Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
ok … now are you happy … kid
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
No I still need to meet him. Can you help me, Sir?
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
Dawood Ibrahim, the son of a police constable, became the Don to help Muslims as his biggest rival, Bal Thackery, known as Sarkar, was helping Hindus. Sarkar made a political party to help him in case of bad situations, while Don was dependant on other political parties for his survival.
MM Singh (A well-known khatri) was appointed as the leader of India. MM Singh, who is often known to many as a Sikh instead of a khatri, along with RAW and Sarkar imprisoned Don (who was declared terrorist) in Jaipur. It has been known through rumors that Sarkar and his pony tailed Hindus are using the absence of Don to strengthen themselves. Meanwhile, The Sikh community is reported to appeal MM Singh to resign, and if he is a true Sikh (as many believe), then he will resign soon.
Now what will happen to Don? Will he (still) be aterrorist? If MM Singh resigns then Don must enjoy freedom too.
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
Dear Phonixdesi….please appear and tell us that this guy umer.ashraf is perfectly well and mentally sound.
Otherwise I would like to offer you to accept the winning award in this thread as you are the only one who has understood the clarity and deepness of his thoughts.
I am sure that all other participants….. vineshvk and Maihu_don will not object if you get the coveted award for understanding the intellects of umer.ashraf.
With best regards
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
anjjan bhai who is going to present the award, MM Singh or Sarkar?
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
No Objection at all …
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
.
..
…
…
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
The city of Bombay as well as the state may never have witnessed anything more interesting than Don and Sarkar, two of the biggest rivals of modern age. Don, the son of a police constable, turned out to be a gangster to help Muslims as Sarkar was helping Hindus. The shared many things:
- Both of them harmed public and properties at times to get certain benefits at times.
- Both were said to have links with ISI and RAW at some time.
- Both were good friends of Javed Miandad, former Pakistan Cricket player and coach.
They had some differences too. The most important one was that Sarkar had his very own political party while Don was said to have links with other political parties. Sarkar's political party is perhaps the biggest reason he is still a free man, while Don is declared as a gangster (terrorist) and is believed to have been imprisoned in Jaipur. Even some times he is claimed to be in Pakistan, but I never found him.
It is my request to MM Singh to either declare Sarkar a gangster or let Don live a free life too. It is not good to label one as a gangster and the other as a humanity-savior.
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
Links with Al-Qaeda (whether it exists or not) is one reason to label a person as a criminal. It is becoming a common practice these days to link some unwanted person with Al-Qaeda and let him/her suffer.
Dawood Ibrahim is amongst the ones who have suffered from it recently. He is also linked with Al-Qaeda by Americans. Don, who was the son of a police constable, had no choice but to turn himself into a gangster to help Muslims of the state as Sarkar was helping Hindus.
It is yet unknown why and when he went to join Al-Qaeda to help the Muslims all over the World. Oh is Al-Qaeda helping Muslims? That's another discussion, but CIA believes that it exists and is helping Muslims by making their lives miserable.
There is very strong need to stop people like Sarkar, who left kids of law enforcing agencies with no option but to become a gangster and then join Al-Qaeda. Similarly, Don needs to be punished for what he has done.
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
I think umer is the “bhai”..he is the DON 
badhai ho, aapki beti ke nigah par 
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
If some “Intelligence Agency” is involved then I may be the Don. 
Don did not attend his daughter’s wedding celeberations and I did not attend it either. This can mean that I am Don. (the analysis of intelligence agencies)
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
Makes perfect sense to me
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
Thackeray is a communal leader with some questionable practices that are yet to be proven illegal. But he is not a traitor.
Dawood Ibrahim is a smuggler, drug pedlar and mafiosi. He did nothing good any Indians. moslems or otherwise. Most informed people believe he ran to Pakistan and is running his pimp trades there.
Where is the comparison between these two?
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
Don is the son of a police constable who was turned to a gangster due to the communal practices of Sarkar. This makes Sarkar a traitor as well. He encourages the kids of law-enforcing agencies to turn out as gangsters.
Many informed people say that Sarkar and Don are all the same in many regards.
- Don helped Muslims as Sarkar helped Hindus.
- Both are involved in many killings and destructions
- If Don is a traitor then so is Sarkar
Also some informed people say that Don is imprisoned in Jaipur. He is surely not in Pakistan as no informed person has ever told me that. If you know some informed person who is sure he is in Pakistan, please provide me his address. I want to meet him.
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
^ you just make these things up. Just look at how many times you're saying 'some informed people say...bla bla'. That's a good indicator of guilty conscience. Just go to bindi bazaar and ask anyone there about dawood ibrahim and they'll tell what exactly that perverted thug did for them.
you're too funny
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
^ There may be many places like Bindhi Bazar, where people will tell me what actually Sarkar and his pony-tailed Hindus did. If Don was not imprisoned in Jaipur, you might never have said anything like that.
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
Shiv Sena and Al-Qaeda
As it was confirmed from various news sources that Don is linked with Al-Qaeda by Americans, the situation has become complicated.
Don **(Dawood Ibrahim), the son of a police constable turned out to be a gangster to help Muslims as **Sarkar (Bal Thackery) was helping Hindus. Sarkar had his own religious-cum-political party, but Don was all alone with his gang. Don might have joined Al-Qaeda to balance the share of power with Sarkar.
Now Sarkar's party (Shiv Sena) and Al-Qaeda has interesting links. Al-Qaeda is doing for Muslims what Shiv Sena is doing for Hindus.
Al-Qaeda and Shiv Sena must be banned and Sarkar must be imprisoned like Don.
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
ahem! your slip has been showing for a while senor.
Bhendi Bazar, is about 95% muslim.
Re: Outcome of negative politics: Dawood Ibrahim and Bal Thackeray
..
Who said any thing about Bhendi(Bindhi) bazar and its population percentages.