[quote="callofduty, post:605, topic:185971"]
well... i dont have to remind myself that i am talking to an idiot.. product of Bharatrakshak delusional fanboy...
read my post #26... since you are an idiot i will explain you again.. J-6 is a reversed engineered Mig-19 and F-6 under PAF designation.. 2-3 F-6 squdarons were modified for aim-9 heat seekers integration by PAF during 71 war. F-6 literally slaughtered IAF Su-7s with 8-0 kill ratio! and 1-1 ratio aganist superior mig-21!
later in that decade PAF held friendly exercise with USAF** "Shahbaz 78"**..
one clearly shows you need to go to school my boy.This is not the place to prove how best nonsense you are .
Nonsense,J-6 could claim just two Mig-21 planes in the war and look at your previous idiotic post!!!
Su-7 ,during 1971 war had taken part actively.India lost just 14 in the whole war and forget your worthless post.
Moron ,your comments about Mirage 2000 shows how ignorant you are .Seeing the reply from you,one can estimate that you are simply trying to be ostentatious rather than trying to provide with some sensible replies.Indian Mirages took part in Kargil and not a single plane was lost and had inflicted havey casuality on you side,you babe.
The state-of-the-art Mirage-2000s were used for electronic warfare, reconnaissance and ground attack. This fighter delivers its weapons with pinpoint accuracy. In addition to carrying free-fall bombs, it also fires the laser-guided bomb with deadly effects. In fact, it was this weapon that caused considerable devastation to your terrorist bunkers on the ridges at Tiger Hill and Muntho Dhalo. In the Mirage attack on Muntho Dhalo, terrorists suffered 180 casualties.
For your Your J-10 hallucination,read on............
Direct aircraft to aircraft comparisons, based on public information about the J-10, don't really favor the Chinese aircraft either. None of the likely radars (Chinese Type 1471 / KLJ-1 most likely) have anything like the range, tracking ability, or modes of the later APG-68 versions used by the USAF. They also lack a datalink, putting them at a huge disadvantage against F-16s in BVR. In a dogfight, the Block 50/52 F-16 has better thrust to weight ratio but higher wing loading. That's almost a moot point anyway, given the superiority of AIM-9X and JHMCS over the Chinese HMS with Chinese early-model
And now you are blabbeing that J-10 would scare off U.S?
Boy go to school.If you are here to disturb other's time,think twice before posting.I neither have any time or propensity to reply to your worthless posts and ur statements like PAF had 10-0 kill against Soviet/Afghan air forces.
Chap read on what defence experts say........
(Richard Bitzinger, a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore.
Bitzinger, an Asian defense expert, says the J-10 probably has some radar-reduction materials or coatings on its skin that make it tough to "see" on enemy radar.
Still, analysts say the J-10 is no match for top U.S. fighters like the Boeing-Lockheed F-22 Raptor. Lockheed is also making a plane called the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter that many analysts say will beat anything in the sky for years to come.
"Everyone is treating the J-10 like some kind of surprise and major ratcheting-up of Chinese military prowess. But basically, it's a glorified, advanced F-16," Bitzinger said. "It's an improvement over what the Chinese Air Force currently flies, something roughly comparable to what many other Asian air forces fly. But it's hardly state of the art.")
You got what you wanted now?