Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

Khan A. Sufyan

The vision of Pakistan’s founder Muhammad Ali Jinnah, in the 1940s  did not only constitute creation of a Muslim political entity at the  expense of India’s Hindu domination. It was also embedded in thousands  of years of historical and geographical realities. These aspects clearly  emerge from Jinnah’s interviews given to foreign correspondents where  he described the geopolitical importance of Pakistan. The two nation  reality also did not emerge only because of the differences between  Hindu and Muslim peoples. It was an outcome of thousands of years of  historical, geographical and genetic distinction between the peoples of  Indus Valley Civilization and those occupying the Gangetic plains. 

Extent of the Indus Valley Civilization
imposed over modern borders

The existence of Indus Valley Civilization emerged though the ruins at Harappa in Punjab, Pakistan which were first described by Charles Masson in 1842, in his “Narrative of Various Journeys in Balochistan, Afghanistan, and the Punjab.” Though the site was visited by General Alexander Cunningham in 1856, who later headed the archeological survey of northern India, it was in 1921-22 that the excavations began which unearthed the great civilization buried under the sand for thousands of years.

The irony of it all was that it was General Alexander Cunningham who allowed East Indian Railways which was constructing railway line between the cities of Lahore and Karachi, to use the ancient bricks recovered from these sites as track ballast for the 150 kilometers of nearby stretch and thus destroyed much of the city of Harappa (3300 BC – 1300 BC). Mohenjodaro (2600 BC – 1900 BC) in Sindh, Pakistan was excavated by 1931. Mehrgarh (7000 BC -. 2500 BC) in Balochistan, Pakistan was discovered in 1974 and the excavations continued from 1974-86 and again from 1997-2000. Rehman Dheri (4000 BC) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa was excavated from 1976-1980. Based on recent evidence and analyses, archeologists and historians have proclaimed that Indus Valley Civilization is over 9000 years old, making it one of the oldest civilizations of the world.

The South Asian subcontinent is principally divided into two major geographical regions; the Indus Valley and its westerly inclined tributaries, and the Ganges Valley with its easterly inclined tributaries. In his book, “The Indus Saga and the Making of Pakistan,” Aitzaz Ahsan identifies the geographical divide between these two regions as the Gurdaspur-Kathiawar salient, a watershed which is southwesterly inclined down to the Arabian Sea. This watershed also depicted the dividing line between the peoples of Indus Valley Civilization and those of Gangetic plains and also corresponds almost exactly with the current day Pakistan-India border.

Historically, only the Mauryas, Muslims and the British amalgamated these two regions as a unified state. For most of the remaining history, when one empire did not rule both the regions as a unified state, the Indus Valley Civilizational domain was always governed as one separate political entity.

Rather than an unnatural creation as propounded by many, Pakistan much more than the Gangetic plains, is an appropriate and modern embodiment of thousands of years old Indus Valley Civilization. The historical, geographical and its people’s organic linkages with Arab, Persian, Turkic and South Central Asian populace also clearly differentiates it as a distinct and definite independent identity as compared to the rest of India.

The discovery of Indus Valley Civilization in the run up to 1947 independence of Pakistan and India provided Indian nationalist Hindus an opportunity, to embed their Vedic Hindu cultural identity in a civilization, which was one of the oldest civilizations on earth and also predated emergence of Islam. However, the later identification of emergence of Vedic Hindu cultural traditions between 1500 – 600 BC, discounted such linkages. Also, the fact that Indus Valley Civilization’s cultural moorings were discovered mainly in the Indus River Valley, and partly in Ghaggar-Hakra basin and in the Doab, these cultural moorings did not find an extension into the central and lower Ganges Valley in the eastern and central Indian plains. The presence of fortified cities, town planning and drainage system, depiction of specialized epic art form and the architecture of burnt bricks, sea trade, use of seals, weights, measures and script and the custom of burying the dead in cemeteries, presented clear differentiation because of the absence of such depiction in Vedic Hindu literature and culture.

Many adherents of Indian Hindu nationalist ideology believed that India was and is a primarily Hindu nation and has Hindu religious culture in continuity from Vedic Aryans. The mosaic of cultures of the past evolving into composite Indian Hindu culture through the process of history was not based on archeological evidence but what they essentially believed in. In many cases distorting and manipulating or even forging the mute archaeological evidence through depiction of fire places as fire altars, waste pits as sacrificial pits in Harappan era sites and the imaginary reading of Sanskrit legends, was quoted in order to suit their pseudo-ideological and opportunistic interests.

Between 1900-1300 BC the civilization declined and there were no more references to Meluhha (Mesopotamian name for Indus Valley Civilization landmass) in Mesopotamian finds. However, the people who made up this great civilization continued living in places like Mehrgarh, Harappa, Mohenjodaro and other settlements long after that.

The legacy of Indus Valley Civilization lives on in present day Pakistan. Amongst some of the aspects that can still be traced to this legacy are the trade and commerce routes developed by the mentors of this great civilization. Ships from Meluhha regularly sailed from locations near modern day city of Karachi for the ports of Babylon. And they evidently made stops all along the way, as indicated through discovery of seals found in Oman, Abu Dhabi and Bahrain as well.

The city of Peshawar lies on what is thought to have been one of their main overland trade routes. That route is now a major highway that constitutes the eastern approach to the Khyber Pass and links the northwestern Indus River Plain to the highlands of Afghanistan and Central Asia. An old branch of the route runs from Peshawar, south into rugged tribal territory, through the Pakistani cities of Kohat and Bannu and the foothills of the Suleiman Mountains down across the Gomal Plain to the early historical site of Rehman Dheri.

After the decline of this civilization, the religion and language of which has still not been deciphered, at different times these people followed Vedic Hindu culture and traditions, also adopted Buddhism and in the end embraced Islam and are now overwhelmingly Muslim.

The core spread of Indus Valley Civilization primarily lay in Pakistan. The three major cities and many other sites which represent the core of Indus Valley Civilization are all located in Pakistan. However, the Indians still refer to India as the “Home of Indus Valley Civilization,” which is surprising and indeed a misnomer. India needs to realign its history and should seek its identity in its own legacy instead of claiming something to which they do not belong to.

It is the people of Pakistan who represent one of the oldest civilizations on earth. Indus Valley Civilization’s legacy is linked to Pakistan and this fact cannot be denied. The people of Pakistan thus rightly claim to be the true heirs of Indus Valley Civilization.

Link: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization - Analysis Eurasia Review

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

You want to discuss again? :hmmm:

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

Why not - Have the Indians stopped saying that Indus Valley Civilization is Indian civilization ???

I, as a Pakistani would not rest till not only my own country’s people as well as the Indians understand that Indus Valley Civilization is a Pakistani civilization and that the Two Nation Theory is a reality borne out of the history of Pakistan. :slight_smile:

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

Tinu, please do not rest. continue with your theory.
best of luck.

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

Conclusion - Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization. (Note to reader - O is capitalized in Of)

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

I’m sure there might be some remains of great civilisation in India too, even if we consider OP’s theory correct for discussion purposes, as the areas were not too far. That may be a parallel or equivalent civilisation.

We had many things common. If we read people like Babar and Ibn e Batuta, they express their views about the flowers, fruits and foods like they are aliens from some other planet. like Ibn e Batuta compares Mango with lemon :cb:

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

^ Really Ibn e Batuta had not seen a mango before?

As far as the history is concerned, we are not taught anything prior to 1000 AD and the history being taught to Indians also seem to be biased (to rake up Nationalistic fervor). I'll buy Ahmed Dani's book on history of the subcontinent and then will discuss it on this forum.

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

yes, I'll post extract from Ibn e Batuta's travelogue in evening :D

Biased or not, but banning writers like Romila Thapar says that authorities in India don't want to listen to different view of history.

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

would appreciate if you give these lessons in our culture forums, so that we can rectify our mistakes :)

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

Have you read Romilla Thapar?

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

yes, I got her book from a book shop at Boat Basin :D

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

Whats the basic theme of her book?

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

Its two volume book. first volume discuss the history and trends before Mughals and second volume covers history of Mughals and afterwards. The book covers aspects like Aryan Invasion, purdah system in sub-continent, Sufi and Bhakti movements, etc

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

The OP’s theory is hogwash. The writer has no academic and historical facts to back his theory. Indus valley civilization was not a Vedic hindu civilization. It was indeed a precursor to the dharmic religions that developed later. There were many elements in the Indus valley that can be seen in the Hindu/Jain/Buddhist culture/Religion. The author is trying to manipulate history to legitimize his religious belief. Take for example monotheism. The Op claims that IVC was monotheistic just cos no temples were discovered. Wah ! What logical conclusion. People of IVC were most probably nature worshippers and also probably worshipped different deities. Monism or monotheism was first historically recorded in the Indo-European religions in the Iron age with Zoroaster. This is definitely after the bronze age IVC. There were similar monotheistic trends in Vedic India in the Iron age. As for the people of IVC, after the gradual degradation of their civilization which happens to every civilization, they migrated in different directions especially south and east. There were also migrations from outside the subcontinent which caused a gradual mixing of people, Elements of new cultural practices were also adopted. Happens every where. Importanace - Horse remains foundSurkotada site contains horse remains dated to ca. 2000 BCE, which is considered a significant observation with respect to Indus Valley Civilisation. Sander BÕkÕnyi (1997), on examining the bone samples found at Surkotada, opined that at least six samples probably belonged to true horse. During 1974, Archeological Survey of India undertook excavation in this site and J.P.Joshi and A.K.Sharma reported findings of horse bones at all levels (cicra 2100-1700 BCE)
The residential area consists of houses which are the smaller than the citadel houses. A typical example is a house with five interconnected rooms, a courtyard closed on three sides and a platform outside facing the street. The platform would have been used for transactions and as a shop. The southern fortification wall of the residential area also has an entrance which has received a different treatment by its builders. It differs from other Harappan gates in the sense that it is a straight entrance and not a staggered or bent one. The gate itself is set in the thickness of the fortification wall while there are two guard rooms projecting out. The fortification wall of the residential complex has an average thickness of 3.4 m (11 ft) and has bastions at the corners which are smaller than the ones on the citadel fortification wall.
All these features show mature Harappan traits even up to 1700 BC which chronologically is quite remarkable. Mature Harappan principles were being followed in Surkotada long after the civilization itself had started declining and most other sites had decayed or died out.
Surkotada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Anyways, the writer and OP can shout out their theories from the rooftops, it will not become true without historical proof .

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

:khumar:

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

many historians in Sindh believe that people of Moen jo Daro were nature worshipers (water). That is why each house in Moen jo Daro has a well. water worship is present in Sindhi Hindus todate, even Muslim Sindhis have a special attachment to the river Indus that might goes back to that era.

The question is what was the religion of people in Ganges valley before vedic period?

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

Good Question. How do you know that the Indo-Gangetic plain was inhabited before the collapse of IVC? This is all I found… In the aftermath of the Indus Civilization’s collapse, regional cultures emerged, to varying degrees showing the influence of the Indus Civilization. In the formerly great city of Harappa, burials have been found that correspond to a regional culture called the Cemetery H culture. At the same time, the Ochre Coloured Pottery culture expanded from Rajasthan into the Gangetic Plain. The Cemetery H culture has the earliest evidence for cremation; a practice dominant in Hinduism The earliest anatomically modern human remains found in South Asia date from approximately 30,000 years ago.[SUP][18]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] Nearly contemporaneous Mesolithic rock art sites have been found in many parts of the Indian subcontinent, including at the Bhimbetka rock shelters in Madhya Pradesh.[SUP][19]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] Around 7000 BCE, the first known Neolithic settlements appeared on the subcontinent in Mehrgarh and other sites in western Pakistan.[SUP][20]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] These gradually developed into the Indus Valley Civilisation,[SUP][21]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] the first urban culture in South Asia;[SUP][22]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] it flourished during 2500–1900 BCE in Pakistan and western India.[SUP][23]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] Centred around cities such as Mohenjo-daro, Harappa, Dholavira, and Kalibangan, and relying on varied forms of subsistence, the civilization engaged robustly in crafts production and wide-ranging trade.[SUP][22]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP]
During the period 2000–500 BCE, in terms of culture, many regions of the subcontinent transitioned from the Chalcolithic to the Iron Age.[SUP][24]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] The Vedas, the oldest scriptures of Hinduism,[SUP][25]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] were composed during this period,[SUP][26]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] and historians have analysed these to posit a Vedic culture in the Punjab region and the upper Gangetic Plain.[SUP][24]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] Most historians also consider this period to have encompassed several waves of Indo-Aryan migration into the subcontinent from the north-west.[SUP][27]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP][SUP][25]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP][SUP][28]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] The caste system, which created a hierarchy of priests, warriors, and free peasants, but which excluded indigenous peoples by labelling their occupations impure, arose during this period.[SUP][29]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] On the Deccan Plateau, archaeological evidence from this period suggests the existence of a chiefdom stage of political organisation.[SUP][24]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] In southern India, a progression to sedentary life is indicated by the large number of megalithic monuments dating from this period,[SUP][30]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP] as well as by nearby traces of agriculture, irrigation tanks, and craft traditions.[SUP][30]](India - Wikipedia)[/SUP]
Source:wikipedia. Not sure if Gangetic plains were populated before Vedic period. In most places in India history begins with Iron age/Vedic period since historians and archeologists have not found remains to significantly conclude otherwise. It is almost as if humanity began with the Iron age here.

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

During recent excavation in Karachi, Sindh, many artifacts have been found much older than Moen Jo Daro. Karachi is a coastal area like Mumbai and they are not far from each other.

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

^ remember Ibn e batuta

Re: Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization – Analysis

ji zaroor, agar aaj Dr zakoota ke paas na jana pada to phir aap ko bataen ge ke Ibn e Batuta ne Hindustani aam ki kaisi bizti kharab ki hai