[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by sholay: *
Basic Force
If you've taken the liberty of viewing my previous posts, then you are no doubt fully aware that I can take you to school and back on any issue you choose to discuss.
The problem with this post my son is that you are new on this Forum and have chosen to ask questions using your emotions rather than your intellect. Within these emotions you have used the classic 'programmed' stereotypical approach hoping for a radical response. I tend to deal with people like you dime a dozen and saw you coming a mile off. It is for this reason I re-directed you to a source which you can no doubt relate to. However, you did not heed to my advice ( why am I not surprised) and now give me no choice but to start another lesson.
For the record, the term fundamental is derived from the Latin word 'fundamentum' meaning foundation or base. The adjective of this word means basic, central, essential, principal.
So you see, as another Guppie stated, every human on earth is a Fundamentalist. Why? because they all have some foundation and core values which they 'fundamentally' believe in. Whatever they are, they have something. Including you. Therefore, you now become the fundamentalist. Can you therefore take the liberty to answer your own post please. I can help with the answers if you require.
Moving on, I see you quote our Holy Book as being outdated. If this is the case then what becomes of the previous scriptures such as the Bible, Torah, Psalms, Vedas, Geeta, Zend Avesta, Jain Texts, Kojiki & Nihongi, Tripitaka & Dhammapada, Tao Te Ching, The Analects & Adi Granth. You see, these books are the most important 'scriptures' for these Faiths and came way before the Qur'aan, even though some of them are man-made, but nevertheless they are the central theme and guidance for the related communities. Please take your time on this one as I wouldn't want to be accused of rushing you for an answer!
What you attempted was a pathetic jump on the current common bandwagon approach 'loosely' using the word Fundamentalists hoping to get away with it and not realising that there are people like Sholay on this Forum waiting for the likes of you.
Now you can say, 'this really is a pleasant day for me'.
[/quote]
"If you've taken the liberty of viewing my previous posts, then you are no doubt fully aware that I can take you to school and back on any issue you choose to discuss."
While viewing your previous posts I was not asked for any permission from your side so I was at my liberty. You can only take any one to a school because you appear to be a school master.
"The problem with this post my son is that you are new on this Forum and have chosen to ask questions using your emotions rather than your intellect. Within these emotions you have used the classic 'programmed' stereotypical approach hoping for a radical response. I tend to deal with people like you dime a dozen and saw you coming a mile off. It is for this reason I re-directed you to a source which you can no doubt relate to. However, you did not heed to my advice ( why am I not surprised) and now give me no choice but to start another lesson."
Ok! Start your lesson...
"For the record, the term fundamental is derived from the Latin word 'fundamentum' meaning foundation or base. The adjective of this word means basic, central, essential, principal. "
I am not concerned over 'fundamental'. I was talking of 'fundamentalist Muslims'. I am not interested in your Latin or English Garammer.
"So you see, as another Guppie stated, every human on earth is a Fundamentalist. Why? because they all have some foundation and core values which they 'fundamentally' believe in. Whatever they are, they have something. Including you. Therefore, you now become the fundamentalist. Can you therefore take the liberty to answer your own post please. I can help with the answers if you require."
Now you say that every one is a fundamentalist whereas in your previous post you denied yourself being a fudamentalist. You said in your previous post that I will not find any fundamentalist on this forum. You also tried to direct me to some other forum. However, your present analysis may be correct but rememer that I was not talking of any 'fundamentalist'. I was talking of only 'fundamentalist Muslims'.
"Moving on, I see you quote our Holy Book as being outdated. If this is the case then what becomes of the previous scriptures such as the Bible, Torah, Psalms, Vedas, Geeta, Zend Avesta, Jain Texts, Kojiki & Nihongi, Tripitaka & Dhammapada, Tao Te Ching, The Analects & Adi Granth. You see, these books are the most important 'scriptures' for these Faiths and came way before the Qur'aan, even though some of them are man-made, but nevertheless they are the central theme and guidance for the related communities. Please take your time on this one as I wouldn't want to be accused of rushing you for an answer!"
**Despite your "vast experience" you have been unable to guess my mind. I myself have to open it before you. Quran is the most recent Holy Text. It is about 14 or 15 hundered years old. Other Holy Texts you quoted are even more ancient. If I can consider Quran to be 'out dated' (I mean it does not contain practical solutions to practical problems of present or future world.), then why should I consider all other religious holy texts to be 'up to date'? Surly all these religious holy texts are 'out dated'. Your analysis that older religios holy texts are still the central theme and guidence for related communities is not correct. World's most advanced communities do not believe in any religious theme. For example, they are christiens by name only. They openly critisize the teachings of bible and New Testament. They, despite being Christiens, do not believe in any super natural charactristics of Jesus, their holy person. They do not believe biblical description of how universe originated. Rather they believe in related scientific theories. They do not believe in Adam Eve Story as is described in their bible. They give more importance to Darwin's theory. So ancient religios holy texts are not the central theme and guidence for the related communities.
In present world, only 'Fundamentalists Jews' and "Fundamentalist Muslims" still insist their ancient holy texts to be the central theme and guidence. I condemn both Jew and Muslim Fundamentalists. This is a forum to discuss matters especially related to Muslims. I can ask all these questions to funadamentalist Jews as well on some other forum ofcourse.**
"What you attempted was a pathetic jump on the current common bandwagon approach 'loosely' using the word Fundamentalists hoping to get away with it and not realising that there are people like Sholay on this Forum waiting for the likes of you."
I have shown your misjudgments about me and your wrong analysis about the followers of other religions in previous para. People like you can be easily handled by people like me.
And it is another fine day for me.