Re: Pakistan average economic growth under different head of states:
^^^
I cannot see anything wrong with the data you quoted from Guardian newspaper. Only problem is in your understanding the data given and your claims. You quoted the figures, gave your analysis and calculations, but you completely misunderstood the data.
Look at the heading of the data figures, as it is self-explanatory. If you had carefully read my earlier post (10 ](http://www.paklinks.com/gs/pakistan-affairs/635373-pakistan-average-economic-growth-under-different-head-of-states.html#post9898680 )), probably you would not have made mistake you made. Let me explain what it says:
[TABLE]
Year
Economic Assistance,
Total
Economic Assistance
(through USAID)
Military Assistance,
Total
Coalition Support Funds
AAAA
X
X1
Y
Y1
It means … in year AAAA:
USA gave total economic assistance = X
… Out of that (X), X1 was given through USAID
USA gave total military assistance = Y
… Out of that (Y), YI was given as Coalition Support Funds.
It seems you are thinking that in year AAAA, USA gave aid = X + X1 +Y + Y1 … or … X + Y + Y1
Correct your mistake and you will get right figures (double counting in accounting is big big sin).
No you are wrong again. Read the article again and see the graph. They are different and I rightly added them. Rest of your post is as usual proving lie as truth.
Since you have agreed to my figures, even you add according to your concted formula, proportionately the figures will remain the same.