Re: Pakistan's map
TLK: Brother, what is troubling you?
Pakistani map shows Pakistan, that is ~310,000 sq mile.
What else should they show? ... or you want Pakistan to show Azad Kashmir, Gilgit and Baltistan as part of Pakistan too? ...
But, how can Pakistan show those territory as part of Pakistan when they are not part of Pakistan (as yet)?
To show those territories as part of Pakistan would mean, accepting line of control as international boundary, accepting right of India over Indian occupied Kashmir.
India do that, show line of control as their international boundary, what Pakistan do not accept. India do that, because they would like to see line of control as international boundary, where Pakistan has Azad Kashmir, Gilgit and Baltistan and rest belongs to India.
For Pakistan, whole Kashmir (Jammu, Kashmir, Ladakh, Gilgit and Baltistan) as disputed territory and future of these territories can be decided only after plebiscite.
That means, after plebiscite, Azad Kashmir, Gilgit and Balstistan could go to India or Indian occupied Kashmir comes to Pakistan ... and if that would happen, that is in Plebiscite if Indian occupied Kashmir comes to Pakistan than only international border would get determined ... with whole of Kashmir as part of Pakistan ... it means, if in plebiscite India get the votes, whole of Kashmir (including Azad Kashmir, Gilgit and Baltistan) would go to India ... and the international border that Pakistan show on map would stay.
Even though India shows Kashmir as their part, if you would see most world map, they show Kashmir as disputed territory (that includes Pakistan Kashmir, Indian Kashmir and Kashmir that China holds).