Re: ok fine, screw military courts but?
we have 3 million cases pending in the civilian courts...the civilian courts simply dont have extra staff plus will power to expedite the cases
Civilian courts have far more staff than military courts. They dont lack in will power..they lack in 'orders from above'. Plus, its not like they are going to set up 5000 military courts to help. The number of military courts is going to be just a handful, and will only be looking at selective cases. It wont make a dent in the 3 million pending cases.
[quote]
but even if civilian courts somehow want to expatiate terrorism cases, they cant do it much faster..why? because in military courts the burden of proof falls on the accused, unlike in civilian courts where the state has to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Many prosecution cases fail to meet this high standard, and hence the delays and the high acquittal rate....
[/quote]
It would be easier to pass legislation allowing for terrorism cases to be tried in civilian courts 'under military rules'...and make that a standing order, so it doesnt expire after 2 years. Anything can be done. The lack of will power lies with politicians.
[quote]
sure we can ask civilian judges to conduct behind screens but anyone can go to the civil court and give 200 rs to muharar as bribe and will get full info who is running the show.
[/quote]
Yes it happens, but just like the govt tried to send a message to terrorists by hanging several of them one after another over the past month, can they not do the same for similar criminals in the judicial system? If someone is found to have passed on information, fire them, take away their benefits and pension and make an example out of them. Why does that not ever happen?
[quote]
WE HAVE A CRISIS BEYOND OUR IMAGINATION AND WE NEED TO ACT FAST. WE ARE FIGHTING FOR OUR SURVIVAL sarkar AND YOU ARE CONCERNED ABOUT SHAM DEMOCRACY RIGHT NOW?
[/quote]
Ive been hearing this for the past decade or so. After every attack, 'we are fighting for our survival', assuming this is the worst ever.
We have been dealing with suicide bombings for more than a decade now. Dozens and dozens of women, children and adults have died due to terrorism over the years. As harsh as it sounds, and despite the fact that I come from a military family and love our army, this current backlash came out only because the victims involved were kids of armed forces personnel. The army pressurized the govt into taking these steps, and the govt has happily agreed to be called impotent, because at the end of the day, it is a sham democracy.
Such urgency on part of the govt comes only when there is a loaded gun on their temple...whether from the army (because of army related victims) or from foreign countries(because of foreigners involved).
And frankly, bottom line is not whether I agree with you on the setup of military courts or not. The bottom line is, will it bear fruit? Will it be a long term solution? Or is it just a stop gap-feel good measure? Will terrorists now think twice solely because now they somehow fear being tried in a military court after they get arrested?
And oh, 2 more terrorists hanged today....again, involved in the 'attack on Musharraf' (not in the murder of 17 others, just the attack on Musharraf).