bhai sahib you know what is the base of CHRISTINITY ?? or difference ??
They beleive Hazrat Isa A.S a god DID U BELEIVE IT ? I dont think so
and He go back to skies and come back again to fullfill His mission.
And we are proving that there god is dead like other humen being or like other prophets… To prove Hazrat Isa A.S death is DESTH of Chrisnity
Dear I told u earlier in post u better study or reserch then talk…
and some thing more here for you. read it all
Allama Iqbal ko dobara quote kar raha hoon ke apko bhol jane ki bhi adat lagti hai, aur sath main kuch apke PURANE ULMA ke comments bhi padh lena ke unhon ne BRITISH RAJ ke qaside kese kahahe…
The Promised Massiah quote on his book ( Kishti e Nooh )
"So listen to me O, the unwise people, I do not seek to please the governemnt, becuase such a government which does not stop muslims from our religious observence nor does it use force to implement its own faith on her subjects, fighting a religious war against such government is not allowed according to Quran as it (the government) is not fighting a religious war anyways. (Footnote on Kishti e Nooh)
Surah Al-Furqan verse 4-6 point out to an allegation on Holy Prophet (Saw) according to which the Meccans believed that a person from some other nation was helping Holy Prophet (saw) to achieve some hidden political objective.
The Promised Messiah (as) did indeed praise the British government in its effort to establish peace on the land. This was due to the fact that the Sikha Shahi (sikh rule) in india was the darkest age for muslims in the history of Indian subcontinent.
A hindu writer Tulsi Ram writes in his book “Sher e Punjab” (published 1872)
“Sikh method (of rule) was looting and bloodshed. They barred muslims to say Azaan from their mosques. They recited Guru Granth in mosques”
Syed Ahmad Barelvi wrote on the plight of muslims and this is published in a book “swaneh Ahmedi” that Sikh abducted muslim women and kept them as their slaves in their houses. They demolished mosques, used them as stables and killed muslims for no reasons.
Such was the sikh rule from which the British freed the muslims and gave them freedom to practice their faith. The event of the mutiny (Jange Azadi) was a form of civil war started by hindus for which muslims were used as scape goats. Many religious leaders including the scholars of Deoband and Barelvi sects condemned it. Sir Syed Ahmad khan’s views on that matter are no secret to us.
Sir Allama Iqbat and his praise for the British:
When Queen Victoria died, Allama Iqbal wrote a Marsiya in which he stated that
“For respect of the funeral of the Empress
Iqbal went out on the street with dust in his hair
It feels the same, you can name it anything
but i can give the name of Muharram to this month”
He writes again
“O India, the shadow of God lifted from your head
She, the well wisher of your people has left
This commotion in the skies is for her condolence
The one who was the reason for your beauty has gone”
(Baqiyate Iqbal, compiled by Sayed Abdul Wahid, Second Edition, Anarkali Lahore)
Ahle Hadith and Deobandi sect and the British:
Prominent muslim leader, shamsul Ulema Maulana Nazeer Ahmad Dehlvi wrote,
“It is in the interst of whole india that some foreign ruler must rule it. Not any hindu or muslim, but European power. It is God’s special favour on us that English came to rule us.” (compilation of Lectures, Maulana Nazir Ahmad Dehlvi, Published 1890)
Maulana Shoorish Kashmiri wrote in his book entitled “Attaullah Shah Bukhari”
“those who in that era of tribulations (british rule) supported the abrogation of Jihad and declared the british to be the Rightful Rulers (in the light of Quran), among them was Deputy Nazeer Ahmad.”
Same goes for the Shia scholars. Allama Ali al Haeeri also supported the british rule.
Maulan Zafar Ali Khan said,
“Muslims can not even think of entertaining bad ideas about the Government. If some unfortunate muslim revolts agains the government, than we declare it openly that such muslim is not a muslim” (Zamindar, Lahore, 11 Nov, 1911)
“We will shed blood in place of even a single drop of perspiration of His Highness the King. Same is the state of other muslims of India.” (Zamindar, Lahore, 23 Nov 1911)
Two faced Mullahs of the sub-continent:
If you look at the evidence, it will become crystal clear that the founder of Ahmadiyya Movement never praised the government to seek favours. It was instead his opponents who were more than eager to rub their noses on the feet of the “forieng rulers”. The Promised Messiah (as) only truthfully acknowledged the fact that the british sought to establish peace on the land and thats it.
In fact his bitterest opponent, Maulvi Muhammad hussain Batalwi tried to convince the government that this “mahdi” is seeking violence agains the government just as the Mahdi of Sudan. (Isha’at usSunnah, Vol 6)
In response to such allegations, Promised Messiah (as) wrote to clarify his position and told the government that he had nothing to do with violence and infact his family had always supported the British Raj during and after the times of the Sikha Shahi. There was no mention of Ahmadiyyat in such writings and they were aimed to clarify the fact that his opponents were trying to undermine his movement by inciting the government againt him.
Where the Mullahs of the subcontinent were leaving no opportunity to make sure the British saw and appreicated their submissiveness, at the same time Ahmadiyya scholars were at the forefront of resistance against the christian missions and hindu shudhi movements. Queen Victoria recieved the personal invitation to accept islam from the Promised Messiah (as).
The Real Cronies:
Darul Uloon, Nidwatul Ulema, the headquarters of the Deoband sect was established under the auspices of the british. So much so that its foundation stone was laid by none else than Lt. Governor Sir John Brescott Hewitt.
History is witness that the Wahabi movement was sponsored by the British. The Saudi royal family were forced to co-operate with the Najadiyans (Wahabis) and the movement recieved financial backing from the British. Who was responsible for the downfall of the last Caliphate in Turkey?? Wahabi-Saudi alliance.