Religious Perversion by a Preacher pedophilie marriage

Re: Religious Perversion by a Preacher pedophilie marriage

Well, I do not know what you people get out of bringing up same arguments over and over again without providing any solid evidence to back it up and ignoring other people's questions. My questions have been ignored for weeks now and every 2nd person comes to the topic and start talking about same thing over and over again.


Why do most people find it repugnant? Why do you think it is gross? Who defines such morality? Why following the law of nature is wrong? What evidence do you have that a man only marries a young woman (girl is not an appropriate word because according to the law of nature you become adult once you hit puberty) for purpose of fulfilling his lust? You are presenting arbitrary claims without any logical explanation and evidences. Remember that burden of proof lies on you and also proving your point from couple of cases does not make it true for all the cases and therefore logically it is not acceptable.

The emphasized part of your post well fall under logical fallacies, for example,

Appeal to Belief: Most people believe that X is true therefore X is true. Just because many people in general believe that X is true does not serve as an evidence to prove that X is true.