One Day Ratings

manimal · April 22, 2002, 7:15am

Cricketer Magazine One Day Ratings -latest update 04 Apr 2002



 No   Team        Points  
 1  South Africa   78  
 2  Australia      72  
 3  Pakistan       63 (-5) 
 4  Sri Lanka      59  
 5  New Zealand    55 (+1) 
 6  West Indies    51 (+5) 
 7  England        49 (-1) 
 8  India          45 (-3) 
 9  Zimbabwe       27 (+3) 
10  Kenya          15  
11  Bangladesh     10 

Rank Change    Player       Team  Points  Average  Economy   Highest Rating
   1   (-)    M Muralitharan  SL    931     24.09    3.88    934 v NZ at Sharjah 2002
   2   (-)    GD McGrath      AUS   911     23.13    3.96    924 v SA at Bloemfontein 2002
   3   (-)    SM Pollock      RSA   812     23.35    3.81    911 v Aus at Melbourne 2002
   4   (-)    Harbhajan Singh IND   766     26.20    4.04    766 v Zim at Gauhati 2002
   5   (-)    WPUJC Vaas      SL    739     27.63    4.21    804 v Ind at Mumbai 1997
   6   (+3)   Wasim Akram     PAK   733     23.86    3.87    882 v Zim at Rawalpindi 1993
   7   (+2)   Saqlain Mushtaq PAK   723     20.90    4.23    835 v WI at Sydney 1997
   8   (-3)   D Gough         ENG   715     24.70    4.26    809 v SA at Johannesburg 2000
   9   (-2)   M Ntini         RSA   710     26.30    4.25    738 v Aus at Bloemfontein 2002
  10   (+1)   SK Warne        AUS   690     25.71    4.28    839 v WI at Mohali 1996

These ratings show that Pakisan is on the
third place at the ranking table, i pray it
goes to the top of it.
And two of our star bowlers i.e. Waseem Akram
and Saqlain Mushtaq are amongst the wicket
takers being in the top ten, sixth and
seventh, to be exact.

Long Live Pakistan

[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited April 22, 2002).]

speed_master · April 22, 2002, 8:47am

Kool ..

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/ok.gif

**
سكورپین کنگ
§©ö®Þïoñ_kîñg
**
Back In GupShup

UMAIR316 · April 22, 2002, 10:37am

They are ahead of Srilanka and and behind Australia, thus making them 3rd best team in the world, soon after the world cup, they will gain back their spot as the best team in the world.

Ali_R · April 22, 2002, 12:47pm

What does the (-5) stand for?

“WatCh youR tHoughtS; they become words.
WatCh youR wOrdS; they become actions.
WatCh youR aCtiOns; they become habits.
WatCh youR hAbiTs; they become character.
WatCh youR chaRactEr; it becomes your dEsTinY."

dewana_tera · April 22, 2002, 1:47pm

How come Australia is behind South Africa??

Pyaar Bhi Zindagi Ki Tarah Hota Hay.
Hur Mor Asan Nahin Hota, Hur Mor Pay Khushi Nahin Milti;
Pur Jub Hum Zindagi Ka Saath Nahin Chortay To Pyaar Ka Saath Kyon Chorayn

Spock · April 22, 2002, 4:13pm

Pakistan 4 life!!

andha_qanoon · April 22, 2002, 5:11pm

Dear ,
Which cricket magazine are you quoting here.

Sa ahead of AUS..
ha ha ha

manimal · April 22, 2002, 5:19pm

[quote]
Originally posted by andha_qanoon:
**Dear ,
Which cricket magazine are you quoting here.

Sa ahead of AUS..
ha ha ha**
[/quote]

Read above... i did give the reference
its taken from

Cricketer Magazine One Day Ratings -latest update 04 Apr 2002

Spitfire · April 22, 2002, 6:51pm

[quote]
Originally posted by dewana tera:
**How come Australia is behind South Africa??

**
[/quote]

yeah i didn't get this....well there is no razzaq in bowler's list.....
he should be there

~~Hum aah bhi karte hein to ho jaate hein badnaam~~
~~Woh qatal bhi karte hein to charchaa nahi hotaa~~

andha_qanoon · April 22, 2002, 7:20pm

[quote]
Originally posted by manimal:
** Read above... i did give the reference
its taken from

Cricketer Magazine One Day Ratings -latest update 04 Apr 2002 **
[/quote]

Can you give the link...
I guess we would like to see their logic of rating?

[This message has been edited by andha_qanoon (edited April 22, 2002).]

UMAIR316 · April 22, 2002, 7:28pm

AQ, I quite agree with the ratings, South Africa should be ahead of Australia but real close, after winning the tri series in Australia, their one day record is quite impressive before they played the one day series at home against Australia which might hurt them a bid.

You don't have to worry for long after Pakistan thrash Newzeland and upset Australia and win the ICC Champions Trophy in Srilanka, we would be back on top.

Ali_R · April 22, 2002, 7:32pm

Can anyone answer my question plz, I feel ignored

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/frown.gif

“WatCh youR tHoughtS; they become words.
WatCh youR wOrdS; they become actions.
WatCh youR aCtiOns; they become habits.
WatCh youR hAbiTs; they become character.
WatCh youR chaRactEr; it becomes your dEsTinY."

UMAIR316 · April 22, 2002, 7:42pm

In reply to ali's question

They have lost 5 rating points from before.

This rating is just not determined only by wining matches, for example if Pakistan beats Bangladesh they recieve 2 pts or we beat Srilanka we get 2 pts.

These type of ratings are much different, it depends on what type of team are you playing or the location, so for example if pakistan beats australia in Pakistan, their pts will be much lower than if Pakistan beats Australai in Australia.

Ali_R · April 23, 2002, 7:10am

Oh I see thanks a lot Umair. Appreciate that

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

“WatCh youR tHoughtS; they become words.
WatCh youR wOrdS; they become actions.
WatCh youR aCtiOns; they become habits.
WatCh youR hAbiTs; they become character.
WatCh youR chaRactEr; it becomes your dEsTinY."

Question · April 23, 2002, 8:20am

[quote]
Originally posted by andha_qanoon:
**Dear ,
Which cricket magazine are you quoting here.

Sa ahead of AUS..
ha ha ha**
[/quote]

was that a joke? hmmmm

Spock · April 23, 2002, 1:01pm

andha, does your question have to do anything with Indias great position? hehe

Cricketer mag rulez the cricketing media!!

andha_qanoon · April 23, 2002, 3:17pm

Well,

Its nothing to do with Indias position.

Its more to do with Australie's and Pakistan position.I was amazed how could Pakistan be ahead of Sri lanka. and SA ahead of AUS.

Thats why I wanted to know whats is thsi "Cricket magazine"...whats the name this magazine...or "Cricket Magazine" is the name itself.I never heard of that.

Where is it published?
Is there anyway we can see that article on net?
what is the logic of deciding the rating?

does anyone here knows?

There are 100s of rating in business these days.If you want I can come out with 10 other ratings which will be entirely different from thsi ratings.

[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited April 23, 2002).]

Question · April 23, 2002, 9:55pm

You will never let go any opportunity to show Pak on the bottom. I know you’re pulling your hairs that how come this Magazine show Pak on 3rd so you bring in the SL to try to atleast bring Pak 1 more number down.

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

[This message has been edited by ehsan (edited April 24, 2002).]

Pristine · April 23, 2002, 10:10pm

All you had to do was ask. “Cricketer” is one of the oldest magazines of cricket, and you can check this and all previous ratings, and their basis by clicking here
www.cricketer.com

They carry the world-famous PricewaterhouseCoopers ratings (previously known as “Coopers and Lybrand” ratings).

andha_qanoon · April 23, 2002, 10:43pm

Thanks Pristine.
I dont know why people were calling it with some different names.This one is famoues as PriceWater’s rating.That why I was confused.

[This message has been edited by andha_qanoon (edited April 23, 2002).]