read what I've written. its siezing upon a single sentence to create headlines in virtually every indian newspaper and virtually no non-indian newspaper.
if it is not a sensationalist headline, and really a grave concern where americans are concerned of Pakistan using taliban, at a time of war, to deliver nuclear bombs (instead of using the missiles), then just find anything comparable in the media of the country where these congressional discussions are taking place.
Indian media usually or perhaps media through out the world, looks for "masala" news to increase their viewership. This could be one such case.
If this idea is indeed given a thought, then Pakistan might as well let taliban take control of some nukes and let it be used against india,then put all the blame on taliban.
Even in this case, india for sure will retaliate putting all the blame on pakistani government.
Another scenario - even if some nukes do fall into talibans hands without the knowledge of pakistani authorities and taliban uses them against india, taliban will put the blame on pakistani government so that india retaliates to eliminate all its enemies fighting against them within pakistan.
Looks like latter scenario is more probable than the former.
yes a report by an officially chartered committee in the all powerful US government about a threat to India, and you cant bring yourself to answer why nobody but indian newspapers have headlines screaming about it.
the indian approach to journalism is like someone eavesdropping on a conversation, waiting for a juicy snippet and then going off running shouting their heads off.
nonsense. notice that you have not even attempted to answer the principle criticism for why, if this is international standard journalism, can you not find headlines of a similar sort, or even articles of a similar sort, in the country to which this committee belongs, to which this retired senator was commenting.
how the heck do I know why only HT reported and others didn't? All I said was:
1) all you guys were blaming the newspaper for reporting it instead of the US commission which actually made the statement
2) none of you have refuted that the US commission made that statement
how the heck do I know why only HT reported and others didn't? All I said was:
1) all you guys were blaming the newspaper for reporting it instead of the US commission which actually made the statement
Sensationalism doesnt mean that whats reported isnt true. Just that whats reported is sensationalised as a cute little headline in virtually every freaking indian newspaper.
Masala merchants. Why dont you know why others havent reported it in the manner that Indian newspapers have? There is a simple explanation here that you are finding difficult to refute.
[quote]
2) none of you have refuted that the US commission made that statement
[/QUOTE]
The US commission didnt make that statement. A retired senator who now spends his time chairing a congressional committee, in talking to the committee, commented that he is afraid of this scenario.
how the heck do I know why only HT reported and others didn't?
bas itni si baat thi, pehaly keh detay ke kuchh pata nahi hay, fazool mai ravage ka time barbaad kia.
And yet where they are produced is the great paradise... Always leave it to an Indian brain.. LMAO....
LMAO..hypocrite pakistani..By posting this many posts you already gave your brain count. You know that you do not any other entertainement other than watching Indian movies and channels. Or else watch and enjoy your super blowing up videos.
**WASHINGTON: A US bipartisan commission has urged Congress to help develop a mechanism for preventing an accidental nuclear war between India and Pakistan, warning that Kashmir could become a nuclear flashpoint. ** The commission includes members of both Republican and Democratic parties and is supported by the US Congress. Bob Graham, a former senator, who now heads the commission, described various scenarios for this possibility, arguing that a war in Kashmir could cause Pakistan also to hand over nuclear weapons to the Taliban.
“If, for instance, something broke out in Kashmir … that could be an incident that could cause someone to make the decision” to hand over nukes to the Taliban, said Mr Graham.
Someone in Pakistan, he argued, might come to the conclusion: “We don’t want to use these weapons, but we’re going to let our surrogate, Taliban, have access to these weapons and they’ll do our dirty work,” he added.
Pakistan rules out the possibility of ever handing over nuclear weapons to non-state actors.
International observers say that if Pakistan appeared to be losing a convention war, it may be forced to think of the nuclear option to avoid a defeat.
Pakistani lobbyists in Washington use this argument to suggest that the United States should not allow India to become so powerful that it starts thinking of defeating Pakistan in a conventional war, which obviously would lead to a nuclear conflict.
Mr Graham recalled that his commission also submitted a separate report to the committee on how to deal with such situations.
“On the more immediate, I think one of our recommendations was to work with India and Pakistan to develop some failsafe procedures,” he said.
LMAO..hypocrite pakistani..By posting this many posts you already gave your brain count. You know that you do not any other entertainement other than watching Indian movies and channels. Or else watch and enjoy your super blowing up videos.
Hehe, seems like stepped on your tail!!! Now if cheap copies of English movies kill your brain cells which is quite evident from your rebuttals. Then please elobrate the condition that exist where they are produced dime a dozen and watched by 1.2+B... Ah! that space between the ears of 1.2+B is lot of space.
BTW I am not in Indian movies, have heard enough of cheap imitation.