I appreciate your humble manners, but if things were that cozy and rosey, India too would have acted impartially in the case of Modi the murderer and other 35+ wanted men whose list Pakistan provided to India, who are wanted by Pakistan for terrorism. So, lets not make it a one-sided issue.
Pakistan did what the law required, detained him, tried him, evidence was not sufficient to keep him under arrest and he was released. It's no different than the findings of Modi Commission where he was not only considered "innocent", but went on to get re-elected in a public office. India is in no position to lecture others on how to prosecute suspects.
Thanks for ur kind appreciation brother.
Modi is entirely different case in comparision to Hafiz Saeed. Modi, although as henious criminal as Hafiz or any other terrorist, enjoys political clout and support of public in his state. We may call it side effects of democracy but we have to live with it.
Modi's role in Gujrat riots was questionable though, but he was never a direct accused. Stilll there is some ray of hope and he has not been fully aquitted of his crimes. Inquiry about Modi's role in riots is still on. Even today the SIT (Special Invstigation Team) appointed by Supreme court of India is going to start grilling Modi and others.
Here by dragging Modi into the conversation U have tried to justify Pakistan's position regarding relese of Hafiz saeed. But I cant buy this justification. Two wrongs doesnt make a right brother. Ppls like Modi can be tackled because they mostly have to work in a constitutional framework, (Refer to electoral debacle of BJP) but ppls like Hafiz cant be dealt with coz their hate agenda is often laced with misinterpretation of religious scriptures, and thus seems religiously justified. I hope U can see the difference.
Peace.