Qalma, wrong?

*"invoking anyone with Allah", "joining anyone with Allah" which makes up the "shirk" is strictly forbidden and regarded as "un-forgivable" sin. when Muslims say the kalima "la ilaaha il-Allah Muhammad-ur rasool-ul-Allah", how does it make up for "invoking anyone" or "joining anyone". No Muslim ask Mohammed PBUH for his sins to be forgiven, no Muslim asks Mohammed PBUH for his 'rizk' to be expanded, no Muslim *uses Mohammad PBUH to pass his 'requests' (prayers) to Allah.

Why do people think of kalima in present form as "shirk"? "joining with Allah"? "invoking anyone with Allah" etc?
**

PakistaniAbroad, would you mind answering questions above??? I waited for a while for you to answer.


May Allah SWT guide us all towards right and help us follow the right

[quote]
Why do people think of kalima in present form as "shirk"? "joining with Allah"? "invoking anyone with Allah" etc?
[/quote]

Changez,

I apologize for the delay in responding. Seems like I've a unique point of view and have to work harder to respond to all queries directed at me.

For a short and quick response to your query, brother tell me what's so wrong with the alleged Shiite 'kalima' in which Ali's name is also cited??

You'd soon discover that it's factually correct but PRINCIPALLY wrong to bear witness to anyone elses responsibility or status in the religion in the same breath as bearing witness to Allah's oneness.

I'd be arguing Brother Ibrahim's statements inshallah so this matter will become more clear to us all.

Allah Knows Best

[quote]
Originally posted by PakistaniAbroad:
** Changez,

.......
For a short and quick response to your query, brother tell me what's so wrong with the alleged Shiite 'kalima' in which Ali's name is also cited??

You'd soon discover that it's factually correct but PRINCIPALLY wrong to bear witness to anyone elses responsibility or status in the religion in the same breath as bearing witness to Allah's oneness.
....**
[/quote]

My question is about "shirk" not if it is technically/politically/principally correct.


May Allah SWT guide us all towards right and help us follow the right

I thought you'd grasp it by now..

the 'PRINCIPAL' involved is shirk itself. Not elevating ANYONE or ANYTHING to the status of Allah.

Should you feel compelled to witness the oneness of ALLAH.. just witness that ALONE. DO NOT add your testimony to the religious status of other human beings.

[quote]
anyone who denies the teachings of the prophet (pbuh) is denying the prophet (pbuh) and in one sense denying Allah (swt) , since it was Allah (swt) who appointed him as a guide for mankind.
[/quote]

and I never disagreed. My contention is that Allah never guaranteed the sanctity and authenticity of 'records' of the conversations of the Prophet outside the Qur'anic message. Allah however promised to keep the Qur'anic revelations by the Prophet intact in the form of a Qur'an and told us that the Prophet's sole duty was to deliver the message clearly and believers were to 'obey' this message he was preaching.

[an-Nur 24:54.46] Say, `Obey ALLAH, and obey the Messenger.' But if you turn away, he is responsible for what he is charged with and you are responsible for what you are charged with. And if you obey him, you will be rightly guided. And the Messenger is only responsible for the plain delivery of the Message.

Does it get any clearer?? if we obey him, we will be rightly guided because he is delivering the message. Allah's Message which is in the Qur'an.

The Prophet fulfilled his responsibility and delivered the Qur'an. It's upto us to learn it and understand it and uphold.

(al-`Ankabut 29:18) And if you reject the truth, then the generations before you also rejected it. And the Messenger is only responsible for the clear delivery of the Message.

The Prophet was responsible for NOTHING MORE. Just the clear delivery of the Message.

[quote]
A person must recite the shahadah to convert to Islam. The shahadah in Islam is:: "I testify that there is no god but Allah and I testify that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah
[/quote]

This does not move the argument forward. I know what it is, All I wanted to know was the source.

[quote]
Thus the combination of both testimonies confirms the individuals faith in Allah and his chosen prophet.
[/quote]

How come this formula, of joining one line from a verse with another?

[quote]
The Kalima that Muslims recite was taught by the Prophets and recited by all prophets and their followers according to the titles that those prophets were given by Allah (swt)
[/quote]

This appears to be pure conjecture on the part of 'scholars'.

[quote]
In short a person who submits to Allah (swt) must bear testimony of his faith .
[/quote]

Yes.. now your getting closer. A person who submits to Allah HAS to declare his submission. His testimony to have submitted to Allah. For sure Allah doesn't want him to say that he 'witnesses' that Allah is one.

My previous posts has the verses which clarify that Allah alone as witness is enough. What is needed is for the person to declare his submission to Allah.

So the 'kalima' or 'shahada' would be the person embracing the religion to declare that he does indeed submit to Allah.

[quote]
His faith is firstly to bear testimony that there is no god but Allah and secondly to bear testimony that he /she is following such and such prophet.
[/quote]

This is where you start to lose me. Who made this theory up? Allah never asked us to submit to him by saying this. Think about it, the 'shahada' you claim has 'rasul Allah' in it; testifying to a 'messenger of Allah'.

Now you know more than me that there were many many overlapping messengers. Can you imagine the dilemma of people trying to decide between Yaqoob and Al-Asbat (twelve sons of Yaqub)? Musa and Haroon? Who should they 'testify' to?

The answer is simple. The messengers NEVER asked their people to testify their risaalat They only invited them to submit to Allah. And since the religion is that of Abraham, the testimony remained the same over the periods of time through different messengers and DID NOT change between messengers.

(al-Baqarah 2:130) And who will turn away from the religion of Abraham but he who makes a fool of himself. Him did we choose in this world, and in the next he will surely be among the righteous.

So this is the beginning. The religion of Abraham is our religion. Surely Allah would have told Abraham how to recite the 'kalima'.

(al-Baqarah 2:131)When his Lord said to him, Be a Muslim, he said: I submit myself to the Lord of the worlds.

Here's the 'kalima'

Aslamtu Li Rabbil Aalameen

That's how Abraham, the father of our religion declared his submission to Allah when Allah specifically asked him to be a Muslim, a submitter to Allah.

And he taught his children the same thing

(al-Baqarah 2:132) The same did Abraham enjoin upon his sons, - and Jacob also - saying, `O my sons, truly ALLAH has chosen this religion for you; so let not death overtake you except when you are in a state of complete submission.'

And then Jacob, when he was dying, took the same 'shahada' from his sons.

(al-Baqarah 2:132) Were you present when death came to Jacob, when he said to his sons. What will you worship after me ?' They answered,We will worship thy God, the God of thy fathers, Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac, the One God; and to HIM we submit ourselves.'

The Queen of Sheba, when invited to Islam by Solomon, didn't 'testify' anything else but:

(an-Naml 27:44) It was said to her, Enter the palace.' And when she saw it, she thought it to be a great expanse of water, and she bared her shanks. Solomon said,It is a palace paved smooth with slabs of glass.' She said, `My Lord, indeed I have wronged my soul; and I submit myself with Solomon to ALLAH, the Lord of the worlds.'

And the disciples of Jesus

(Al-Imran 3:52) But when Isa perceived unbelief on their part, he said Who will be my helpers in Allah's way? The disciples said: We are helpers (in the way) of Allah: We believe in Allah and bear witness that we are submitting ones.

Remember the importance of Abraham, the father of our religion.

[an-Nahl 16:120] Abraham was indeed a paragon of virtue, obedient to ALLAH, ever inclined to HIM , and he was not of those who set up equals with ALLAH;

And Allah taught the same way to our Prophet too:

[an-Nahl 16:123] And now WE have sent revelation to thee, enjoining, `Follow the way of Abraham who was ever inclined to ALLAH and was not of those who set up equals to HIM.'

And did the Prophet follow the same way of Abraham, submitting to ALLAH ALONE and not setting up equals to HIM?

[al-Mu'min 40:66] Say, I have been forbidden to worship those whom you call upon beside ALLAH since there have come clear proofs unto me from MY Lord; and I have been commanded to submit myself solely to the Lord of the worlds.'

aslima li rabbil aalameen

For those who dare to dispute with the Prophet:

(Al-Imran 3:20) So if they dispute with thee, say: "I have submitted My whole self to God and so have those who follow me." And say to the People of the Book and to those who are unlearned: "Do ye (also) submit yourselves?" If they do, they are in right guidance, but if they turn back, Thy duty is to convey the Message; and in God's sight are (all) His servants.

(al-Anam 6:71) Say,Shall we call beside ALLAH, upon that which can neither profit us nor harm us, and shall we be turn back on our heels after ALLAH guided us ? - Like one whom the evil ones entice away, leaving him bewildered in the land, and who has companions who call him to guidance, saying, Come to us.' Say :Surely, the guidance of ALLAH is the only true guidance and we have been commanded to submit to the Lord of all the worlds.

Brother and sisters, over and over again in the Qur'an, Allah tells us the way the father of our religion Abraham, his sons, and sons of his sons, other messengers and our beloved Prophet accepted Islam and declared their 'submission to Allah the Lord of the Worlds'. Let's declare our submission today.

The same 'kalima' of Abraham.

Aslamtu Li Rabbil Aalameen

Allah Akbar
Allah Knows Best


These are GOD's revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than GOD and His revelations do they believe?(45:6)

[quote]
Originally posted by PakistaniAbroad:
My contention is that Allah never guaranteed the sanctity and authenticity of 'records' of the conversations of the Prophet outside the Qur'anic message.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Salaams to all,

PA,you mean you received revelations to this effect? or what the Prophet (pbuh) have scribes written and what the companions of the Prophet memorized relentlessly and transferred to later generations are all false??

Tell you what, collect all the Qur’an on this planet and lock it up and challenge the Muslims, if they can put it back to together word for word without errors ( i.e. about 6000 plus verses) . If you are sure they can do that be sure they can also memorize the kalima ( one verse long) without getting it wrong (ever).

Only the ignorant would try to argue about what Muslims have memorized and repeated over and over again. BTW they are people who also memorize the hadiths word for word. And it was transmitted in this form too, until it was later compiled by others.

[quote]
Allah however promised to keep the Qur'anic revelations by the Prophet intact in the form of a Qur'an and told us that the Prophet's sole duty was to deliver the message clearly and believers were to 'obey' this message he was preaching.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; your statement is full of errors.

1) Qur’anic revelations are NOT by the Prophet but through the Prophet and are the words that originates from Allah (swt)

2) How does a Prophet deliver a message clearly , when the wordings are from Allah (swt)? are you saying the Prophet added his own words or did Allah (swt) gave a confused message that made it unclear in the first place?

3) hence are you claiming It took 23 years for a prophet to convey 6000 plus verses to mankind and the Prophet made a mistake in guiding his followers on matters that were fundamental for that faith to be put into practice ( which are not found in that revelation) ?

[quote]
PA wrote: [an-Nur 24:54.46] Say, `Obey ALLAH, and obey the Messenger.' But if you turn away, he is responsible for what he is charged with and you are responsible for what you are charged with. And if you obey him, you will be rightly guided. And the Messenger is only responsible for the plain delivery of the Message.
Does it get any clearer?? if we obey him, we will be rightly guided because he is delivering the message. Allah's Message which is in the Qur'an.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Read! 4: 80 ** He who obeys the Apostle obeys Allah:** but if any turn away We have not sent thee to watch over their (evil deeds)

Does this need to be any clearer? If you failed to obey how he taught you to pray would you be obeying him or disobeying him?

Can we consider your deeds evil than?

Show us where in the Qur’an Allah (swt) taught us how to worship him or do you believe the Prophet invented his own methods and allowed everyone to invent one for themselves according to their whims and fancies ?

Now read!

6:90 Those were the (prophets) who received Allah's guidance: ** copy the guidance they received;** Say: "No reward for this do I ask of you: this is no less than a Message for the nations."

Now PA , THINK!!! , you need to that when you read the Qur’an or want to be a Muslim .

First a message is being sent by the Creator to mankind via a chosen prophet. Allah (swt) could have written it in the skies or dropped the Qur’an from the sky, IF he so willed , but he chose a man and made it a book, such that we will take our guidance from that man.

That message contains instructions that you MUST obey that man

That message further tell you he is being guided and the rest should copy him and his ways.

Now here you are, appearing after 1422 years later , telling us that what ever the Prophet (pbuh) did is mentioned in the Qur’an, OK! , ** show me where in the Qur’an, Allah (swt) had guided us on how we are to submit in worship to the Creator? **

[quote]
The Prophet fulfilled his responsibility and delivered the Qur'an. It's upto us to learn it and understand it and uphold. (al-`Ankabut 29:18) And if you reject the truth, then the generations before you also rejected it. And the Messenger is only responsible for the ** clear ** delivery of the Message.
The Prophet was responsible for NOTHING MORE. Just the clear delivery of the Message.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: PA, you keep repeating the same thing! , was there an argument that the prophet failed in delivering the message? , surely not! at the same time, you failed to understand why the word “CLEAR” is mentioned in those verses.
Contemplate on it and ask yourself how can the prophet make things clear, if he had not been guided and when he is guided ( why it is not in the Qur’an) where are his works/efforts/instructions/teachings that explain the message (ayats) and make it clear?

[quote]
How come this formula, of joining one line from a verse with another?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; It is not one verse joining with another, it is a testimony uttered as such which was what had been practiced from ancient times , which was taught to the prophet (pbuh) and by the prophet ( pbuh) to Muslims to put into practice.

If you chose to reject it, than clearly you are on an erroneous path framed by your own mind, for this guidance had not only been transferred in written form but also via memory just like scripture for 1422 years.

[quote]
This appears to be pure conjecture on the part of 'scholars'.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: which means you are blind of what you read even! I had already quoted the ayat where even Allah (swt) exposes the hypocrites for practicing such testimonies without being sincere about it.

Read!

63: 1 When the Hypocrites come to thee ** they say "We bear witness that thou art indeed the Apostle of Allah." ** Yea Allah knoweth that thou art indeed His Apostle and Allah beareth witness that the Hypocrites are indeed liars.

Read AGAIN that above verse and THINK before you reply!

IF bearing witness , meaning testifying that Muhammad (pbuh) was the Apostle of Allah (swt) was not a requirement or had not been in practice even at the time the Qur’an was being revealed and approved/accepted by Allah (swt) , why would this verse be revealed ?

Now If hypocrites bore false witness due to their hypocrisy what would believers be doing?

[quote]
For sure Allah doesn't want him to say that he 'witnesses' that Allah is one.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; hmm.. according to your fancies? Or should Muslims be following the guidance of their prophet( pbuh) ? BTW the shahada is not said/made to the Prophet (pbuh) but to Allah (swt) and ** most of all when we say there is no god but Allah we are saying, There is ONLY Allah (swt) and Allah (swt) has no equals not Allah (swt) is one, further the second part confirming that even the Prophet is only a messenger of Allah establishes that he is not equal to Allah (swt) but his messenger only **

[quote]
My previous posts has the verses which clarify that Allah alone as witness is enough. What is needed is for the person to declare his submission to Allah.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; you seem awfully silly and keep making assertions without valid proofs as to what you are implying. I have not seen you quote any verse where Allah (swt) had instructed those who submit to bare witness in this way or that way, such guidance’s are conveyed to the chosen prophet by the angels who are sent to guide him and than after conveyed to mankind by that prophet . It becomes a prophetic teaching and is practiced as such. But you are the denier of Prophetic teachings , so how do you expect to understand Islam?

Your folly here is that you do not realize that each prophet is responsible for his own flock ( meaning they will be the one to intercede (when allowed by Allah) on his/her behalf on the day of judgment and most of all they will be judged by what had been approved or disapproved for that Prophet and not by what has been approved or disapproved to another prophet) hence the testimony of the person who submits MUST clearly state who the person is submitting to and who is the Prophet he/she is following.

[quote]
So the 'kalima' or 'shahada' would be the person embracing the religion to declare that he does indeed submit to Allah.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; according to you and not according to the chosen prophet by Allah (swt)

Will you ever understand, submission is not done by uttering the kalima but by following the rules and regulations set out by Allah (swt) and put into practice by the respective Prophet assigned for that time frame.?

[quote]
* Ibrahim says: His faith is firstly to bear testimony that there is no god but Allah and secondly to bear testimony that he /she is following such and such prophet. *

PA: This is where you start to lose me. Who made this theory up?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Read above and THINK, you only came into the scene some tens of years ago, the Prophet (pbuh) whom I obey gave clear guidance and Allah (swt) further enriches me and Muslims by his Grace , He did not leave such matters to be guessed by every tom, dick and harry like you.

The testimony one undertakes when he/she chose to accept Islam is that he/she accepts to obey Allah (swt) by declaring “There is no god but Allah” and second that he/she is following the foot steps of the chosen prophet and in our time frame it has to be Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and none other.

[quote]
Allah never asked us to submit to him by saying this.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; why would Allah (swt) ask “us” when He has already appointed a chosen Prophet and advise all and sundry to copy his ways not yours or mine?

Stop making silly comments like this, for your own good.

[quote]
Think about it, the 'shahada' you claim has 'rasul Allah' in it; testifying to a 'messenger of Allah'.

[/quote]

Ibrahim says; If you had sufficient senses you would understand, why it says that but I suppose you need to be spoon fed…you see, earlier generations did take their prophets and anchorites as gods, hence when one testifies that so and so is only a messenger of Allah (swt) and not Allah (swt) or his equal in any form or shape, one establishes and testifies and ensures that the truth of who that person is remains unaltered for ever

[quote]
Now you know more than me that there were many many overlapping messengers. Can you imagine the dilemma of people trying to decide between Yaqoob and Al-Asbat (twelve sons of Yaqub)? Musa and Haroon? Who should they 'testify' to?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; man you are not asked to testify to anyone accept to Allah (swt) and the kalima taught by the prophet (pbuh) does not testify to the Prophet but attest that you are to be considered as being under his flock . Whatever words you utter or just kept secret in your mind has all been recorded and you will be held accountable for it.

Read!

2: 284 To Allah belongeth all that is in the heavens and on earth. ** Whether ye show what is in your minds or conceal it Allah calleth you to account for it. ** He forgiveth whom He pleaseth and punisheth whom He pleaseth. For Allah hath power over all things.

Hence, when people bear false testimony, Allah (swt) is fully aware of it

This should be simple to understand for those who are firm in faith….you see

If you did not testify that you are a follower of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) or you testified that you are a follower of Prophet Musa (pbuh) . The obligations vary and in one case Sabbath becomes obligatory as opposed to it being abrogated for the followers of prophet Muhammad (pbuh) .

As such it is clear that you lack knowledge and your argument is based on your whims and fancies (folly when it comes to religion) and not based on the correct understanding of religion of truth.

[quote]
The answer is simple. The messengers NEVER asked their people to testify their risaalat They only invited them to submit to Allah. And since the religion is that of Abraham, the testimony remained the same over the periods of time through different messengers and DID NOT change between messengers.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; this is your own conjecture and not based on what the Prophets had taught their followers. I had already quoted the testimony by many prophets and they have remained consistent. Your failure is due to lack of knowledge as to why Allah (swt) enjoined or abrogated certain practices for different prophets. What was obligatory for one prophet had been changed by Allah (swt) to another prophet , as such each group will be judged according to what was taught by that prophet and not by what was taught by prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) .

BTW, only those without knowledge will talk about Abraham and the Qur’an has no such person mentioned in it. His name was Ibrahim (pbuh) , translations may use the word Abraham, Jesus, God ( just to make it easier for non Muslims to understand them) BUT such words are not found in the Qur’an

quote And who will turn away from the religion of Abraham but he who makes a fool of himself. Him did we choose in this world, and in the next he will surely be among the righteous.
So this is the beginning. The religion of Abraham is our religion.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: The beginning is from Prophet Adam (pbuh) and not from Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) BUT the new laws and a new generation was enacted from Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) for generations coming after Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) hence we are all considered practicing the same religion , yet we are not subject to what was given to prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) but what was given to prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

Read!

37: 79 ** "Peace and salutation to Noah among the nations!" **

80 Thus indeed do We reward those who do right.

81 For he was one of Our believing Servants.

82 Then the rest We overwhelmed in the Flood.

83 ** Verily among those who followed his Way was Abraham.**

Ibrahim says; hence what Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) himself followed was also similar to what was taught by Prophet Nuh (pbuh)

[quote]
Surely Allah would have told Abraham how to recite the 'kalima'.
When his Lord said to him, Be a Muslim, he said: I submit myself to the Lord of the worlds. Here's the 'kalima' Aslamtu Li Rabbil Aalameen That's how Abraham, the father of our religion declared his submission to Allah when Allah specifically asked him to be a Muslim, a submitter to Allah.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: So according to you, the Prophets (pbuh) had failed to teach his followers how to testify before Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) ? or did Allah (swt) ask you this question ("Bow (thy will to me)"? ) as Allah (swt) had asked the Prophet Ibrahim ( pbuh), for you or others to repeat what was said by him to Allah (swt)?

** Please tell me when Allah (swt) went around asking you or others questions? **

[quote]
And he taught his children the same thing
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; let me make this simple for you, under mentioned are the verses you quote as evidence for the kalima being aslamtu li rabbil 'a_lamin(a ?

(al-Baqarah 2:131) ** aslamtu li rabbil 'a_lamin(a). **

(al-Baqarah 2:132) Wa wassa_ biha_ ibra_himu banihi wa ya'qu_b(u), ya_ bunayya innalla_has tafa_ lakumud dina fala_ tamu_tunna illa_** wa antum muslimu_n(a). **

(al-Baqarah 2:132 ) [This is verse 133 and not 132] Am kuntum syuhada_'a iz hadara ya'qu_bal maut(u), iz qa_la li banihi ma_ ta'budu_na mim ba'di, qa_lu_ na'budu ila_haka wa ila_ha a_ba_'ika ibra_hima wa isma_'ila wa isha_qa ila_haw wa_hida_(n),** wa nahnu lahu_ muslimu_n(a). **

(an-Naml 27:44) Qila lahad hulis sar falam ma_ ra at hu hasibat hu luj jataw wa kasyafat an sa_qaiha_ qa_la in nahu_ sarhum mumar radum min qawa_rir qa_lat rab bi in ni zalamtu nafsi ** wa aslamtu ** ma'a sulaima_na lil la_hi rab bil a_lamin

(Al-Imran 3:52) Falamma_ ahassa 'isa_ minhumul kufra qa_la man ansa_ri ilalla_h(i), qa_lal hawa_riyyu_na nahnu ansa_rulla_h(i), a_manna_ billa_h(i), wasyhad bi ** anna_ muslimu_n(a) **

Ibrahim says: PA, now explain to me why your kailma (aslamtu li rabbil 'a_lamin(a). is not found in the rest of the verses that you claim is supposedly the same kalima uttered by most of the other prophets ?

[quote]
PA posts the following verses [an-Nahl 16:120] [an-Nahl 16:123] [al-Mu'min 40:66] and claims this testify that the kalima is aslima li rabbil aalameen
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: here you go to lengths and quote the above verses to try and imply that Allah (swt) has no equals, which is what the kalima practiced by all Prophets testifies in principal “la ilaha ill-Allah” meaning there are no other equals to Allah (swt)

Show me where in the Qur’an or another book the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) taught
this “aslima li rabbil aalameen” (meaning : I bow (my will) to the Lord and
Cherisher of the universe." ) to his followers as the shahada ?

[quote]
For those who dare to dispute with the Prophet:
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Are you not disputing with the prophet by negating what he has taught?

Read!

60: 4 There is for you an excellent example (to follow) in Abraham and those with him when they said to their people: "We are clear of you and of ** whatever ye worship besides Allah:** we have rejected you and there has arisen between us and you enmity and hatred forever ** unless ye believe in Allah and Him alone":** But not when Abraham said to his father: "I will pray for forgiveness for thee though I have no power (to get) aught on thy behalf from Allah." (They prayed): "Our Lord! in Thee do we trust and to Thee do we turn in repentance: to Thee is (our) final Goal

walla here we have it!

See what Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) insisted upon

1) "We are clear of you and of ** whatever ye worship besides Allah:**

2) ** unless ye believe in Allah and Him alone":**

[quote ]
PA posts (Al-Imran 3:20) , (al-An`am 6:71) and writes Brother and sisters, over and over again in the Qur'an, Allah tells us the way the father of our religion Abraham, his sons, and sons of his sons, other messengers and our beloved Prophet accepted Islam and declared their 'submission to Allah the Lord of the Worlds'. Let's declare our submission today.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: you mean lets make a fool ourselves like you? Sorry PA, there is no other way to make you understand the fact that all Muslims submit to Allah (swt) alone when they testify and say “La ilaha ill-Allah” ( just like Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) insisted upon his own father and followers)** and when they say “Muhammadur Rasoolullah” , they testify that they are following the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) as is required in this time frame. ** If you claim you have no prophet to follow accept your own whims and fancies , that is your own making and has nothing to do with Islam as taught by the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)

Islam further teaches

Read!

6: 102 Such is Allah, your Lord. ** There is no God save Him,** the Creator of all things, ** so worship Him. And He taketh care of all things. **
Za_likumulla_hu rabbukum,** la_ ila_ha illa_ huw(a) ** , kha_liqu kulli syai'in fa'budu_h(u), wa huwa 'ala_ kulli syai'iw wakil(un).

103 Vision comprehendeth Him not, but He comprehendeth (all) vision. *He is the Subtile, the Aware. *

104 Proofs have come unto you from your Lord, ** so whoso seeth, it is for his own good, and whoso is blind is blind to his own hurt. ** And I am not a keeper over you.

105 Thus do We display Our revelations that they may say (unto thee, Muhammad): "Thou hast studied," and ** that We may make (it) clear for people who have knowledge **

Ibrahim says; just so that you will get your head straight some time soon.

Read!

2: 163 Wa ila_hukum ila_huw wa_hid(un), ** la_ ila_ha illa_ huwar** rahma_nur rahim(u).

2: 255 ** Alla_hu la_ ila_ha illa_ huw(a), ** al hayyul qayyu_m(u), la_ ta'khuzuhu_ sinatuw wa la_ naum(un), lahu_ ma_ fis sama_wa_ti wa ma_ fil ard(i), man zal lazi yasyfa'un 'indahu_ illa_ bi iznih(i), ya'lamu ma_ baina aidihim wa ma_ khalfahum wa la_ yuhitu_na bi syai'im min'ilmihi illa_ bima_ sya_'(a), wasi'a kursiyyuhus sama_wa_ti wal ard(a), wa la_ ya'u_duhu_ hifzuhuma_, wa huwal 'aliyyul 'azim(u).

3: 2 ** Alla_hu la_ ila_ha illa_ huwal ** hayyul qayyu_m(u).

3: 6 Huwal lazi yusawwirukum fil arha_mi kaifa yasya_'(u), ** la_ ila_ha illa_ huwal ** 'azizul hakim(u).

3: 18 Syahidalla_hu annahu_ ** la_ ila_ha illa_ huw(a),** wal mala_'ikatu wa ulul 'ilmi qa_'imam bil qist(i),** la_ ila_ha illa_ huwal** 'azizul hakim(u).

4: 87 ** Alla_hu la_ ila_ha illa_ huw(a),** layajma'annakum ila_ yaumil qiya_mati la_ raiba fih(i), wa man asdaqu minalla_hi hadisa_(n).

6:102 Za_likumulla_hu rabbukum, ** la_ ila_ha illa_ huw(a),** kha_liqu kulli syai'in fa'budu_h(u), wa huwa 'ala_ kulli syai'iw wakil(un).

6: 106 Ittabi' ma_ u_hiya ilaika mir rabbik(a), ** la_ ila_ha illa_ huw(a), ** wa a'rid 'anil musyrikin(a).

7: 158 Qul ya_ ayyuhan na_su inni rasu_lulla_hi ilaikum jami'anillazi lahu_ mulkus sama_wa_ti wal ard(i), ** la_ ila_ha illa_ huwa ** yuhyi wa yumit(u), fa a_minu_ billa_hi wa rasu_lihin nabiyyil ummiyyil lazi yu'minu billa_hi wa kalima_tihi wattabi'u_hu la'allakum tahtadu_n(a).

9: 31 Ittakhazu_ ahba_rahum wa ruhba_nahum arba_bam min du_nilla_hi wal masihabna maryam(a), wa ma_ umiru_ illa_ liya'budu_ ila_haw wa_hida_(n), ** la_ ila_ha illa_ huw(a),** subha_nahu_ 'amma_ yusyriku_n(a).

9: 129 Fa in tawallau fa qul hasbiy** alla_hu la_ ila_ha illa_ huw(a),** 'alaihi tawakkaltu wa huwa rabbul 'arsyil 'azim(i).

11:14 Fa illam yastajibu_ lakum fa'lamu_ annama_ unzila bi 'ilmilla_hi wa ** alla_ ila_ha illa_ huw(a), ** fahal antum muslimu_n(a).

13:30 Kaza_lika arsalna_ka fi ummatin qad khalat min qabliha_ umamul litatluwa 'alaihimul lazi auhaina_ ilaika wa hum yakfuru_na bir rahma_n(i), qul huwa rabbi ** la_ ila_ha illa_ huw(a), ** 'alaihi tawakkaltu wa ilaihi mata_b(i).

Ibrahim says; ** show me how many times your new kalima (“aslima li rabbil aalameen”) is repeated in the Qur’an? ** PA this is a blessed month try not make a mockery of yourself, you may well end up being blessed with foolishness for the rest of your life if you do not repent for your foolish utterances, for Allah (swt) records all things.

Was salaam
Ibrahim

** Every time you talk your mind is on parade **

Great Ibrahim

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

Jazakallah

I also wanna add something here. PA, do you consider Azaan (call for prayers) valid or not? Casue Azaan contains the second part of kalima (Muhammad ur Rasoolullah).

Accoring to you, procedure of prayers and count of rakaats, are presrved traditions, so do you consider Azaan and Kalima as preserved traditions?

[This message has been edited by OASis (edited December 01, 2001).]

[quote]
Tell you what, collect all the Qur’an on this planet and lock it up and challenge the Muslims, if they can put it back together word for word without errors
[/quote]

I try and argue using just this particular strength; the authenticity of the Qur'an.

[al-Waqi`ah 56:77] That this is indeed a Qur'an Most Honourable,

[al-Waqi`ah 56:78] In a Book well-guarded,

The Hadith Books however are disputed, even among muslims. You claim they are beyond doubt and have gone too far in equating their 'quality' and 'accuracy' with the Qur'an. I disagree.

That's exactly where we depart.

*Ths issue at hand is how the 'bearing witness' and 'testimony' started and why adding the testimony to a messenger crept into the original 'testimony' and how today anyone who wishes to only cite Allah's name and omit the messenger's name is declared a 'kaafir' *

You still haven't produced a SINGLE source that explicitly tells "This is what you say when you 'embrace' Allah's religion". Not the azan, not some write up on someone's accepting Islam; direct instructions or the origin of establishment of the current 'kalima'.

Finding similar words in the Qur’an is not the goal. It’s the direct commandment, verse or description of a similar occasion when Prophets or their followers embraced Allah’s religion.

I have argued using such verses. You can do the same by producing the source for the exact statement you say is necessary to declare one’s acceptance of Allah’s religion; complete with the testimony to the messenger.

That at least will move the argument forward.

[quote]
2) How does a Prophet deliver a message clearly , when the wordings are from Allah (swt)? are you saying the Prophet added his own words or did Allah (swt) gave a confused message that made it unclear in the first place?
[/quote]

Please Read:

[al-Haqqah 69:43] It is a revelation from the Lord of the worlds.

[al-Haqqah 69:44] And if he had fabricated against Us some of the sayings,

[al-Haqqah 69:45] We would certainly have seized him by the right hand,

The Prophet didn't fabricate anything. Allah made sure he didn't and the message has reached us clearly as promised. The Prophet has thus fulfilled his duty to Allah of delivering the message clearly.

[quote]
3) hence are you claiming It took 23 years for a prophet to convey 6000 plus verses to mankind and the Prophet made a mistake in guiding his followers on matters that were fundamental for that faith to be put into practice (which are not found in that revelation)?
[/quote]

[quote]
Show us where in the Qur’an Allah (swt) taught us how to worship him or do you believe the Prophet invented his own methods and allowed everyone to invent one for themselves according to their whims and fancies ?
[/quote]

[quote]
show me where in the Qur’an, Allah (swt) had guided us on how we are to submit in worship to the Creator?
[/quote]

[quote]
If you failed to obey how he taught you to pray would you be obeying him or disobeying him?
[/quote]

[quote]
Can we consider your deeds evil than?
[/quote]

How many times do I have to debunk the 'Salaat not in the Qur'an myth'? Topics on Ablutions, Specific Times of Salaat, Standing, Magnifying Allah, Bowing, Glorifying his name while bowing, Prostrating, Glorifying him, Method of reciting Qur'an (not too loud, not too low), and many other Salaat topics are in the Qur'an.

Can one get the ** EXACT ** methods by studying Hadiths? From Hadiths DIRECT from the Prophet, not some third person saying he observed the Prophet offer Salat in so and so way, because that is just an observed narration.

Does having the minute details of bowing and prostrating make these collections Books of Commandments?

The Qur'an has the ** COMPLETE ** message for our Salvation. Allah has included details of everything. When Allah omits something, it is for the purpose of providing us flexibility in our religion and not an omission or oversight (naoozobillah).

[Yusuf 12:111] In their history, there is a lesson for those who possess intelligence. This is not fabricated Hadith; this (Quran) confirms all previous scriptures, provides the details of everything, and is a beacon and mercy for those who believe.

Prophet conveyed Allah's message for us to pray. Many times in the Qur'an, Allah tells us to pray. Message conveyed. We can obey Allah and his Prophet by establishing prayer, something not entirely new to the Planet as you would have us believe. Generations before us used to offer Salaat and Zakat, it was enjoined on all before us as it was enjoined on us.

[Maryam 19:31] "He made me blessed wherever I go, and enjoined me to observe the * Salaat * and * Zakat * for as long as I live.

So now if we find Books from Orthodox Christians on how to pray, do they become our Books of Commandments?

and while we're at it, the testimony you defend is also used in Salaat; taking a messenger's name with Allah, here's what Allah has to say about that

[al-Jinn 72:18] And that the mosques are Allah's, ** therefore call not upon any one with Allah: **

[quote]
First a message is being sent by the Creator to mankind via a chosen prophet. Allah (swt) could have written it in the skies or dropped the Qur’an from the sky, IF he so willed , but he chose a man and made it a book, such that we will take our guidance from that man.
[/quote]

Qur'an tells us that creations REFUSED to carry the burden of the Qur'an. Man took that covenant. It is a test when a man from among his nation stands up and proclaims the message of Allah. Nations have always been inclined towards idol-worship, wanting to see Allah's manifestation into something tangible,

[an-Nisa' 4:153.33] The followers of the Book ask you to bring down to them a book from heaven; so indeed they demanded of Musa a greater thing than that, for they said: Show us Allah manifestly; so the lightning overtook them on account of their injustice. Then they took the calf (for a god), after clear signs had come to them, but We pardoned this; and We gave to Musa clear authority.

Now you know why Allah didn't just send a Book but chose to reveal it through messengers. So he could separate the believers from the idol-worshippers who need an object or a personality to believe in Allah, without whom they'd still insist to cling to the alleged sayings of that person who brought the message, neglecting the Real Message he brought.

The guidance is ** NOT ** from the man, but from the ** MESSAGE ** which the Messenger is conveying. Messenger was on his own for 40 years, no one was taking any guidance from him till Allah chose him to deliver ** The Message **

Allah teaches us the religion.

[al-Baqarah 2:138.23] Say, `We have adopted the religion of ALLAH; ** and who is better than ALLAH in teaching religion, and him alone do we worship.'**

Who is responsible for explaining the Qur’an?

[al-Qiyamah 75:16] Do not move your tongue with it to make haste with it,

[al-Qiyamah 75:17] ** Surely on Us (devolves) the collecting of it and the reciting of it.**

[al-Qiyamah 75:18] Therefore when We have recited it, ** follow its recitation.**

[al-Qiyamah 75:19] *Again on Us (devolves) the explaining of it *

And who will guide us and with what?

[az-Zumar 39:23] ** Allah has revealed the best Hadith, A Book ** conformable in its various parts, repeating, whereat do shudder the skins of those who fear their Lord, then their skins and their hearts become pliant to the remembrance of Allah; this is Allah's guidance, ** He guides with it whom He pleases; ** and (as for) him whom Allah makes err, there is no guide for him.

[quote]
Ibrahim says; It is not one verse joining with another, it is a testimony uttered as such which was what had been practiced from ancient times , which was taught to the prophet (pbuh) and by the prophet ( pbuh) to Muslims to put into practice
[/quote]

You have yet to show me verses from the Qur'an where Prophets are quoted as bearing witness to Allah and their own status or a previous messenger’s status.

[quote]
If you chose to reject it, than clearly you are on an erroneous path framed by your own mind, for this guidance had not only been transferred in written form but also via memory just like scripture for 1422 years.
[/quote]

This is the fundamental disagreement. I am highly skeptical of the accounts that people collected and proclaimed as sayings of the Prophet; you embrace them with the same reverence and confidence as you would the Qur'an. You fail to see the numerous contradictions these Books have in themselves and with the teachings of the Qur'an, not to mention the method of compilation which checks the authenticity of the last relating person rather than the content itself.

[quote]
63:1 When the Hypocrites come to thee they say "We bear witness that thou art indeed the Apostle of Allah." Yea Allah knoweth that thou art indeed His Apostle and Allah beareth witness that the Hypocrites are indeed liars.

Read AGAIN that above verse and THINK before you reply!
[/quote]

The hypocrites came to the Prophet.

They testified the messenger is the messenger of Allah. ** It doesn't imply what they said was an established testimony, or is the right testimony **, in fact Allah scorns at their testimony saying He knows who Muhammad is.

The hypocrites thus tried to hide behind this 'oath'.

[al-Munafiqun 63:2] They make ** their oaths ** a shelter, and thus turn away from Allah's way; surely evil is that which they do.

The background is striving in the way of Allah. The hypocrites were trying to wriggle out of it. They bore witness to the messenger trying to hide behind an 'oath'. Allah scorned at them saying that of course He knows that the messenger is the apostle of Allah, but the hypocrites are liars.

Yet today many people insist they add to their 'kalima' what the hypocrites said.

[quote]
PakistaniAbroad says: My previous posts have the verses, which clarify that Allah alone as witness is enough. What is needed is for the person to declare his submission to Allah.

Ibrahim says; you seem awfully silly and keep making assertions without valid proofs as to what you are implying. I have not seen you quote any verse where Allah (swt) had instructed those who submit to bare witness in this way or that way, such guidance’s are conveyed to the chosen prophet by the angels who are sent to guide him and than after conveyed to mankind by that prophet . It becomes a prophetic teaching and is practiced as such. But you are the denier of Prophetic teachings, so how do you expect to understand Islam?
[/quote]

Since you didn't do me the courtesy of searching my previous post for it, i'd have to reproduce it for you.

(an-Nisa' 4:166) But ALLAH bears witness by means of the revelation which HE has sent down to thee, that HE has sent it down full of HIS knowledge, and the angels also bear witness; ** and sufficient is ALLAH as a Witness.**

As for bearing witness to the Prophet being a messenger.

[an-Nisa' 4:79] Whatever good, (O man!) happens to thee, is from God; but whatever evil happens to thee, is from thy (own) soul. And We have sent thee as an apostle to (instruct) mankind. ** And enough is God for a witness.**

Once again Allah tells us that HE sent down Muhammad as a Prophet and HE himself is enough for a witness.

(al-Anam 6:19)] Say,What thing is the weightiest in testimony.' ** Say, ALLAH is a Witness between me and you.** And this Qur'an has been revealed to me so that with it I may warn you, as well as whomsoever it reaches, of the impending punishment. What ! do you really bear witness that there are other gods besides ALLAH ?' Say,I bear not witness thereto.' ** Say, `HE is the One God, and certainly I am innocent of that which you associate with HIM.'**

Now is it clear? Even the Prophet of Allah said Allah's testimony is the greatest. And he is not responsible when anyone assoicates anybody with Allah.

[quote]
Your folly here is that you do not realize that each prophet is responsible for his own flock ( meaning they will be the one to intercede (when allowed by Allah) on his/her behalf on the day of judgment and most of all they will be judged by what had been approved or disapproved for that Prophet and not by what has been approved or disapproved to another prophet) hence the testimony of the person who submits MUST clearly state who the person is submitting to and who is the Prophet he/she is following.
[/quote]

How many overlapping messengers were they? you get all tongue tied when I ask you to tell me plainly, To whom did the people of Moses and Haroon testify?

One simple answer will shatter your theory.

Please Also Read:

[Al-Imran 3:84] Say, `We believe in ALLAH and that which has been revealed to us, and that which was revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes, and in that which was given to Moses and Jesus and other Prophets from their Lord. *We make no distinction between any of them and to HIM we submit*

Prophets are for ** WARNING ** and ** CONVEYING THE MESSAGE ONLY**.

Guidance is from Allah and it is HE who will take us to account. Prophets bear witness to their respective flock (not the other way around) on the Day of Judgement that they did convey the message clearly. Intercession lies with Allah, whomever he allows.

[al-Ahzab 33:45.2] O Prophet! Lo! We have sent thee as a witness and a bringer of good tidings and a warner.

[an-Najm 53:56.2] This Messenger of Ours is a Warner like the Warners of Old.

[al-A`raf 7:184.10] Do they not consider that there is nothing of insanity about their companion ? He is only a plain warner.

[al-Baqarah 2:119.16] We have sent thee with the Truth, as a bearer of glad tidings and a Warner. And thou wilt not be questioned concerning the inmates of Hell.

And that’s ALL the Messenger was responsible for.

[al-Ma'idah 5:99] On the Messenger lies only the conveying of the Message. And ALLAH knows what you disclose and what you hide.

Prophet’s only responsibility to their flocks is conveying the message. They will bear witness to it in front of Allah.

With time message of the messenger gets corrupted by the likes of the very Books of Hadith you hold dear and Allah needs to send in another messenger.

[Al-Imran 3:50.3] `And I come fulfilling that which is before me, namely the Torah; and to allow you some of that which was forbidden unto you, and I come to you with a Sign from your Lord; so fear ALLAH and obey me.

Now what do the Jews do.. hmm keep Musa rasul allah, or Isa rasul ullah.?

[al-Ma'idah 5:19.44] O People of the Book! there indeed has come to you Our Messenger, after a break in the series of Messengers, who makes things clear to you lest you should say, `There has come to us no bearer of glad tidings and no Warner.' *So a bearer of glad tidings and a Warner * has indeed come to you. And ALLAH has power over all things

And now both Christians and Jews, are to decide whether it's to be Musa rasul ullah, Isa rasul ullah or Muhammad ur rasul ullah.

[quote]
Ibrahim says; according to you and not according to the chosen prophet by Allah (swt)
[/quote]

Qur’an is the word of Allah. When Ibrahim says "Aslamtu Li Rabbil Aalameen", what part of it do you not consider to be truthful?

[quote]
Prophet (pbuh) whom I obey gave clear guidance and Allah (swt) further enriches me and Muslims by his Grace , He did not leave such matters to be guessed by every tom, dick and harry like you.
[/quote]

So who did he leave it to? You seem so dead sure that the Hadith Books are the true word of the Prophet. I am highly skeptical. Which is why I wish to use Qur'an as the infallible reference ALONE, and Qur'an doesn't tell us that those who accepted Allah's religion also bore witness to the messengers.

[quote]
you see, earlier generations did take their prophets and anchorites as gods, hence when one testifies that so and so is only a messenger of Allah (swt) and not Allah (swt) or his equal in any form or shape, one establishes and testifies and ensures that the truth of who that person is remains unaltered for ever
[/quote]

I'm sure you'd have proofs which prove this theory of yours. Something that states that Allah enjoined the nations to recite their particular prophet's testimony.

[quote]
Ibrahim says; man you are not asked to testify to anyone accept to Allah (swt) and the kalima taught by the prophet (pbuh) does not testify to the Prophet but attest that you are to be considered as being under his flock
[/quote]

Once again.. overlapping messengers is the question. Whose flock are people with two or three messengers among them? Aren't they in a dilemma if they start testifying to messengers instead of Allah ALONE?

[quote]
Ibrahim says; this is your own conjecture and not based on what the Prophets had taught their followers.
[/quote]

I quoted qur’anic verses? You can call it conjecture at your own peril.

[quote]
I had already quoted the testimony by many prophets and they have remained consistent.
[/quote]

I think I definitely did miss that. where are the verses from the Qur’an explaining that the Prophets asked and taught their people to witness they are messengers of Allah?

[quote]
Ibrahim says: yet we are not subject to what was given to prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) but what was given to prophet Muhammad (pbuh)
[/quote]

Please Read:

[al-Hajj 22:78] And strive hard in (the way of) Allah, (such) a striving a is due to Him; He has chosen you and has not laid upon you an hardship in religion; the faith of your father Ibrahim; He named you Muslims before and in this, that the Apostle may be a bearer of witness to you, and you may be bearers of witness to the people; therefore keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate and hold fast by Allah; He is your Guardian; how excellent the Guardian and how excellent the Helper!

NO matter how you slice it. It’s the same Religion. We have all been Muslims from Day one, ** submitting to Allah.**

[quote]
Ibrahim says: PA, now explain to me why your kailma (aslamtu li rabbil 'a_lamin(a). is not found in the rest of the verses that you claim is supposedly the same kalima uttered by most of the other prophets ?
[/quote]

You are tied up in semantics. It happens when we grow up regarding text in Arabic as something surreal. Would it matter if it were not repeated? Do you think the prophets said something other than meaning “We submit to the Lord of the Universe”?? Is it not clear what Ibrahim said? Is it not clear the Prophets repeated his message by saying the same in meaning.

If the Qur’an doesn’t quote them verbatim do you think it makes it less of a statement? Yet you prefer to argue the wordings, not the concept.

My position is that it's what we have to say to declare our submission to Allah. Remember we are not testifying as Allah is enough for that. But if we were to, as Allah has said that angels and people of knowledge also testify, than the testimony could be:

** la ilaha il allah **

That's it. No witnessing any prophets.

[quote]
Show me where in the Qur’an or another book the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) taught this “aslima li rabbil aalameen” (meaning : I bow (my will) to the Lord and Cherisher of the universe." ) to his followers as the shahada ?
[/quote]

Please Read 6:71, where the Prophet says that "we are commanded to submit to the Lord of the World".

Once again, if it's not there verbatim doesn't mean the Prophet didn't ask his followers to submit to the Lord of the Worlds.

How about ** YOU ** bring me proof FROM THE QUR”AN that that the Prophet commanded his people to say the second part of the kalima like you say needs to be added?

[quote]
Ibrahim says: you mean lets make a fool ourselves like you?
[/quote]

No. If you say anything Ibrahim, and his sons, and their sons and our Prophet said, I'm very sure it wouldn't make us fools.

[quote]
Ibrahim says; show me how many times your new kalima (“aslima li rabbil aalameen”) is repeated in the Qur’an?
[/quote]

The discussion is on ‘declaring’ one’s belief in Allah and why this unnecessary addition of messenger’s name. I did quote various verses in which prophets declared their acceptance of the religion by saying they “Submit to the Lord of the Worlds” and DID NOT say anything about themself being messengers.

You have argued that it's not repeated often enough in the exact form, and I accept it. Doesn't make it any less of a statement to declare your religion.

As you've painstakingly illustrated la ilaha illa huwa is repeated MANY places in the Qur’an. It may not have been used explicitly for declaring one's religion, but is of course a firm belief of the believer.

If knowledgable people are to bear witness, they proclaim ** la ilaha illa huwa **. Although Allah is sufficient as a witness.

Although not occuring in the same form, we also say la ilaha il allah derived obviously from the same recurring statement.

So statements can be 'derived' as long as the essence of the message remains the same.

However the point of this thread still remains: NOT EVEN ONCE does Allah say we have to add the name of the messenger at the end.

We need sources to confirm that we do the right thing by adding a messenger's name at the end and when and why did this practice start.

Allah Knows Best

These are GOD's revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than GOD and His revelations do they believe?(45:6)

[This message has been edited by PakistaniAbroad (edited December 02, 2001).]

[quote]
Originally posted by PakistaniAbroad:

[quote]
I argue using just this particular strength; the authenticity of the Qur'an. [al-Waqiah 56:77] , [al-Waqiah 56:78]

[/quote]

Ibrahim says; salaams to all

PA, was there an argument about the Qur’an’s authenticity or was the argument concerning your dubious assertions that the Prophet of Islam had failed to deliver the clear message?

[quote]
The Hadith Books however are disputed, even among muslims. You claim they are beyond doubt and have gone too far in equating their 'quality' and 'accuracy' with the Qur'an. I disagree. That's where we depart.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: The hadith cannot be compared with the Qur’an and I have not claimed they (which hadith are you referring to??) are beyond doubt since hadiths are classified under various categories , what I conveyed was they too have been transferred via memory to mankind like all other scriptures

But your initial claim that ……………………

  • My contention is that Allah never guaranteed the sanctity and authenticity of 'records' of the conversations of the Prophet outside the Qur'anic message. *

is rather silly because you seem to lack the knowledge on how all previous scriptures and their relevant prophetic teachings have been transferred to mankind. Second your statement amounts to folly when no such revelation was sent to you or anyone else to that effect.

My point being hadith are classified according to authenticity and those that are knowledgeable in such matters know which hadiths to accept and which hadiths to reject.

But your claim is that NONE of the hadiths are acceptable because you THINK SO !!! which are comments made by the ignorant in defiance of truth and in denial of the Prophetic teachings.

The point being Allah (swt) does not pick and choose a man to be His sole representative on this planet, to lead multitudes of generations to come after him, whilst blindly allowing his teachings to be totally corrupted can HE ?

What takes place is that deviators will increase as time passes and they will invent their own hadiths and try to push it and some will end up following such teachings and end up like you , not knowing what is authentic and what is not.

So the criteria for those who have knowledge is to verify what they read before accepting it contents ( this goes for all matters).

This can only be achieved if that person is well grounded on religious knowledge as for others who are now faced with the dilemma of having two conflicting hadiths, that becomes part of their trial and they now have to seek assistance from those who are knowledgeable about such matters.
What you do not seem to comprehend is that since you are in a time frame where deviators have introduced their own versions of hadiths and want to derail the truth , ** you should make effort to identify the truth NOT become another deviator on your own based on you own whims and fancies. **

[quote]
Ths issue at hand is how the 'bearing witness' and 'testimony' started and why adding the testimony to a messenger crept into the original 'testimony' and how today anyone who wishes to only cite Allah's name and omit the messenger's name is declared a 'kaafir'
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; That was not the issue! as far as I can recall on this thread , the issue was kalima was wrong ( the person who started this thread Ahmad and your claims was such )

I had already presented Qur’anic verses to confirm that the kalima ( Muhammadur Rasoolullah was practiced even before the completion of the Qur’an

Even after presenting such evidence you seem to be denying it, what other evidence would a Muslim need other than from the message and the messenger?

[quote]
You have dilly dallied and beaten around the bush but haven't reproduced a SINGLE source that explicitly tells "This is what you say when you 'embrace' Allah's religion". Not the azan, not some write up on someone's accepting Islam; direct instructions or the origin of establishment of the current 'kalima'.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; I am amazed at your blindness! Do you honestly need to be referred back to my initial post on this thread? Read it again,

Let me recap it for you:-

1) The five pillars of Islam

2) The call to prayer from the beginning of Prayers being performed as a congregation at the reestablishment of Islam in Arabia.

3) Biographies of the companions of the Prophet

4) Previous messengers and their kalimas
were all mentioned in my previous post.
Most of all for Muslims , they only need to understand what had been revealed to them

Read!

4: 59 O ye who believe! obey Allah and obey the Apostle ** and those charged with authority among you. ** If ye differ in anything among yourselves refer it to Allah and His Apostle if ye do believe in Allah and the Last Day: that is best and most suitable for final determination

Ibrahim says: If you want direct instructions from the Prophet (pbuh) , you should have been born when he was present amongst us, all others have been instructed to follow whom? “Those Charged with authority” ?? …find out who they were and are, not you, for sure !

Again for those who cannot understand why the hadiths become the secondary source in Islam,

Read!

3: 31 Say: "If ye do love Allah ** follow me:** Allah will love you and forgive you your sins for Allah is Oft-Forgiving Most Merciful."

3: 32 Say: "Obey Allah and His Apostle"; but if they turn back ** Allah loveth not those who reject Faith **

Ibrahim says: PA, Do you suppose Allah (swt) asked mankind to follow his chosen prophet and failed to keep his teachings intact and available for future generations?

Why do you suppose Allah (swt) conveyed this?
Read!

8: 20 O ye who believe! obey Allah and his apostle ** and turn not away from him when ye hear (him speak). **

21 ** Nor be like those who say "we hear" but listen not:

22 For the worst of beasts in the sight of Allah are the deaf and the dumb those who understand not. **

Ibrahim says: When Allah (swt) wanted man to listen to the Prophet speak, you don’t suppose his speeches will not be available for later generations do you? Or do you say Islam was only for those who were present at the Prophets time and the rest have to grope in darkness and invent what they chose?

Read!

40: 51 ** We will without doubt help Our apostles and those who believe ** (both) in this world's life and on the Day when the Witnesses will stand forth

Read!

2: 285 The Apostle believeth in what hath been revealed to him from his Lord ** as do the men of faith. ** Each one (of them) believeth in Allah His angels His books and His Apostles ** "We make no distinction (they say) between one and another of His Apostles." And they say: "We hear and we obey; ** (We seek) Thy forgiveness Our Lord and to Thee is the end of all journeys."

Read!

4: 69 All who obey Allah and the Apostle are in the company of those on whom is the Grace of Allah of the Prophets (who teach)** the sincere (lovers of truth) the witnesses (who testify) and the righteous (who do good): ah! what a beautiful fellowship! **

Ibrahim says: As to the people who used to doubt , just like you , they used to claim “we submit” ( also just like you) but had NO FAITH in their hearts , Allah (swt) already exposed them even in the Qur’an

Read!

49: 14 The desert Arabs say "We believe." Say "Ye have no faith; ** but ye (only) say `We have submitted our wills to Allah.' For not yet has Faith entered your hearts. ** But if ye obey Allah and His Apostle He will not belittle aught of your deeds: for Allah is Oft-Forgiving Most Merciful."

15 ** Only those are Believers who have believed in Allah and His Apostle and have never since doubted but have striven with their belongings and their persons in the Cause of Allah: Such are the sincere ones. **

16 Say: ** "what! Will ye instruct Allah about your Religion?" ** but Allah knows all that is in the heavens and on earth: He has full knowledge of all things

Read!

40: 56 Those who dispute about the Signs of Allah** without any authority bestowed on them there is nothing in their breasts but (the quest of) greatness which they shall never attain to:** seek refuge then in Allah: it is He Who hears and sees (all things).

Read!

4: 61 ** When it is said to them: "Come to what Allah hath revealed and to the Apostle": thou seest the Hypocrites avert their faces from thee in disgust. **

Read!

4: 115 If anyone contends with the Apostle even after guidance has been plainly conveyed to him ** and follows a path other than that becoming to men of faith We shall leave him in the path he has chosen and land him in Hell--what an evil refuge! **

Ibrahim says; so here we have it, you not only rejected the appointed Apostle teachings you have been trying to discount his authority to guide mankind as he had been taught by the Angels, hence we have been shown why you have been left to wander and wonder on your own. .

[quote]
Finding similar words in the Qur’an is not the goal. It’s the direct commandment, verse or description of a similar occasion when Prophets or their followers embraced Allah’s religion. The Spirit of the message is One. "Submit to the Lord of the Universe."
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: If you understand the spirit of the message than why are trying to discredit what had been taught by the Prophet and practiced from ancient times? Maybe you feel you need to be shown everything or else you will not believe and you will resolve to dispute with those that have faith in such matters?

Direct commandments, is Allah’s absolute will and pleasure and what He designs for man He conveys through the chosen Prophets, the rest have to follow their guidance, not demand for details or ask for special requirements.

Read!

42: 51 It is not fitting for a man that Allah should speak to him except by inspiration of from behind a veil ** or by the sending of a Messenger to reveal with Allah's permission what Allah wills: ** for He is Most High Most Wise

The unbelievers also demanded such things from the prophets sent to them and on account of such arrogance and rejection of his teachings ended up in the fire

The very idea that after 1422 years , we have YOU, claiming that Muslims for the past 1422 years have been deluded and you and your insolent deviant clique have realized the Muslims using the wrong kalima is absurd …please grow up …People will consider you a loony, I myself am left with little choice , since up till now you have not proofed anything except convey your personal conjectures.

[quote]
I have argued using such verses. You can do the same by producing the source for the exact statement you say is necessary to declare one’s acceptance of Allah’s religion. That at least will move the argument forward.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: What ever you presented had been refuted by me and others on this thread already . You mean all that I wrote had no source? Please wake up and read again telling stories is not the way of a Muslim.

[quote]
Ibrahim earlier * 2) How does a Prophet deliver a message clearly , when the wordings are from Allah (swt)? are you saying the Prophet added his own words or did Allah (swt) gave a confused message that made it unclear in the first place? *

PA: Read: [al-Haqqah 69:43] . [al-Haqqah 69:44] [al-Haqqah 69:45] The Prophet didn't fabricate anything. Allah made sure he didn't and the message has reached us clearly as promised. The Prophet has thus fulfilled his duty to Allah of delivering the message clearly.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Good! then why are you in doubts as to what he taught and what he did not teach ? or do you suppose the majority who have been practicing what has been taught by the Prophet (pbuh) are all fools?

But you did not answer my question, I asked you how will the Prophet makes thing CLEAR, when all the words found in the Qur’an are from Allah (swt)?

[quote]
How many times do I have to debunk the 'Salaat not in the Qur'an myth'?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; excuse me! Can you show me where you have done this? It is possible I could be losing my sight but not my senses! So care to tell me when you have shown clear evidence for your statements?

[quote]
Topics on Ablutions, Specific Times of Salaat, Standing, Magnifying Allah, Bowing, Glorifying his name while bowing, Prostrating, Glorifying him, Method of reciting Qur'an (not too loud, not too low), and many other Salaat topics are in the Qur'an.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Good, now name them according to the way the Prophet had guided Muslims as per the records found in the Qur’an ( use only verses) and tell us why it is in such an order (kindly explain in detail). ** You can start separate thread IF you like **

I repeat my question is about the procedure of worship as done by the majority of Muslims who unite in congregation across the globe for the past 1422 years.

Since you claim it has been clearly taught in the Qur’an, I expect you to be a man/woman of your word and lay out the details for me to see them for myself.

I pray you will not fail me , in posting the verses and its correct order as taught by the prophet in the Qur’an

[quote]
Can one get the EXACT methods by studying Hadiths? And even if one can, does it make those collections Books of Commandments?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: What!!! I thought, you said all of them are found in the Qur’an so why are you now concerned with the hadiths?? Did I ask you from the hadiths or from the Qur’an? so stay on the subject and answer the question, don’t play merry go around with me!

Second if you deny the Prophet you deny Allah, hence If the Prophet guided man to do such and such , they become commandments of Allah ( I have already quoted verses to this effect, hope I do not have to repeat them again and again)

Anyway, Don’t worry about the hadiths, show me , tell us and explain the verses in the Qur’an concerning the exact methods to be followed in submitting to Allah (swt)
Mind you, the salaat is also a pillar of Islam , so If you cannot get that right, we can understand why you cannot get the shahada right !

REMEMBER you said the Prophet had made it CLEAR, so make it CLEAR to me using the Qur’an

That is all I ask!

[quote]
The Qur'an has the COMPLETE message for our Salvation. Allah has included details of everything. When Allah omits something, it is for the purpose of providing us flexibility in our religion.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Meaning you can do what you like? Or follow what the Prophet teaches concerning such matters as such matters are left to the prophet, who will be guided by the angels.

Remember Allah (swt) had repeatedly conveyed to mankind to obey the Apostle, If Allah (swt) had left matters according to our whims and fancies, there is NO need for an apostle to make things clear, nor for Allah (swt) to tell us to obey the Apostle, since the Qur’an is complete, is there?

[quote]
[Yusuf 12:111] In their history, there is a lesson for those who possess intelligence. This is not fabricated Hadith; this (Quran) confirms all previous scriptures, provides the details of everything, and is a beacon and mercy for those who believe.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; I give you two translations of the same verse PLUS commentary

Pickthall

12: 111 In their history verily there is a lesson for men of understanding. It is no invented story but a confirmation of the existing (Scripture) and a detailed explanation of everything, and a guidance and a mercy for folk who believe.

Yusof Ali;

12: 111 There is in their stories instruction for men endued with understanding. It is not a tale invented but a confirmation of what went before it a detailed exposition of all things and a Guide and a Mercy to any such as believe

Commentary from Yusof Ali for above verse

A story like that of Joseph is not a purely imaginary fable. The People of the Book have it in their sacred literature. It is confirmed here in its main outline, but here there is a detailed spiritual exposition that will be found nowhere in earlier literature. ** The exposition covers all sides of human life. If properly understood it gives valuable lessons to guide our conduct ** ,-an instance of Allah's grace and mercy to people who will go to Him in faith and put their affairs in His hands.

Ibrahim says : Now tell me something, when all details are provided in the scriptures why did Allah (swt) ask us to obey , copy and emulate the Prophets?

[quote]
Prophet conveyed Allah's message for us to pray. Many times in the Qur'an, Allah tells us to pray. Message conveyed. We can obey Allah and his Prophet by establishing prayer, something not entirely new to the Planet as you would have us believe.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Good! now you can post how the other prophets prayed with complete references for them too from where ever you can get them

[quote]
Generations before us used to offer Salaat and Zakat, it was enjoined on all before us as it was enjoined on us. [Maryam 19:31] "He made me blessed wherever I go, and enjoined me to observe the Salaat and Zakat for as long as I live.
So now if we find Books from Orthodox Christians on how to pray, do they become our Books of Commandments?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Did I not tell you that each prophet had been guided and they all had the same message and their similitude’s would be similar? , now since you are aware the all prophets prayed and all of them worshipped Allah (swt) only , do you suppose Allah (swt) failed to guide them as to how they should pray?

Second you seem to be under the delusion that current Christians and those that are called Nasrani’s in the Qur’an are one and the same with regards to how they comprehend or practice their religion. Once you understand that, {they are not the same,} you will realize why the current praying procedures of Christians cannot be considered valid as what was practiced and taught by their prophets. So there goes your theory down the drain.

[quote]
and while we're at it, the testimony you defend is also used in Salaat; taking a messenger's name with Allah, here's what Allah has to say about that
[al-Jinn 72:18] And that the mosques are Allah's, therefore call not upon any one with Allah:
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; You must be naïve or willfully trying to deceive yourself, can you point out any Muslim salaat which involves the invoking of any Prophet or anchorite other than Allah (swt) ?

Read!

33: 56 Allah and His angels send blessings on the Prophet: ** O ye that believe! send ye blessings on him and salute him with all respect.**

Ibrahim says: Hey PA, will you deny this verse knowingly or do you expect to invent your own rules on what was approved by Allah (swt)

[quote]
Ibrahim wrote earlier: * First a message is being sent by the Creator to mankind via a chosen prophet. Allah (swt) could have written it in the skies or dropped the Qur’an from the sky, IF he so willed , but he chose a man and made it a book, such that we will take our guidance from that man. *
PA: Read the Qur'an. All creations REFUSED to carry the burden of the Qur'an.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says : I suppose I have failed to read the Qur’an , kindly tell us who refused to carry the burden of the Qur’an and why would the Qur’an be burden for all creations?

[quote]
PA: Man took that covenant.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Kindly quote verses for your assertions as per your above context.

PA you are out of context, maybe you have misunderstood what I am saying or maybe I did not word it correctly anyway…………. I have no time to go around the bend with you. My emphasis was that Allah (swt) chose his prophet amongst man , such that man will learn to emulate them not do as they wish.

[quote]
The guidance is NOT from the man, but from the MESSAGE which the Messenger is conveying.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: The chosen man is not some tom, dick and harry, that happened to reach 40 years of age, he had been guided from child birth , just like most other prophets ( although his stories are not available to us as is the case of prophet Musa or Prophet Yusoof in the Qur’an . But there is sufficient evidence to proof that the prophet even before being given prophet hood was a most respectable/trustworthy person in word and deed.

Hence the prophets set exemplary human behavior on their own and after being primed for 40 years by Allah (swt) were anointed to represent Allah(swt) and given a message to convey to mankind. They were not just left on their own to decide for themselves but were guided all the time by angels appointed for such purpose.
Hence when I say we are to follow their guidance, it is in principal the guidance of Allah (swt) and not his own. That is why it is conveyed when you obey the prophet you obey Allah (swt)

[quote]
Messenger was on his own for 40 years, no one was taking any guidance from him till Allah chose him to deliver The Message
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; Agreed when it comes to the message

[quote]
Allah teaches us the religion. [al-Baqarah 2:138.23] .[al-Qiyamah 75:16] [al-Qiyamah 75:17] [al-Qiyamah 75:18] [al-Qiyamah 75:19]

[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Allah (swt) is the guide not only for religion but for every other knowledge that man could and will posses in this planet, that does not mean Allah (swt) comes down and tells you to do this or that.
The message is given to a chosen man and he subsequently transferred that message to mankind ( already quoted the verse above ) At the same time Allah (swt) can inspire man, as per his will but when a final prophet had been appointed to deliver a final message to mankind which has been completed, it is not fitting for any tom, dick and harry to claim the prophet had made a mistake ( which is what you are doing when you try and deny the kalima practiced by Muslims for 1422 years)

[quote]
And who will guide us and with what?
[az-Zumar 39:23] Allah has revealed the best Hadith, A Book conformable in its various parts, repeating, whereat do shudder the skins of those who fear their Lord, then their skins and their hearts become pliant to the remembrance of Allah; this is Allah's guidance, He guides with it whom He pleases; and (as for) him whom Allah makes err, there is no guide for him.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Let me give another translation for easier understanding, since you keep using the word hadith in the Arabic context on your translations

39: 23 Allah has revealed (from time to time) the most beautiful message in the form of a Book consistent with itself (Yet) repeating (its teaching in various aspects): the skins of those who fear their Lord tremble thereat; then their skins and their hearts do soften to the celebration of Allah's praises. Such is the guidance of Allah: He guides therewith whom He pleases but such as Allah leaves to stray can have none to guide

Now PA, The Qur’an took 23 years to complete , not because it would take such a length of time to deliver but because it had to be made clear to mankind. meaning when a person who had some doubts about what was being revealed , he /she did not cry out to Allah ( swt) but approached the Prophet and he would explain to them or enlighten them, it was such and such when he knew the answers failing which it would be rfered to Allah (swt) and He sends revelations answering that Question. This is the same scenario for all prophets. That is why you will see answers to many questions posed by the followers as well as non believers found as part of that revelation.

I have already made it clear to you all guidance comes form Allah (swt) and also made it clear to you that Allah (swt) does not speak to man but have assigned Prophets and messengers to do so. Hence as far as mankind is concerned , the words of Allah (swt) are received through the assigned man as such we are to follow his guidance.

Now at this time frame, since the Prophet is not present amongst us, we are still obliged to follow his teachings not invent one on our own as per our whims and fancies.

[quote]
* Ibrahim says; It is not one verse joining with another, it is a testimony uttered as such which was what had been practiced from ancient times , which was taught to the prophet (pbuh) and by the prophet ( pbuh) to Muslims to put into practice *

PA: I have debunked it using the verses. You have yet to show me verses from the Qur'an where Prophets are quoted as bearing witness to Allah and their status or a previous messenger’s status. or a previous messenger's .

[/quote]

Ibrahim says; that is funny, because what you claim you have debunked is your own assertion as far as I can see , you took a reply to a question posed by Allah (swt) to one of his prophets and started to claim it was the kalima, not knowing the fact that the same prophet did not convey that to his followers or his own father even , whereas I have shown you numerous verses in the Qur’an where the kalima taught by the Prophet is being repeated again and again in varying forms.

[quote]
* If you chose to reject it, than clearly you are on an erroneous path framed by your own mind, for this guidance had not only been transferred in written form but also via memory just like scripture for 1422 years. *
PA: This is the fundamental disagreement. I am highly skeptical of the accounts that people collected and proclaimed as sayings of the Prophet; you embrace them with the same reverence and confidence as you would the Qur'an. You fail to see the numerous contradictions these Books have in themselves and with the teachings of the Qur'an.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: You are allowed to be skeptical as you chose at your own peril and that is not a concern to me BUT when you claim prophetic teachings are false with regards to the shahada you are indirectly saying Allah (swt) had failed Muslims. As I said earlier the method of transmission in Islam are in two forms and both forms are in agreement as to what was taught by the prophet and practiced by Muslims concerning the shahada, hence it is you who are in error manifest and not Muslims.

When you try and claim they are contradicting hadiths as such the kalima is in error, it is down right stupidity ( since both forms of transmission is in total agreement as well as the texts being found within the Qur’an attest to the wordings. If you find errors in parts of other hadiths than it is your duty to verify them as to its authenticity ( no one is compelled to accept it because it is said it is a hadith) that does not mean all hadiths become unauthentic.

[quote]
* 63:1 When the Hypocrites come to thee they say "We bear witness that thou art indeed the Apostle of Allah." Yea Allah knoweth that thou art indeed His Apostle and Allah beareth witness that the Hypocrites are indeed liars.
Read AGAIN that above verse and THINK before you reply! *

PA: The hypocrites came to the Prophet.
They testified the messenger is the messenger of Allah. It doesn't imply what they said was an established testimony, or is the right testimony , in fact Allah scorns at their testimony saying He knows who Muhammad is.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: see how you make a mockery of yourself? You read in one verse a prophet answering a question and out of your folly you start to claim that is and must be the testimony and not what Muslims have practiced for 1422 years .

Here I present you with clear evidence that human beings had been bearing testimony that Prophet Muhammad is the messenger of Allah even when the Qur’an had not been fully completed and you reject it according to your whims and fancies.

The verse attest to the fact that hypocrites used to bear false testimony and believers used to bear sincere testimonies to that effect.

You can reject all you want but that is not going to change that verse or its meanings in any way.

[quote]
The hypocrites thus tried to hide behind this 'oath'.
[al-Munafiqun 63:2] They make their oaths a shelter, and thus turn away from Allah's way; surely evil is that which they do.
The background is preparation of fight in the way of Allah, and the hypocrites were trying to wriggle out of it. They bore witness to the messenger trying to hide behind an 'oath'. Allah scorned at them saying that of course He knows that the messenger is the apostle of Allah, but the hypocrites are liars.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Maybe you would need to read more ( ah yes! you are one who uses your own conjectures hence we need to excuse you for your blunders) , as to the background it has nothing to do with fighting in the cause of Allah but they were hypocrites and they were basically giving false testimonies and Allah (swt) knew that they are giving false testimonies, that is the theme of that surah.

Here let me give you yusof Ali commentary for that verse.

The hypocrite element, if one exists in any society, is a source of weakness and a danger to its health and its very existence. ** When the holy Prophet came to Madinah in Hijrat, his arrival was welcome to all the patriotic citizens: ** it not only united them in common life and healed their old differences, but it brought honour and light to them in the person of the greatest living Prophet. ** But there were some baser elements filled with envy. ** Such hopes as they had entertained of attaining power and leadership by playing on the animosities of the factions were now dashed to the ground. ** They now began to work underground. For fear of the majority they dared not oppose the new growing Brotherhood of Righteousness. They tried to undermine it by intriguing secretly with its enemies and swearing openly its loyalty to the holy Prophet. ** They were thoroughly unmasked and discredited at the battle of Uhud. See iii. 167, and n. 476.

[quote]
Yet today many people insist they add to their 'kalima' what the hypocrites said.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says : that is due to your lack of knowledge and inability to understand even the title of that surah. Hypocrites are hypocrites, they due to their hypocrisy will always give false testimony , that is why they are called hypocrites.

But my point is that IF giving such testimony was not practiced or had not been approved by Allah (swt) you will not only see Allah (swt) exposing the hypocrites but also the condemnation of such testimonies.

I guess you just do not have sufficient senses to understand this point.

[quote]
* PakistaniAbroad says: My previous posts have the verses, which clarify that Allah alone as witness is enough. What is needed is for the person to declare his submission to Allah.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; you seem awfully silly and keep making assertions without valid proofs as to what you are implying. I have not seen you quote any verse where Allah (swt) had instructed those who submit to bare witness in this way or that way, such guidance’s are conveyed to the chosen prophet by the angels who are sent to guide him and than after conveyed to mankind by that prophet . It becomes a prophetic teaching and is practiced as such. But you are the denier of Prophetic teachings, so how do you expect to understand Islam?*

PA: Since you didn't do me the courtesy of searching my previous post for it, i'd have to reproduce it for you. (an-Nisa' 4:166) an-Nisa' 4:79]

[/quote]

Ibrahim says: PA you are a very confused person, EVERY WORD, EVERY ACTION and every blink of an is witnessed by Allah (swt) that does not mean one does not need to affirm his faith in Allah (swt) when he/she chooses to submit to him. What I have said above is that you have not shown any verse in the Qur’an , where Allah (swt) had asked you to say this or that when you want to submit to him, ** what you have been toying with is the answer of Prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) to a question that was posed to him by Allah (swt) …that is not an affirmation of faith but a reply given to that question. ** The affirmation of faith are words that convey or established who that person has chosen to worship and who is the prophet he will be following.

[quote]
Now do you get it? Even the Prophet of Allah said Allah's testimony is the greatest. And he is not responsible when anyone assoicates anybody with Allah.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: why are you asking me to deny what Allah (swt) has conveyed , are you honestly a Muslim? So try not to play with revealed texts.

So far you have been saying

That Allah (swt) is the witness…who is denying that? But you go on to say the testimony for accepting Islam should be what Prophet Ibrahim said in reply to a question , that is your folly , because Allah (swt) is also a witness as to what was the Kalima taught by the Prophets and he had not objected to it, BUT YOU SEEM TO OBJECT TO IT BECAUSE YOU THINK SO…that my friend is foolishness and have to be exposed as foolishness in my view. ( which is what I have been doing even though , I have no desire to be involved in discussions in this month)

[quote]
Your folly here is that you do not realize that each prophet is responsible for his own flock ( meaning they will be the one to intercede (when allowed by Allah) on his/her behalf on the day of judgment and most of all they will be judged by what had been approved or disapproved for that Prophet and not by what has been approved or disapproved to another prophet) hence the testimony of the person who submits MUST clearly state who the person is submitting to and who is the Prophet he/she is following. *

PA: The most ignorant statement I've ever heard. How many overlapping messengers were they? you get all tongue tied when I ask you to tell me plainly, To whom did the people of Moses and Haroon testify?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; very hasty aren’t you? You ask a question and you claim I am tongue tied even before I have a chance to reply as per its relevance, are you dreaming or hoping I won’t be able to respond? Very silly indeed!
The Prophet Musa (pbuh) was sent to the Israelites and they had the same testimony as Muslims have been doing from the beginning BUT what was enjoined upon them and what is enjoined upon the current Muslims have similarities and variations. You should know them, if you had been studying the Qur’an.

[quote]
One simple answer will shatter your theory.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says : sure it will just like you have shattering your own conjectures I suppose.

[quote]
Mr. Ibrahim, you give me doubts that you've ever even bothered to read the Qur'an. [Al-Imran 3:84] Say, `We believe in ALLAH and that which has been revealed to us, and that which was revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes, and in that which was given to Moses and Jesus and other Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them and to HIM we submit
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Here you go again making another silly comment, are you able to understand what I am saying, I repeat again ALL prophets are from Allah (swt) as such their affirmation of faith has always been La Ilaha Ill-Allah, you sound so silly when you try to tell a Muslim that he is unaware of the fact that all Prophets and messengers had only been submitting to Allah (swt) .

My above point was that a person who want to embrace Islam has to utter the shahada to affirm his faith in Allah (swt) alone, by saying La ilaha Ill-Allah and also attesting as to which prophet he is following, even though Allah (swt) knows what is in that person’s heart and mind even without such an utterance. We are bearing witness and Allah (swt) has asked us to bear witness.
In fact we will be judged by our intentions and actions , hence when one fails to utter the shahada thus disclosing his/her intentions, he cannot be a Muslim.

[quote]
Alas you do not submit to HIM but hide behind other oaths.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Just Pathetic! Now you accuse me of bearing false testimony? Are you now going to claim you know me and what I profess too?

Be a man and proof your assertions, do not try to make statements or allegations that you cannot proof.

As far as I am concerned you are so silly to deny 1422 years of testimony , what else can anyone expect from such a person, accept folly? ?

[quote]
Let me remind you what Prophets are for. They are for WARNING and CONVEYING THE MESSAGE . Guidance is from Allah and it is HE who will take us to account. Prophet bear witness to their respective flock (not the other way around) on the Day of Judgement that they did convey the message clearly. Intercession lies with Allah, whomever he allows.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: why repeat what I have already confirmed?

BTW Contemplate on this…………

5: 8 ** O ye who believe! stand out firmly for Allah as witnesses ** to fair dealing and let not the hatred of others to you make you swerve to wrong and depart from justice. Be just: that is next to Piety: and fear Allah for Allah is well-acquainted with all that ye do.

[quote]
[al-Ahzab 33:45.2] [an-Najm 53:56.2] [al-A`raf 7:184.10] [al-Baqarah 2:119.16] [al-Ma'idah 5:99] Prophet’s only responsibility to their flocks is conveying the message. They will bear witness to it in front of Allah.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: I suppose by quoting this you have altered what I have already said? No you seem blind, for I have told you clearly that It is Allah (swt) that will judge and those who follow that prophet have to attest to the fact they are following the message revealed through such and such prophet . so please grow up and proof your kalima was what Allah (swt) enjoined for mankind and prophet Muhammad (pbuh) had altered it, for that is the gist of your assertions on this thread.

[quote]
With time message of the messenger gets corrupted by the very Books of Hadith you hold dear and Allah needs to send in another messenger.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says : so now you are silly enough to state what Allah (swt) will do next?

Frankly speaking the message gets misconceived because of tom dick and harries like you disseminating disinformation as to its meaning, according to their whims and fancies.

Seriously you need to get help, for you now claim the hadith will corrupt the Qur’an whereas earlier you swore the Qur’an cannot be corrupted.

[quote]
[Al-Imran 3:50.3] `And I come fulfilling that which is before me, namely the Torah; and to allow you some of that which was forbidden unto you, and I come to you with a Sign from your Lord; so fear ALLAH and obey me. Now what do the Jews do.. hmm keep Musa rasul allah, or Isa rasul ullah.?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: apparently you must have forgotten your glasses too, or was it that evil mind that snipped away the kalmias that I had quoted with regards to earlier prophets.

Here Read!

4:125 Wa man ahsanu dinam mimman aslama wajhahu_ lilla_hi wa huwa muhsinuw wattaba'a millata ibra_hima hanifa_(n), wattakhazalla_hu ** ibra_hima khalila_** (n).

this was the title given by Allah (swt) to prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) hence the followers of prophets Ibrahim testified

** la ilah Ill-Allahu Ibrahimu Khalilulla **

whether you chose to accept it or reject it is not the matter, but you are clearly one who denies truth out of arrogance and ignorance in defiance of what Allah (swt) had clearly confirmed to mankind.

[quote]
[al-Ma'idah 5:19.44] Now tell me are the people of Book going to sit tight and rejoice in what they have or should heed to what the ‘new’ messenger has brought?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: STOP running around the bush and proof your point according to this thread, after responding this far, I still do not see any proof for your new kalima and the failure of the Prophet to establish such a kalima.

[quote]
oh sure.. he left it upto Abu Huraira to report.. Nice.. keep on obeying him.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; I guess you have no answers accept, this foolish statement? BTW Abu Huraira has a better track record than you can have ever have .

Just wondering can you tell me where Abu Huraira reported it? ( I bet you will snip this off, like the others which you have no answers for)

[quote]
]* you see, earlier generations did take their prophets and anchorites as gods, hence when one testifies that so and so is only a messenger of Allah (swt) and not Allah (swt) or his equal in any form or shape, one establishes and testifies and ensures that the truth of who that person is remains unaltered for ever *
PA: Another gem.. Proof Sir.. verses.. no conjecture.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: sheez.. and you claimed you knew the Qur’an and I had taken false oaths…truly a silly person you have become

Read!

9: 31 They take their priests and their anchorites to be their lords in derogation of Allah and (they take as their Lord) Christ the son of Mary; Yet they were ** commanded to worship but one Allah: there is no god but He. ** Praise and glory to him: (far is He) from having the parents they associate (with him).

Ibrahim says; Did you get it? Or you need to be spoon fed all the time, notice the la ilah ill-Allah in this verse , even though it has been repeated over and over again, you seem to be the most silliest of people who would like to change it according to your whims and fancies BUT only fools will follow you on such matters.

[Quote ]
* Ibrahim says; man you are not asked to testify to anyone accept to Allah (swt) and the kalima taught by the prophet (pbuh) does not testify to the Prophet but attest that you are to be considered as being under his flock *

That’s the best ‘sidewinder’ that I’ve ever seen fired. Once again.. overlapping messengers is the question and you try and dodge it. Whose flock are people with two or three messengers among them?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; is that what is bothering you, whose flock are people with two or three messengers?.

I already gave you that answer, but I guess you lacked sufficient senses to understand such matters. You see when I quoted some of the kalimas of earlier Prophets I only quoted some of the prominent ones . If you had the brains you would have seen that these are the prophets who were sent with a book of their own ( thus the testimony is based on the revelation), hence the kalima remains the same for the duration of messengers that have been sent to confirm the same book and not the kalima used by the earlier Prophet for the earlier corrupted book, which led to the revelation of a new book.

Meaning when Prophet Musa (pbuh) came with the Torah, the shahada is made based on the contents of the torah and the Prophet assigned for it and all those messengers sent to reestablish the torah all fall under Prophet Musa’s shahada

[quote]
* Ibrahim says; this is your own conjecture and not based on what the Prophets had taught their followers. *
PA. I quoted qur’anic verses? You call that conjecture?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: absolutely, quoting Qur’anic verse which reveals a reply to Allah (swt) by a prophet and claiming it is a kalima for current Muslims based on your own whims and fancies amounts to conjecture and nothing more.

[quote]
* I had already quoted the testimony by many prophets and they have remained consistent. *
PA: Hello?? I did miss that. where are the verses from the Qur’an explaining that the Prophets asked and taught their people to witness they are messengers of Allah.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: blindness also seems to be your major problem, track back and read what I wrote, each prophet had a title bestowed upon them by Allah (swt) and that title was used for those prophets NOT “messenger of Allah” , which is used only for the final Prophet.

Do your home work, don’t try to tire me by spoon feeding you all the time.

[quote]
* Ibrahim says: yet we are not subject to what was given to prophet Ibrahim (pbuh) but what was given to prophet Muhammad (pbuh) *
PA: Read the Qur’an. [al-Hajj 22:78], NO matter which way you slice it. It’s the same Religion. The practices may have differed from time to time but we have all been Muslims from Day one, submitting to Allah. Quit making absurd theories about different religions.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says : I think you are sick, honestly! for I have conveyed and have been expounding what is in the Qur’an and here in your inability to prove your point, you have resorted to accuse me of

1) making false oaths
2) not knowing the Qur’an
3) promoting different religions, when there is ONLY one religion.

what next? Are you able to save you neck or you want to end up being a false teacher and an enemy of Islam in this forum

just so that you mind has something to think about tell me how, what I said conveys that there were two religions?

[quote]
*Ibrahim says: PA, now explain to me why your kailma (aslamtu li rabbil 'a_lamin(a). is not found in the rest of the verses that you claim is supposedly the same kalima uttered by most of the other prophets ? *
PA: You are tied up in semantics. It happens when we grow up regarding text in Arabic as something surreal. Would it matter if it were not repeated?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: In other words you lied by claiming they uttered the same kalima…think about it lying is not permitted in Islam.

[quote]
Do you think the prophets said something other than meaning “We submit to the Lord of the Universe”??
[quote]

Ibrahim says; Firstly there is NO “we” in that verse, so go and read what was said as a reply by that Prophet to a question and try not to add into it, which would amount to altering the texts of the Qur’an

[quote]
Is it not clear what Ibrahim said? Is it not clear the Prophets repeated his message by saying the same. If the Qur’an doesn’t quote them verbatim do you think it makes it less of a statement? Yet you prefer to argue the wordings, not the concept.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: you are being silly, when some one ask another a question, one gives a reply , that reply can be used by others when they are asked such questions and here you have explicitly claimed such were the words used by all prophets…for which I see NO proof and the proof that you claimed you initially posted were untrue.

So either show us the verses that proofs the repeated use of those identical words or accept the fact that you are twisting and turning in order to deny the teachings of the final Prophet (pbuh)

[quote]
The concept is to declare submission to Allah, He has said HE HIMSELF is enough to testify to his oneness and he knows who his messengers are.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: are you trying to teach Allah (swt) and his prophet what the concepts are, when it is clear for Muslims across the globe as to what has been uttered for 1422 years. ?

[quote]
* Show me where in the Qur’an or another book the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) taught this “aslima li rabbil aalameen” (meaning : I bow (my will) to the Lord and Cherisher of the universe." ) to his followers as the shahada ? *

PA: You must be joking? After having argued and quoted yourself the verse in which Ibrahim says “Aslamtu Li Rabbil Aalameen” you still demand proof?

Ibrahim says; as I said you are conjecturing!! Now show me evidence where the Prophet conveyed that to his followers as you have been demanding?

[quote]
How about YOU bring me proof FROM THE QUR”AN that that the Prophet commanded his people to say the kalima like you wish to recite; . complete with the testimony to the Prophet being messenger of Allah.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: . It is you who have been foolishly claiming the kalima used for 1422 years is wrong hence it is you who should put forward the evidence to proof your assertions.

[quote]
* Ibrahim says: you mean lets make a fool ourselves like you? *
PA: No, in your words.. Make a fool of yourself (naoozobillah)
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: how could that be? when it is you who seems to be fool enough to deny the prophetic teachings and try to insist that you found averse in the Quran uttered by one Prophet as a reply to a question as such that must be the kalima?

Even though you admit the Prophet had conveyed the message as Allah (swt) had commanded, you in your folly deny THEM by claiming it must be wrong.

[quote]
like Ibrahim, his sons, sons of his sons, and our Prophet Muhammad. I can only pity your insolence that you will call Ibrahim’s words, as mentioned in the Qur’an as folly?
[/quote]

Ibrahim says : You must be too silly to underhand what I am saying! I am saying your words are folly not any of the Prophets or are any message found in the Qur’an or authentic prophetic teachings. .

[quote]
Who do you follow? Who’s your lord? Allah? His Book says Ibrahim said “Aslamtu Li Rabbil Aalameen”. You gonna call it folly?? How sad.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: so when you cannot provide clear answers and you have ended up running around in circles , you will resort to twisting my words too…sorry, try someone else, what I have conveyed is clearly written and found on this thread as is!

[quote]
“la ilaha illa huwa” is in MANY places in the Qur’an. However the point remains that it’s not used in the context of accepting the religion. And that Allah is enough as a witness. The believer’s first belief is the same.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Guess I have to repeat myself, you are too silly to understand these things. The Kalima is a testimony and it does not need to be present in the Qur’an yet it is found in it and more often than your notion…so either grow up or keep deluding yourself even further. None can help you unless Allah (swt) had willed and for sure we can see that he has left you to stray

When Allah (swt) himself had chosen to repeat that verse ( used as the kalima for 1422 years by Muslims) again and again, it does not take a rocket scientist to note its importance but for deaf, dumb and blind people they can do what they like.

[quote]
The discussion is on ‘declaring’ one’s belief in Allah and why this unnecessary addition of messenger’s name. And I did quote various verses in which prophets declared their allegiance to Allah by saying they “Submit to the Lord of the Worlds”
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Stop lying, I already proved to all that , the kalima you quote is only found as is in one verse and that too it is a reply to a question and not uttered as a testimony or declaration of faith in Allah (swt)

I had also explained clearly why a person who declares his faith in Islam has to also declare which Prophet’s foot steps he /she is adhering to.

[quote]
* Ibrahim says; show me how many times your new kalima (“aslima li rabbil aalameen”) is repeated in the Qur’an? *
PA: So your kalima should be la ilaha illa huwa. That’s what is repeated.. NOT EVEN ONCE does Allah say ‘la ilaha il allah Muhammad ur rasul ullah”. . NOT ONCE or you would have brought it forth by now. But hey, I could have missed it.. you can still quote it, or from the other Books you hold so dear.

[/quote]

Ibrahim says: Tell you what, you use whatever kalima your mind conjures ( for your brains had jammed and does not seem to be able to digest what had already been conveyed to you by many) but Muslims are enjoined to follow what their prophet taught and for sure he did not teach what you wish to establish, so either proof that Allah (swt) enjoined such and such and the prophet deviated from it or proof Muslims for 1422 years had been renegades denying what the Prophet had enjoined.

PA, If you cannot do that, ** giving you any credence would amount to folly and Islam teaches that one should not be in such a persons company,** so go in peace Allah (swt) is awake!

** BTW we know now why you are insisting that the kalima is wrong from your own comments made on another thread. **

PA WROTE:
** I let my mind roam free ** and am not chained down by tradition and dogmas.

My mission is to combat ignorance and tradition ** and let free thought rule.** I'll be alone for a long part of it.. ** but sooner or later.. someone else will open their mind, break the shackles and join in thinking freely.**

Ibrahim says: the animals too roam freely and Allah (swt) knows best as to what they will be held accountable for but human beings are warned to follow their Prophets.

Was salaam
Ibrahim

As for those who have faith in Allah (swt)and obey the Prophet (pbuh)

read this!

Sahih Muslim Hadith Hadith 1 Narrated by Abdullah ibn Umar ibn al-Khattab

It is narrated on the authority of Yahya ibn Ya'mar that the first man who discussed Qadr (Divine Decree) in Basrah was Ma'bad al-Juhani. Humayd ibn AbdurRahman al-Himyari and I set out for Pilgrimage or for Umrah and said: Should it so happen that we come into contact with one of the Companions of the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) we shall ask him about what is talked about Taqdir (Division Decree). Accidentally we came across Abdullah ibn Umar ibn al-Khattab, while he was entering the mosque. My companion and I surrounded him. One of us (stood) on his right and the other stood on his left. I expected that my companion would authorize me to speak. I therefore said: AbuAbdurRahman! ** There have appeared some people in our land who recite the Holy Qur'an and pursue knowledge. And then after talking about their affairs, added: They (such people) claim that there is no such thing as Divine Decree and events are not predestined. He (Abdullah ibn Umar) said: When you happen to meet such people tell them that I have nothing to do with them and they have nothing to do with me. And verily they are in no way responsible for my (belief).** Abdullah ibn Umar swore by Him (the Lord) (and said): If any one of them (who does not believe in the Divine Decree) had with him gold equal to the bulk of (the mountain) Uhud and then, it (in the way of Allah), Allah would not accept it unless he affirmed his faith in Divine Decree. He further said: My father, Umar ibn al-Khattab, told me: ** One day we were sitting in the company of Allah's Apostle (peace be upon him) when there appeared before us a man dressed in pure white clothes, his hair extraordinarily black. There were no signs of travel on him. None amongst us recognized him.** At last he sat with the Apostle (peace be upon him) He knelt before him placed his palms on his thighs and said: Muhammad, inform me about al-Islam. ** The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: Al-Islam implies that you testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah,** and you establish prayer, pay Zakat, observe the fast of Ramadan, and perform pilgrimage to the (House) if you are solvent enough (to bear the expense of) the journey.** He (the inquirer) said: You have told the truth. ** He (Umar ibn al-Khattab) said: It amazed us that he would put the question and then he would himself verify the truth. He (the inquirer) said: Inform me about Iman (faith). He (the Holy Prophet) replied: That you affirm your faith in Allah, in His angels, in His Books, in His Apostles, in the Day of Judgment, and you affirm your faith in the Divine Decree about good and evil. ** He (the inquirer) said: You have told the truth. ** He (the inquirer) again said: Inform me about al-Ihsan (performance of good deeds). He (the Holy Prophet) said: That you worship Allah as if you are seeing Him, for though you don't see Him, He, verily, sees you. ** He (the enquirer) again said: Inform me about the hour (of the Doom). He (the Holy Prophet) remarked: One who is asked knows no more than the one who is inquiring (about it). He (the inquirer) said: Tell me some of its indications.** He (the Holy Prophet) said: That the slave-girl will give birth to her mistress and master, that you will find barefooted, destitute goat-herds vying with one another in the construction of magnificent buildings. He (the narrator, Umar ibn al-Khattab) said: Then he (the inquirer) went on his way but I stayed with him (the Holy Prophet) for a long while. He then, said to me: ** Umar, do you know who this inquirer was? I replied: Allah and His Apostle knows best. He (the Holy Prophet) remarked: He was Gabriel (the angel). ** He came to you in order to instruct you in matters of religion.

Sunan of Abu-Dawood Hadith 2993 Narrated by Yazid ibn Abdullah

We were at Mirbad. A man with dishevelled hair and holding a piece of red skin in his hand came. We said: You appear to be a bedouin. He said: Yes. We said: Give us this piece of skin in your hand. He then gave it to us and we read it. It contained the text: "From Muhammad, Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him), to Banu Zuhayr ibn Uqaysh. ** If you bear witness that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is the Apostle of Allah,** offer prayer, pay zakat, pay the fifth from the booty, and the portion of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and his special portion (safi), you will be under by the protection of Allah and His Apostle." We then asked: ** Who wrote this document for you? He replied: The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him). **

Al-Tirmidhi HadithHadith 104 Narrated byAli ibn AbuTalib

Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) said: No servant will be a believer (in the true sense of the term) till he affirms his faith in four things:** 1. He bears witness to the fact that there is no god but Allah. 2. I am His Messenger whom He has sent with Truth.** 3. He affirms his faith in death and in the life after death. 4. He affirms his faith in the Divine Decree.
Transmitted by Tirmidhi and Ibn Majah.

Sunan of Abu-Dawood Hadith 2333 Narrated by Abdullah ibn Abbas

A bedouin came to the Prophet (peace be upon him) and said: I have sighted the moon. Al-Hasan added in his version: that is, of Ramadan. ** He asked: Do you testify that there is no god but Allah? He replied: Yes. He again asked: Do you testify that Muhammad is the Apostle of Allah? He replied: Yes. and he testified that he had sighted the moon. He said: Bilal, announce to the people that they must fast tomorrow. **

Was salaam
Ibrahim

** Take account of yourself before you are asked to give account **

You probably worked with my post before I edited it.

Since I find the amount of knowledge exchanged inversely proportional to the length of posts, I'd try and summarize our viewpoints and add my responses in it.

I've copied the rest of the arguments and will inshallah open a separate thread for those as they are a totally different debate on the validity and necessity of Hadith accounts.

Please correct me where I understand your point of view incorrectly.

You have finally, in another post related the Hadith that seems to be the confirmation for the addition of the prophet's name.

The Prophet was told in the Qur'an to tell those enquiring about the Hour that none knows it save Allah.(7:187), hence I have to doubt the Hadith.

You say that the current testimony is found in the Qur'an.

I assert that you have defended it by joining two lines out of different verses and it's not present in it's complete form anywhere in the Qur'an.

You say that in 63:1 the Hypocrites say an established shahada

I contend that's an oath they formulated (or they would have said the full testimony with the la ilaha il allah part) to hide their hypocricy which Allah revealed. And Allah does repeat with scorn what they invented as an 'oath' saying that indeed he knows who Muhammad is, but he also knows these hypocrite are liars.

We agree to disagree?

You answer my question about overlapping messengers and Musa and Harun in particular by stating that testimony is to be of the Prophet that brings the new Sharia.

I have only to point out the text of your proposed testimony which has 'rasul ullah' and not 'nabi ullah' in it.

Also BOTH Musa and Harun were given the scripture. (37:114-117), (21:48)

You have said then that they weren't testifying to be messengers status but of certain qualities of them. You quote (4:125) with Ibrahima Khalila

I seem to recall the kalima you had suggested was Ibrahim khalil ullah, not the same words, as you stress on that a lot when it comes to the verses I quote.

There is also Ibrahima hanifa right in the same verse. I wonder why that didn't make it. Or do you get to pick and chose?

You contend that people have to attest to the Prophet's they follow by reciting their testimony mentioning the Prophets.

You say that the kalima is a testimony and it does not need to be present in the Qur'an but it is.

I think it appears to be important enough for us to have exchanged such lengthy posts and it should be present in the Qur'an, at least once in it's whole form.

I say that messengers will testify against their nations (73:15), (2:143), (22:78) and one has only to attest to Allah ALONE bearing witness that "There is No God but He" (3:18), or declare his acceptance of religion in a fashion similar to other Prophets:* "I submit to the Lord of the Universe"* (2:131) which is a statement in response to Allah's order of 'Submit' and not a response to a question.

One does not have to testify to a messenger as Allah alone is enough witness for that(4:79), (48:28),

You need Hadiths to establish the addition of muhammad ur rasul allah at the end of the testimony as a legitimite addition.

You ask me to tell you where Abu Huraira reported the addition of the second part.

I've read a summary of a Hadith, reported to be from "Mishkat-ul-Masabih", translation by Maulana Fazlul Karim, Volume 1, Chapter 1, no.27.

I hope I've covered our arguments on this particular topic fairly. Feel free to criticize.

Allah Knows Best

These are GOD's revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than GOD and His revelations do they believe?(45:6)

Edited: 15:09 Hours US Central Time

[This message has been edited by PakistaniAbroad (edited December 03, 2001).]

[quote]
Originally posted by ThandyMazaq:
*what about shias kalima? i have researched it loooot of time...how? by asking shia kids, as i know all adult shias are master liars about their faith, cuz they know if waht they believe in is revealed they will be declared kafirs. they know that too. any way, there was this 10 yr old kid in our school bus in khi. and i knew he was shia cuz there was a whole big flag thing on his house flying constantly. i asked him to recite the kalima, he recited the regular la ilaha illa mohammed ur rasool ulllah, but then i said no, recite the real kalima, and he was kinds shocked and said we are shais. and i said yes recited ur kalima and he recited la ilaha illa mohammed ur rasool ullah ali u wali ullah wa khalifa wa bil akhir or something like that. and my best friend was also shia and i confirmed it with him. so now if we are debating the name of mohammed SAW in the kalima, waht about shias???? they have the name of ali RA...knida amazing rite? *
[/quote]

Are shias ooposed to the kalima ?

No, then why bring the shia issue into this.

Try use your energy to protect yr beliefs - that is, if you can.

Aliyun wali ul la means "Ali is Allah's (swt) chosen wali. How does this oppose the kalima testifying to the prophethood of our holy messenger (pbuh) ?

Thanday, you are indeed a big mazaq.

[quote]
Originally posted by PakistaniAbroad:
***You* probably worked with my post before I edited it.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: salaams to all

PA, I am compelled to expose you as a deviant as such I am responding in this thread, even in the month of Ramadan, where it is my nature to seize all discussions and divert my attention to other matters. So I will respond as time permits and I do it by noting what you posted and could not care less to take note when you may have edited it ( If you edited it later.)

[quote]
Since I find the amount of knowledge exchanged inversely proportional to the length of posts, I'd try and summarize our viewpoints and add my responses in it.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says; PA stop the nonsense and answer the questions posed to you in my reply that is IF you want to discuss the issue. ** I have noted that you have snipped out what you cannot or do not want to answer in my earlier replies ** and I for one answer all questions hurled towards me as I understand them according to the relevance of the thread.

I have tried to shorten the thread by snipping out verses and using their references only.

I expect you to do the same BUT NOT SUMMARIZE and thrash my questions according to your whims and fancies.

[quote]
I've copied the rest of the arguments and will inshallah open a separate thread for those as they are a totally different debate on the validity and necessity of Hadith accounts.
[/quote]

Ibrahim says: I have already suggested that in my reply for your answers concerning prayer, ** there was no issue raise concerning validity and necessity of hadiths in my reply since I made sure I did not quote any hadiths therein. **

NO BE A MAN AND CONTINUE THE THREAD WITHOUT ANY SNIPPING OR SPLICING of my replies as much as possible . such that the readers can see your follies for themselves.

** If you cannot do that , I can understand that you have retired due to inability to proof your assertions. **

I have not bothered to read the rest of your reply as I can see you are doing the Judea Christian dance on me.

I am used to 50-60 pages email discussions at a time with deviants of all faiths , so even in this month ( dead tired) I am not going to let a deviant like you scam me with this summarized version in order to escape answering and discussing the issues being raised by me earlier.

Was salaam
Ibrahim

** To live in the present is wisdom . To live for the present is folly **

Ibrahim,

My message was edited before your post. I reserve the right to correct any statements of mine which I no longer find correct on a proof read.

There are no time stamps on display, but I hope the admins or sys admins would help me out by letting you know the timestamp of when exactly my message was edited.

The Prophet used to send out invitations to opposing armies inviting them to embrace Islam.

An example of these invitations is his message to Heraclius, the Byzantine Emperor

"In the name of God, the Beneficent, the Merciful. From Mohammad, the son of Abdullah, the Apostle of God, to Heraclius, the great of the Romans. Surely I send you the invitation of Islam. Be Muslim, and thou will be safe. God will reward thee twice. If thou turn away, thou will be burdened with the sins of thy subjects. People of the Scripture, come to an equitable word between us and you: That we shall worship none but God, and that we shall associate naught with Him, and that we shall not take each other for lords besides the Almighty God. But if they turn away, then say: Bear witness, we are Muslims."

Life of the Prophet Mohammad, Mohammad Hussein Haikal, 3rd ed., p. 371

From http://al-islam.org/inquiries/index.html

Interesting to note how the Prophet of Allah is explicitly following Allah’s directions

[al-An`am 6:19] Say: What thing is the weightiest in testimony? Say: Allah is witness between you and me; and this Quran has been revealed to me that with it I may warn you and whomsoever it reaches. Do you really bear witness that there are other gods with Allah? Say: I do not bear witness. Say: He is only one God, and surely I am clear of that which you set up (with Him).

The part in italics in the message to Hercalius is identical to the verse (3:64)released by Allah and the Prophet is warning using the Qur’an ONLY

[Al-Imran 3:64] Say: O followers of the Book! come to an equitable proposition between us and you that we shall not serve any but Allah and (that) we shall not associate aught with Him, and (that) some of us shall not take others for lords besides Allah; but if they turn back, then say: Bear witness that we are Muslims.

Throughout the message, the Prophet ONLY invites him to:
[list=1]
[li] Be Muslim[/li][li] Worship none but God[/li][li] Associate Naught with him[/li][li] Bear Witness that We (Prophet and his followers) are Muslims.[/li][/list=a]

Thus casting doubts on the validity of the message in the Hadith quoted.

Allah Akbar


These are GOD’s revelations that we recite to you truthfully. In which Hadith other than GOD and His revelations do they believe?(45:6)

Further Proofs of ‘Shahada not containing bearing witness to the Prophet’ from History

I stumbled upon an interesting find of some old coins said to be issued probably around 157 A. H. by the Caliph Al-Mansoor.

Here’s the link from an article.

Islamic Awareness - Origins of Islam

Here’s the relevant excerpt from the article.

Offa’s reign over Mercia began in 757AD and continued until 796. The date inscribed upon the gold coin bearing his name is 157AH = 774AD. This piece is considered to be a copy of an Arabic dinar of the year 157AH issued by Caliph al-Mansur, and was issued in, or more probably, subequently to the year 774AD.

There are many examples of ‘reformed coinage’ from the time of cAbd al-Mâlik which also had inscriptions similar to that of Offa’s gold coin. They were first issued in 696-699 CE comprising of gold, silver and copper.

These reformed coins bear on the obverse the Muslim profession of faith

There is no god but God: He has no associate.

and around it the marginal legend

In the name of God; this dinar (or dirham) was struck at . . . in the year. . . .

The reverse area has a quotation from Qur’ânic sûrah CXII,

Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; And there is none like unto Him.

Around is Qur’ân IX, 33:

He it is Who hath sent His messenger with the guidance and the Religion of Truth, that He may cause it to prevail over all religion, however much the idolaters may be averse.

The gold coin of Offa definitely shows that basics of Islamic faith have already come into being, like the shahadah, as does the coins from the period of cAbd al-Mâlik.

I hope this puts Hadith thumpers dubious claims to rest once and for all.

Allah Akbar

Edited: 15:12 Hours, US Central Time

[This message has been edited by PakistaniAbroad (edited December 03, 2001).]

[quote]
Originally posted by ThandyMazaq:
*what about shias kalima? i have researched it loooot of time...how? by asking shia kids, as i know all adult shias are master liars about their faith, cuz they know if waht they believe in is revealed they will be declared kafirs. they know that too. any way, there was this 10 yr old kid in our school bus in khi. and i knew he was shia cuz there was a whole big flag thing on his house flying constantly. i asked him to recite the kalima, he recited the regular la ilaha illa mohammed ur rasool ulllah, but then i said no, recite the real kalima, and he was kinds shocked and said we are shais. and i said yes recited ur kalima and he recited la ilaha illa mohammed ur rasool ullah ali u wali ullah wa khalifa wa bil akhir or something like that. and my best friend was also shia and i confirmed it with him. so now if we are debating the name of mohammed SAW in the kalima, waht about shias???? they have the name of ali RA...knida amazing rite? *
[/quote]

You brazenly slander shia. It appears you have no respect for them. Consider this Hadith from Sahih Bukhari:

Volume 9, Book 93, Number 560:
Narrated 'Ubada bin As-Samit:
I, along with a group of people, gave the pledge of allegiance to Allah's Apostle. He said, "I take your Pledge on the condition that you (1) will not join partners in worship with Allah, (2) will not steal, (3) will not commit illegal sexual intercourse, (4) will not kill your offspring, (5) will not slander, (6) and will not disobey me when I order you to do good. Whoever among you will abide by his pledge, his reward will be with Allah, and whoever commits any of those sins and receives the punishment in this world, that punishment will be an expiation for his sins and purification; but if Allah screens him, then it will be up to Allah to punish him if He will or excuse Him, if He will."
I allege slander because of your statement: “…as i know all adult shias are master liars about their faith.”

I don’t believe it is possible for any human being to judge ALL Shias. Even if ONE shia abstains from lying, your statement is falsified. If it is your belief that you CAN judge all shias, than in my humble opinion you are either inhuman or insane. My personal guess would be the later one. And
Allah knows best.

[This message has been edited by HalCiON (edited December 08, 2001).]

[quote]
Originally posted by HalCiON:
** You brazenly slander shia. It appears you have no respect for them. Consider this Hadith from Sahih Bukhari:

Volume 9, Book 93, Number 560:
Narrated 'Ubada bin As-Samit:
I, along with a group of people, gave the pledge of allegiance to Allah's Apostle. He said, "I take your Pledge on the condition that you (1) will not join partners in worship with Allah, (2) will not steal, (3) will not commit illegal sexual intercourse, (4) will not kill your offspring, (5) will not slander, (6) and will not disobey me when I order you to do good. Whoever among you will abide by his pledge, his reward will be with Allah, and whoever commits any of those sins and receives the punishment in this world, that punishment will be an expiation for his sins and purification; but if Allah screens him, then it will be up to Allah to punish him if He will or excuse Him, if He will."
I allege slander because of your statement: “…as i know all adult shias are master liars about their faith.”

I don’t believe it is possible for any human being to judge ALL Shias. Even if ONE shia abstains from lying, your statement is falsified. If it is your belief that you CAN judge all shias, than in my humble opinion you are either inhuman or insane. My personal guess would be the later one. And
Allah knows best.
**
[/quote]

If it is the declared policy of a group to lie, the one who does not, is an exception. Thus to identify all as liars would be appropriate. Taqiyyah (lying) is the established policy. It forms nine-tenth of your religion according to your books and scholars.

As for the hadeeth, shias are breaking four of the six pledges, as shown below:

(1) will not join partners in worship with Allah - in several ways you venerate Ali (radhi allaho anh) to an extent equal to Christian's veneration of Eesa (alaihe salam). For example, in Makkah you sit on one side of the kaaba because Ali (radhi allaho anh) was born there. You are looking at the kaaba and thinking of Ali. Isn't this shirk? Then you ask Ali for madad. Isn't that shirk? You have the picture of Khomenee in your imambaraghs in front when you pray.

(2) will not commit illegal sexual intercourse - they commit zina and consider it a virtue, by performing muta'.

(3)will not slander - they are constantly slandering the beloved wives and companions of the prophet (sallallaho alaihe wasallam) and consider it an act worthy of sawab through tabarrah.

(4)will not disobey me when I order you to do good - disobey in not following his sunnah as prescribed by the valid ahadeeth. Thus, your kalima is different, your adhan is different, your prayers are different, God only knows what else as your madhab is kept strictly confidential.


Rabbeshrah lee sadree; wa yassirlee amree; yafqahoo qaulee.

[quote]
Originally posted by FactFinder:
** If it is the declared policy of a group to lie, the one who does not, is an exception. Thus to identify all as liars would be appropriate. Taqiyyah (lying) is the established policy. It forms nine-tenth of your religion according to your books and scholars.

As for the hadeeth, shias are breaking four of the six pledges, as shown below:

(1) will not join partners in worship with Allah - in several ways you venerate Ali (radhi allaho anh) to an extent equal to Christian's veneration of Eesa (alaihe salam). For example, in Makkah you sit on one side of the kaaba because Ali (radhi allaho anh) was born there. You are looking at the kaaba and thinking of Ali. Isn't this shirk? Then you ask Ali for madad. Isn't that shirk? You have the picture of Khomenee in your imambaraghs in front when you pray.

(2) will not commit illegal sexual intercourse - they commit zina and consider it a virtue, by performing muta'.

(3)will not slander - they are constantly slandering the beloved wives and companions of the prophet (sallallaho alaihe wasallam) and consider it an act worthy of sawab through tabarrah.

(4)will not disobey me when I order you to do good - disobey in not following his sunnah as prescribed by the valid ahadeeth. Thus, your kalima is different, your adhan is different, your prayers are different, God only knows what else as your madhab is kept strictly confidential.

**
[/quote]

Sure.

I don't see how that absolves YOU of slander.

[quote]
Originally posted by HalCiON:
** Sure.
I don't see how that absolves YOU of slander.**
[/quote]

But my facts you agree with. Then you are responsible for 4 out of 6. I am responsible for pointing out what you guys are up to. You call it slander, I call it informing the public of the fitna.


Rabbeshrah lee sadree; wa yassirlee amree; yafqahoo qaulee.