Care to share the full sermon of the Amir Ali (a.s.)?
Let me do the favor for u and post the rest of the sermon no 91 from Nahjul Balagha.
"If you want me for your worldly ends, then I am not ready to serve as your instrument. Leave me and select someone else who may fulfil your ends. You have seen my past life that I am not prepared to follow anything except the Qur'an and sunnah and would not give up this principle for securing power. If you select someone else I would pay regard to the laws of the state and the constitution as a peaceful citizen should do. I have not at any stage tried to disrupt the collective existence of the Muslims by inciting revolt. The same will happen now. Rather, just as keeping the common good in view I have hitherto been giving correct advice, I would not grudge doing the same. If you let me in the same position it would be better for your worldly ends, because in that case I won't have power in my hands so that I could stand in the way of your worldly affairs, and create an impediment against your hearts' wishes. However, if you are determined on swearing allegiance on my hand, bear in mind that if you frown or speak against me I would force you to tread on the path of right, and in the matter of the right I would not care for anyone. If you want to swear allegiance even at this, you can satisfy your wish."
Nussairee - It is very kind of you to do me favour by posting rest of the sermon no 91 from Nahjul Balagha. Much obliged.
In fact this sermon of Hz. Ali (ra) goes against core belief of 12er Shias.
Read and then re-read the above sermon again and you will notice that Hz. Ali (ra) is (and rightly so) emphasizing that:
1) he alone at that time was the most suitable person to lead the Muslim Ummah out of mayhem/anarchy/civil confusion.
2) And that his leadership will be soundly based on Quran and Sunnah for the betterment of the Ummah importantly for Hereafter and this world too.
3) He was agreeable if the people selected anyone else to be their leader
Your (Shias) claim is that Prophet (saw) had appointed Hz. Ali (ra) as his successor on the direct command of Allah (swt) at Khum Ghadeer.
Isn’t Hz. Ali (ra) duty bound to remind the people of his Divine appointment?
Isn’t he duty bound to remind the people that he is the Imam of the time?
Isn’t he duty bound to remind the people that his Imamate is part of Islamic creed?
Isn’t he duty bound to remind the people that not following his Imamate is Kufr (Disbelief)?
For instance we have the example of Prophet (saw):
**1) **He was never tired to telling the people that he was appointed as the Messenger of Allah (swt) and what his mission was all about. [a few examples given below].
I am Muhammad, the unlettered prophet of Allah. I am Muhammad, the unlettered prophet of Allah. I am Muhammad, the unlettered prophet of Allah. There will be no prophet after me. - (Musnad Ahmad)
I am Muhammad, I am Ahmad, I am the effacer and infidelity shall be erased through me; I am the assembler. People shall be assembled on Doomsday after my time. And I am the last in the sense that no prophet shall succeed me. - (Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, Muatta')
I have been sent by Allah to carry His Divine message to the whole world.
I am Muhammad, I am Ahmad, I am the effacer and infidelity shall be erased through me; I am the assembler. People shall be assembled on Doomsday after my time. And I am the last in the sense that no Prophet shall succeed me. (Bukhari, Muslim, Tirimzi, Mishkawt)
*2) **Even when under the pressure of Quraish his dear uncle Abu Talib requested him to tone down his opposition the Quraish, his answer was uncompromising and he said the following: *'O my uncle, by Allah, if they put the sun in my right hand and the moon in my left in return for my giving up this cause, I would not give it up until Allah makes Truth victorious, or I die in His service.
Read the sermon 91 again and you will notice that Hz. Ali (ra) does not even once mention the incidence of Khum Ghadeer or his divine appointment as the successor of the Prophet (saw).
This was the Golden opportunity **he had to remind the people of this **Divine appointment to be the *rightful successor to the Prophet *(saw).
He had no need to practice **Taqiyyah **as all the people were clamouring for him to be the Khaleef.
Do let me know why?
By saying the following “I am better for you as a counsellor than as chief" he is aware that he had no ‘automatic divine right’ to the Khilaafat.
(i'm aware that we are going 'off' the thread)