Re: Segregation at Parties
I mean temporarily exposing it for the purpose of curing or treating for positive outcome doesn’t mean it should always be exposed when everything is normal. If someone is suspected of having breast cancer and needs her breasts examined does not mean she should always expose her breasts. The intent is different if for the purpose of preserving life vs lustful/sexual intent. And to a professional they would not have the secondary intent. Besides gloves would be used. If the person involved is uncomfortable she should make it clear but in emergencies she cannot make that decision.Exceptions for necessities are always made. Like if someone fainted in a burning house and they were in a semi-naked state should male firefighters or passers-by not help because of the situation? Unless she talks to the patient she may not know when/if it is required. I am not sure if doctors in the West can refuse patients on basis of gender but I am sure in Islamic or Asian countries people can go to their own gender specific doctor unless an emergency arises for which exceptions should be made. Besides, in the case of the niqabi doctor it is not made clear whether she wears niqab at all times or only specific times so I guess we cannot assume she wears it while working. She may wear it to and from work but not during closed doors. Interesting..but think this discussion may be heading off topic tho