Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

This is really interesting. Many of the anti US regimes are finding hard to stay afloat financially.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/25/world/europe/oils-swift-fall-raises-fortunes-of-us-abroad.html?_r=1

BRUSSELS — A plunge in oil prices has sent tremors through the global political and economic order, setting off an abrupt shift in fortunes that has bolstered the interests of the United States and pushed several big oil-exporting nations — particularly those hostile to the West, like Russia, Iran and Venezuela — to the brink of financial crisis.

The nearly 50 percent decline in oil prices since June has had the most conspicuous impact on the Russian economy and President Vladimir V. Putin. The former finance minister Aleksei L. Kudrin, a longtime friend of Mr. Putin’s, warned this week of a “full-blown economic crisis” and called for better relations with Europe and the United States.

But the ripple effects are spreading much more broadly than that. The price plunge may also influence Iran’s deliberations over whether to agree to a deal on its nuclear program with the West; force the oil-rich nations of the Middle East to reassess their role in managing global supply; and give a boost to the economies of the biggest oil-consuming nations, notably the United States and China.

After a precipitous drop, to less than $60 a barrel from around $115 a barrel in June, oil prices settled at a low level this week. Their fall, even if partly reversed, was so sharp and so quick as to unsettle plans and assumptions in many governments. That includes Mr. Putin’s apparent hope that Russia could weather Western sanctions over its intervention in Ukraine without serious economic harm, and Venezuela’s aspirations for continuing the free-spending policies of former President Hugo Chávez.

The price drop, said Edward N. Luttwak, a longtime Pentagon adviser and author of several books on geopolitical and economic strategy, “is knocking down America’s principal opponents without us even trying.” For Iran, which is estimated to be losing $1 billion a month because of the fall, it is as if Congress had passed the much tougher sanctions that the White House lobbied against, he said.

Iran has been hit so hard that its government, looking for ways to fill a widening hole in its budget, is offering young men the option of buying their way out of an obligatory two years of military service. “We are on the eve of a major crisis,” an Iranian economist, Hossein Raghfar, told the Etemaad newspaper on Sunday. “The government needs money badly.”

Venezuela, which has the world’s largest estimated oil reserves and has used them to position itself as a foil to American “imperialism,” received 95 percent of its export earnings from petroleum before prices fell. It is now having trouble paying for social projects at home and for a foreign policy rooted in oil-financed largess, including shipments of reduced-price petroleum to Cuba and elsewhere.

Amid worries on bond markets that Venezuela might default on its loans, President Nicolás Maduro, who was elected last year after the death of Mr. Chávez, has said the country will continue to pay its debts. But inflation in Venezuela is over 60 percent, there are shortages of many basic goods, and many experts believe the economy is in recession.

Continue reading the main story
But the biggest casualty so far has probably been Russia, where energy revenue accounts for more than half of the government’s budget. Mr. Putin built up strong support by seeming to banish the economic turmoil that had afflicted the rule of his predecessor, Boris N. Yeltsin. Yet Russia was back on its heels last week, with the ruble going into such a steep dive that panicked Russians thronged shops to spend what they had.

“We’ve seen this movie before,” said Strobe Talbott, who was President Bill Clinton’s senior Russia adviser in the aftermath of the Soviet Union’s 1991 collapse and is now president of the Brookings Institution in Washington.

Russia’s troubles have rippled around the world, slashing bookings at ski resorts in Austria and spending on London real estate; spreading panic in neighboring Belarus, a close Russian ally; and even threatening to upend Russia’s Kontinental Hockey League, which pays players in rubles.

Photo

Venezuelans waited outside a market in Caracas in October to buy basic items like diapers and detergent. Their economy relies almost entirely on oil revenue. Credit Ariana Cubillos/Associated Press
“It is a big boost for the U.S. when three out of four of our active antagonists are seriously weakened, when their room for maneuver is seriously reduced,” Mr. Luttwak said, referring to Russia, Iran and Venezuela.

The only major United States antagonist not hurt by the drop in oil prices is North Korea, which imports all of its petroleum.

David L. Goldwyn, who was the State Department’s international energy coordinator during President Obama’s first term, warned that an implosion of Venezuela’s economy could hurt the Caribbean and Latin America in ways that the United States would not welcome.

But “on balance, it’s positive for the U.S.,” he said of the low price of oil, because American consumers save money, and “it harms Russia and puts pressure on Iran.”

Even some of the indirect consequences of the price slump, like last week’s break in the half-century diplomatic logjam between Washington and Havana, have generally worked in the United States’ favor. Fearful that Venezuela, its main benefactor, might cut off supplies of cash and cheap oil, Cuba sealed a historic deal that has in turn lifted a shadow over the United States’ standing in much of Latin America.

Another casualty of the price collapse has been Belarus, a former Soviet territory long reviled by American officials as Europe’s last dictatorship. It produces no significant amount of crude oil itself but has nonetheless taken a big hit. This is because its economy depends heavily on the export of petroleum products that Belarus produces using crude oil supplied, at a steep discount, by Russia.

Marwan Muasher, a former foreign minister of Jordan who is now a vice president at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, predicted another domino effect in Syria as Russia and Iran find it difficult to sustain their economic, military and diplomatic support for President Bashar al-Assad.

Others speculate that Persian Gulf oil producers, though still wealthy, might trim their financial support for radical Islamist rebel groups in Syria.

Continue reading the main storyContinue reading the main storyContinue reading the main story
Mr. Muasher said the drop in oil prices could also prod Middle East oil producers toward political and economic change by challenging so-called rentier systems in which governments derive much of their income from rents paid by foreigners for resources. “Whatever the case, it is clear that the effect of the new oil price levels will not be limited to the economic sphere,” he wrote in a Carnegie report.

Photo

Cubans received a meal at a hospice center in Havana on Sunday, a few days after the Cuban and American presidents announced plans to normalize relations. Credit The New York Times
Hard-hit anti-American oil producers have blamed foreign machinations for their woes, suggesting that Washington, in cahoots with Saudi Arabia, has deliberately driven down prices.

This view is particularly strong in Russia, where former K.G.B. agents close to Mr. Putin have long believed that Washington engineered the collapse of the Soviet Union by getting Saudi Arabia to increase oil output, driving down prices and thus starving Moscow of revenue.

In many ways, the recent price fall really is the United States’ work, flowing to a large extent from a surge in American oil production through the development of alternative sources like shale.

By offsetting declines in conventional oil production, increases in shale oil output have allowed overall American crude oil production to rise to an average of about nine million barrels a day from five million a day in 2008, according to the United States Energy Information Administration. That four-million-barrel increase is more than either Iraq or Iran, the second- and third-largest OPEC producers after Saudi Arabia, produces each day, and it has put strong downward pressure on world prices.

The geopolitical shakeout set off by the oil market has not gone entirely America’s way. Russia’s troubles have so far shown no sign of pushing Mr. Putin toward a more conciliatory position on Ukraine, and some analysts believe they could make Moscow even more pugnacious and prone to lashing out.

The Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee, which monitors possible systemic threats, warned in minutes released this week that “sustained lower oil price also had the potential to reinforce certain geopolitical risks.” It voiced alarm, too, over an increased risk of deflation in the eurozone, the 18-nation area that uses Europe’s common currency.

The price drop could also encourage more freewheeling use of oil products like gasoline, undermining what appears to be a growing consensus among nations that carbon emissions must be reeled in to offset the most dire effects of global warming.

While authoritarian oil producers like Russia are clearly suffering, China is enjoying a huge windfall thanks to the price drop. It imports nearly 60 percent of the oil it needs to power its economy.

China became the world’s largest importer of oil in 2013, surpassing the United States, and so stands to benefit from plummeting prices. Bank of America Merrill Lynch estimated last month that every 10 percent decline in the price of oil could increase China’s economic growth by 0.15 percent.

Strong growth in China would lift demand for oil and help reduce the current agonies of OPEC, which pumps around a third of the world’s oil but, largely as a result of increased American production, has lost much of its ability to dictate prices by controlling output.

In an interview with the Middle East Economic Survey this week, the Saudi energy minister, Ali al-Naimi, indicated a fundamental rethinking by OPEC, saying that it needed to focus on keeping its market share rather than trying to raise prices by slashing production. “We have entered a scary time for the oil market,” he said.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

Not sure if this price drop is sustainable. Lots of small E&P companies don't have great balance sheet. And would have to shutter production. Europe is now in a slowdown. China also has less consumption than say a year or two ago. These things will reverse.

Once that happens oil will go up again. In a year it should recover 5o at least 80 dollars a barrel (Brent crude)

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

I got 93 octane for $2.40 today! I think that is a full $1.60 less than a year ago.

The Opec/Saudi gambit has decimated Russia but many shale companies are devastated too - read somewhere that >$1.5B worth of in-motion projects are shutting down or have shut down as nobody would give them capital to continue. They need the $70+ mark to break even.

But that is one way to bring Putin dreams down

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

If OPEC decides to curtail down the production?

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

There are lots moving parts. Asset prices rarely are at fair value. From memory, circa 2002 oil.was at 32 to 34 dollars a barrel. Then I think by 2007 Oct oil was at 145 $/barrel. Both prices were, in hindsight, significantly different from fair value. Right now it's a Sangam of events that has created this low price. If OPEC curtails, if some smaller E&P companies go under, if the winter gets severe - unlikely, if the Europe and China economy picks up, if renewables can't compete with low oil and Nat gas prices - each of these events could increase crude prices.

Anyway inflation adjusted back of the envelop Calc assuming 3 pct inflation the 33 dollar crude price in 2002 is 40 pct higher today. Or 46 dollars per barrel. I believe Brent closed at 59 per barrel. So oil in 2002 trough was cheaper.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

OPEC’s monoply is slowly fading because of the Tar Sands and the Fracking Process…but what eventually will kill their Monopoly is the discovery by NASA.

“NASA scientists are about to publish conclusive studies showing abundant methane of a non-biologic nature is found on Saturn’s giant moon Titan, a finding that validates a new book’s contention that oil is not a fossil fuel. 'We have determined that Titan’s methane is not of biologic origin,” reports Hasso Niemann of the Goddard Space Flight Center, a principal NASA investigator responsible for the Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer aboard the Cassini-Huygens probe that landed on Titan Jan. 14. Niemann concludes the **methane ‘must be replenished by geologic processes on Titan’ **…"

In the late 1950’s, the CIA handed President Eisenhower a somber report which stated that the Middle East would run out of oil before the end of the century. Based upon this bogus information, Eisenhower formulated the policy of deliberately capping some oil wells in America so that we would be forced to buy foreign oil. Then, when the rest of the world was dry of oil, America would have plenty. This policy has been followed by Presidents since that time.
However, since all areas of the world are replenishing their supply of oil, America can uncap her wells and cease being so dependent upon foreign oil!

therefore No one is selling their Oil cheap so they can drive others out of the market…

They are selling it cheap because they want to sell as much as they can at this high price…in other words make hay while the “Sun Shines” on Oil that is! :hmmm:

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

Nice article Mr. President. Let us assume that some of the methane in earth is from non biological processes. I don't see how that makes a difference. Since the source is finite.

Methane is considered non renewable because it takes millions of years to form methane from fossils. If the NASA theory is correct, methane would STILL be considered non renewable. So doesn't change the situation.

Thanks for the NASA study info. I wasn't aware of that. Uncle Google informed me that NASA came up with this in 2005. Note that oil peaked at 145 in 2007. That methane is still non renewable regerdless of the mechanism of methane formation may have something to do with this.

Always a pleasure, sir.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

Market price = fair value.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

I respectfully disagree

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

and this, is why the US keeps the saudis close despite all the crap they come with. well done, saudis. :wave:

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

I stand corrected.

99% of the times, market price = fair value.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

TOT
February 15 2014 56
July 1 2014 73
Dec 10 2014 49
Dec 26 2014 53

Price on Feb 1 twice that of price on Dec 10. So where was the 1 pct of time price was not at fair value

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

Tesla Motors

Feb 1 2014 140
September 10 2014 280
Dec 10 2014 228
Price on Dec 10 twice that of price on Feb 1
If this is indicative of market price being fair value 99 pct of the time, this is great news for value investors.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

Csco 1994 Jan 2.5
At 2000 peak 82 (from memory, though yahoo chart shows abt 76)
2003 trough 8. (From memory) yahoo chart shows abt 12.
2009 March 14.5 Now 28.5

So 2000 peak price 10 times 2003 trough price. And 34 times Jan 1994 price.

What was the period corresponding to mkt price being equal to fair value 99 pct of the time.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

Let us take the S&P500.

2000 peak 1500
2003 trough 800
2007 peak 1570
2009 trough 675
Current price 2088

Or 3.1 times the 2009 trough price.

So what was the period in which mkt price represented fair price. Was it 99 pct of the time span of 2000 April to 2014 December?

The efficient market hypothesis can be taken literally - to the delight of value investors. And detriment of those that do.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

All data from charts for max period. Where the numbers differ from what I remember I have used my memory. But the results would be similar either way.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

Uncle, you confuse 'fair price' and 'fair value'. Quite different concepts.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

Ok. Then could you clear up my confusion and explain the difference between fair price and fair value?

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

Fair Price is what the price of a thing 'should be' for a particular person. As you have given examples, the prices in the markets can be much higher or lower than what you think should be the price. So, essentially, fair price is subjective and differs person to person.

Fair Value is another name for market price. If I have something and I need to know how much it is worth, the best estimate of its 'fair value' is the market price (given an active market exists for that thing) of an identical (or similar) thing at that point in time. For you, the 'fair price' of that thing might be lower or higher than the market price but 'fair value' is the price at which several other buyers and sellers are willing to exchange it.

Re: Oil’s Swift Fall Raises Fortunes of U.S. Abroad

So which of the above is intrinsic value of an asset - fair value or fair price