peace psyah,
What I'm going to say is not "personal judgement", but purely a comment on the use of "legacy".
So hear me out. OK?
Do you know what Amr ibn Hishām used to tell Mohammed pbuh?
*--- He would say,I love you, and I care for you. You are my family, my tribe, My nephew. *
*my dear nephew! Why are you bent upon proving that our "legacy" is bad. Do you think our fathers, and forefathers, and fore-fore-fathers were idiots? *
*Please respect them, they have been been the caretaker of the Allah's house for centuries upon centuries. *
*Do you think they were all wrong? *
He would say O Mohammad pbuh ---
----- Please stop spreading this message of yours, that no man made interpretation should be accepted. **
*-----Don't tell us that we the Quraish should be in direct conneciton with Allah swt. *
**----- Respect the legacy of our family, our tribe etc.
Psyah,
do you know that Amr ibn Hishām became rigid, and said, I don't care what you say Mohammed pbuh, I'll continue following my legacy, my teachers, my teacher's teachers, all the way upto Ibrahim pbuh.
And precisely due to his staunch opposition to adapt and change, Amr ibn Hishām was known as?
you known his given name? Don't you?
Peace burqaposhx
I had a feeling someone was going to bring this topic up when I mentioned the term 'legacy'.
The difference in what I am saying and in what you have said is an ocean.
1) The legacy refered to by Amr ibn Hisham (above) is the legacy of idol worship. It was not that his reasoning was wrong, rather it was sound, and there is a basis and purpose for tradition in Islam, however he was saying this legacy trumped the authority of Muhammad (SAW), there he was wrong. I am on the other hand talking about the great legacy of Islam.
2) Their basis for legacy was family and age old traditions, our basis for legacy is to refer matters to the knowledgable and pious predecessors. There is a world of difference in here alone.
3) Also the method of Sahabah is well documented. They used to wait until they heard the interpretation of Muhammad (SAW). If not legacy then at least we should follow their excellent example and 'wait' to interpret matters from Qur'an until we have heard what our authorities and in turn their authorities have said about the issue first.
4) Scientifically it is sounder to first get background data before we draw conclusions.
Legacy or tradition has a place in Islam, it is purified from the legacy that was used as an excuse to continue doing blind acts of wrongful worshipping of idols. We on the other hand are not doing anything blindly but it requires alot of research to find the opinions of the Salaf and study them.
To follow our immediate understanding of Qur'an is more like following what our parents say without questionning it, because both of these require less effort and no attempt to be correct.
Their form of submission was nested in the idea of going against their norms, our form of submission is to accept our intellects are limited.