Re: Panama case Final round SC Vs Shareef family
What a farce defence.
… What happened is that, it was kid of Haramkhor who made statement that in UK, no offices are open on holiday (Saturday), rather, Lawyers do not even pick up phone on Saturday … but Lawyer of Haramkhor produced a document signed on Saturday … and that is what Judges were referring to that … how come the document is dated on Saturday (as earlier, Haramkhors claimed … or made statement … that no documents can be issued on Saturday … rather, no lawyer even pick up phone on Saturday)? ,… So, please comment before defending these Haramkhors.
Well, judges said that , NS is facing case on corruption … (according to NAB ordinance …section 9A 5: If a person holding or ever held public office, would be considered guilty of corruption and/or corrupt practices if he or his close relatives (sons, daughters, wife, brother, etc) are found having assets and/or living beyond means but could not justify the living or assets using their legal earnings).
That means, since NS ‘held and still holding’ public office , he and his kids have to justify their ‘assets and living standard’ using legal earnings .., and if NS and his kids cannot justify their assets or living , NS would be considered guilty of corruption … So, for NS to save his Arse, his son and daughters have to show their income or means, that they used to obtain assets … and also their living standard.
IF Haramkhor is not corrupt and have nothing to hide, than only way he can come out of case … that is, to show (not fake but real) purchase or transfer documents of all those 4 Mayfair flats in SC .., plus, give trail of money used to purchase or transfer these flats …
NS or his kids have already confirmed that they own these flats … so they can give their consent to SC that SC can obtain all documents related to their companies, wherever those companies are registered … plus, also allow the SC to obtain all documents and ownership records of their properties with British land Registry.