[quote]
Originally posted by Indian_Muslim:
The Hadith were written roughly about 10-20 years after the death of the Holy Prophet (S).
[/quote]
Absolutely incorrect. There is NO documentary evidence even for the Qur'an, let alone Hadith for 10 to 20 years after the Prophet's death.
[quote]
Before Imam Bukhari (rah.), there were, ** ATLEAST THOUSANDS of books on hadeeth. ** (This is a very ** CONSERVATIVE ** figure)
[/quote]
Earliest written material would still be 100 years after the Prophet's death.
[quote]
Before the Scholars and the students of religion, used to ** MEMORIZE the AHAADEETH, JUST as they used to memorize the QUR'AN. **
[/quote]
The Qur'an wasn't only memorized.. from the day it started being revealed, the Prophet made sure it was written and scribes were assigned. NO scribes were assigned for Hadith. No Books compiled.
Spare me the super human memory anecdotes, suffice to say Qur'an itself stresses on documentation and science proves a severe communication breakdown in oral transmissions, a phenomenon known as Chinese Whispers.
[quote]
A note-book belonging to one of the students of Hadhrat ** Abu Hurairah (R) ** was found, and it contained many ahadeeth (if I remember correctly, 168). These ahaadeeth were ** COMPARED ** with our collection of ahaadeeth, and ** every word was found to be authentic. **
[/quote]
There are NO guarantees that Abu Huraira didn't start the fabrications. He was a Jewish convert who only had a couple of years of time with the Prophet in which he compiled an abnormally large number of hadith. He used to hang out with other Jews and introduced many Judaeo-Christian concepts into Islam through his ludicrous narrations, most of which were with him as the ONLY witness!!
He was also accused of embezzlement of funds as Bahrain's Governor by the second Caliph. Looks like Bukhari missed that point.
[quote]
And the conditions of Imam Bukhari (rah.) are very very ** strict **.
[/quote]
makes me laugh.. does anyone on this site actually ever read what they are talking about??
Sahih is classified according to the reliability and memory of reporters
PERIOD.
[quote]
Also, we have the *biographies of 100,000 NARRATORS * of ahaadeeth, and that's a lot of data. There are ** very strict criteria ** to judge a narrator.
[/quote]
like what?? sometimes they pass if they've even 'seen' the Prophet in their lifetimes even if they weren't an adult at that time.
btw the first written histories again are not until a 100 years after.. even more.
[quote]
Also, the Qur'an says ** to follow the Holy Prophet (S) **
[/quote]
Unfortunately he isn't around no more. What he left is the Qur'an.. so let's follow that... not fabrications attributed to him.
[quote]
and also says ** to take what the Holy Prophet (S) permits us, and to refrain from what he prohibits us. ** (not the exact words).
[/quote]
yeah and not even the right context.. The verse is regarding distribution of the loot after a war.
[quote]
Now, ** if only Islam is acceptable to Allah (SWT), HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO FOLLOW THE SAME ISLAM if the ahaadeeth are missing?
[/quote]
I can't even begin to respond to this.. what do you mean?? Islam is what it's in the Hadith and the Qur'an is????
why did Allah send over 6000 verses?? so that some Persians can compile fabrications to explain it 250 years later??
[quote]
Do you think "OUR FORM OF ISLAM" is an acceptable alternative to the "Holy Prophet's (S) Islam" ?? ****
[/quote]
The Prophet's Islam is in the Qur'an. What's in the hadiths is the Judaeo-Christian-Pagan influences on Islam.. Follow at your own peril.
So it shall be written, so it shall be done
[This message has been edited by PakistaniAbroad (edited April 11, 2002).]