Yeah right 
Everyone here seems to disagree
*Sa1eem, do you know how to read, I said PROVINCIAL ASSEMBLY. Your friend RP already posted this. Next time do bother to read what I said, or if you dont understand the angreji, ask me instead of typing out paras and paras of irrelevent stuff! *
**>> **Elections to the Majlis-i-Shura (National Assembly)
Look who is talking? The guy who does not know the difference of use between 'Who' and 'That' ... want to teach angreeji ... It is funny :) ... Where you learned English and Jokes, in your pind? Anyhow, if you like to be Joker then joke with people of your pind.
And yea, don’t talk rubbish with me full of your lies. I showed you the vote figures and if you do not agree, don't F* with your lies ... prove it or else sit with team of PML(N) Liars who are known for their notoriously characters and blatant lies.
Look who is talking? The guy who does not know the difference of use between 'Who' and 'That' ... want to teach angreeji ... It is funny :) ... Where you learned English and Jokes, in your pind? Anyhow, if you like to be Joker then joke with people of your pind.
And yea, don’t talk rubbish with me full of your lies. I showed you the vote figures and if you do not agree, don't F* with your lies ... prove it or else sit with team of PML(N) Liars who are known for their notoriously characters and blatant lies.
I don't need to babble my posts in "Microsoft Word" like you do, and still have silly fobby grammatical mistakes, and we all know how educated you truly are. You showed me the vote figures of the national assembly, something your party affiliate RP friend already pulled and something I already caught, now no need to cry like a little boy. Unless you can quote the Provincial Assembly results, stop posting your lies, as they are no more credible than the 175 Seats you predicted for the lota league.
I don't need to babble my posts in "Microsoft Word" like you do, and still have silly fobby grammatical mistakes, and we all know how educated you truly are. You showed me the vote figures of the national assembly, something your party affiliate RP friend already pulled and something I already caught, now no need to cry like a little boy. Unless you can quote the Provincial Assembly results, stop posting your lies, as they are no more credible than the 175 Seats you predicted for the lota league.
First of all, I do not think that you have ability to write more than few lines at a time, so do not babble when others can.
Second: I use Microsoft word because I have to, as I write while at work and my posts are long, thus could write few incomplete lines at a time, that when finished I paste here and post it. When I write directly on forum, I have to correct my post quite often, as long posts typed in hurry can have lot of mistakes. On the other hand, what is wrong in using Microsoft word? Only idiots would consider that a problem.
Third: As for how educated I am, what would you know? You should worry about your own education as everyone can see from your ridiculous and unsynchronised posts without any meaning or sense, that you lack even basic education.
Fourth: RP and even I quoted vote counts with reference. As for you, it is your words and since you support liars like NS, obviously your words are worthless (like most PML(N) team). If you could not show any reference for Provincial Assembly figures, why quoting?
Fifth: As for I ever predicted 175 seats, that is your lies. If you are not liar than show it where I predicted 175 seats for PML(Q).
Who told you that PML(N) got highest votes in PA (even assuming that when you refer to PA, it means Punjab provincial assembly as you do not see beyond Punjab). If you have any reference, why not show that? :)
As for PML(Q) votes, they did not only got highest votes but many of their votes fell to independent candidates like Wattoo as even though he is VP in PML(Q), he contested election as independent (and there are many such PML(Q) candidates who contested election as independent). As for Wattoo, he is still office holder of PML(Q) and did not resigned from the party.
Saleem, look, this is what you posted, and when I asked for proof, you gave me the statistics from the national assembly and wrote paras and paras of broken english, to make it look legit... Now tell me do you know the difference between national and provincial assemblies? If not, dont waste your own time babbling.
[quote="Sa1eem"]
Who told you that PML(N) got highest votes in PA (even assuming that when you refer to PA, it means Punjab provincial assembly as you do not see beyond Punjab). If you have any reference, why not show that? :)
As for PML(Q) votes, they did not only got highest votes but many of their votes fell to independent candidates like Wattoo as even though he is VP in PML(Q), he contested election as independent (and there are many such PML(Q) candidates who contested election as independent). As for Wattoo, he is still office holder of PML(Q) and did not resigned from the party.
Saleem, look, this is what you posted, and when I asked for proof, you gave me the statistics from the national assembly and wrote paras and paras of broken english, to make it look legit... Now tell me do you know the difference between national and provincial assemblies? If not, dont waste your own time babbling.
[/quote]
Spock: Do you know Angreejee? :) Do you know why paragraphs are used and what paragraph means? Go to your School teacher and he/she would tell you what above two paragraphs mean and what relation it has with each other :)
Spock: Do you know Angreejee? :) Do you know why paragraphs are used and what paragraph means? Go to your School teacher and he/she would tell you what above two paragraphs mean and what relation it has with each other :)
Everyones familiar with how brilliant your angreji is, I mean it takes you 1942835 lines to get one point across, which needless to say is based on lies and hogwash. Now tell me, you diligently told me how PML[q lota] got the highest number of votes, and not the pml[n], now back it up or im gonna send you back to pre-school where you belong.
And please stop posting those girly smilies.
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showpost.php?p=5478628&postcount=21
There you go! hahaha you actually predicted 175-180 instead of just 175! LOL
:D:o
Re: Is it moral for the Govt to sell accused people?
why it's so quiet in hereß :D
Well, you have to see that post according to what was written. If you cannot see the prediction accordingly, then it is not my fault. 
My prediction was for 175-180 seats in NA not 175 -180 seats PML(Q) would win in election. If you will see the post, you can see that I also wrote that at present they have 132 NA seats and it would increase to 175-180. So, whatever was there in those 132 seats (seats of PML(F), PML(J), PML(Z), NPP, independents, Patriots, Women plus minorities) are all included in that 175-180 seats. That does not correspond to winning 175-180 seats in election (read that post carefully)
Election was contested on 272 seats but NA has 342 seats. For instance, PPP won 88 seats out of 272 in election, but after all additions they got 122 seats in NA of 342 seats (88 plus 7 ind, 4 minorities plus 23 women). That does not mean, PPP won 122 seats, they won 88 seats but they got 122 NA seats (if more independents would have joined PPP then they would have got more).
For instance, PML(N) won 103 seats out of 265 contested Punjab Assembly seats and not 164 seats in Punjab Assembly but with independents (27), women (30) and minorities (4), they have 164 seats in 371 Punjab Assembly seats, because most independent (27) joined them that boosted their women and minority seats too.
My actual expectation before BB death was that PML(Q) would win around 95 to 100 seats (out of 242 seats) in election and with their allies [PML(F), NPP, Patriots, etc] they would have around 110 -115 seats, that after addition of independents, women and minorities would end up as 175-180 seats in NA. That is much different than saying that I predicted PML(Q) would get 175 seats in election.
Actual result was 47 seats [PML-Q = 42, PML-F = 4, NPP =1], half of what I expected in mid November before BB death, and I acknowledged that too (waisay bhee, I am not jotshi :)). As for 175-180 seats in NA, they together have 60 seats [PML-Q:54, PML(F) = 5, NPP = 1].
Re: Is it moral for the Govt to sell accused people?
sure sure You can babble all you want now, I just quoted your own post (clear and concise, PML[Q] 175-180 seats) so next time think before you say something.
Re: Is it moral for the Govt to sell accused people?
Sighs
My prediction was for 175-180 seats in NA not 175 -180 seats PML(Q) would win in election
[quote]
*I believe that in 2008 election, PML(Q) and their allies would get better results than what they got in 2002 election *(that includes PPP (sherpao) and independent candidates that joined PML(Q)). The reason is that the boom in economy and unprecedented work done in the country, specially in rural areas, would give PML(Q) a huge advantage over their opponents.
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
blah blah blah
** Today Party position in NA members is:
PML(Q): 132**
PPP (Sherpao): 19
MQM: 18
MMA: 57
PPP: 55
PML(N): 16
Others: 45 (32 pro-Musharraf)
** I expect the numbers in coming NA election would be (I could be wrong, but that is my estimate at present, though that may change as election nears):
PML(Q): 175 - 180**
PPP (Sherpao): 19 - 22
MQM: 22 - 25
MMA: 20 -25
PPP: 40 - 45
PML(N): 7 - 10
Others: 40 - 50 (35 - 40 pro-Musharraf)
To get elected, Prime Minister (if eligible) would need: 172 votes (more than 50 percent votes from total strength of 342 MNAs)
To get constitution changed, 228 NA votes are required. That means for BB or NS to become Prime Minister, they would need to change the constitution, and that would require 228 out of 342 votes before they can even bid to become Prime Minister.
** I believe that result would be such that pro-Musharraf parties would get enough seats to change constitution without help from opposition**.
[/quote]
By everyone you mean people owho belong to Nawaz league, PPP?
Let me add little bit in this defination,
To me, Muhajir is political group, to identify a group of people of various ethnic backgrounds settled in Sindh,must be a member of MQM and are working to feed the leadership of MQM for their idea of creating this group.
People who have no idea whatsoever and have never lived in the areas shouldn't come and bs about stuff they don't know..
Re: deadlock happened cause of nawaz sherrifs zid of thrid tie pm bar
^ Same can be said about the MQMers offering their great advice on how to deal with the tribal regions.
Re: deadlock happened cause of nawaz sherrifs zid of thrid tie pm bar
^ True but then non-MQM non-tribals shouldn't offer any advice on that area either, right?
Re: deadlock happened cause of nawaz sherrifs zid of thrid tie pm bar
^ Nope, I never said I agree with that. I just drew a stark comparison to what you said to hannibal.
Re: deadlock happened cause of nawaz sherrifs zid of thrid tie pm bar
Well then that is a punjabi double standard which doesn't fly...
Well then that is a punjabi double standard which doesn't fly...
How so? I didnt make any recommendations, just pointed out your double standards.
^ Same can be said about the MQMers offering their great advice on how to deal with the tribal regions.
What tribals are doing have repercussions for entire country and it's future.