Re: Seminar: Enlightened Moderation and Islam
Fraudia Ji, the Maulana used a mild example compared to what the Holy Prophet :saw: used for such people…
The Mullah is not the prophet. and regardless, there are many many fabricated ahadeeth anyways.
BScholars need not lessons in public debate but Muslims need to learn how to listen…Indignation is the lowest form of argument given one doesn’t undetstand the context in which something was said…**
Yes scholars need lessons in how to get a point across. The countless tactless mullahs we see screaming in the mics in pakistan are a testament to the low quality of our clergy.
Heart of the matter was, a point had to be made and Maulana Abdul Rauf sahib did a good job…How? It got you riled up…
His bayhooda example got me riled up.
The simily did its job in conveying, shocking and presenting an argument to the listeners with surgical precision…Face it, if it hadn’t, you wouldn’t be writing this…
No surgical precision, the coarse chichorapana of his statment made me shake my head in disbelief that he had to resort to such bay hayayi to make a point.
Those who were addressed in the simily got the point…It wasn’t personal against anyone so indignation by you here is really not necessary…
I decide what is necessary or not necessary in how I choose to react lajjo, this is not some orhtodox clergy ruled place like taleban era afghanistan or iran where one can not have an opinion. there is no indignation, there is a concern, disappointment and repulsion at the tactics used by our mullahs who thus are nothing more than teh radio shock jocks.
reminds me of mullah bijli in salman ahmed’s documentary, who kept on saying haramazaday and all, tameez bhi koi cheez hoti hai. aa jaay hain kahan kahan say uth kar religion kay savior banay, low class log.