and you are right Aamer have only bowled against teams like Srilanka, Newzealand, and **India **and as you said none of them are quality batting teams...
He has just played one ODI against India. And his stats were pretty average - 2/46 @ economy rate of 5.75. Have you forgotten the whacking he got from Gambhir ?
Wonder what will happen against "quality" batting teams :D
I know you said that but in response to a different issue. I am not sure how that response is applicable here…Or maybe you are in the habit of giving the same stock response irrespective of the issue being discussed
He has just played one ODI against India. And his stats were pretty average - 2/46 @ economy rate of 5.75. Have you forgotten the whacking he got from Gambhir ?
Wonder what will happen against "quality" batting teams :D
aaah mairee yaaddasht zara kamzoor hai, if you can please remind me. Is this the same game in which your Top spinner went for 71 runs and your "next wasim akram" went for 59? yeah ...Aamir did not do good by just taking 2 wickets for 46 runs, on that bowler friendly wicket :)
Re: Pakistan v New Zealand 2nd Test, Wellington - Dec. 03-07, 2009
^^ r u talking about irfan pathan (next waseem)? or other....just for my kamzor demagh as well...I want to keep up with my indian team info since a great fan such as PIU is present among us ....:D
aaah mairee yaaddasht zara kamzoor hai, if you can please remind me. Is this the same game in which your Top spinner went for 71 runs and your "next wasim akram" went for 59? yeah ...Aamir did not do good by just taking 2 wickets for 46 runs, on that bowler friendly wicket :)
Oh he tried to bowl properly for once that's why he went for 71 runs, if he had stuck to his normal chucking routine he might have taken some wickets. ;)
I just couldn't go to sleep yesterday watching over-hyped bowlers do their thing. The amount of turn Kaneria was getting was ridiculous. Batting on this pitch obviously ain't easy so a lead of 250-300 should be enough, inshallah.
Pakistan currently at 84/2, lead of 249, should we declare? :D
led by 245 runs...............pak should ain around 425
oh yaar NZ na howee Australia ho gayee. I personally think 250 is enough and 300 lead will be more than enough. That is if two sub club standard players, farhat and Butt dont drop any catches.
Knowing that we do have butter-handed fielders and most likely they will be in slips again, we should go for 350+ and that should be achievable today so we will have 2 days to bowl them out.
oh yaar NZ na howee Australia ho gayee. I personally think 250 is enough and 300 lead will be more than enough. That is if two sub club standard players, farhat and Butt dont drop any catches.
yaar kuch pta nhe hota ...........v have lots of time to play ........lead should b 400 so that NZ should be completely out of the game before even getting to bat
Re: Pakistan v New Zealand 2nd Test, Wellington - Dec. 03-07, 2009
Only hope for kiwis is vettori and he could be a nemesis for pakis...they better watch him closely...
otherwise they should be ok...and only stupidity will do them in...