Sex with slaves

Re: Sex with slaves

Name Julia - Canada
Topic Politics & Economics

Title What is “a captive that your right hands possess”?

Question Hi, as-salaamu alaikum, i am confused about the following statement that is often a part of verses you quote from the Qur'an: "(a captive) that your right hands possess"

What exactly is "a captive that your right hands possess"? It was always my understanding that Islam forbade slavery as slavery and equality contradicted one another. I would appreciate if you could explain.

Wa `alaykum salaam waramatullah wabarakatuh!

Dear sister Julia, thanks for your question.

You are right. Islam forbade slavery for it is the religion that gives rights of individuals, males or females. It made this as clear as daylight, many centuries ago, before the slogan of “human rights” came to be known to the Westerners.

Slavery was not initiated by Islam, it had been in practice long before the advent of Islam. As we know, it’s the custom of war to have captives and those captives or prisoners used to be turned into slaves and concubines by their masters. This was not the case only in the pre-Islamic Arab regions, but it was there every other place. It was even worse in some societies, especially with women. She was subject to all kinds of injustice, oppression and barbarian treatment. This went as far as that Greeks used to consider her a mere commodity, to be bought and sold. As for Romans, she was a slave already by nature, even without being captured at war!

In short, Islam is not the religion that jeopardizes the rights of woman, as Western scholars would have us believe, concocting any ideas to distort the image of Islam. Was it Islam that considered woman as being responsible for the banishing of man from Paradise? Was it Islam that took women as being the cause of all evils or regarded her as serpents? Was it in Islam that a meeting was held to debate whether woman could be regarded as a human being or not? No! This took place in France in 587 C.E. Actually all this was the norm of the day in the past Western civilizations. Yes, it was also the habit in the pre-Islamic Arab, when female babies used to be buried alive.

When Islam came, it tried to put an end to all such inhumane practices. It left no stone unturned in its quest to let women have their rights and dignity restored. This is clearly manifest in the way Islam handled the issue of slavery. Right from the start, Islam set a goal to eradicate this barbaric system. Yet, it needed to be done gradually, as the case with all bad habits that have gained ground. People never give up easily!

So, first of all it confined the issue of taking captives to the period of warfare. This is just as a situation necessitated by hostility between warring states. Then it allowed the female captives to be married by their captors. But why? Does this mean giving men a golden chance to unleash their sexual desires or to sexually brutalize those captives? No, not at all!

Here lies certain wisdom that completely escapes the mind of those Western scholars, who take this issue to launch attacks against Islam.

As we know, after the end of hostility, it’s the norm that prisoners of war be freed and exchanged through mutual agreement between the parties. Islam has made this clear in its divine texts that the captives must be freed through ransom or without ransom. Also, it’s socially understood that marrying freed female captives, would normally secure their rights, more than would be the case if they were set free without any guarantee for survival or for preserving their dignity.

Thus, Islam gave them hope of survival, trying to prevent their becoming prostitutes. In fact, they would have definitely found it hard to find suitors, even from among their free male counterparts, who’d suspect them of being ravished by their captors. Though glimmer it may be in the beginning, this hope soon turned glittering by securing them a marital home, whereby their rights and dignity would be secured.

Here comes the issue of “ma malakat aimanukum” (what your right hands possess). This is mentioned in many verses in the Qur’an, like the following:
If any of you have not the means wherewith to wed free believing women, they may wed believing girls from among those whom your right hands possess: And God hath full knowledge about your faith. Ye are one from another: Wed them with the leave of their owners, and give them their dowers, according to what is reasonable: ...

Surah 4 Verse 25

This verse confirms what I have just said; opening the door for female slaves or captives to be married by destitute Muslims who cannot afford the dowry of free women. Notice here that the Qur’an uses the expression “what your right hands.” What is the significance of this expression?

The word “right hands” here refers to women taken as prisoners of war. It is by no means an implication of concubinage, for this is totally prohibited in Islam. Nor does it refer to purchasing female slaves from market to be used to satisfy sexual urge. It’s during warfare that the right hand actually takes possession of captives, and this is what the Qur’an means. That’s point number one.

Point number two is that, the word “right hands possess” also has another significance that clearly reflects the great concern Islam has for preserving the rights of those captives. As we know, the right hand has its special merit and privileged functions that man instinctively reserve for it. Imam Kurtubi, in his commentary on this verse, says: “Allah Almighty uses the word ‘right hand’ here for it denotes great honor and respect. It suffices that it’s the one used when referring to spending, as mentioned in the hadith ‘… he who provides charity (seeking only Allah’s reward) in a way that his left hand does not know what his right hand spends …’ And it is the very hand used in making pledge of allegiance … etc.”

All this indicates that the word “what your right hand possess” has a special and glorified meaning in Islamic usage. In fact, it signifies the great care and good treatment that captives or prisoners of wars should be accorded. This is how Islam dealt with the issue from the earliest stages.

All this did not materialize all of a sudden, for slavery was a social ailment that needed to be addressed. So it was a gradual strategy laid down by Islam, not only to eradicate slavery, but also to give the freed slaves a complete social rehabilitation. First of all, Islam stipulated that all masters should take care of their captives; they should not be overburdened with tasks, nor should they be deprived of their human rights. The Prophet (pbuh) made this clear in his hadith that masters should treat their slaves as their brothers and female captives as their sisters, if not in faith, at least in humanity. He said:

“Your servants are thy brethren. Allah has put them under your control. He could, if He willed, make you under their control. Thus, whoever has his brother under his control, let him feed him of his same food and dress him of his same dress. Never saddle them with work that goes beyond their capability. If the work happens to be somehow difficult, lend them a helping hand.”

As for female captives, Imam Bukhari quotes the Prophet, as saying:

“If any of you have a slave girl, whom he gives good education and excellent training, and then he emancipates her and marries her, he shall have a two-fold reward.”

You see; that’s how Islam set the course of emancipating slaves. They should definitely be well treated. Also, educating female captives and marrying them, after emancipation is considered an act of charity, which would earn one great reward. Not only that. Islam further put an end to the habit of using derogative names of “slaves” or “servants”. For in Islam, man must not show servitude to anyone besides Allah the Almighty. So it was stipulated that the captives should be addressed by “fatah” (boy) or “fatat” (girl). Besides, the act of emancipating slaves used to be a competitive work among the Prophet’s Companions, for it was highly recommended by Islam and was considered an act of worship.

What’s more, Islam has also made use of what was an international custom during that era; i.e. the custom of having intercourse with female captives. Here Islam stipulated that if through sexual intercourse, the female slave got pregnant from her master, she would automatically gain her freedom. So would her child, for he’d be born free then. What a wise approach to eliminate a bad habit! So it was not a means of unleashing sexual desires. Otherwise, it would have been something permanent, being pregnant would have availed the slave woman nothing, for she’d remain the property of her master no matter how. No, Islam was not after such a sensual and voluptuous goal.

Sister Julia, to cover all the aspects of humane treatment of slave women in Islam, it’d take volumes of books. So I think this brief remark will do for now.

Does Islam allow Slavery?

If you have any further inquiry don’t hesitate to contact us. Thanks.

Mr. Lamaan Ball editor of Ask About Islam adds:

Islam effectively prohibited slavery by prohibiting making people slaves in any way except temporarily during wars. Once the war is over, such people must either be freed by negotiation and ransom (e.g. exchanges of prisoners of war) or set free without any ransom.

There were many ways that existing slaves could become freed including those mentioned by Kamal but also to gain God’s forgiveness for doing a sin, setting a slave free was commanded in the Qur’an. Freeing slaves was also one of the clear priorities for government spending of Zakat(obliged charity spending administered by the state).

Re: Sex with slaves

i Got the following from this website: http://www.islamonline.net/askaboutislam/display.asp?hquestionID=2852
plz remember that if something is stated in the quran it should not be questioned. and that all depends on how much u believe in the authenticity of the quran, for in the first line of the quran it clearly states that, the book is for those who believe. islam does not need u, u need islam. so if u want to pick at it, then go somewhere else. dont try to change the religion just so ur christian friends won’t think ur backwards. accept as it is, if u believe. if u don’t want to, then get lost, no one is forcing u, u were given a choice and free will.
another point is the fact that Islam also makes it permissable to eat the meat of christians and jews, and later says to eat only zabiha. this is not a contradiction. Allah first sent three books before the quran, each book was an ammended version of the previous. likewise the quran it slef is the last book, and no more books will come down after it, but the quran was revealed over a period of a few years, and also has ammendments within it self. why allah chose not to send down the quran in the first place instead of three other books, or make changes in it, is for him to know. if he wanted us to know the deatails he would have told us. i hope the following helps. if not, plz dont point fingers at the quran, the problem is in ur thinking.

Re: Sex with slaves

So the Qu'ran could have practically ANYTHING in it and you would agree to it? The Qu'ran
itself tells you to think an understand....its not a book that says: if you don't agree with me get the F outta here.
No, the book was "released" infront of the harshest of critics the pagan Arabs..and its released to the world. It has made a claim that it is the truth and that it is perfect. People ask questions because things aren't consistent or don't make sense; threatening the perfection of the Qu'ran.

Don't tell people to get lost just because you are afraid the perfection of the Qu'ran is at stake. If it is the truth then why are you worried? You should happily let people question and interrogate. When Muslims respond to others by stating: we don't know, Allah knows..then how is the Qu'ran supposed to stand up to its claim? Its not right to make the claim of perfection and then when an issue is brought up..its answered with...um..we feeble human minds cannot understand. That is just a scapegoat excuse!

If you (or any person or religion) make such a strong claim like "i am truth..the rest of u are wrong"..then u better take the criticism, the questions and answer them with logic and reasoning. Don't tell me "its in there, so its right". Right or wrong isn't proven by some words existing between the front and back covers of a book.

Re: Sex with slaves

I did'nt know Taliban raped Hutus and Tutsis.....But I guess you have to retaliate if your goats are being raped by shias....

Re: Sex with slaves

YES I WOULD AGREE TO EVREYTHING AND NETHING THAT BOOK SAYS! I WAS BORN INTO ISLAM, BUT I CHOSE TO CONTINUE IT, ADN I CHOSE IT AFTER KNOWING EVERYHTING ABOUT IT. EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING! IF U HAVEN'T, THEN U GOT SOME THINKING TO DO.

yes, the quran does tell u to think and understand, and even learn about it and islam, but not question its authenticity and ridicule it, or say that something from the quran disturbs u. if u dont understand soemthing, ask about it, research it, ponder over it, learn. dont ridicule it. i had the same question with the subject. i found what it meant. and i accept it. if u choose to believe some parts of isalm, adn not others than u r following some other unkown religion, not islam. who r u trying to fool ne ways by doing that?
Nobody is afraid that teh perfection of the quran is at stake. That will never be my dear. we are afraid that certain dumb people want to cause a seperation in the unity of muslims by making such claims. they want to twist words around. no one can ever harm the quran or islam. my job is to try and protect it, even if i cant. and that is what i am doing by telling others not to twist words. learn about what they mean first, befoere u say something is contradicitng.

and allah does always know everything, there is alot we will never know. that is a basic teaching of islam. u can not be muslim if u dont believe that.
and allah knows best!

Re: Sex with slaves

"YES I WOULD AGREE TO EVREYTHING AND NETHING THAT BOOK SAYS! I WAS BORN INTO ISLAM, BUT I CHOSE TO CONTINUE IT, ADN I CHOSE IT AFTER KNOWING EVERYHTING ABOUT IT. EVERYTHING AND ANYTHING! IF U HAVEN'T, THEN U GOT SOME THINKING TO DO."

Great...so then you won't have any problem if a Christian felt the same for a Bible, a Jew for the Torah ...hindu, buddhist, zoroastrian ...and on and on??? But I'm quite sure i know the answer to that. You will still believe that person is wrong and should question THEIR book or else they will end up in hell fire. That's called double standards.

Why cannot we question Qu'ran's authenticity? Do you just want someone to believe in it with blind faith and ignorance? By accepting the authenticity you automatically accept every letter in the book as perfection; based on nothing but belief and what people around you believe. But then how can you question any statement, any contradiction, any inconsistency..if you have made the presupposition that it is correct and unrighteous to question?

I'm not trying to fool anyone here to mislead anyone. I don't think it is right to find out excuses for things in the Qu'ran instead of actually considering for a second that what's in there might not necessarily be right. See, that is what you and others are doing. If you face an issue in the Qu'ran that makes you think, you do not consider if there is something wrong with it, but you go looking for reasons to it. There's nothing wrong with that, but whats wrong is with exclusively looking only for reasons supporting it and not considering the other alternative: that it simply is an incorrect or inconsistent statemtn.

Because you will take the first reason and hold on to it, and will suspend any logic to hold on to it. This is what you mean when you say "i found what it meant. and i accept it." You accept it only because you have already made up your mind that: sex with slaves is part of Quran and therefore acceptable and therefore there is a reason..so..gimme any reason. Logic and reasoning have no value when you have already made up your mind. Then why even bother trying to find reasons to questions about the Quran?

You think I'm ridiculing Qu'ran..but no..i am ridiculing the excuses that you are offering to me as to why its ok to have sex with slaves. My point is that its inconsistent with the sanctity of marriage. It provides no useful function to the greater good of society. All points given in favor of it are very myopic:
- female slaves have needs that will be satisfied by their master having intercourse with them at their discretion and without the master's wive/s approval
- female slaves who have lost their husbands in war with the same country can no enjoy having intercourse with one of the men that was part of the enemy army
- if an accidental childbirth happened..your reward is to be married to this man who wanted to just have intercourse with you but no other emotional bond (regardless of whether he already had wive/s).
- Oh and i almost forgot my favourite: there is no islamic state, slavery doesn't exist, so only stupid people argue about sex with slaves.

The people who were at the forefront of this religion, the founders, they participated in this act..this act is IN the Qu'ran AND hadith...it is NOT a bygone topic that is irrelevant..that is a very immature excuse to sidestep the real issue that this is not an easy topic for ourseves to digest. Why is that? Because no one would be able to justify this law if there were no holy book. The only reason why you agree to it right now is because it is within the covers of the book. Otherwise, you wouldn't have made the leap of faith to accept this as allowable. Once again, the only defense you have athis moment is that sex with slaves DID occur in Islamic history in Hadith ..and it is mentioned in the Qu'ran as allowable : and so you return to the safety of your blind faith by stating..its in there so its ok..let's not question it. Then does God want us to question nothing? Is God ok with people of other religions not questioning their faith and living in their own false religion? Just for a second..work with me here..if Islam happened to be false..and the Qu'ran was almost perfect but not quite..then how would its people find out if they couldn't question their own belief system? I am not claiming Islam is false or the Qu'ran is..im giving an analogy...im trying to make you step into the shoes of people in other religions.

Re: Sex with slaves

First of all the purpose of starting this thread is not for ridiculing Quran. Also I don’t think that there is anything wrong with saying ‘that Quranic verse disturbs me’.

If you found what it meant then could you please enlighten me why sex with salves is ok in Islam while at the same time there is severe punishment for fornication and adultery in Quran. So far no one has explained any appropriate reason. Most of the ‘representative’ of Islam on religion forum did not even bother to participate in this thread because they don’t have any clue themselves. The only decent answer I got (which I didn’t agree with) came from a Minh_Pa a CATHOLIC person.

Re: Sex with slaves

828 I WILL try to say this one more time. I never said that there is anything wrong in having or asking questions about the quran. I had a million of em. i looked for answers. to me everything made sense. so i am still practicing islam. i never said that u should have blind faith, ALlah did. and faith is blind, there is no way to prove it, thats why its called faith, even for a christian, jew or hindu. everyone not only should but will be responsible for searching for what they believe is right. if to a chrisitian everything makes sense, then thats her/his decision. they will be held responsible for it, likewise i will be responsible for mine. I can not doubt the authenticity of the quran, it maeks no sense. its like saying i odn't believe in my biology book. i do.

Re: Sex with slaves

i think its wrong to say that, u may not think so.
as for ur second question, read my first post, if u want more help, i will gladly try to look more up.

Re: Sex with slaves

But how can anyone be held responsible on faith if you yourself are claiming it has nothing to do with proof, therefore not much to do with logic or reason…but where you were born and what book you have read that ‘appeals’ to your emotional state..thus resulting in faith. Is Faith something that can be choosed or is it sometihng like “love”..it just happens? If so, then how can anyone be held responsible for what faith “just happens”? It seems to me that this would be a very bad way to judge for someone’s eternal life. I dont see how a decision can be made on something like religion if it claims it can only be received through a blind acceptance. You have accepted the Qu’ran version of God as true, because of your faith in it…but would you jump ship to the Biblical Trinity God? No, you wouldn’t because of you would not want to question your God..but feel really happy about putting down the other “foreign” God. But if we put the foot in the other shoe, and think of a Christian, then should they also not question their God and just put down our God? Where is the consistency?

Re: Sex with slaves

But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (O Muhammad SAW) judge in all disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept (them) with full submission. (An-Nisa 4:65)
so if having any "resistant" in the hearts about the decisions of prophet SAW is kufr, imagine having any resistance to the verses of quran. there can be no bigger kufr than that.

we do not apologize for islam. islam is perfect. slavery is allowed by islam and any one who makes haram what Allah has made halal is kafir.

O you who believe! Make not unlawful the Taiyibât which Allâh has made lawful to you, and transgress not. Verily, Allâh does not like the transgressors. (Al-Ma'idah 5:87)

And say not concerning that which your tongues put forth falsely: "This is lawful and this is forbidden," so as to invent lies against Allâh. Verily, those who invent lies against Allâh will never prosper. (An-Nahl 16:116)

if something in quran disturbes you, then look into your heart and ask yourself, am i even a believer? for doubting quran is an act only for kuffar. a momin can never doubt ANY verse in it.

Re: Sex with slaves

" for doubting quran is an act only for kuffar. a momin can never doubt ANY verse in it."

That is VERY dangerous.

1) your belief in a verse is MOST LIKELY not based on your own logic or reason, but on which sheikh, friend, parent, internet website, translation told you. This is dependent on the above person's bias and reasoning: which is not necessarily the truth.
2) This is double standards. Its ok for you to not doubt the Qu'ran, but its not ok for a Christian to do the same to the Bible; cause he'll end up in hell (i would use the same points if i was talking to an evangelist christian)
3) Your above statement is NOT based on your knowledge of the Qu'ran, but due to a socially transmitted belief. You are literally putting your future in the balance by accepting what is the common concept of truth held by other people without any intellectual rigour.
4) To doubt is human. The reason someone doubts is because all the information is not readily available. I doubt because I wasn't there when the angel transmitted the words to the Prophet. Its been 1400 years since those days; I wasn't there when it was been put back in place by the Caliphs and scribes. To not doubt is again..ignorance. I thought that Islam was against ignorance; how else would the pagans, the Christians, the Jews realize of the truth? But this same test must be applied to ourselves. We must be able to doubt our own stuff to show others that we are not being one sided.

Re: Sex with slaves

what if non-muslim relgen says muslim girl can be taken as slaves you need a common sense. whatever you can do to others they can do it to you too.

Re: Sex with slaves

doubt is of different kinds. one doubt is of ibrahim AS who asked allah that show me how you give life to dead. Allah asked him have you no faith? he replied, I have but i just want to make my heart content. as mentioned in Quran.
so doubting of this kind if ok. ibrahim AS did not doubt the existance of allah. or the fact that Allah can give life and death and life again. he asked how yuo give life to dead, not how can you give life to dead. there is a difference. he believed that allah gives life to dead but just wanted to know its mechanisms. allah o alam. but then there is a doubt that what allahs says in this verse, is that really aplicable in todays time? is it not disproved by science? why would allah care what we do if our actions do not harm or benefit him? or why did allah do that?. that doubt is kufr. allah o alam.
and about understanding…we rely on the understanding of the prophet SAW and the sahaba, cuz their understanding was the best. quran tells the prophet SAW in sura qiyamaah, i cant qoute now, but will tell what i remember of the meaning.
that it is upon allah to make the prophet understand quran, and then it is on him to make him act on it and then it is upon him to make him explain it. so his understanding is the only possible understanding. so if prophet SAW understood the right hand possesions to be slaves of war, then that is the only understanding possible. no ifs or buts. unless someones shaytan takes him deep in misguidance that he starts to doubt authentic hadith, then it is useles to even talk to him. allah o alam

Re: Sex with slaves

ok.i guess there's not much left to say then. you cannot find a flaw within Islam because even a flaw becomes "the truth".

Re: Sex with slaves

Regarding Female Prisoners of War

extract from The Meaning Of Quran, Surah Nisa, Commentary of Verse 24-25, by S. Abul Ala Madudi.

“Those women, who become prisoners of war, while their husbands are left behind in the War Zone, are not unlawful because their marriage ties have been broken by the fact, that they have come into the Islamic Zone. It is lawful to marry ,such women and make them wives, and it is also lawful for those, in whose possession they are, to have sexual relations with them. There was, however, a difference of opinion as to. 'whether such a woman is lawful, if her husband has also been taken as a prisoner along with her. Imam Abu Hanifah and those of his way of thinking are of the opinion that the marriage tie of such a pair should remain intact but Imam Malik and Shafi are of the opinion that it should be broken.”

As there exist many misunderstandings in the minds of the people concerning the slave-girls taken as prisoners of war, the following should be carefully studied :

(1) It is not lawful for a soldier to have conjugal relations with a prisoner of war as soon as she falls into his hands. The Islamic Law requires that all such women should be handed over to the government, which has the right to set them free or to exchange them with the Muslim prisoners in the hands of the enemy or distribute them among the soldiers. It is lawful for a soldier to cohabit only with that woman who’ has been formally given to him by the government.

(2) Even then, he shall have to wait for one monthly course before he can cohabit with her in order to ensure whether she is pregnant or not; otherwise it shall be unlawful to cohabit with her before delivery.

(3) It does not matter whether the female prisoner of war belong; to the people of the Book or not. Whatever her religion, she become’, lawful for the man to whom she has been given.

(4) None but the one whom the slave girl is given has the right to “touch her.” The offspring of such a woman from his seed shall be his lawful children and shall have the same legal rights as are given by the Divine Law to children from one’s loins. After the birth of a child she cannot be sold as a slave girl and shall automatically become free after her master’s death.

(5) If the master marries his slave girl with another man, he forfeits his conjugal rights over her, but retains other rights such as service from her.

(6) The maximum limit of four has not been prescribed for slave girls as in the case of wives for the simple reason that the number of female prisoners of war is unpredictable. The lack of limit does by no means provide a license for the well-to-do people to buy any number of slave girls for licentious purposes.

(7) The proprietary rights over a slave male or female as given to a person by the government are transferable like all other legal proprietary rights.

(8) The handing over of the proprietary rights over a slave girl to a man formally by the government makes her as much lawful for him as the giving of the hand of a free woman to a man by her parents or guardian by means of nikah (marriage ceremony). Therefore there is no reason why a man who does not. hold marriage in detestation should hold sexual intercourse with a slave girl in detestation.

(9) When once the government hands over the female prisoner of war to some one, it has no right whatever to take her back from him, just as the parent or guardian has no right after the woman is handed over to a man through nikah.

(10) It should also be noted well that if a military commander temporarily distributes female prisoners of war among the soldiers for sexual purposes, or permits them to have sexual relations for the time being, such an act shall be unlawful and there is absolutely no difference between this and fornication, and fornication is a crime according to the Islamic code. (For detailed discussion please refer to my books, Tafhimat II and Rasa’il-o-Miasa’il I).

Retrieved from “HugeDomains.com

Re: Sex with slaves

^ I just cannot accept this. I do not agree at all. I am actually repulsed by the "points" you have mentioned.

Re: Sex with slaves

^ Well it makes sense when we are in a practical situation (that is when we are there at the moment and at the heart of the problem). Many things in Islam makes sense only when you look at the bigger picture. Slavery has been dominant since earlier times. The time of Moses (A.S) or earlier ... I think these laws are the same if not a bit altered to the one in the bible (Old Testament) given to Moses (A.S.).

On the brighter side the system of slavery was slowly abolished by the Muslims ... I think it was Caliph Umar (R.A.A) who had majorly removed the slavery system.

Things may not convince you at the moment, but i urge you to research on it further and look on it as practically and historically. Inshallah Allah Taala will guide us.

Re: Sex with slaves

^ but time and time again I am told that Islam is a culture for all times; culture should not influence religion. This rule is very very strikingly out of place with fundamental principles of theology. If you agree that Islam was molded to fit the cultural situation; then why not agree that religion should support cultural readaptation without loosing core principles but not giving into ritualistic rigidism.

I am getting two contradictory messages when someone says that it was the practice back then to have sex with unlimited female slaves and now it is somewhat out of fashion cause our wifey will not cook us biryani BUT it is completely haraam, evil, foolish for women to lead prayers now because they didn't do it back then.

can i get a ...what what?

Re: Sex with slaves

So if my husband is killed in war, you mean to say that the enemy can take me and keep me as his slave? What about the rights of those slave-women? Or do they not have any rights becoz they had hte misfortune to be married to the enemy???