Link???????????
Anyways! Such articls used to be written by Hindu-fundamentalists and socialists. Now Islamists have joined their wonderful company. These guys should probably be grouped as neo-Hindus. Are you one Mr. Phent?
Here is point by point rebuttal for you.
*1-A. 1971 and politicians vs. miltiary rule. *
It is time you get this thing out of the head that somehow democracy guarantees that there will be no separatist movement. Here are some eye-openers for you.
I. Indian-Punjab. Lot of democracy and still separatist movement. Guess what?democratic Indians used the same military style that Pakistan used in BDesh. What gives?
II. Canada - wealthy and democratic. Still Qubec is dying to leave. What gives? And if ever Qubecans start armed uprising against Ottawa, I guarantee that Canadians army will be on them like a pitbull on a juicy steak.
III. Northern Ireland - Calm only recently. Still the birthplace of modern democracy aka UK could not stop separatists.
IV. USA - back in 1860 had 100 years democracy, and one of the best known leader aka Abe Lincoln as the prez. Still the separatists fought one of the biggest battles ever. Americans lost 650,000 of their young men out of their total population of mere 31 million. Guess what? democratic USA used the same military style that Pakistan used in BDesh. What gives?
Do you need more, or your hate against Pakistan will ever end? Pakistan must fight on the internal anarchists aka Jihadists aka Islamists aka neo-Hindus.
1B. 1971- Ayub vs. Sh. Mujib
Sh. Mujib was no little fat chubby, cuddly little Santa Clause. He was a criminal to the core like any politician of the day.
Did you ever ask yourself Mr. Phent, why Bengalis killed Sh. Mujib, his kids, grand kids, uncles, and ants???
If Sh. Mujib was so much of an angel in your eyes, why did his own people utterly destroyed him and his seed. Only one daughter survived. And 60 years on, they are ruled by guess who? M-I-L-I-T-A-R-Y!
Hello! Are you awake?
- Constitution - Yes it should be respected. But it should be respected by ALL. Blaming military is like blaming a surgeon who comes in to get rid of a tumor. And the likes of you start jumping up and down, doctor is letting the blood spill, the doctor is bad, very bad.
If us the civilians learn to live under constitution, and it won't remain a piece of paper. Anarchists don't care about constitution. They just use it to spread fasad and anarchy in Pakistan. And this article surely is written by a fasadi.
This is where the problem starts, character assassination, and that is exactly how some “burqaPosh” opportunist would grab the opportunity to start defaming any one who would utter a word against their masters or in favor of the rule of law, they would start spewing their gab in a most despicable way, leaving the drape of decency cuddling with the filth of their intentions. Although you are behind the veil, BourqaPosh, I can definitely identify who you share your ideological affinity with and at what price.
I am proud to be a Muslim and abhor borrowing and using words like “islamists”, spun by crusaders who found support for their ideology from within treacherous ruling oligarchy in countries like Pakistan, though I doubt you yourself have any thing to do with being loyal to Pakistan but you can disparagingly point your finger towards others, whose loyalty to Pakistan is beyond any doubt , right BPS?
Had you given any “reading” to what I was trying to say before jumping into the thread with your lame rebuttal and before start comparing personalities as oppose to systems, you might have noticed that I was not playing on your talking points. But again, talking logic to a monomaniac chauvinist or a dictator or for that matter to an agent of theirs is like playing opera in the congregation of pigs and still hoping for a standing ovation.
No where in my post I claim that there will be, guaranteed, no separatist movement if there is a democratic Gov in place, you probably dreamed about it, or you probably thought you can dope me with your obnoxious twist to soul of the discussion. However with that spelled out clearly I can still logically prove that the chances of a separatist movement when a dictatorial rule is in place are far more than during a true democratic rule in place, since an Army rule is widely accepted as “naked dictatorship”, every citation of the word “dictatorship” is a slap to anyone who share perks with dictatorial Generals in uniform without any realization that this world reflects a form of Gov. and an ideology rather than a personality on the helm of affairs. A civilian can very well be a dictator, just like Hitler and many others, so donot start jumping up and down like a savior to an Army dictator. Calm down
Your own words are working against your own spin, if Pakistan used force against the separatist movement in East Pakistan, and India did it too for East Punjab, then why, my dense friend, did Indian not suffer the loss of East Punjab just like Pakistan.
Canadian Army would do exactly what democratically elected Canadian Gov would ask it to do, but it would not take over the political affairs of the state, if it does that, it would probably not be able to crush the separatist rule. You probably forgot to come up with anything exemplary from the disintegration of Soviet Union, did they use any force, or from old Czechoslovakia, didn't Malosovitch use a lot of force?
This is too naïve to reiterate same logic that proves you wrong over and over again, during civil war of US, army didn’t acted upon itself , if you can’t distinguish this simple fact, you should not bother to spew here.
In our case, genius lady, Army is rogue, not because of foot and low rank soldiers but because of nutty generals, it considers itself above the constitution, it considers itself a sacred cow, a thing to worship and never to be questionable. And before fighting “internal anarchists” one must identify them, and the reasons for the anarchy. Violence against civilians would do no good to the integrity of the country.
Indeed, Sh Mujib was criminal, just like many other Balouch leaders are considered traitors today, because he raised his voice against one unit, he raised his voice against the rights of the people of East Pakistan, and what happen then that instead of talking to the leader of the biggest Party in the country, Military Mafia tried to crush its popularity with the help bayonet. Had the issue been dealt with wisdom and justice and on the table instead of GUNS we would have not lost East Pakistan.
To my wise PBS, its not job of Army to come and fix the constitution, there are other organs of the state like “supreme court” that can interpret the laws better, I am feeling so very humble to the divinity of exalted statement of yours that makes “army” a doctor of the “constitution”, nothing can be so misleading so divided from reality. Surgery that Army knows is different, their impressive rationale would insist upon chopping the arm instead of giving the patient a bandage.