Our History?

[the_kaur]

Re: Our History?

@khoji

I think the bias is evident when one says that the CORE reason they came here was to loot. How can you come to this conclusion about tens of Muslim warlords and emperors whose history encompasses hundreds of years?
No. To say that ALL of them had only one thing on their mind (LOOT) is ridiculous.

Purpose of everyone who turned towards India from Kushans in First century AD to British was loot of resources, for instance Babar had nowhere to go after escaping from Samarqand. So they came for loot, religion for most of them was a politically necessary tool to extend their empire. Natives never needed there rule, they had equally better rulers already. Many of them for benevolent dictator but dictator nevertheless.

@khoji

And if ALL of them came for looting then why not implement this on all the emperors/warlords throughout the history?

It is implemented through out history irrespective of rulers, it straight away says that Sikhs tried desecrating Jama Masjid in 1857

@khoji

Yes, they wanted to be political leaders and powerful kings. But what’s wrong with that? Everyone in the world had this goal. Just because they succeeded doesn’t make them hateful character as portrayed by Bharatis.

It does make them look hateful, becoming political leader by damaging anybody’s religion site will definitely make them what they were looter, same thing is not extended to Akbar who was politically Muslim or Al-Biruni or Malik Muhammad Jayasi or Mirza Ghalib.

---

@khoji

And mentioning Khiljis’ burning some university for some reason, and then leaving it to the students to come to the obvious conclusion, is a clear manifestation of Bharati bias towards Muslims. The only purpose is to create hatred against Muslim emperors among the Bharati students.

Khiljis burning Nalanda for loot and stating that this is infidel knowledge house is self-evident reason. Again, No history book is against Akbar or Shahjehan or Balban or Tuglaq. Modern History records almost all modern kings be it Nizam of Hyderabad or Maharaja of Patiala as inept or spendthrifts:)

@khoji

If they mentioned Khiljis’ that particular “crime” then I wonder if Bharati curriculum also mentions Sikh action of turning Badshahi Mosque in Lahore as cattle stable.

Yes it does, it also mentions that after defeating the Mughals whom Sikhs considered enemy, Sikh soldiers stationed themselves in Moti Masjid, ate pork and danced around fire.