Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

Are channels free to talk against atrocities committed by army and inelegance agencies in UK and USA?

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

Absolutely

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

But you know in Pakistan, its not possible. Its ultimate treason. Be involvement in making Bengladesh or missing persons in Balochistan, bloody civilians are responsible.

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

But here wohi kuchh keh sakta hay , jis ki back par ISI khari ho

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

Which corruption are we talking about here?

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

Not supporting the ban of Geo, Ary, Ptv etc. I don't care about who biases against whom. The important issue is that different voices must be heard in this country, not just who you think is right. If someone thinks the voice of opposition should be banned then they should burn their history books (although I'm going to presume they already have because they have learnt nothing from them). The whole Bangladesh debacle happened because the media was lying to the west Pakistanis and it will happen again and again because people are incapable of even allowing a different point of view. Pemra is a joke and it really needs an overhaul.

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

recently ik send defamation notice to javed chaudry because he leaked ik personal number

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

If you supported geo being banned you have no moral, legal authority to speak. You are nothing but a hypocrite.

It was wrong when geo was banned. It is wrong now. But everyone backed geos ban.

PTIs stance was to boycott geo. Noone called for a ban on the channel. People in their individual capacity called for a ban, but that doesnt matter.

In Luqman's case, Im still trying to figure out what the case was against him. If he reported any lies, then those lies should be brought forward and he should be shamed based on counter proof, rather than use federal persuasion to settle personal scores.

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

#BringBackMubasharLucman](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=BringBackMubasharLucman)

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

You mean ... All those bhangra dance on road, Corrupt and Characterless judge Iftikhar and his corrupt supporters were doing throughout Punjab, all those monkey behaviour they were showing (especially Kurd), and all what media was saying, were all sponsored by ISI?

Do you think Media not mentioning that Iftikhar Chaudhary and Rana Sanaullah are cousins and they were/are both supporters of banned outfits like Sipah-sahaba and lashkar-e-Janghvi ... media ignored that because ISI wanted to?

And all those lies and misinformation media was concocting about Lal-building goons to show them innocent, keep insisting that Iftikhar was sacked when he was suspended, Making Bugti a hero and blaming army that they killed him without mentioning that Bugti died in cave he was hiding when cave caved-in during meeting of army men with Bugti and without mentioning that many army high ranking officers also lost their life in cave with Bugti .. that was all conspiracy of ISI and media was doing all this to please ISI?

When was shouting with loud voice that BeNazir, Asif Ali Zardari, Nawaz ... all of them were/are world class criminals, corrupts, and liars with different faces of same coin, but Pakistani media never mentioned that and always ignored world reports and documentaries on them, was it all happening because ISI wanted to?

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

Corruption of BeNazir and Zardari.

Probably Pasha Saheb is saying that bilawal](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=Bilawal) Bhutto’ each and every drop of blood and piece of flesh are made of corruption money, so of entire world he is capable and best suited of anchoring a corrupt party of thugs like PPP, and no western country would take it as offence, because Bilawal is grown in west and it was west who allowed and protected corruption money of BeNazir and Zardari.

I hope I guessed right what Pasha Saheb meant. :slight_smile:

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” George Orwell

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

now this is shame, government I think taking out their personal grudges

Shireen Mazari ‏@ShireenMazari1 · 23m23 minutes ago

To target Mubashar Lucman's children & family shows the intense levels of intolerance & vengeance PMLN can stoop to!

Moeed Pirzada @MOEEDNj · 18m 18 minutes ago

Mub-Luqman may have offended many powerful people by his style; but Punjab Govt harassing his family & children only exposes their "values"

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

Clean , astaghfirullah , His character every one knew . Worst character , Allah hamaray nojawanon ko is kay shar say mehfooz rakhay

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

Is he the same Judge of LHC who put gag on ML that Luqman went after in Asim Malik's case?

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

ALLAH ap ko bilawal k sher se mehfoos rakhay

there are many who are proud of Pakistan, but very few that Pakistan is proud of n ik is one of them

#hatersgonahate](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/usertag.php?do=list&action=hash&hash=hatersgonahate)

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

Though I never liked him, good he is not on screen but this should have been done by media houses rather than PEMRA. What reason is cited by PEMRA?

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

This corrupt criminal journalist would have been in jail in countries where freedom of speech is part of their constitution.

Re: Pemra bans Mubashir Lucman’s ‘Khara Sach’

I think PEMRA has banned him as per LHC decision.

[quote]
The decision was taken in compliance of Lahore High Court (LHC) orders dated 17.10.2014 passed in Crl. Org. No.2070-W/2014, said a Pemra press release issued here.
[/quote]