Re: Serious Question for Muslims
^as for your first point; I have already stated in my previous post:
democracy is ruling by other than the sharee'ah and ijmaa' in Ahlus Sunnah is consensus among people of knowledge on sharee' ahkam.
please read my point it said that how it has been consistently applied. I don't think you can define Ijma if you account for the qualifier "consistently applied".
Another point, please let me know who the people of knowledge are? who picks them? So if today all the people of knowledge get a consensus that God has two horns (nauzobillah) would that be a sharaee fact?
Are you also claiming that there was Ijma on Abu Bakr's caliphate?
[quote]
as far your rest of points, open new topics. When did you reach the level of scholarship to discuss the issues of fiqh? If you want to discuss anything with me then discus tawheed and don't forget that you showed little knowledge in this topic. I'll also look forward to these "salafi quotes censoring using aql".
[/quote]
you probably meant censure, but that is mere semantics. (wink wink)
Just to let you know, and you don't repeat this and embarrass your salafi sugar daddies, Tawheed is not part of Fiqh. Fiqh is jurisprudence, meaning legal framework.