Holy sherlock! It’s the same people who thought Iraq had WMDs… now they are after Pakistan’s WMDs! Holy $mokes Hindu Zionism to the rescue!!!
xephyr
April 26, 2010, 4:43am
42
Hehe, seems like stepped on your tail !!! Now if cheap copies of English movies kill your brain cells which is quite evident from your rebuttals. Then please elobrate the condition that exist where they are produced dime a dozen and watched by 1.2+B… Ah! that space between the ears of 1.2+B is lot of space.
BTW I am not in Indian movies, have heard enough of cheap imitation .
That statements clearly shows your pathetic ignorance. I am not here to educate you, anyway. If watching bollywood kills your brain cells, what is the volume of hallow space of people from our western border, who watches nothing but Indian entertainment , hypocrite.
Re: Pak may let taliban nuke India
why would Pakistan want a half hearted effort to nuke india through taliban when it can attract a full fledge strike back from India? its absured Idea. Pakistan will only use nukes against India or anyone when its very own existence is in danger and has run out of options given that Pakistan cant match India’s conventional war weapons! will possibly use with less strike back ability from Indian side.
Using taliban or any group will be disaster!
mo293
April 26, 2010, 1:09pm
44
That statements clearly shows your pathetic ignorance. I am not here to educate you, anyway. If watching bollywood kills your brain cells, what is the volume of hallow space of people from our western border, who watches nothing but Indian entertainment , hypocrite.
Ah! Just as I though, you been watching too many Indian movies…explains a lot bout the paradise and its inhabitants.
Re: Pak may let taliban nuke India
Yeah given that Pakistan allowed Shoaib Malik to marry Indian tennis queen Sania Mirza, there is every possibility that they may allow taliban to nuke India too. There is not much difference in both scenario.
hidustan times: bas naam hi kafi hai …
bittu:
“If something broke out in Kashmir that reignited the vitriol between India and Pakistan, that could be an incident that could cause someone to make the decision,” he warned
“(The Pakistanis may say) We don’t want to use these weapons, but we’re going to let our surrogate Taliban have access to these weapons and they’ll do our dirty work,” he said.
if “something broke out” in kashmir, pakistan will give dirty bombs to the taliban? um ok.
while one can’t definitively put such stupidity past the pakistani establishment, its clear that this is random gibberish from a random guy.
arkam
April 28, 2010, 11:03am
48
Re: Pak may let taliban nuke India
May sound very far-fetched but maybe Pakistani establishment is capable of doing anything. Human lives have no value these days.
Re: Pak may let taliban nuke India
Imagine the scene first, Pakistani establishment gives nukes to militants, then they try to smuggle through LOC, and try to detonate in Indian capital, not only it is too risky but also seems foolish as well.
And again assume this happens, and then India retaliates immediately, finishing complete Pakistan. There will be no Kashmir, no Pakistan and what remains is half of India. This can happen if Taliban takes over Pakistani military, which is next to impossible..
bittu:
can it be a bogus threat after the cold war between the two blocks in europe is over…
http://www.hindustantimes.com/Pakistan-may-let-Taliban-use-its-nuclear-weapons-against-India/H1-Article1-534956.aspx
‘Pakistan may let Taliban use its nuclear weapons against India’
Pakistan may let surrogate Taliban use its nuclear weapons to do its “dirty work” against India in the event of escalation of tension between the two South Asian neighbours over Kashmir, a top US non-proliferation expert has suggested.
Bob Graham, head of US Commission on the Prevention of WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) proliferation and terrorism painted such a scenario at a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on nuclear terrorism on Thursday.
“If something broke out in Kashmir that reignited the vitriol between India and Pakistan, that could be an incident that could cause someone to make the decision,” he warned
“(The Pakistanis may say) We don’t want to use these weapons, but we’re going to let our surrogate Taliban have access to these weapons and they’ll do our dirty work,” he said.
“I think one of our recommendations was to work with India and Pakistan to develop some fail-safe procedures,” Graham said responding to questions from lawmakers concerned about the safety and security of nuclear weapons in Pakistan.
Although during the Cold War, the US and the Soviet Union were strong adversaries and had the capability of destroying each other, “we understood that we didn’t want to allow a mis-step or an accidental event to become the ignition for such a war”, Graham said.
Indian/Hindustani media should be rated as the worlds most irresponsible/exaggerative media of the universe…so full of crap
bai log.. didnt u read this from dawn? While still mine is bigger than ur. Anybody pops a nuke..its all over..no winners. retards or should i sau moron123?
http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/front-page/mechanism-to-prevent-indopak-nwar-urged-440
**WASHINGTON: A US bipartisan commission has urged Congress to help develop a mechanism for preventing an accidental nuclear war between India and Pakistan, warning that Kashmir could become a nuclear flashpoint. **The commission includes members of both Republican and Democratic parties and is supported by the US Congress. Bob Graham, a former senator, who now heads the commission , described various scenarios for this possibility, arguing that a war in Kashmir could cause Pakistan also to hand over nuclear weapons to the Taliban.
“If, for instance, something broke out in Kashmir … that could be an incident that could cause someone to make the decision” to hand over nukes to the Taliban, said Mr Graham.
Someone in Pakistan, he argued, might come to the conclusion: “We don’t want to use these weapons, but we’re going to let our surrogate, Taliban, have access to these weapons and they’ll do our dirty work,” he added.
Pakistan rules out the possibility of ever handing over nuclear weapons to non-state actors.
International observers say that if Pakistan appeared to be losing a convention war, it may be forced to think of the nuclear option to avoid a defeat.
Pakistani lobbyists in Washington use this argument to suggest that the United States should not allow India to become so powerful that it starts thinking of defeating Pakistan in a conventional war, which obviously would lead to a nuclear conflict.
Mr Graham recalled that his commission also submitted a separate report to the committee on how to deal with such situations.
“On the more immediate, I think one of our recommendations was to work with India and Pakistan to develop some failsafe procedures,” he said.
Imagine the scene first, Pakistani establishment gives nukes to militants, then they try to smuggle through LOC, and try to detonate in Indian capital, not only it is too risky but also seems foolish as well.
And again assume this happens, and then India retaliates immediately, finishing complete Pakistan. There will be no Kashmir, no Pakistan and what remains is half of India. This can happen if Taliban takes over Pakistani military, which is next to impossible..
am I missing something? where are did 6 dance songs go from this story?
in that case you missed few things
SRK or amir khan is also needed, they make movie a blockbuster before it hits multiplexes and a sexy and useless bollywood actress, plus as you recommended 6 songs at least two of them sung by rahat fateh ali khan and atif aslam or kailash kher
or else
give it to hollywood
they will make mission impossible 4 or behind the enemy lines 4, though they can change name of locations.
and they dont need six songs
mo293
April 30, 2010, 5:09am
54
Throw in a nice juicy sexy dance and you got a blockbuster