Re: Pakistan's top judge is suspended (Merged)
Well, if Musharraf was corrupt, I would have been against him too. I know many in Pakistan high posts and know how some are corrupts to the heel. Personally, if I would like to gain in Pakistan legally or illegally, I would gain most if there is rule of corrupt political power in Pakistan. Rather, I would gain most if PPP is in power.
But, I know that what ever I would gain personally, I won’t be taking that to my grave, and in the end, I have to answer to Allah. So, why I should want to gain anything illegally and thus wish that corrupts come to power again?
Regarding treason, I do not believe that government servant (that includes people in forces) when act to safeguard the interest of country, constitution should stand in between them and their action. Rather those that act to safeguard country from corrupts, they are doing great service to the country (regardless of what constitution says), and that is not treason.
Nevertheless, as for treason, I believe that treason is not 'to follow' or 'not follow' the constitution, but it is to do something that harms the country. Thus, the biggest traitors in the country are corrupts. If following constitution or not could make a person traitor, then all revolutionaries, or those that act to change the constitution, were traitors.
** Well, under constitution, no Pakistanis should keep illegal fire arms and in that way, according to Pakistani constitution, all that have fire arms in the country without licence are breaking constitution and thus could be declared traitor.
Under Pakistani constitution (or constitution anywhere in the world), all type of corruption while in government service is not allowed (it is against the constitution). So, in that way, all corrupts are guilty of treason, as when they do corruption, they break the constitution.
Even Chief justice could be guilty of treason, as according to constitution he did wrong by using his influence to get government job for his son. ***Thus CJ broke his oath of upholding the constitution, he broke the constitution, and thus did treason. Right?*
Now, what punishment should be recommended for CJ that broke the constitution while under oath, that not to use his office to gain illegal benefits, like getting job for his idiot son or use government facilities (like cars and other protocols) that he was not entitled to under constitution?
Same goes regarding NS and BB, who did corruption, did not declared their asset to EC when contesting election, lied to tax office and did not payed proper tax, when under constitution all that contest election should have good character (article 62 and 63) and obviously should not do corruption while in office or lie. Are these corrupt goons (NS and BB) not guilty of breaking the constitution and thus should be charged of treason?
At least what army did, thrown corrupt government from power, they did to safeguard the country from corrupts, corrupts that were breaking the constitution daily by doing corruption and misusing the power they were trusted (something they should not be doing under the constitution, breaking that trust). Think about these corrupts that break the constitution not for the benefit of the country but for their selfish personal benefits and interests.
Now who are the real traitors and should be punished for treason? One that breaks the constitution to safeguard the country from corrupts or one that continuously breaks the constitution for their greed and personal benefits?
*Just think: *
A corrupt harms the country for his greed, personal financial gains, and personal satisfactions. The harm by the corruption of corrupts effects the country in every way, from holding development in the country, increasing misery amongst the poor, increasing poverty in the country, spreading injustice in the country, as well as security of the country. Harm from corrupt corruption is ever lasting and keep destroying the country all the time.
A traitor that sells the secrets of the country, that person also does that for greed and personal gains, just like corrupt. Only difference is that, treason of selling secret by that traitor ‘may or may not’ harm the country or security of the country, as that secret can become out of date in no time.
Thus, when we look at the effects of traitor and corrupts on the country, it is obvious that corrupts harm the country more than traitor. Thus, corrupts are more dangerous for the country and they should be treated worse than a traitor. Treason of corrupts (as their harming the country is treason) should be punished severely. It is best for the country that all corrupts should get hanged.