interesting, as opposed to Saudi Arab being our biggest source for petroleum? But surely why should we care for that in current islamophobia. While nawaz has taken refuge , simplifing the relation to mere refuge would be quiet absurd to say the least. please take a visit to the link, will provide you with basics Pakistan ? Saudi Arabia relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
as for the qadiani factor. i am a sceptic, if a guy tendency of being a bleeding heart and then this post is very little to do with pakistani interests again. so yeah i attribute it to his qadiani zeal. so far indians in this threads have cheered him on, as i am neither an indian nor a qadiani i find little of substance here.
Croquet - my central point is that before anyone asks Saudi Arabia to invest 'more' in Pakistan, they should ask the govt of Pakistan itself to stop wasting resources on covert support to terrorism (such as strategic depth in Afghanistan through taleban, cross border crimes in Kashmir through mujahideen, double-side play by Musharaf in the WOT etc). If you are wasting your own resources on these unholy pursuits, what right to you have to ask another country to aid you more?
A complex issue of bilateral relations between Pakistan and KSA.
More interesting and worrisome is the zeal of those who support Indian interest and are anti-Pakistan jumping up and down to promote any possible negative effect on this bilateral relations or creating arab/non-arab fake issue. This topic is hardly about India so why so much interest shown? Is it because people are trying to put India as possibly another player in current problems in Pakistan?
Don't know why OP decided to bring this issue to begin with but what's wrong if KSA is advising something good.
Now, one can try to blame KSA for its alleged role in current day problems but it can hardly be proven that KSA is Anti-west or creating problem for Pakistan. No benefit to KSA.
**
We can never resolve the issue who did what and who is to blame.** Its a futile course to take. **Only option is to deal with problem immediately and put it to end.
When there is fire there is no time to ask who started it.**
Qadiyani/Ahmadis are Pakistani and must be respected as such.
Overall, the thread is making an issue of non-issue.
^^^ Its not easy to defend suicide attacks and beheadings all in the name of religion.
Good to know that is what you think you should defend when relating stuff to Pakistan. Thanks for proving my point that once Pakistani go to the West they start to act like Westerners. Good job on the Fox News point of view.
Hypothetically, Allah maaf karey but if there's a war between Pakistan and Saudi, most of the Pakistanis would fight on the side of the Saudis, only the minorities and shia would fight for Pakistan.
what are you sick? .. .wtf.. dude
err... are you in kindergarten - this is the one and the only statement in my life on which i don't know what to do or say. Its just despicable shyt !
Good to know that is what you think you should defend when relating stuff to Pakistan. Thanks for proving my point that once Pakistani go to the West they start to act like Westerners. Good job on the Fox News point of view.
hm. you really don't agree with him? Ask anyone outside Pakistan, including those of Pakistani origin, what the first image that comes to their mind is when asked about Pakistan
hm. you really don't agree with him? Ask anyone outside Pakistan, including those of Pakistani origin, what the first image that comes to their mind is when asked about Pakistan
face reality at least once in a while
Thanks for proving my point. That is the image they have, because they lack the understanding of the situation on the ground. They do not understand the political, social and cultural dynamics on the ground.
They simple see something in the Media and think it is right because it re-affirms their political point of view.
If you aren't there, you understand very little of what goes on. That is a simple fact of reality.
^ that is simply your opinion or theory. I know a lot of people who know about places they don't live in. In fact there are many cases where peopel don't or can't see the reality of where they're living in because they're too close to it.
So it's always wise to argue the message rather than try vainly to discredit the messenger based on who they are, where they live etc.
not irritated. just pointig out so you can mind for future
Yep! I will keep in mind you have no civil way of talking, understanding the simple post, need to be explained and do get irritated when pointed out your intentions.
Yep! I will keep in mind you have no civil way of talking, understanding the simple post, need to be explained and do get irritated when pointed out your intentions.
when you have more contradictions in the few lines of your little post than holes in swiss cheese, obviously you will be called on those. Too bad you can't handle it