FAisla aa gaya. magar kia aaya !!!
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
#PanamaCase](https://twitter.com/hashtag/PanamaCase?src=tren&data_id=tweet%3A854987036859678720)**#تخت_لاہورکےمشھورٹھگ](https://twitter.com/hashtag/تخت_لاہورکےمشھورٹھگ?src=hash) Vs پنجابی جج
Thug won again
PM was not Sindhi Baluch , Mahajir Pakhton or Saraiki
Qanoon ka hi nikalna tha
**Insufficient evidence to remove PM Nawaz Sharif over corruption allegations, SC rules
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
Wat a decision . If more probe is needed than do it and than only give the decision. IF proof can not be provdied now than how it can be provdied in future. Clearly a compromized decision.
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
Yeh bik gayee hia adlia. Pakistan ka aab kuch nahee hosakta.
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
For me it is same as earlier. That is a very very huge moral defeat for PML-N .
Ahsan Iqbal addresses the media outside SC:
“The split verdict proves that people especially the PTI who opposed PM Nawaz are a minority,” says Ahsan Iqbal.
Wat a stupid statement …
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
15:03اندازہ کریں وزیراعظم جے آئی ٹی میں پیش ہوں گے، فواد چوہدری](اندازہ کریں وزیراعظم جے آئی ٹی میں پیش ہوں گے، فواد چوہدری)
14:57وزیر اعظم کا آج شام 7 بجے قوم سے خطاب متوقع](http://urdu.geo.tv/latest/164380-wazeer-azam-ka-aj-sham-7-bjay-quam-say-khitab-mutawaqqe)
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
No hope for PAkistan…Insaaf key bghair mulk nahi chal saktaaa.
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
Pakistani Cort Judgment Only For PPP Not For Others is it justice ?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C92ZyMaVoAATO3U.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C92Z4EWU0AAd_5s.jpg
Insufficient evidence to remove PM Nawaz Sharif over corruption allegations, SC rules
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
iss faislee main aisaa kia hey jo sadion yaad rakha jaiyee ga…
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
qaum k sath aik or LOL…
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
Nation is no where. Both are celebrating.
**#تخت_لاہورکےمشھورٹھگ](https://twitter.com/hashtag/تخت_لاہورکےمشھورٹھگ?src=hash) Vs Rest of Pakistan
**#اناللہ_وانا_الیہ_راجعون](https://twitter.com/hashtag/اناللہ_وانا_الیہ_راجعون?src=hash) #PanamaCase](https://twitter.com/hashtag/PanamaCase?src=hash)
جے آئی ٹی بنانا نواز شریف کو راہ فرار دینا ہے، اعتزار احسن](جے آئی ٹی بنانا نواز شریف کو راہ فرار دینا ہے، اعتزار احسن)
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
As expected a hotchpotch by the apex court. NS is not disqualified but it not a clean chit for him either by the Court. Two judges were in favour of his disqualification while the other three judges opted for a JIT probe of Sharif family
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
ORDER OF THE COURT
By a majority of 3 to 2 (Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and Gulzar Ahmed, JJ) dissenting, who have given separate declarations and directions, we hold that the questions how did Gulf Steel Mill come into being; what led to its sale; what happened to its liabilities; where did its sale proceeds end up; how did they reach Jeddah, Qatar and the U.K.; whether respondents No. 7 and 8 in view of their tender ages had the means in the early nineties to possess and purchase the flats; whether sudden appearance of the letters of Hamad Bin Jassim Bin Jaber Al-Thani is a myth or a reality; how bearer shares crystallized into the flats; who, in fact, is the real and beneficial owner of M/s Nielsen Enterprises Limited and Nescoll Limited, how did Hill Metal Establishment come into existence; where did the money for Flagship Investment Limited and other companies set up/taken over by respondent No. 8 come from, and where did the Working Capital for such companies come from and where do the huge sums running into millions gifted by respondent No. 7 to respondent No. 1 drop in from, which go to the heart of the matter and need to be answered. Therefore, a thorough investigation in this behalf is required.
2.In normal circumstances, such exercise could be conducted by the NAB but when its Chairman appears to be indifferent and even unwilling to perform his part, we are constrained to look elsewhere and therefore, constitute a Joint Investigation Team (JIT) comprising of the following members :
ii) a senior Officer of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), not below the rank of Additional Director General who shall head the team having firsthand experience of investigation of white collar crime and related matters;
ii)a representative of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB);
iii) a nominee of the Security & Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) familiar with the issues of money laundering and white collar crimes;
iv)a nominee of the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP);
v)a seasoned Officer of Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) nominated by its Director General; and
vi)a seasoned Officer of Military Intelligence (M.I.) nominated by its Director General.
3.The Heads of the aforesaid departments/ institutions shall recommend the names of their nominees for the JIT within seven days from today which shall be placed before us in chambers for nomination and approval. The JIT shall investigate the case and collect evidence, if any, showing that respondent No. 1 or any of his dependents or benamidars owns, possesses or has acquired assets or any interest therein disproportionate to his known means of income. Respondents No. 1, 7 and 8 are directed to appear and associate themselves with the JIT as and when required. The JIT may also examine the evidence and material, if any, already available with the FIA and NAB relating to or having any nexus with the possession or acquisition of the aforesaid flats or any other assets or pecuniary resources and their origin. The JIT shall submit its periodical reports every two weeks before a Bench of this Court constituted in this behalf. The JIT shall complete the investigation and submit its final report before the said Bench within a period of sixty days from the date of its constitution. The Bench thereupon may pass appropriate orders in exercise of its powers under Articles 184(3), 187(2) and 190 of the Constitution including an order for filing a reference against respondent No. 1 and any other person having nexus with the crime if justified on the basis of the material thus brought on the record before it.
4.It is further held that upon receipt of the reports, periodic or final of the JIT, as the case may be, the matter of disqualification of respondent No. 1 shall be considered. If found necessary for passing an appropriate order in this behalf, respondent No. 1 or any other person may be summoned and examined.
5.We would request the Hon’ble Chief Justice to constitute a Special Bench to ensure implementation of this judgment so that the investigation into the allegations may not be left in a blind alley.
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
PTI walay apni haar ki khushi main mithai kha rhaay hian…
main appko likh kar desakt hon… JIT say bhi Nawaz Sharif kay khilaf kuch sabit nahi hoga…
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
Re. Point 2:
The SC judgement is also a black mark on NAB chairman’s integrity and shows a complete lack of trust in his ability to conduct a fair and impartial exercise.
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
It is a moral victory nevertheless. In any other democratic country esp. western societies, the PM would have voluntarily resigned after such a damning verdict.
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
After judgement, I have different feeling than most. To me, what happened is worse for NS and PMLN than if Court had given clear verdict against NS. Reason is simple, that is:
1: From whatever little I read of the judgement, it seems, all 5 judges declared that NS is ‘Blatant liar and dishonest person’, unworthy to hold any public office.
2: Two judges gave clear verdict, but three judges want further investigation (through JIT … we should remember that JIT is normally set for criminals, hence those 3 judges, by their action declared that NS is a criminal).
3: From comments of judges, it seems that all 5 judges would have given verdict against NS and his kids as criminals. But 3 did not (as Yet).
4: Not giving their verdict and keeping the situation open, especially with all their comments, means: It is obvious that these 3 judges want to further rub the nose of Nawaz Shareef and his kids on mud, and damage political situation of PMLN as political entity.
5: If verdict would have been given, than situation would have ended with NS disqualification, still PMLN would have stayed a formidable political force. But leaving the judgement for 2 more month, with clear indication that soon NS would be disqualified, PMLN would make a mockery out of themselves and media coverage would make them further demonised.
There are many other factors … but I think, what happened is bad news for PMLN. As for NS and his kids, they are already declared Liars, dishonest and criminals, either by direct verdict (by 2 judges) or through comments and observations (by 3 judges). For next 2 months, both PMLN and NS would get demonised by media, NS, his family, and PMLN themselves would be going through torment and would do a lot to make themselves more demonised, damaging themselves politically and effecting their future political position.
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
so the topi drama continues…and how does JIT function properly if NS doesn’t resign? By not resigning he can control/manage those JIT people and their actions
Re: PANAMA case : final verdict
Lakh di lanat Supreme Court and inn 5 judges pay. I don’t care about “adliya ka tadadus” they can go to hell with all the other bikao people.