Re: Rana Naveed becoming a liability for Pakistan?
Well, I have been thinking about this idea in relation to our team performance. Reading the paragraph might seem a bit of a roller-coaster ride. In any case, please provide your feedback.
Pitches in Pakistan, absolutely batting paradises, since Day 1. Days of Imran, Wasim/Waqar, and now Inzamam/Akhtar. There is a general expectation of witnessing complete belter of surfaces during the games on our turfs. The theory that surrounds our batting is such that (and along the lines of) we need to perform outside of the sub-continent in order to "really" prove our worth. Younis's pileup at Lahore and Faislabad during the test series didn't help him one bit, as he was sent back in the pavilion to join in our loverboy Butt, on a seaming surface at that. A short example, one could say. The point being made here is, there is much more importance and significance of performance being evaluated in the pitches of Australia, South Africa and West Indies. Granted that a certain player might "prove his worth" on certain home grounds and during certain series (such as Malik completely failing in the opening slot during the English series, while scoring back-to-back centuries during the current ODI's. Arguably, his position of batting order might come under a microscope), but eventually, they all have to perform well, and we expect them to do so, in every single match (Again, emphasis on pitches outside of the sub-continent).
That is so far for the batting part. Now, in bowling department, albeit one could argue that it is hard-enough bowling already in such conditions when you have the likes of Akhtar and Dhoni smacking the ball all over the park, one should learn and manage himself to strive strongly in such conditions, and I don't agree with this theory. Most probably I am missing something here (please do correct my thinking process), but my understanding is, playing on seaming wickets will result in every doodh wala's and golay gunday wala's ball to swing sideways and seam at the same time. One could say that is true, however, it also opens a floodgate of opportunities for fast and spin bowlers, alike, and paves way for more prospects to demonstrate their qualities and skills in a more appropriate manner (which, effectlvely and permanently, removes the "belter pitches" from the equation, hence, we now have seaming pitches in sub-continent as well as in the rest of the world).
If the above conditions are true, which means that our batting area needs to click very heavily, and from all four corners of the pendulum outside of the sub-continent, and our bowling needs such surfaces in order to be effective, why not just go ahead and at least give an effort of creating a seaming wicket? I know, I know, it will die out at the end of Day 2, but still, why not force our batsman to practice in such conditions, on home soil, so that when they get their round-way tickets to the outside world, they are in full preparation to fire all blazes? Plus, having 'FAST AND BOUNCY' pitches will ensure that we have the cream of the crop bowlers, who are experienced, organized, and have an idea as to what does it take to generate a wicket in such conditions. In conclusion, both batting, and our bowling department, to say the least, are provided a base (middle ground) to start on. From thereon, we can improvise as necessary.
This is straight from the top of my head. Some things might not make sense, but overall, is this idea effective/ineffective? What will be the consequences and aftermath of implementing such a strategy?