Meaning: The starbucks where she wanted to go, now she will be kachra uthaeng and safai karing there? Austalian starbucks just got a new employee on less pay
Wonder what will happen to her parents or sisters if have?
Claiming to be an ex Muslim to gain asylum isn’t a new thing
Many fake it to gain residency/asylum/visa/job etc etc
Anyway I did my own homework. Conclusion - women are allowed to go out on their on. LP is correct, and I was wrong.
***Hey I commend you and your “sixpack”
for admitting you was wrong! :k:
However did you know even though women are allowed to go anywhere all alone in all the Western Countries!***
**Butt why is it that in the West they never go to the Ladies Room alone! ![]()
especially in Restaurants and Night Clubs ![]()
Always in Pairs Why??
I am sure only the Ladies know the real answer to that?**
There is nothing called a moderate. And extreme left of today simplynwas the moderate of yesteryears. I am not done fighting el Sid
I read the original post by Sid. Do you even realize that this statement was not out out by the lady who sought asylum. This is another anonymous person ?Sarah? who wrote that. What does this anonymous persons statement have to do with Rahaf seeking asylum.
Why would you and other fellow Muslims in this thread be so easily dismissive of this person. Which 18 year old would leave her entire family behind with no chance of going back. Why would you jump to the conclusion that this persons concerns are not legitimate just because an anonymous person said something about Starbucks.
?But the most noteworthy part is that she doesnt like all the limitation imposed by Islam and implemented by Saudi Govt.
I would say, this trend will bring more people come forward and follow the suit. Go somewhere, seek asylum, tell them you are abused by the religion.
While that may be happening or no is a separate story, but the trend is dangerous.?
Whether that may be happening or not is a separate story? NO, IT IS RELATED TO THIS STORY.
Ehy is thisntrend dangerous. Dangerous for whom?
What is dangerous is ?moderates? such as yourself would consider the trend of people renouncing their religion and seeking asylum dangerous. As opposed to the repressive regime in Saudi Arabia dangerous to women
How lazy can you be. Do you even realize that the quote about trip to Starbucks was from an anonymous lady ?Sarah?, and had NOTHING to do with this lady seeking asylum? The facts are in your own original post. Shame on you to not even fact check what LP stated. And shame on you to state this trend of seeking asylum is dangerous. As opposed to the fact that anyone renouncing Islam in Saudi Arabia could be punished - which is the actual,inhumanity of it all.
Indeed, you are no liberal.
?She started a twitter-storm (a term now only used for one crazy president normally) about her life being in danger in SA. But the most noteworthy part is that she doesnt like all the limitation imposed by Islam and implemented by Saudi Govt.?
What other option did she have than to tweet till she dropped. The most noteworthy part was not that she did not like the limitation imposed by Islam as you chose to state, but that ?Alqunun’s family was abusive, she said, even more so since she had renounced Islam.?
Sunce wehn do you think abuse is to be ignored when it comes to the most noteworthy part, Mr. ?Moderate?
Southe wants a war now..
Yes, war wrt Saudi type repression, not wrt any religion. We need to ensure everyone gets to live the life they want as long as they are not hurting anyone else. Which 18 year old would choose to leave her entire family and friends circle and start a totally new life with no one to call a family. We need to stand with such people rather than conclude she is exaggerating. Especially when that conclusion is based on a total anonymous persons tweet re Starbucks trip. Which is being incorrectly assigned to this person! To discredit her reasons to leave.
People need to understand that just because the West is biased against Muslims doesn’t mean they have to exaggerate or make-up stuff to “spread an agenda.” Whatever ~the West’s~ intentions may be, it does not erase the fact that this young lady was in a terrible situation and that the Saudi regime is repressive, especially to people who leave their religion.
Now Southie is on a tirade. And literally against moderates, Islam, KSA and everybody who differs with him.
After accusing LP of lying, he is on a rampage to say whatever.
I initially thought his last night posts might be due to him being possibly drunk, but he rphrased everything today.
Very interesting. So @Southie please carry on. Let your innerself be out in the open. Tell us all about the beef you have against Islam, moderates etc. We are all ears.
The ironic part is that he said he was done fighting. Apparently now we know who was lying ![]()
looks like she has downs or autism based off her nose shape
This is a clear example of my thread where someone gets some freedom, acts repressed and loses the plot.
[quote=““third string””]
looks like she has downs or autism based off her nose shape
[/quote]
Autistic people would know their own.
Another lie on your part. Here is what I wrote about LP
?read the original post by Sid. Do you even realize that this statement was not out out by the lady who sought asylum. This is another anonymous person ?Sarah? who wrote that. What does this anonymous persons statement have to do with Rahaf seeking asylum.
Why would you and other fellow Muslims in this thread be so easily dismissive of this person. Which 18 year old would leave her entire family behind with no chance of going back. Why would you jump to the conclusion that this persons concerns are not legitimate just because an anonymous person said something about Starbucks?
Tell me where I have called her a liar.
if you had any integrity, yo would ACKNOWLEDGE that Sarah?s statement re Starbucks has NOTHING to do with this young lady?s actions. But LP and YOU used a total ananymous Sarah?s words to discredit and trivialize this young lady?s situation.
Agaim, you accuse me of having a beef against Islam. Why do you insist of lying.
When you misstate facts due to carelessness acknowledge it. The Sarah quote had nothing to do with the young lady. LP used that quite to state she doesn?t want to ready any further. And you thanked her for this insight stating it was important to take into account that Sarah was exaggerating. Either both of you though it was this young lady who issued the Starbucks statement, I?m that case you were plain lazy and careless. Which is fine. Just admit you were wrong and move on. ( like I did re women not being able to go places alone in Saudi mahalia).
Or, bot of you deliberately assigned that quote to this young lady. In that case you were being dishonest.
It is either careless of dishonest. Only you know which one it is. Either way, admit the mistake and move on. Rather than accusing the person who points out this truth to be attacking Islam.
I have never attacked any religion, and am not about to start doing that now.
As for attacking moderates, that was your description of yourself. So you are a moderate who would question a young lady?s statement that she wants asylum and leave her entire family due to abuse at home resulting from her leaving Islam.
That is your position. And you are a self described Moderate. There is. O need for me to add anything here. You have done a good job of discrediting your ?Moderate? position.
Southie I read all your comments and none of them making any sense. May be its time for you to put your bottle down while I drink my ![]()
PS: You can call me anything you want. Very thick skin here. And winter helps too. Ciao