Power tariff hike: Govt imposes 30 paisa per unit EQ surcharge

Re: Power tariff hike: Govt imposes 30 paisa per unit EQ surcharge

Brother thanks for appreciating efforts. :slight_smile:

I know that many would not like to even read anything i have put here, as they are not interested in truth … rather many on forums have job to spread propaganda full of lies, and that is what they are doing, without concern for the country or poor sufferers.

Army of propagandists thug parties have hired (through brainwashing or with money) could not understand that thug leaders may throw some bones to them but in long run they (propagandists) would suffer too with country … well, if not they then their children.

I am just trying to do what I can … counter ‘propaganda and lies’ that I hope those who are sincere, with country and with themselves, would try to understand.

Re: Power tariff hike: Govt imposes 30 paisa per unit EQ surcharge

Why does the Fing IMF ask govt to raise tariffs? Why can't they push the govt to increase bills collection, tax collection (from the thiefs/non-payers) instead of shoving more sticks up consumers behinds?

Re: Power tariff hike: Govt imposes 30 paisa per unit EQ surcharge

From what I know … during Musharraf time, government made a commitment that government would keep budget deficit below 5 percent of GDP. But once Musharraf government ended (2008), thugs into power increased budget deficit above 5 percent (mostly due to their mismanagement, incompetency, and corruption), causing lot of problems. In 2004, Pakistan came out of all IMF programs, but in 2009, Zardari took Pakistan back to IMF.

When lending, IMF tells government to reduce budget deficit, as low budget deficit means healthy economy, low inflation, low interest rate in country (means low borrowing cost to government) and also low borrowing requirement (as low budget deficit means less need to borrow).

Now it is up to government how to reduce budget deficit and from where. IMF only recommends ways and areas budget deceit can be reduced.

For instance: Showing expenditure, Pakistan government may say that they are subsidising electricity by ‘X’ amount. IMF might say that they should reduce electricity subsidy (along with other subsidies) so that deficit reduces. Reduction in subsidy means increasing electricity tariff cost.

Well, government can reduce cost on electricity to consumers by reducing corruption, line losses, stealing of electricity, non-payment of bills, etc … and then to keep tariff at particular price. This way, government may need to give no subsidy, rather could even start making profit (reducing budget deficit).

But corrupt and incompetent governments (Zardari/Nawaz) do not like to reduce corruption, line losses, stealing of electricity, non-payment of bills, etc … and that means high cost of paid electricity (electricity to consumers who pay). As cost of paid electricity could go too high, government allocate money to cover some cost in budget as subsidy on electricity. This allocation increases budget deficit.

Here is Pakistan budget deficit data over years since ‘1950 to 2012’:

Source … Pakistan ministry of finance (and State bank of Pakistan).

[TABLE]

Decade
Average Budget deficit
Period

(as percentage of GDP)

1950-59
7.7
Pre-Ayub

1960-69
8.6
Ayub

1970-79
7.1
Bhutto

1980-89
7.0
Zia

1990-99
6.8
Thugs (BB and NS)

2000-09
4.7
Musharraf

2009-10
6.3
Zardari

2010-11
6.6
Zardari

2011-12
8.5
Zardari

Re: Power tariff hike: Govt imposes 30 paisa per unit EQ surcharge

yaar sub pata hey me ko lekin bhains k agey been bajanay ka koi faida naheen hota hay :cobra: iss liye bus lulz kah dia karo ya phir troll :sunnyboy:

#bhains_k_agey_been](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=bhains_k_agey_been)

Re: Power tariff hike: Govt imposes 30 paisa per unit EQ surcharge

**LATEST:

Nawas Shareef has vetoed the increase by Khwaja Asif. this will be effective from next month. so, one month's collection will be gifted to Khowaja Asif to keep in quiet.**