Re: Our History?
I think the bias is evident when one says that the CORE reason they came here was to loot. How can you come to this conclusion about tens of Muslim warlords and emperors whose history encompasses hundreds of years?
No. To say that ALL of them had only one thing on their mind (LOOT) is ridiculous.
Here is what Babur said to Humayun. See that Babur is not asking Humayun to fleece the locals and loot all they’ve got. NO. He is talking about peaceful preaching of ISLAM. How can Bharatis say that their core aspect was LOOTING?!
He told Humayun that “Islam can better be preached by the arms of love and affection, rather than the sword of tyranny and persecution.”
And if ALL of them came for looting then why not implement this on all the emperors/warlords throughout the history?
Yes, they wanted to be political leaders and powerful kings. But what’s wrong with that? Everyone in the world had this goal. Just because they succeeded doesn’t make them hateful character as portrayed by Bharatis.
And mentioning Khiljis’ burning some university for some reason, and then leaving it to the students to come to the obvious conclusion, is a clear manifestation of Bharati bias towards Muslims. The only purpose is to create hatred against Muslim emperors among the Bharati students.
Is that burning an established historical event, or just a concocted claim by Bharatis? Ok. I assume it really did happen. But if they mentioned Khiljis’ that particular “crime” then I wonder if Bharati curriculum also mentions similar crimes by Bharatis against Muslims. Like Sikh action of turning Badshahi Mosque in Lahore as horse stable.
On 7 July 1799, the Sikh army of the Sukerchakia chief, Ranjit Singh, took control of Lahore.[SUP][6]](Badshahi Mosque - Wikipedia)[/SUP] After the capture of the city, the Badshahi mosque was desecrated[SUP][7]](Badshahi Mosque - Wikipedia)[/SUP] by Ranjit Singh, who used its vast courtyard as a stable for his army horses