Re: Pakistan’s top judge is suspended (Merged)
Actually I recently got a better understanding of the Pakistani governments point of view, and most of it is like what I said (I actually did not know they used Article 180 until I read it yesterday, it was clear by reading the Constitution that Article 180 allows the President of Pakistan to suspend the Chief Justice). But anyway, the government’s reasoning looks totally sensible..here seems to be what they’re saying.
Article 180
*180. Acting Chief Justice. At any time when- (a) the office of Chief Justice of Pakistan is vacant; or (b) the Chief Justice of Pakistan is absent or is unable to perform the functions of his office due to any other cause, the President shall appoint [163] [the most senior of the other Judges of the Supreme Court] to act as Chief Justice of Pakistan. *
Article 209
*3) If at any time the Council is inquiring into the capacity or conduct of a Judge who is a member of the Council, or a member of the Council is absent or is unable to act due to illness or any other cause, then *
*(a) if such member is a Judge of the Supreme Court, the Judge of the Supreme Court who is next in seniority below the Judges referred to in paragraph (b) of clause (2), and *
*(b) if such member is the Chief Justice of a High Court; the Chief Justice of another High Court who is next in seniority amongst the Chief Justices of the remaining High Courts, shall act as a member of the Council in his place. *
In plain English, the Chief Justice cannot carry out his normal functions of office since he cannot preside over his own case before the SJCouncil. Therefore someone else needs to be appointed as Chief Justice temporarily while he is suspended pending the outcome. This is all very clear from the Constitution. Section (3) of Article 209 clearly shows that if a member of the SJ Council including the Chief Justice is unable to fulfill his role as Chief Justice, then Article 180 comes into play, and this clearly directs the president to appoint a new acting Chief Justice until the inquiry is over.
It is also clear that Musharraf can call an inquiry into the Chief Justice if he is only of the suspicion the Chief Justice is corrupt, also mentioned in Article 209. The Council will decide his fate and Musharraf will execute their decision.
Article 209
*(5) If, on information [231A] [from any source, the Council or] the President is of the opinion that a Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court, *
*(a) may be incapable of properly performing the duties of his office by reason of physical or mental incapacity; or *
*(b) **may have been guilty of misconduct, ***
*the President shall direct the Council to [231B] , or the Council may, on its own motion,] inquire into the matter. *
*(6) If, after inquiring into the matter, the Council reports to the President that it is of the opinion, *
*(a) that the Judge is incapable of performing the duties of his office or has been guilty of misconduct, and *
*(b) that he should be removed from office, *
*the President may remove the Judge from office. *
Once again, all this means the judiciary is independent of the President and the government, since they do not have the power to sack him. A very pathetic episode by some lawyers, and even more by the Chief Justice who doesnt know his own Constitution even. For a Chief Justice to politicize this issue into a judiciary versus Musharaf case is scandalous, when he of all people should know full well, it is the judiciary versus the judiciary because Musharraf is not going to decide his fate before the SJCouncil.