President should dissolve the parliament

[Sa1eem]

Enough is enough. President should use 58-2B to dissolve the parliament as it is need of the time. There could be many grounds and some serious grounds that government would not be able to defend in courts are as follows:

A: Government is run by two unelected thugs sitting outside the parliament and making decisions some time in hotels of Dubai and sometime in London.

B: Government is not sincere with problems facing the country but wasting time on non-issues and creating conflicts between state organs and institutions. Government is also replacing government officials at crucial posts on basis of personal like and nepotism, without even notices.

C: During their tenor, Pakistan has seen complete economical meltdown, political instability, bickering on ministries, while government is showing indifference about it.

D: Many of crucial ministries in government, including home ministry and information ministry, is getting run by un-elected members of party.

E: Country has experienced irreparable damage to the economy during short 4 month tenor of this government, that includes foreign exchange reserves getting reduced by around 7 billion or 40 percent, rupee getting devalued by 25 percent, National debt going up by over 20 percent (in 4 months), Stock market dropping 40 percent, prices of essentials going up by 30 percent, many industries closing down, many investments that was coming to country got stopped because of mistrust on this government, billions of dollars left the country, etc. While, all these are happening, none in the government seems concerned.

After assemblies would get dissolved, let see how this government of crooks and thugs would go to court and would defend themselves.

Later, President can annul NRO and pardon he gave to convicted terrorist Nawaz.

[gesto]

Re: President should dissolve the parliament

And after that,what would you like to prefer?A president rule?Or another election to cause tremendous financial burden to an already crippling economy?

[Sa1eem]

And after that,what would you like to prefer?A president rule?Or another election to cause tremendous financial burden to an already crippling economy?

Most important at present is to dissolve the assembly and then impose virtual martial law ... put election pending indefinitely on ground that lot needed to get sorted out before election ... that could go on for next 5 to 10 years.

[coOoLBreeze]

Most important at present is to dissolve the assembly and then impose virtual martial law ... put election pending indefinitely on ground that lot needed to get sorted out before election ... that could go on for next 5 to 10 years.

you need help dude,...

[Sa1eem]

What happened in Pakistan is because Musharraf made big mistake of running the country along with crook politicians, hoping that he would be able to satisfy Western powers that Pakistan has some sort of token democracy, so that they could help in development of the country. He forgave big time crooks also hoping that World could see some sort of democracy in the country. Unfortunately, he was wrong.

If I want to educate my kids, I would not give them in the hand of paedophiles. Just like paedophiles are dangerous for children, corrupt and thugs are dangerous to democracy. Just like a kid cannot be left with paedophile even if paedophile tries to show his face as teacher and well wisher of the child, a Country cannot be left with crooks and thugs even if those crooks and thugs show their faces as democrats and well wisher of the country. Nawaz and Zardari (along with crook partners in their parties) are same for Pakistan as paedophile is for a kid.

[khanabadoshpk]

[sameenji]

Uff Politics is very boring na, i hate politics really.

[Panthr3ss]

Re: President should dissolve the parliament

ya definitely...58 2b iz da way to go!...these ppl will never learn on their own..

[khanabadoshpk]

Re: President should dissolve the parliament

WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on Sunday granting asylum to embattled Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf was not currently under consideration by the United States.

“That’s not an issue on the table, and I just want to keep our focus on what we must do with the democratic government of Pakistan,” Rice told foreign news channel on Sunday when asked if Washington would give the Pakistan president asylum.

She spoke as Pakistan’s ruling coalition readied impeachment charges against Musharraf and gave him two days to step down.

Asked if it would be in the best interest of Pakistan to have Musharraf resign, Rice said: "This is a matter for the Pakistanis to resolve.

“We have been supportive of democratic elections that took place in Pakistan. In fact, advocated for them.”

She said the United States had showed its support for the new government, citing President George W. Bush’s recent meeting with Pakistani premier Yousuf Raza Gilani.

Rice said “President Musharraf has been a good ally” but that Washington had disagreed with his decision to declare a state of emergency.

US asylum for Musharraf ‘not on the table’: Rice

[ehtasab]

Re: President should dissolve the parliament

and people like Sa1eem call themselves "kher-khawahan-e-Pakistan", sure, India and Afghanistan think the same too.

[ehtasab]

@Sa1eem

A: Government is run by two unelected thugs sitting outside the parliament and making decisions some time in hotels of Dubai and sometime in London.

It would be too embarrassing for someone who has 1 bit of shame to dissolve govt based on this reason, as he himself is responsible for letting these crooks of the hook and let them be part of the political system.

@Sa1eem

B: Government is not sincere with problems facing the country but wasting time on non-issues and creating conflicts between state organs and institutions. Government is also replacing government officials at crucial posts on basis of personal like and nepotism, without even notices.

What conflicts between “state organs and institutions” are you talking about other than “Presidency” and rest of the govt?

@Sa1eem

C: During their tenor, Pakistan has seen complete economical meltdown, political instability, bickering on ministries, while government is showing indifference about it.

Complete economical meltdown? Did it not have to do anything with the political crisis created by his very ownself by not resigning even after so many promises?

@Sa1eem

D: Many of crucial ministries in government, including home ministry and information ministry, is getting run by un-elected members of party.

Please do show us where un-elected party members are running ministeries, that would be some proof!

@Sa1eem

E: Country has experienced irreparable damage to the economy during short 4 month tenor of this government, that includes foreign exchange reserves getting reduced by around 7 billion or 40 percent, rupee getting devalued by 25 percent, National debt going up by over 20 percent (in 4 months), Stock market dropping 40 percent, prices of essentials going up by 30 percent, many industries closing down, many investments that was coming to country got stopped because of mistrust on this government, billions of dollars left the country, etc. While, all these are happening, none in the government seems concerned.

All of it has nothing to do with the self-created political crisis? You are more worried for your investments then the country itself.

@Sa1eem

After assemblies would get dissolved, let see how this government of crooks and thugs would go to court and would defend themselves.

Later, President can annul NRO and pardon he gave to convicted terrorist Nawaz.

Annul NRO? I can only pray for that.

[coOoLBreeze]

ya definitely...58 2b iz da way to go!...these ppl will never learn on their own..

you also need help... try taking chill pills for starter.

[Guy1]

Re: President should dissolve the parliament

who the hell cares if mush dissolves this corrupt govt...public give their **** to nawaz benazir and especially professional chor zardari....

[Sa1eem]

@ehtasab

and people like Sa1eem call themselves “kher-khawahan-e-Pakistan”, sure, India and Afghanistan think the same too.

hmm .. To you, it seems that only people like ehtasab is ‘kher-khawahan-e-Pakistan’. Rest are enemy, right?

Anyhow, I pay tax in Pakistan and it is obvious that I should get worried for Pakistan. I do not want my tax to get transferred in Switzerland bank account of ‘Ganja choor’ of Raiwand or commission of dallal Mr ‘10 percent’. I want Pakistan to develop, prosper and get rich, so that as Pakistan develops and prospers, I along with all Pakistanis also develop and prosper.

@ehtasab

It would be too embarrassing for someone who has 1 bit of shame to dissolve govt based on this reason, as he himself is responsible for letting these crooks of the hook and let them be part of the political system.

Why? What shame and what embarrassment in performing duty bestowed on a person by constitution and saving the country from crooks and thugs destroying the country?

Is it not in constitution that if there are reasons, President should dissolve the parliament and send government home? Why all of a sudden it become shame when government is sacked because they are ruining the country without concern and is run by people who are not even elected.

As for being responsibility, than it was not president who is responsible but people who elected crooks are responsible for all mayhem … or … those who after getting elected are letting crooks and thugs run the country from outside (from hotels of Dubai and London) and not running the country themselves are responsible.

@ehtasab

What conflicts between “state organs and institutions” are you talking about other than “Presidency” and rest of the govt?

Conflicts between Parliament and Presidency, conflict between Parliament and Judiciary, conflict between parliament and National Intelligence Agencies (ISI). Even one conflict is enough for destabilisation of government, but here we have 3 or more conflicts. [Actually, Ganja choor of Raiwand is master of conflicts and whenever he finds institution obstacle in his looting, plundering, nepotism, and destroying Pakistan, conflicts follows]

@ehtasab

Complete economical meltdown? Did it not have to do anything with the political crisis created by his very ownself by not resigning even after so many promises?

No, it has nothing to do with political crises created by President, but it is to do with incompetent thugs in government who are more interested in looting and plundering the country than serving the country. What these thugs are doing today is nothing new, as it was expected from them and Pakistan has seen same during 1988 to 1999 by them. Only difference is that, at that time Pakistan had little so one could not see such obvious deterioration in so short a time, but this time when these thugs came in, there was plenty to loot and plunder, so when deterioration is happening, everyone can see.

@ehtasab

Please do show us where un-elected party members are running ministeries, that would be some proof!

Advisor to Prime Minister effectively runs home ministry: Rahman Malik
Law Minister: Farooq Naek
Information Minister: Sherry Rehman
Effective Prime Minister: AA Zardari
Joker to Prime Minister: Ganja Shareef

All above are un-elected.

@ehtasab

All of it has nothing to do with the self-created political crisis? You are more worried for your investments then the country itself.

No, it is nothing to do with self-created political crisis. It is to do with incompetency of the present government who are more concerned about how to loot and plunder than worry about Pakistan and Pakistani economy. As for worrying about investment, if I have some investment in Pakistan then it is not for myself but for the country, as one can invest anywhere in the world for benefit, but place where investment goes benefit most.

@ehtasab

Annul NRO? I can only pray for that.

Well … I also pray for that. I think that this can only happen once President use 58-2B and dissolve the parliament.

[Monk]

Re: President should dissolve the parliament

is this guy for real ????????

[Spock]

[ehtasab]

hmm .. To you, it seems that only people like ehtasab is 'kher-khawahan-e-Pakistan'. Rest are enemy, right? :)

Obviously you don't want Pakistan to have institutions, you want country to be run on ad-hocism.

Why? What shame and what embarrassment in performing duty bestowed on a person by constitution and saving the country from crooks and thugs destroying the country?

It'd be embarrassing because it was Mush who let these crooks get out of jails, let them go scot free of their crimes in name of NRO.

Is it not in constitution that if there are reasons, President should dissolve the parliament and send government home? Why all of a sudden it become shame when government is sacked because they are ruining the country without concern and is run by people who are not even elected.

It was known all along what'd happen, why surprised now?

As for being responsibility, than it was not president who is responsible but people who elected crooks are responsible for all mayhem ... or ... those who after getting elected are letting crooks and thugs run the country from outside (from hotels of Dubai and London) and not running the country themselves are responsible.

Looking other way in face of NRO will not absolve Musharraf from the NRO crime.

Conflicts between Parliament and Presidency, conflict between Parliament and Judiciary, conflict between parliament and National Intelligence Agencies (ISI). Even one conflict is enough for destabilisation of government, but here we have 3 or more conflicts. [Actually, Gutter=-dhakkan choor of Raiwand is master of conflicts and whenever he finds institution obstacle in his looting, plundering, nepotism, and destroying Pakistan, conflicts follows

There is no conflict between Parliament and any other institution besides Presidency. ISI conflict was storm in cup of tea, there is no "conflict" with judiciary.

No, it has nothing to do with political crises created by President, but it is to do with incompetent thugs in government who are more interested in looting and plundering the country than serving the country. What these thugs are doing today is nothing new, as it was expected from them and Pakistan has seen same during 1988 to 1999 by them. Only difference is that, at that time Pakistan had little so one could not see such obvious deterioration in so short a time, but this time when these thugs came in, there was plenty to loot and plunder, so when deterioration is happening, everyone can see.

I guess you'd have seen the case of Zubaida Jalal by now. That is one, I am sure there are many including the billions of "forgiven" loans of Chodharies, if that is not a corruption then I don't know what is.

[quote]
Advisor to Prime Minister effectively runs home ministry: Rahman Malik
Law Minister: Farooq Naek
Information Minister: Sherry Rehman
Effective Prime Minister: AA Zardari
Joker to Prime Minister: Ganja Shareef

All above are un-elected.
[/quote]

Well I wouldn't count Zardari and Ganja but yeah Sherry/Farooq/Rahman are not elected then they shouldn't be occupying "minister" seat. Is anyone from "opposition" taking any action? What is PML-Q doing in that regards?

[nGenius]

If Musharraf resign Pakistan will be in worse situation, political turmoil. There will be no progress, Pakistan probably go bankrupt. We may see civil war.

We certainly can kiss good bye to Frontier province. Pakistan Taliban my launch Independent movement in Frontier province. Baluchistan will be next to go.
We can't trust Zaradri, he will probably sell the gwader to USA since USA is planning to invest 50+ billion in Gwader.

If Musharraf dissolve assembly, he should put both Zardari and Ganja in jail for corruption for rest of their life and banned all the corrupted politician from Pakistani politics.

[vigoratus]

Enough is enough. President should use 58-2B to dissolve the parliament as it is need of the time. There could be many grounds and some serious grounds that government would not be able to defend in courts are as follows:

A: Government is run by two unelected thugs sitting outside the parliament and making decisions some time in hotels of Dubai and sometime in London.

B: Government is not sincere with problems facing the country but wasting time on non-issues and creating conflicts between state organs and institutions. Government is also replacing government officials at crucial posts on basis of personal like and nepotism, without even notices.

C: During their tenor, Pakistan has seen complete economical meltdown, political instability, bickering on ministries, while government is showing indifference about it.

D: Many of crucial ministries in government, including home ministry and information ministry, is getting run by un-elected members of party.

E: Country has experienced irreparable damage to the economy during short 4 month tenor of this government, that includes foreign exchange reserves getting reduced by around 7 billion or 40 percent, rupee getting devalued by 25 percent, National debt going up by over 20 percent (in 4 months), Stock market dropping 40 percent, prices of essentials going up by 30 percent, many industries closing down, many investments that was coming to country got stopped because of mistrust on this government, billions of dollars left the country, etc. While, all these are happening, none in the government seems concerned.

After assemblies would get dissolved, let see how this government of crooks and thugs would go to court and would defend themselves.

Later, President can annul NRO and pardon he gave to convicted terrorist Nawaz.

blah blah blah...

he resigned because he knew he couldn't beat the charges brought against him during impeachment. Furthermore, his beloved MQM and PML(Q) would have been found guilty in many of the decisions because they were at the forefront of his policies.

GET OVER IT!

[Spock]

Re: President should dissolve the parliament

president khud hi dissolve ho gya lol