Re: Revolution with Water
First of all, let me clarify that I do not have detailed knowledge of this invention and do not know if this is feasible or not.
Given the fact that this process has not been duplicated anywhere else in the world, I am quite skeptical.
However, I am shocked at Dr Atta’s simple misunderstanding and misplaced criticism.
There is no issue of conservation of energy or perpetual motion involved here.
The battery is only used for the process of electrolysis. Indeed, energy is conserved in this process. But this is not the energy that is used to power the car.
The car is powered by combusting the hydrogen that is produced by the electrolysis. That is a separate process. The energy of combustion does not have to be less than the energy of the battery.
Also, there is no claim of perpetual motion. The fuel, (i.e hydrogen) needs to be constantly resupplied via water and electrolysis.
In the end, there may be more complex reasons why this invention may not work out. But these simple criticisms are completely misplaced.