Re: RAMAYANA & MAHABHARATA :FICTION?
Mr Pathania
lets hope Gov comes out with good plans and do not stop in between its very good news.... .. do u know any excavations in other part of country going on right now..,,,,,
regards
Kumar
Re: RAMAYANA & MAHABHARATA :FICTION?
In my opinion it is immoral and for those who believe in sins, sinful, for someone to wantonly diminish others and others' faith. Not to mention such an affront lacks basic respect for others. Speaking monkeys (if they existed) are better than this sort of undeveloped 'humans'
May I ask the moderators to adopt a policy of "nobody insults others" instead of "everyone can insult each other equally". Because that goes to the character of what you want this place to be.
Re: RAMAYANA & MAHABHARATA :FICTION?
Guys.. Hinduism is full of symbolism, metaphors. You would agree that Metaphors are very powerful means of conveying a message. Goddess Durga is shown as wearing a necklace of heads. It symbolises victory of good over evil not that a woman was out in the street to chop and lop the heads of men.
Vanar sena was not a brigade of monkeys but men. Symbol monkey was used to explain agility and swiftness of these people.
Kumar
Apart from excavations.....there is so much above ground which conveys enough information about ancient Indian civilisation. One needs to visit South India (which remain relatively free from attacks) to see most of the ancient things still in vogue. North India showcases a culture which was influenced by many.
Re: RAMAYANA & MAHABHARATA :FICTION?
Vanar sena was not a brigade of monkeys but men. Symbol monkey was used to explain agility and swiftness of these people.
Kumar Apart from excavations.....there is so much above ground which conveys enough information about ancient Indian civilisation. One needs to visit South India (which remain relatively free from attacks) to see most of the ancient things still in vogue. North India showcases a culture which was influenced by many.
u r rite south culture almost untouched .. any specific places...... there//
Re: RAMAYANA & MAHABHARATA :FICTION?
Chennai (Madras) and beyond..
Re: RAMAYANA & MAHABHARATA :FICTION?
Janaab aapke keyboard main 'Caps Lock' hoga aur 'Shift" key bhi hogi.
Writing a message 100% in uppercase is tantamount to shouting. :)
Re: RAMAYANA & MAHABHARATA :FICTION?
REAL STORY OF MAHABHARTA:
DEAR FRIENDS!
PHYSICALY RAVANA HAD ONLY ONE HEAD, 10 HEADS MEAN THAT SEVERAL HEADS(OF STATES) WERE UNDER HIS CONTROL. HE WAS THE PHARAOH OR HITLER OR ROOSVELT OF HIS TIME. RAMA WAS THE FIGHTER OF THUTH. HE WAS THE STALIN AND CASTRO OF HIS TIME. HANUMAN WAS NOT A MONKEY HE WAS A GUERILLA FIGHTER, LIKE CHE GUERA, WITH A STRONG ARMY OF GUERILLAS. RAMA AND HIS COMRADES SUCCEDED IN CONSTRUCTING A BRIDGE BETWEEN LANKA(SIRILANKA) AND HIND(INDIA) BECAUSE AT THAT TIME THE GAP BETWEEN THEM WAS NOT SO LARGE, SCIENCE PROVES THAT CONTINENTS AND STATES HAVE BEEN CHANGING SINCE CENTURIES. mAHABARTA WAS THE WAR OF TRUTH AND EVIL. NEITHER THE RAMA WAS BHAGWAN NOR THE RAVANA WAS DEVIL. RAMA WAS THE LEADER OF POOR PEOPLE WHO HAD BEEN RAGGED BY RAVANA, A TYRANT RULER OF LANKA WITH DEVILISH CHARACTER. IN THE WAR RAMA WON RAVANA FALL AND LATTER BURNT. WHOLE INCIDENT WAS REAL AND TOOK PLACE SOME SEVERAL CENTURIES BEFORE THE BIRTH OF BUDDHA. HISTORY AND SCIENCE BOTH PROVES IT, NO DOUBT MANY PEOPLE STILL THOUGHT IT A FICTISIOUS STORY.
THAT’S ALL MY FRIENDS!
THANKYOU. (i am not a hindu but i know the reality)
Re: RAMAYANA & MAHABHARATA :FICTION?
I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH MY HINDU FRIENDS WHETHER THEY BELIEVE IT TO BE EVEN A REMOTE POSSIBILITY THAT THESE BOOKS ARE NOT REALITY-BASED BUT JUST FICTION WITH COLORFUL CHARACTERS. MOST OF THE WESTERN HISTORIANS BELEIVE THIS . EVEN IN INDIA IN THE HISTORY BOOKS IT IS WRITTEN THAT RAMAYANA & MAHABHARATA WERE COMPOSED IN SOME PARTICULAR ERA . NEITHER IS IT MENTIONED THAT THESE EVENTS ACTUALLY HAPPENED NOR IS THE DATE MENTIONED . MOST PEOPLE IN THE REST OF THE WORLD DON'T BELIEVE ALL THAT IS WRITTEN BUT INDIANS HAVE A HARD TIME FACING THIS TRUTH . THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE AN OPEN DISCUSSION. WE ALSO KNOW THE AUTHORS OF THESE EPIC TALES . ITS QUITE POSSIBLE THAT THESE HISTORIC BOOKS WERE THE EQVIVALENT OF "HARRY PORTER " OF THEIR TIME . NO ARCHEALOGICAL EVIDENCE HAS EVER BEEN FOUND . THE BATTLE OF KURUKSHETRA WHICH SUPPOSEDLY KILLED MILLIONS SHOULD HAVE LEFT ATLEAST SOME EVIDENCE . NOR DO THE CHARACTORS MENTIONED IN THESE BOOKS MAKE ANY SENSE . THERE IS THIS VILLIAN RAVANA WITH 10 HEADS .HOW CAN A PERSON WITH A SINGLE NECK HAVE 10 HEADS . NOWADAYS MANY HINDUS HAVE STARTED DEFENDING THAT BY SAYING THAT HE HAD WISDOM OF 10 PERSONS! BUT IN THE BOOK ITS WRITTEN THAT HE ACTUALLY , PHYSICALLY HAD 10 HEADS. THEN THERE IS THIS CHARACTER CALLED HANUMAN WHO IS A MONKEY BUT CAN TALK . ALONG WITH HIM THERE IS AN WHOLE ARMY OF MONKEYS WHO CAN TALK (VANAR SENA).THE HINDUS SHOULD REALISE THAT THERE IS ONLY 1 SPECIES THAT CAN TALK & THAT'S HUMANS. IF THESE HALF-MONKEY HALF-HUMAN SPECIES EXSISTED THEN WHERE IS IT NOW?????? NO EVIDENCE HAS BEEN FOUND. THERE R MANY OTHER POINTS THAT COME IN MIND BUT ITS SUFFICIENT TO SAY THAT HINDUS ARE LIKE THAT AMERICAN KID WHO EVEN AFTER GROWING UP KEEPS ON BELIEVING IN THE EXSISTENCE OF SANTA CLAUS!!!
chaand ke do tukre (two parts), aasmaanoo (sky) ka sair karne waaloon ke liye kiya kehna?