ONE

[Bigboi]

Re: ONE

@psyah

The term “sons of prostitutes” is a cultural diatribe and upon analysis does not hold any meaningful significance. Proving that it is a nonsensical statement - not only proves that the symbolism is false, but also proves that such a statement can only be made in that cultural setting as one of “hatred” and uncontrolled obsenity - an attribute not befitting for a pious person let alone a prophet.

**The contention:

**The Islamic Shari’ah is strict on the concept of justice and hence will never allow the children of murderers, adulterers, prostitutes , etc to be held responsible for the crimes of their parents. So when a person is said to be the "son of " it can only be said to “insult” them, because the idea is to “defame” the people who they “revere”, “love” and “respect” …

**Afterthought:

**It also appears Bigboi that you do not read your own material. This link shows that zurrayatul baghaya does not mean “sons of prostitutes” but it means “progeny of slave girls” … http://www.alislam.org/library/books/Ahmadiyyat-or-Qadianism-20080602MN.pdf

Read page 336 (printed) = pdf page (347)

This article is the apologetic perspective, but you it appears have a less apologetic view … It doesn’t matter, these are differences as I mentioned earlier … We can still work for good mutually beneficial ends despite these beliefs that you hold about us and despite the way we do not acknowledge your prophet. BUT … this is the way to get peace … We have to grow very thick skins … Knowing what we know about one another we should still be civil and work together !!!

We will stay civil, my intention is not to rub off your skin. Knowing me you should know that.

I admit that it’s my fault and I did not check after it. Years ago someone else translated that as “sons of prostitutes”. It was in Urdu and because I could not read Urdu I did not give much weight to it. Now - after waking up - I have realized that I have to gain more knowledge. Thank you for the clarification. I admit that there is alot of material out there I have to read. Knowledge is something which has no ending.

Brother,

do you read what I write? You are talking about the sharia law which does not allow a Father to kill his children! Where did I state this?

this is what I wrote:

Massih-e-Moud (as) said that a Father who does not take his Kids to the Mosque at a certain age is a murderer. From experience I can tell you that this is absolute true.