Watcher is known to call Shia Hadith false and irregular ect. ect But now I have proof that Shaihs are wrong and contradict the Quran!
The books of Sihah, especially the sahih of al-Bukhari and Muslim,
both have conveyed hadiths from the Holy Prophet (s.w.) in which
many human characteristics such as face, eyes, hands, fingers,
legs, feet, andetc… have been attributed to Allah. In those hadiths
it is also said that He laughs, has a certain place, He comes down
from heaven to the terrestrial world, and soon 1].
Now, our question is:
a\ How could the ancestors accept such fabricated hadiths? Why
didn’tthey check the chain of narrators of these hadiths? Does not
these hadiths clearly refer to incarnation?
b\ How could the ancestors urge the Muslims to believe in the
outwardmeaning of such hadiths without searching the
inwardmeaning 2], since their outward meaning forces us to
believe in the incarnation of Allah,and the Sunnis do not believe in
incarnation, especially when it is to beattributed to Allah, the
Exalted?
c\ The same Sihah have conveyed other part of prophetic hadiths
which declare that a human being can see Allah, the Exalted, by his
natural eyes, and that in the Dooms Day He shall appear to those
who see as a fullmoon 3]. According to this, all Sunni scholars,
narrators, and the imams of the four main sects of Islam, believe
that it is possible to see Allah, the Exalted, and have considered
that as one of the principles thatconsist theirbelief 4]. Moreover,
imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal regards anyone who does not believe in
the possibility of seeing Allah as an irreligious infidel and a
polytheist (tafseer al-Manar, vol.9, p.135).
Here, we ask:
Does not the meaning of those hadiths contradict the concepts of
theHoly Quran in which Allah, the Exalted says:
“Visioncomprehends Him not, and He comprehends (all) vision…”(Anam: 103); and "he said: My Lord! show me (Thyself), so that I may look upon Thee. He said: You cannot (bear to) see Me..."(Araaf: 143);
and “nothing like a likeness ofHim”(Shura: 11); and “And when you
said: O Musa! we will not believe in you untill we see Allah
manifestly, so the punishment overtook you whileyou looked
on”(Baqarah: 55).
And does not such a notion contradict rational intelligence, since
looking upon something requires that the seen thing exists in a
certain place,and that it is a certain distance away from looker.
Consequently, both the looker and the seen thing shall be in front
of each others, and such condition cannot apply to the Creator, the
Exalted, because that meansthat His Holy Essence must be
regarded as a certain material; and thus,He shall be in need of an
abode and direction. But, as we know, suchconditions are only
related to materials, and it is also known that theSunni ulama do not believe in incarnation? Now, if these hadiths are contrary to the Holy Quran and rational intelligence, then how could Sunni ulama accept them and
agree upo nthem without even discussing their chains of narrators
ordocumentation? However, is it correct to agree on these hadiths
onlybecause they have been mentioned in the two Sahihs?