Sure we can play hypothetical scenarios all day long, and based on supposed issues, we can certainly beat the crap out Pak army (at least virtually :) ).
First the generalalities. If you ask that army as a national institution should be fully representative of Pakistan's ethnicities? You bet your bottom dollar, that the answer is yes.
The devil is always in the details. Unless you look at the details, you will not figure out the true nature of anything, let alone a complex and highly specialized institution like a modern army.
Army should never be subjected to purely ethnic analysis. The reason is simple. All over the world, only a specific set of regions provide men who are ready to face the ultimate danger. This aspect is different from many large institutions.
For example it will be easy (and it has been done in the past) to fill the whole Railway system with Urdu speaking group, or hire only Pashtuns to work in the ministry of water. The reason is simple. The jobs in Railway on ministry of water are mostly "safe" jobs. The hazards you face while working in Railway on some ministry are pretty much comparable to many other aspects of our society but it is not so in case of army or other law enforcement agencies.
Even in Punjab, only certain regions qualify and even "want" to join the army. Why do you think a Punjabi chap from a family of doctors settled in Lahore would even consider joining army? When he can use his education and family background to land a cushy urban job in a big hospital? Or do you think he will forego all that and apply for posting on Siachin?
Family traditions do matter as well. How many memans would leave their family business in Karachi and go join the army for low paygrades and tough life? How many times a Sindhi rural family sits around the herth and talk and dream about sending their young ones to serve in the army.
So far I have shown you the motivation for an individual to join the army.
The other aspects is to see what kind of aptitude is the army looking for? They do not select a Punjabi or a Pashtun just because of his ethnicity. This is the same for an IT firm too. Will they hire someone just because the guy is a Balochi? Heck no. They will first check if the guy has an aptitude (and qualifications) to work or get trained for the job.
How many large insurance companies in Karachi are dying to get young chaps from interior Sindh or Balochistan or Wazirastan? Are they discriminating on the basis of ethnicity? May be. But if you are manager in a big (and successful) insurance company, you are primarily concerned with finding the right person.
Coming back to the army, just look at the map and see the regions of Punjab and Frontier. There are specific districts that are known to supply infantry, armored core, and engineers.
Modern armies are complex and highly specialized and that's why they rely on:
- the right aptitude
- desire and motivation
- qualification
- family background
roughly in the same order. So let's quit messing up with our institutions and start focusing on excellence.
This hypothetical scenario is as real as the blood supply to your brain, if it doesn’t echo into your ear drum, you should invest some time into soul search rather than keep beating the drum of obsessive compulsive proclivity. Had all the ethnic group been given equal representation in Pakistn Army, the operation in East Pakistan might have not been perceived as carnage of West Pakistan Army against Bengali people, if Bengali soldiers were mostly involved in the operation it might have been perceived as Army fighting against separatist Mukti Bahni and that would have improved the chances of saving geographical integrity of Pakistan a lot. But we did not learn our lessons, even today an operation in Baluchistan is considered as Punjabi Army operation against Baluch people, against Pashtoon and against Sindhi people.
Indeed the devil is in the details, yet surprisingly you have always shown an ingrained propensity to shy away from the devil when it does not conform to your point of view. In a country like Pakistan where average income stays around one dollar a day and unemployment lurks around 30%, Army is seen as an institution that should serve as an equal opportunity employer. The specificity of certain areas providing most of the men has more to do with opportunities, culture and traditions of that area rather than the myth of audacity to stand against “ultimate danger”. I hope you don not question in intrepidity of Baluch, Pashtton and Sindhi people, if given a chance they would prove that they can defend their homeland as much as a person from an area perceived to have an aptitude for the Army.
Equal representation in Army is important because of two major reasons;
1) Army has ruled this country for more than half the time since its creation, this culture of Army rule makes this institution million times more ostentatious than a cadaverous railway. Serving in army is generally perceived as an honor and privilege and a privilege if not shared among all the building blocks of the society is bound to either bring prejudice in favor or against the very base of the institution that reflects it.
2) Pakistan Army, unfortunately, has been involved in operations against its own people more than it had been involved against a perceived external threat, in this back drop equal representation should serve much better for the reputation of the Army itself and for the better results.
There is absolutely nothing wrong in introducing reforms in recruitment practices within Army, if you pay any attention to the historical background of the areas known for their aptitude for army, you will be surprised to see that these areas were picked up by British colonial ruler rather than by Pakistan Army, and that too not because these people were known for their audacity but because these areas were not rebellious to British Authority, and were largely ruled by hand picked Feudal lords. These hand picked Feudal Lords were serving the appetite for soldiers of British Empire both inside and out side Indian subcontinent.
I am not so sure who is messing up with the institution, if you look at the posts that has been exchanged between you and myself you will not deny the fact that you are defending very bad practices of a few Army Generals that has brought a very bad name to Pakistan Army both at home and around the world, our Army has been called “rouge” Army, it has been called a “group of mercenaries”. I have witnessed with my own eyes diminishing respect that the uniform once used to carry with it. My elder brother is an Army officer; he is not allowed to leave his house with his uniform in the capital of the country. If that is state of excellence and respect then my friend it is better to analyze the situation, make it an institution accountable to its actions and bring back the excellence that it use to carry.
Remember, a child who is never accountable for any of his actions is always spoiled.