You asked in the original post:
But is the intolerance resulting in such massacre, and declaration of Qadiani being non-Muslims somehow related?
I pointed out that the official declaration of Ahmadis as non-Muslim, and the resulting laws the blatantly persecute them because of their religious beliefs serve as a sign of government sanction for the “intolerance that resulted in such a massacre.”
I’m not changing the direction of anything; you’re just refusing to answer basic questions about your pro-amendment position.