلِكَ فَأُوْلَئِكَ هُمُ الْعَادُونَ

But those who trespass beyond this are transgressors;- (70:31)

Re: Sex with slaves

Can we consider the following verse:

[3:7] He sent down to you this scripture, containing straightforward verses - which constitute the essence of the scripture - as well as multiple-meaning or allegorical verses. Those who harbor doubts in their hearts will pursue the multiple-meaning verses to create confusion, and to extricate a certain meaning. None knows the true meaning thereof except GOD and those well founded in knowledge. They say, "We believe in this - all of it comes from our Lord." Only those who possess intelligence will take heed.

Can this verse that has to do with slavery and sex with slaves be one of those multiple meaning verses or one of theose verses that are used by the enemies of God to muddy the waters so to speak? Why are we even talking about this when you and I don't even have slaves? Shouldn't we concern ourselves with more important issues like "Did we think about God today? Did we thank Him? How about yesterday? How about the day before? Did we ask for forgiveness today? How about yesterday? Did we recite the Quran at dawn today?"

These are the true tricks of the devil, bringing up issues that have nothing to do with you and me and making us discuss/argue about a moot topic. I'm not saying slavery does not exist today because it does, specially in the house of saud (may God destroy them all). But slavery related issues do not concern us if we don't have slaves.

It isn't without a sense of irony that the person who started this thread is named Lucifer.

Re: Sex with slaves

I don’t agree with you, I don’t know who started this topic but this topic is in Quran and as Muslims everyone of us must learn Quran, so your reservations and reasons for not discussing such issues are baseless.

Moreover you blame people to pop up issues though you yourself did the same, read it yourself:

People should sweep before their own door!

Re: Sex with slaves

ladies, gentlemen and all others who wish to debate anything in the quran, lets all pack up and go home now … your debate is baseless. :mad:

Re: Sex with slaves

One person can’t be ladies, gentlemen and all others, at a time.

Re: Sex with slaves

Not applicable today? I thought the Quran was the complete guideline to life, and that these guidelines were eternal? I’m also disturbed by that verse, and don’t see any justification to having sex with slaves.

=)
=)

Re: Sex with slaves

One can be a wretch or a brute…ladies and gentelment are not a duality…

Re: Sex with slaves

Uhh ok, you make absolutely no sense, but OK. Maybe the verse that I quoted about verses existing in the Quran that hold multiple meanings and are used by disbelievers to confuse people, what about that verse? Should we not take that verse and deduce that there are in fact verses in the Quran that might not be worth discussing if they don’t apply to us? Do you learn all about divorce law if you’re not even married (Lawyers are barred from this charge)?

Re: Sex with slaves

You should be given the title of Father of the Ignorant, as you are teaching everyone to remain ignorant and never seek knowledge unless it is related to you. So according to your logic a doctor shouldn’t learn how to drive a car unless he buys a car and before buying the car it is haraam for him to learn driving. An aeroplane pilot must not learn how to fly, only when he takes the plane off…SubhaanAllah, sadqay jaawaannn

Re: Sex with slaves

I don’t know what you mean by history, as the sex is allowed with slave girls as is proven by the Sunnah.
You can disagree with me if you are a shia, then I know you have your own history.